EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.26.18

Director Iancu and President Campinos Both Serve the Litigation ‘Industry’ Instead of Science and Technology

Posted in America, Europe, Patents at 4:16 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Campinos at WIPO, whose abuses resemble the EPO's

IP Watch and António Campinos

Summary: When some of the world’s largest patent offices only listen to the new ‘industry’ (created only by virtue of these offices themselves) there’s danger that patents will be granted for the sake of there being more patents and lawsuits rather than for advancement of the sciences

ONCE UPON a time the patent system was conceived/established to (or so we’re told) protect scientists; this predates modern technology where advancements are no longer limited to chemistry and machinery. The USPTO was founded on this principle and EPO is a much more recent construct.

“…it is a major problem that Iancu only ever hangs out with patent zealots like himself, never with actual scientists, which really says a lot.”We have repeatedly expressed concerns about patent policy in the US and in Europe; it’s unfit for purpose if the people who run the system lose sight of the original goals. Days ago the Director of the USPTO spoke at the Intellectual Property Owners Association Annual Meeting, which is a patent maximalists’ hornets’ nest. The EPO was there too (it tweeted a picture from the event yesterday, referring to it as “2018 IPO Annual Meeting”). As we explained yesterday, Director Iancu has a history of advocacy for software patents (on the record). He’s a menace to a USPTO that actually cares about innovation but a blessing to a USPTO as a “litigation factory”. Watchtroll and Kevin Noonan wrote about it some time before last night; they’re clinging onto what their ‘mole’ Iancu intends to do to water down SCOTUS rulings and piles of caselaw, e.g. Federal Circuit on 35 U.S.C. § 101. Their two articles are titled, respectively, “Director Iancu Produces Glimmer of Patent Eligibility Hope” and “What is Director Iancu Proposing the USPTO do for §101 Analysis?” [1, 2]

As we said yesterday, it is a major problem that Iancu only ever hangs out with patent zealots like himself, never with actual scientists, which really says a lot. He barely gets exposed to what ought to have been his primary if not sole stakeholder. Yesterday we learned that “USPTO director Iancu to give speech at IPAS conference,” i.e. another hornets’ nest of the patent maximalists. They keep pressuring him to do what they want. He came from their occupation, so it’s not hard to imagine him just ignoring science and technology in favour of lawyers. The same has happened at the EPO, which is currently run by a banker, chosen by a fellow French politician to succeed him.

As Benjamin Henrion noted yesterday, “US patent office Iancu omits software from the list of unpatentable abstract things, he aims to grant them again https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/news-updates/remarks-director-iancu-intellectual-property-owners-46th-annual-meeting … [] Iancu ( @uspto ) said “as long as the integration is into a practical application, then the 101 analysis is concluded.” That’s the opposite of what the Court has held. https://www.patentprogress.org/2018/09/24/getting-the-future-backwards-iancus-101-comments-at-ipo/ …”

Well, “lawyers are liars,” I told him. “Their job is to manipulate judges and subvert justice. Iancu is a lawyer, so…”

And speaking of the law, Henrion said that “EPO can ignore anti-swpat jurisprudence from France, because the EPO does not follow the rule of law, so they do pretty much whatever they want https://writtendescription.blogspot.com/2018/09/uspto-director-iancu-proposes-revised.html …” (citing an article about Iancu and 35 U.S.C. § 101).

“Being above the law in one thing,” I responded. “The EPO goes further; it actually engages in corruption and commits crimes, hence actively exploiting this immunity…”

Looking at the latest tweets from the EPO, we see no reason for solace. Yesterday it wrote: “AI provides an opportunity for more collaborative innovation and more thoughtful patent protection strategies. That’s one conclusion from our recent conference on patenting #artificialintelligence: http://bit.ly/AIpatents pic.twitter.com/niVbMyxVu0″

“AI” is just a buzzword the EPO misuses to grant software patents in Europe — a subject that IP Watch wrote about several times before (the EPO’s insistence on patenting of algorithms).

Sadly, however, IP Watch seems to be getting close to Team Battistelli. Yesterday it published this tweet (later retweeted by the EPO) to say: “Antonio Campinos, president of the European Patent Office @EPOorg , at the WIPO General Assemblies tonight, with @ipwatch Director William New pic.twitter.com/UYiyblg1q2″

So we don’t suppose IP Watch intends to criticise the EPO (or Campinos) for the abuses as much as before. It has barely done so since Campinos took Office. It always helps the EPO when it makes contacts with the otherwise-inquisitive press. Sometimes the EPO even pays this press.

Meanwhile, the EPO is also associating with patent extremists (Watchtroll in this case), but then again, it has done worse, like letting armed thugs (‘bodyguards’) of Battistelli run amok inside the Office. Roberta Romano-Götsch did this in the above context (IPO).

Perhaps most noteworthy, however, was this tweet about the EPO’s latest news item (warning: epo.org link). It’s about China. It contains group photo op and one of António Campinos, astoundingly similar to the one Battistelli took when he brought it to his other employer, where he later 'laundered' EPO money for him to net. Suffice to say, the corrupt EPO cannot lecture China on human rights or lecture SIPO (now known as CNIP) on patent quality. Here is what the EPO wrote:

The EPO and the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA, formerly SIPO) have agreed on a co-operation programme for next year as part of their long-term strategic partnership on strengthening the patent system. The 2019 co-operation work plan was signed by EPO President António Campinos and CNIPA Commissioner Shen Changyu on Friday at their annual heads of office meeting in Munich.

[...]

Following a reform of China’s IP agencies, SIPO was recently renamed CNIPA, and in addition to patents, utility models and designs, the office now also processes applications for trade marks and geographical indications.

“Following a reform of China’s IP agencies, SIPO was recently renamed CNIP,” the EPO explains. Not because SIPO became a laughing stock like the EPO for all sorts of reasons? Also, why is the EPO logo white now? Rebrand? Perhaps being careful not to associate too closely with China’s all-red flag?

All in all, seeing the world’s most lenient (by some standards, e.g. permitting software patents) together with the EPO in this fashion inspires not much confidence. It does, however, say a lot about what EPO leadership has become.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Indifference or Even Hostility Towards Patent Quality Results in Grave Injustice

    The patent extravaganza in Europe harms small businesses the most (they complain about it), but administrative staff at patent offices only cares about the views of prolific applicants rather than the interests of citizens in respective countries



  2. Links 18/6/2019: CentOS 8 Coming Soon, DragonFly BSD 5.6 Released

    Links for the day



  3. 'AI Taskforce' is Actually a Taskforce for Software Patents

    The mainstream media has been calling just about everything "HEY HI!" (AI), but what it typically refers to is a family of old algorithms being applied in possibly new areas; patent maximalists in eastern Asia and the West hope that this mainstream media's obsession can be leveraged to justify new kinds of patents on code



  4. Patent Maximalism is Dead in the United States

    Last-ditch efforts, or a desperate final attempt to water down 35 U.S.C. § 101, isn't succeeding; stacked panels are seen for what they really are and 35 U.S.C. § 101 isn't expected to change



  5. Links 18/6/2019: Linux 5.2 RC5 and OpenMandriva Lx 4

    Links for the day



  6. Weaponising Russophobia Against One's Critics

    Response to smears and various whispering campaigns whose sole purpose is to deplete the support base for particular causes and people; these sorts of things have gotten out of control in recent years



  7. When the EPO is Run by Politicians It's Expected to Be Aggressive and Corrupt Like Purely Political Establishments

    António 'Photo Op' Campinos will have marked his one-year anniversary in July; he has failed to demonstrate morality, respect for the law, understanding of the sciences, leadership by example and even the most basic honesty (he lies a lot)



  8. Links 16/6/2019: Tmax OS and New Features for KDE.org

    Links for the day



  9. Stuffed/Stacked Panels Sent Back Packing After One-Sided Patent Hearings That Will Convince Nobody, Just Preach to the Choir

    Almost a week ago the 'world tour' of patent lobbyists in US Senate finally ended; it was an utterly ridiculous case study in panel stacking and bribery (attempts to buy laws)



  10. 2019 H1: American Software Patents Are as Worthless as They Were Last Year and Still Susceptible to Invalidation

    With a fortnight left before the second half of the year it seems evident that software patents aren't coming back; the courts have not changed their position at all



  11. As European Patent Office Management Covers up Collapse in Patent Quality Don't Expect UPC to Ever Kick Off

    It would be madness to allow EPO-granted patents to become 'unitary' (bypassing sovereignty of nations that actually still value patent quality); it seems clear that rogue EPO management has, in effect, not only doomed UPC ambitions but also European Patents (or their perceived legitimacy, presumption of validity)



  12. António Campinos -- Unlike His Father -- Engages in Imperialism (Using Invalid Patents)

    Despite some similarities to his father (not positive similarities), António Campinos is actively engaged in imperialistic agenda that defies even European law; the EPO not only illegally grants patents but also urges other patent offices to do the same



  13. António Campinos Takes EPO Waste and Corruption to Unprecedented Levels and Scale

    The “B” word (billions) is thrown around at Europe’s second-largest institution because a mischievous former EUIPO chief (not Archambeau) is ‘partying’ with about half of the EPO’s all-time savings, which are supposed to be reserved for pensions and other vital programmes, not presidential palaces and gambling



  14. Links 15/6/2019: Astra Linux in Russia, FreeBSD 11.3 RC

    Links for the day



  15. Code of Conduct Explained: Partial Transcript - August 10th, 2018 - Episode 80, The Truth About Southeast Linuxfest

    "Ask Noah" and the debate on how a 'Code of Conduct' is forcibly imposed on events



  16. Links 14/6/2019: Xfce-Related Releases, PHP 7.4.0 Alpha

    Links for the day



  17. The EPO is a Patent Troll's Wet Dream

    The makers of software and games in Europe will have to spend a lot of money just keeping patent trolls off their backs — a fact that seems to never bother EPO management because it profits from it



  18. EPO Spreading Patent Extremists' Ideology to the Whole World, Now to South Korea

    The EPO’s footprint around the world's patent systems is an exceptionally dangerous one; The EPO amplifies the most zealous voices of the patents and litigation ‘industry’ while totally ignoring the views and interests of the European public, rendering the EPO an ‘agent of corporate occupation’



  19. Guest Post: Notes on Free Speech, and a Line in the Sand

    We received this anonymous letter and have published it as a follow-up to "Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF"



  20. Links 13/6/2019: CERN Dumps Microsoft, GIMP 2.10.12 Released

    Links for the day



  21. Links 12/6/2019: Mesa 19.1.0, KDE neon 5.16, Endless OS 3.6.0 and BackBox Linux 6

    Links for the day



  22. Leaked Financial 'Study' Document Shows EPO Management and Mercer Engaging in an Elaborate “Hoax”

    How the European Patent Office (EPO) lies to its own staff to harm that staff; thankfully, the staff isn't easily fooled and this whole affair will merely obliterate any remnants of "benefit of the doubt" the President thus far enjoyed



  23. Measuring Patent Quality and Employer Quality in Europe

    Comparing the once-famous and respected EPO to today's joke of an office, which grants loads of bogus patents on just about anything including fruit and mathematics



  24. Granting More Fundamentally Wrong Patents Will Mean Reduced Certainty, Not Increased Certainty

    Law firms that are accustomed to making money from low-quality and abstract patents try to overcome barriers by bribing politicians; this will backfire because they show sheer disregard for the patent system's integrity and merely lower the legal certainty associated with granted (by greedy offices) patents



  25. Links 11/6/2019: Wine 4.10, Plasma 5.16

    Links for the day



  26. Chapter 10: Moving Forward -- Getting the Best Results From Open Source With Your Monopoly

    “the gradual shift in public consciousness from their branding towards our own, is the next best thing to owning them outright.”



  27. Chapter 9: Ownership Through Branding -- Change the Names, and Change the World

    The goal for those fighting against Open source, against the true openness (let's call it the yet unexploited opportunities) of Open source, has to be first to figuratively own the Linux brand, then literally own or destroy the brand, then to move the public awareness of the Linux brand to something like Azure, or whatever IBM is going to do with Red Hat.



  28. Links 10/6/2019: VLC 3.0.7, KDE Future Plans

    Links for the day



  29. Patent Quality Continues to Slip in Europe and We Know Who Will Profit From That (and Distract From It)

    The corporate media and large companies don't speak about it (like Red Hat did before entering a relationship with IBM), but Europe is being littered and saturated with a lot of bogus software patents -- abstract patents that European courts would almost certainly throw out; this utter failure of the media to do journalism gets exploited by the "big litigation" lobby and EPO management that's granting loads of invalid European Patents (whose invalidation goes underreported or unreported in the media)



  30. Corporate Front Groups Like OIN and the Linux Foundation Need to Combat Software Patents If They Really Care About Linux

    The absurdity of having groups that claim to defend Linux but in practice defend software patents, if not actively then passively (by refusing to comment on this matter)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts