EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.26.18

Director Iancu and President Campinos Both Serve the Litigation ‘Industry’ Instead of Science and Technology

Posted in America, Europe, Patents at 4:16 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Campinos at WIPO, whose abuses resemble the EPO's

IP Watch and António Campinos

Summary: When some of the world’s largest patent offices only listen to the new ‘industry’ (created only by virtue of these offices themselves) there’s danger that patents will be granted for the sake of there being more patents and lawsuits rather than for advancement of the sciences

ONCE UPON a time the patent system was conceived/established to (or so we’re told) protect scientists; this predates modern technology where advancements are no longer limited to chemistry and machinery. The USPTO was founded on this principle and EPO is a much more recent construct.

“…it is a major problem that Iancu only ever hangs out with patent zealots like himself, never with actual scientists, which really says a lot.”We have repeatedly expressed concerns about patent policy in the US and in Europe; it’s unfit for purpose if the people who run the system lose sight of the original goals. Days ago the Director of the USPTO spoke at the Intellectual Property Owners Association Annual Meeting, which is a patent maximalists’ hornets’ nest. The EPO was there too (it tweeted a picture from the event yesterday, referring to it as “2018 IPO Annual Meeting”). As we explained yesterday, Director Iancu has a history of advocacy for software patents (on the record). He’s a menace to a USPTO that actually cares about innovation but a blessing to a USPTO as a “litigation factory”. Watchtroll and Kevin Noonan wrote about it some time before last night; they’re clinging onto what their ‘mole’ Iancu intends to do to water down SCOTUS rulings and piles of caselaw, e.g. Federal Circuit on 35 U.S.C. § 101. Their two articles are titled, respectively, “Director Iancu Produces Glimmer of Patent Eligibility Hope” and “What is Director Iancu Proposing the USPTO do for §101 Analysis?” [1, 2]

As we said yesterday, it is a major problem that Iancu only ever hangs out with patent zealots like himself, never with actual scientists, which really says a lot. He barely gets exposed to what ought to have been his primary if not sole stakeholder. Yesterday we learned that “USPTO director Iancu to give speech at IPAS conference,” i.e. another hornets’ nest of the patent maximalists. They keep pressuring him to do what they want. He came from their occupation, so it’s not hard to imagine him just ignoring science and technology in favour of lawyers. The same has happened at the EPO, which is currently run by a banker, chosen by a fellow French politician to succeed him.

As Benjamin Henrion noted yesterday, “US patent office Iancu omits software from the list of unpatentable abstract things, he aims to grant them again https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/news-updates/remarks-director-iancu-intellectual-property-owners-46th-annual-meeting … [] Iancu ( @uspto ) said “as long as the integration is into a practical application, then the 101 analysis is concluded.” That’s the opposite of what the Court has held. https://www.patentprogress.org/2018/09/24/getting-the-future-backwards-iancus-101-comments-at-ipo/ …”

Well, “lawyers are liars,” I told him. “Their job is to manipulate judges and subvert justice. Iancu is a lawyer, so…”

And speaking of the law, Henrion said that “EPO can ignore anti-swpat jurisprudence from France, because the EPO does not follow the rule of law, so they do pretty much whatever they want https://writtendescription.blogspot.com/2018/09/uspto-director-iancu-proposes-revised.html …” (citing an article about Iancu and 35 U.S.C. § 101).

“Being above the law in one thing,” I responded. “The EPO goes further; it actually engages in corruption and commits crimes, hence actively exploiting this immunity…”

Looking at the latest tweets from the EPO, we see no reason for solace. Yesterday it wrote: “AI provides an opportunity for more collaborative innovation and more thoughtful patent protection strategies. That’s one conclusion from our recent conference on patenting #artificialintelligence: http://bit.ly/AIpatents pic.twitter.com/niVbMyxVu0″

“AI” is just a buzzword the EPO misuses to grant software patents in Europe — a subject that IP Watch wrote about several times before (the EPO’s insistence on patenting of algorithms).

Sadly, however, IP Watch seems to be getting close to Team Battistelli. Yesterday it published this tweet (later retweeted by the EPO) to say: “Antonio Campinos, president of the European Patent Office @EPOorg , at the WIPO General Assemblies tonight, with @ipwatch Director William New pic.twitter.com/UYiyblg1q2″

So we don’t suppose IP Watch intends to criticise the EPO (or Campinos) for the abuses as much as before. It has barely done so since Campinos took Office. It always helps the EPO when it makes contacts with the otherwise-inquisitive press. Sometimes the EPO even pays this press.

Meanwhile, the EPO is also associating with patent extremists (Watchtroll in this case), but then again, it has done worse, like letting armed thugs (‘bodyguards’) of Battistelli run amok inside the Office. Roberta Romano-Götsch did this in the above context (IPO).

Perhaps most noteworthy, however, was this tweet about the EPO’s latest news item (warning: epo.org link). It’s about China. It contains group photo op and one of António Campinos, astoundingly similar to the one Battistelli took when he brought it to his other employer, where he later 'laundered' EPO money for him to net. Suffice to say, the corrupt EPO cannot lecture China on human rights or lecture SIPO (now known as CNIP) on patent quality. Here is what the EPO wrote:

The EPO and the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA, formerly SIPO) have agreed on a co-operation programme for next year as part of their long-term strategic partnership on strengthening the patent system. The 2019 co-operation work plan was signed by EPO President António Campinos and CNIPA Commissioner Shen Changyu on Friday at their annual heads of office meeting in Munich.

[...]

Following a reform of China’s IP agencies, SIPO was recently renamed CNIPA, and in addition to patents, utility models and designs, the office now also processes applications for trade marks and geographical indications.

“Following a reform of China’s IP agencies, SIPO was recently renamed CNIP,” the EPO explains. Not because SIPO became a laughing stock like the EPO for all sorts of reasons? Also, why is the EPO logo white now? Rebrand? Perhaps being careful not to associate too closely with China’s all-red flag?

All in all, seeing the world’s most lenient (by some standards, e.g. permitting software patents) together with the EPO in this fashion inspires not much confidence. It does, however, say a lot about what EPO leadership has become.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 5/12/2019: qBittorrent 4.2.0, Expensive Librem 5 and OpenBSD Bugs

    Links for the day



  2. Microsoft Staff Repeatedly Refuses to Tell How Many People Use WSL, Defends Patent Extortion and Blackmail of Linux Instead

    The people who develop WSL (mostly Microsoft employees) get easily irritated when asked how many people actually use this thing; but more interestingly, however, they reveal their disdain for GNU/Linux and support for Microsoft blackmail (for 'Linux patent tax')



  3. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, December 04, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, December 04, 2019



  4. Links 4/12/2019: Tails 4.1, UCS 4.4-3 and Proxmox VE 6.1

    Links for the day



  5. Google Tightens Its Noose

    Now it’s official! Google is just a bunch of shareholders looking to appease the Pentagon at all costs



  6. Europeans Still Need to Save the European Patent Office From Those Who Attack Its Patent Quality

    Patent quality is of utmost interest; without it, as we're seeing at the EPO and have already seen at the USPTO for a number of years, legal disputes will arise where neither side wins (only the lawyers win) and small, impoverished inventors or businesses will be forced to settle outside the courts over baseless allegations, often made by parasitic patent trolls (possessing low-quality patents they don't want scrutinised by courts)



  7. We Never Accepted and Will Never Accept Corporate Money

    Corporate money is a unique problem because of its magnitude and the fact that it's impersonal; shareholders can only ever accept its supposed justifications if they're receiving something in return (of proportional worth to the payment/transaction)



  8. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, December 03, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, December 03, 2019



  9. Links 3/12/2019: elementary OS 5.1 Hera, Plasma 5.17.4, Firefox 71

    Links for the day



  10. Laundering the Reputation of Criminals: That's an Actual Job

    An important reminder that the manufactured, paid-for (media is being bribed) image of Bill Gates is the product of the PR industry he enlisted to distract from his endless crimes



  11. 'Priceless' Tickets to the EPO's Back End and Team UPC

    CIPA's and the EPO's event (later this week) is more of the same; the EPO exists not to serve European businesses but a bunch of law firms and their biggest clients (which usually aren't even European)



  12. IRC Proceedings: Monday, December 02, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, December 02, 2019



  13. New EPO Leak Shows That the Rumours and Jokes Are Partly True and We Know Who 'Runs the Show'

    Europe’s second-largest institution is so profoundly dysfunctional, a reprehensible kakistocracy of tribalism, money-grabbing career-climbing autocrats and possibly major fraud; today’s leak looks at what motivated and enabled the formation and latest incarnation of “Team Campinos”



  14. Links 2/12/2019: Linux Mint 19.3 Beta, DPL Sam Hartman Talks About SystemD

    Links for the day



  15. What Former Debian Project Leader (Second to the Late Ian Murdock) Thinks About SystemD in Debian GNU/Linux

    Now that Debian is debating and voting on diversity in the technical sense the thoughts of Bruce Perens merit broader audience/reach



  16. Free/Libre Software Will Eventually Become the Norm, 'Open Source' is Just Proprietary Software Trying to 'Buy Time'

    More people are starting to ask questions about Free software while “Open Source” languishes (people can see it’s just a mask for proprietary software); it was a two-decade delaying tactic that’s wearing off (people see GitHub and the OSI/Linux Foundation for what they really are)



  17. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, December 01, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, December 01, 2019



  18. Richard Stallman is Active and Doing Well

    The rumour mill may still be humming along; but against all odds — as Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project — Stallman keeps fighting the good fight (in the face of growing resistance)



  19. Banning Former Microsoft Employees Who Complain About Microsoft Lies, Abuses and Crimes

    The official account of Windows Insider is banning people whom it never even spoke to; this seems like a way of 'punishing' people who are not 'true believers' in Microsoft



  20. Wikileaks: Thierry Breton May Have Misused Regulatory/Government Positions to Attack His Competition (in the Market)

    Thierry 'revolving doors' Breton as seen by the United States government



  21. 13 Years of UPC Promises

    The anatomy of UPC 'fake news' or lobbying tactics along the lines of self-fulfilling prophecies and false predictions



  22. Is Water Wet?

    The criteria for patent eligibility reduced only to this question: will allowing these patents increase ‘production’ (number of patent grants)?



  23. The EPO's President Admits He's Illegally Granting Software Patents (CII, 4IR, IoT, AI and Blockchain Mean Software Patents at the EPO)

    The EPO's chief liar is openly and proudly promoting software patents using buzzwords and hype waves (and mysterious acronyms that are rather meaningless but spread by the media in exchange for money received from the EPO)



  24. Tone Policing and the Linux Foundation

    A timely example of situations where the Linux Foundation can seemingly 'cancel' people (using the Code of Conduct) for political opinions



  25. It EEEsn't Just a Microsoft Thing Anymore

    The EEErosion of Python's independence is a known problem and Microsoft is not the sole culprit



  26. Links 1/12/2019: KDE's GTK CSD Support, Skrooge 2.21.0

    Links for the day



  27. Links 1/12/2019: Genode OS 19.11 Release, Sam Hartman (DPL) Speaks Out on SystemD

    Links for the day



  28. Maximalists Cherry-Picking the So-Called 'Corbyn' 'Leak' for Their Patent Agenda While the US Lobbies Britain for Software Patents and Worse

    A quick look at what last week's media coverage may have missed and what patent maximalists don't want to tell us about confidential trade-related documents



  29. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, November 30, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, November 30, 2019



  30. Microsoft Loves Linux Because It Pays for It

    Microsoft cannot ‘buy’ Linux itself, so it has been buying (bribing) all the ‘right’ people while telling them (and then they tell us, too!) they “love Linux” (which they don’t even use!)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts