EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.26.18

Director Iancu and President Campinos Both Serve the Litigation ‘Industry’ Instead of Science and Technology

Posted in America, Europe, Patents at 4:16 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Campinos at WIPO, whose abuses resemble the EPO's

IP Watch and António Campinos

Summary: When some of the world’s largest patent offices only listen to the new ‘industry’ (created only by virtue of these offices themselves) there’s danger that patents will be granted for the sake of there being more patents and lawsuits rather than for advancement of the sciences

ONCE UPON a time the patent system was conceived/established to (or so we’re told) protect scientists; this predates modern technology where advancements are no longer limited to chemistry and machinery. The USPTO was founded on this principle and EPO is a much more recent construct.

“…it is a major problem that Iancu only ever hangs out with patent zealots like himself, never with actual scientists, which really says a lot.”We have repeatedly expressed concerns about patent policy in the US and in Europe; it’s unfit for purpose if the people who run the system lose sight of the original goals. Days ago the Director of the USPTO spoke at the Intellectual Property Owners Association Annual Meeting, which is a patent maximalists’ hornets’ nest. The EPO was there too (it tweeted a picture from the event yesterday, referring to it as “2018 IPO Annual Meeting”). As we explained yesterday, Director Iancu has a history of advocacy for software patents (on the record). He’s a menace to a USPTO that actually cares about innovation but a blessing to a USPTO as a “litigation factory”. Watchtroll and Kevin Noonan wrote about it some time before last night; they’re clinging onto what their ‘mole’ Iancu intends to do to water down SCOTUS rulings and piles of caselaw, e.g. Federal Circuit on 35 U.S.C. § 101. Their two articles are titled, respectively, “Director Iancu Produces Glimmer of Patent Eligibility Hope” and “What is Director Iancu Proposing the USPTO do for §101 Analysis?” [1, 2]

As we said yesterday, it is a major problem that Iancu only ever hangs out with patent zealots like himself, never with actual scientists, which really says a lot. He barely gets exposed to what ought to have been his primary if not sole stakeholder. Yesterday we learned that “USPTO director Iancu to give speech at IPAS conference,” i.e. another hornets’ nest of the patent maximalists. They keep pressuring him to do what they want. He came from their occupation, so it’s not hard to imagine him just ignoring science and technology in favour of lawyers. The same has happened at the EPO, which is currently run by a banker, chosen by a fellow French politician to succeed him.

As Benjamin Henrion noted yesterday, “US patent office Iancu omits software from the list of unpatentable abstract things, he aims to grant them again https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/news-updates/remarks-director-iancu-intellectual-property-owners-46th-annual-meeting … [] Iancu ( @uspto ) said “as long as the integration is into a practical application, then the 101 analysis is concluded.” That’s the opposite of what the Court has held. https://www.patentprogress.org/2018/09/24/getting-the-future-backwards-iancus-101-comments-at-ipo/ …”

Well, “lawyers are liars,” I told him. “Their job is to manipulate judges and subvert justice. Iancu is a lawyer, so…”

And speaking of the law, Henrion said that “EPO can ignore anti-swpat jurisprudence from France, because the EPO does not follow the rule of law, so they do pretty much whatever they want https://writtendescription.blogspot.com/2018/09/uspto-director-iancu-proposes-revised.html …” (citing an article about Iancu and 35 U.S.C. § 101).

“Being above the law in one thing,” I responded. “The EPO goes further; it actually engages in corruption and commits crimes, hence actively exploiting this immunity…”

Looking at the latest tweets from the EPO, we see no reason for solace. Yesterday it wrote: “AI provides an opportunity for more collaborative innovation and more thoughtful patent protection strategies. That’s one conclusion from our recent conference on patenting #artificialintelligence: http://bit.ly/AIpatents pic.twitter.com/niVbMyxVu0″

“AI” is just a buzzword the EPO misuses to grant software patents in Europe — a subject that IP Watch wrote about several times before (the EPO’s insistence on patenting of algorithms).

Sadly, however, IP Watch seems to be getting close to Team Battistelli. Yesterday it published this tweet (later retweeted by the EPO) to say: “Antonio Campinos, president of the European Patent Office @EPOorg , at the WIPO General Assemblies tonight, with @ipwatch Director William New pic.twitter.com/UYiyblg1q2″

So we don’t suppose IP Watch intends to criticise the EPO (or Campinos) for the abuses as much as before. It has barely done so since Campinos took Office. It always helps the EPO when it makes contacts with the otherwise-inquisitive press. Sometimes the EPO even pays this press.

Meanwhile, the EPO is also associating with patent extremists (Watchtroll in this case), but then again, it has done worse, like letting armed thugs (‘bodyguards’) of Battistelli run amok inside the Office. Roberta Romano-Götsch did this in the above context (IPO).

Perhaps most noteworthy, however, was this tweet about the EPO’s latest news item (warning: epo.org link). It’s about China. It contains group photo op and one of António Campinos, astoundingly similar to the one Battistelli took when he brought it to his other employer, where he later 'laundered' EPO money for him to net. Suffice to say, the corrupt EPO cannot lecture China on human rights or lecture SIPO (now known as CNIP) on patent quality. Here is what the EPO wrote:

The EPO and the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA, formerly SIPO) have agreed on a co-operation programme for next year as part of their long-term strategic partnership on strengthening the patent system. The 2019 co-operation work plan was signed by EPO President António Campinos and CNIPA Commissioner Shen Changyu on Friday at their annual heads of office meeting in Munich.

[...]

Following a reform of China’s IP agencies, SIPO was recently renamed CNIPA, and in addition to patents, utility models and designs, the office now also processes applications for trade marks and geographical indications.

“Following a reform of China’s IP agencies, SIPO was recently renamed CNIP,” the EPO explains. Not because SIPO became a laughing stock like the EPO for all sorts of reasons? Also, why is the EPO logo white now? Rebrand? Perhaps being careful not to associate too closely with China’s all-red flag?

All in all, seeing the world’s most lenient (by some standards, e.g. permitting software patents) together with the EPO in this fashion inspires not much confidence. It does, however, say a lot about what EPO leadership has become.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 22/9/2019: KMyMoney 5.0.7, Lennart's Latest Plan

    Links for the day



  2. Summits of Open Bear Traps: The Open Core Summit and Other 'Open' Events That Actually Attack Software Freedom

    Conferences that call themselves "open" something are sometimes nothing but an attack on openness (not to mention freedom) and promotion of FUD about Free/Open Source software (FOSS); there's an ample set of examples to that effect



  3. Openwashing Report: 'Open Source' Without Any or Most of the Benefits

    The cheapening of the term "Open Source" continues; sooner or later everything out there will be called "open" irrespective of what it really is



  4. Patent Extremism is Not Normal and Not an Innocent Mindset

    Reflection upon the sad state of the European patent system and how media turns a blind eye to it; worldwide, in general, the discussion about patents is being warped by the litigation giants, whose sole goal is to maximise the number of lawsuits/shakedowns (personal gain)



  5. Links 22/9/2019: LLVM 9.0.0 and FreeBSD 12.1 Beta

    Links for the day



  6. Links 21/9/2019: Plasma 5.17 Beta in Kubuntu, Cockpit 203

    Links for the day



  7. IBM Cannot Become a True Friend of Free Software Because of Its Current Patent Policy

    IBM needs to quit bullying people/companies with software patents; that would help towards appeasement of IBM critics and sceptics



  8. When Patent 'Professionals' Sound Like Children Who Learned to Parrot Some Intentionally-Misleading Buzzwords, Myths and Lies

    With buzzwords like "AI" and misleading terms like "IP" the litigation zealots are trying to convince themselves (and the public) that software is a physical thing and a "property" which needs "protecting" from "theft"; it doesn't seem to bother these people that copyright law already covers software<



  9. The European Parliament Needs to Become More Outspoken About EPO Abuses

    There are few encouraging signs in Europe right now because the EPO's disregard for patent law (striving to just grant as many patents as possible) earned it much-needed backlash from the European Parliament



  10. Links 19/9/2019: German Federal Ministry of the Interior Wants FOSS, Top Snaps Named

    Links for the day



  11. Buying the Voices of 'Linux' People to Repeat Microsoft's Talking Points While Removing Our Icons and Leaders (Calling Them Sexist)

    The dirty games leveraged by several companies including Microsoft target charismatic people who are essential for morale and leadership; these tactics aren't particularly novel



  12. When the EPO Sees Itself as Above European Law, Grants Patents in Defiance of the EPC (Its Founding Document) and Violates Staff's Labour Rights/Protections (International Law)

    The absurd state of affairs at the EPO has reached the point where laws at every level are being violated and even judges are being threatened or vainly ignored; the EU is belatedly trying to tackle these issues, which have actually cost its credibility a great deal and threaten the perception of Rule of Law at multiple levels



  13. Links 19/9/2019: Samba 4.11.0 and Kubernetes 1.16

    Links for the day



  14. Update on Koch v EPO: Internal Appeals Committee (IAC) Composition Still Likely Illegal

    An important EPO case, concerning a dismissed staff representative, shows what ILO-AT and the EPO's Internal Appeals Committee boil down to



  15. Links 18/9/2019: Fedora Linux 31 Beta, PCLinuxOS 2019.09 Update

    Links for the day



  16. Links 17/9/2019: CentOS 7.7 and Funtoo Linux 1.4 Released

    Links for the day



  17. EPO is Not European

    Internationalists and patent trolls are those who stand to benefit from the 'globalisation' of low-quality and law-breaking patents such as patents on algorithms, nature and life itself; the EPO isn't equipped to serve its original goals anymore



  18. The EPO's Central Staff Committee and SUEPO (Staff Union) Respond to “Fascist Bills” Supported by EPO President António Campinos

    Raw material pertaining to the latest Campinos "scandal"; what Campinos said, what the Central Staff Committee (CSC) said, and what SUEPO said



  19. Storm Brewing in the European Patent Office After a Hot Summer

    Things aren't rosy in EPOnia (to say the least); in fact, things have been getting a lot worse lately, but the public wouldn't know judging by what media tells the public (almost nothing)



  20. Why I Once Called for Richard Stallman to Step Down

    Guest post from the developer who recently authored "Getting Stallman Wrong Means Getting The 21st Century Wrong"



  21. As Richard Stallman Resigns Let's Consider Why GNU/Linux Without Stallman and Torvalds Would be a Victory to Microsoft

    Stallman has been ejected after a lot of intentionally misleading press coverage; this is a dark day for Software Freedom



  22. Links 16/9/2019: GNU Linux-libre 5.3, GNU World Order 13×38, Vista 10 Breaks Itself Again

    Links for the day



  23. Links 16/9/2019: Qt Quick on Vulkan, Metal, and Direct3D; BlackWeb 1.2 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  24. Richard Stallman's Controversial Views Are Nothing New and They Distract From Bill Gates' Vastly Worse Role

    It's easier to attack Richard Stallman (RMS) using politics (than using his views on software) and media focus on Stallman's personal views on sexuality bears some resemblance to the push against Linus Torvalds, which leans largely on the false perception that he is sexist, rude and intolerant



  25. Links 16/9/2019: Linux 5.3, EasyOS Releases, Media Backlash Against RMS

    Links for the day



  26. Openwashing Report on Open Networking Foundation (ONF): When Open Source Means Collaboration Among Giant Spying Companies

    Massive telecommunications oligopolies (telecoms) are being described as ethical and responsible by means of openwashing; they even have their own front groups for that obscene mischaracterisation and ONF is one of those



  27. 'Open Source' You Cannot Run Without Renting or 'Licensing' Windows From Microsoft

    When so-called ‘open source’ programs strictly require Vista 10 (or similar) to run, how open are they really and does that not redefine the nature of Open Source while betraying everything Free/libre software stands for?



  28. All About Control: Microsoft is Not Open Source But an Open Source Censor/Spy and GitHub/LinkedIn/Skype Are Its Proprietary Censorship/Surveillance Tools

    All the big companies which Microsoft bought in recent years are proprietary software and all of the company’s big products remain proprietary software; all that “Open Source” is to Microsoft is “something to control and censor“



  29. The Sad State of GNU/Linux News Sites

    The ‘media coup’ of corporate giants (that claim to be 'friends') means that history of GNU/Linux is being distorted and lied about; it also explains prevalent lies such as "Microsoft loves Linux" and denial of GNU/Free software



  30. EPO President Along With Bristows, Managing IP and Other Team UPC Boosters Are Lobbying for Software Patents in Clear and Direct Violation of the EPC

    A calm interpretation of the latest wave of lobbying from litigation professionals, i.e. people who profit when there are lots of patent disputes and even expensive lawsuits which may be totally frivolous (for example, based upon fake patents that aren't EPC-compliant)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts