EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.01.19

The Reputation of the EPO is Ruined But Now It Ruins the Lives of Staff and Europeans

Posted in Europe, Patents at 4:26 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

A single incident if not a few incidents can be highly corrosive to an institution’s name

EPO pepper spray

Summary: Team Campinos, formerly known as Team Battistelli, is failing to show that things have changed at the European Patent Office (EPO) because software patents are being advocated every day, even patents on life/nature/animals/plants/seeds/beverages

“EPO study reveals the trends in self-driving vehicle innovation and the massive growth in European patent applications in this field in recent years,” the EPO wrote yesterday. I personally wrote some software to that effect, so it bothers me to see the EPO promoting buzzwords (see the remainder of this tweet) to describe what I know to be mostly statistics and geometry, i.e. mathematics.

“The confidence in European Patents will continue to erode if they work around the law or violate the law.”“We have just published this summary of our conference on patenting #artificialintelligence,” the EPO then added, using that old foolish buzzword “AIpatents”, which is very obviously software patents or patents on algorithms. Who do they think they’re fooling?

The 'Battistelli of WIPO', Mr. Gurry, is meanwhile propping up this same software patents agenda using the “AI” buzzword — the same dirty trick as “AIpatents” from the EPO. As IP Watch put it yesterday:

WIPO Sheds Lights On Artificial Intelligence Patenting Trends In New Report

The World Intellectual Property Organization today released its first report on artificial intelligence showing a sharp rise in patenting activities over the last few years. WIPO Director General Francis Gurry called artificial intelligence a “game changer” during a press briefing yesterday and said WIPO hopes to spark a conversation on the issue among its member states this year. As in most other fields, leading patent offices are the United States and China.

We previously showed how the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had worked around 35 U.S.C. § 101/Alice (SCOTUS) by copying “AI” from the EPO. It copied some other buzzwords from the EPO.

“The EPO should never grant patents on life and on maths. Never.”The confidence in European Patents will continue to erode if they work around the law or violate the law. Courts aren’t in the business of granting patents but delivering justice, grounded in underlying laws. The EPO should never grant patents on life and on maths. Never. As this article from EUbusiness in 2017 (and also a couple of months ago, “Headlong rush on UTP directive is jettisoning EU principles – and won’t help any farmer”), there’s a growing perception that the EU and the EPO are against small businesses, farmers, etc. It’s hard to disagree because this perception is correct. IPPro Magazine wrote this article yesterday. “Controversial tomato patent revoked following Syngenta withdrawal,” the headline said, followed by:

Syngenta has withdrawn a controversial European patent on a tomato plant derived from conventional breeding following massive public outcry.

Following Syngenta’s withdrawal, the European Patent Office (EPO) has officially revoked patent EP1515600 which claimed tomato seeds, plants and fruits as its invention.

The aspect the patent claimed to invent was not genetically engineered but was derived from conventional breeding.

The pressure group No Patents on Seeds, which is a vocal opponent to the EPO’s stance on animal and plant related patents, said some 65,000 individuals from nearly 60 countries and 32 organisations participated in the opposition.

Why was it granted in the first place? Whose idea was it to allow such patents? The appeal boards that are being intimidated by Office management? Whose independence is virtually non-existent (not free to judge without fear of consequences any longer)?

“Patent trolls would benefit from this the most because this is their business model.”As we’ve demonstrated using many new examples over the past week (even yesterday), including some from the highest British court, upon closer inspection a lot of European Patents turn out to be bunk and patent courts in Europe do not tolerate these.

Florian Müller‘s many posts (as of late) about Qualcomm culminated in this one yesterday:

Four Qualcomm patent suits against Apple dismissed by Munich court, four others in zombie mode

[...]

These are eight cases because there are two cases for each of the four patents, always one against Apple Inc.–the U.S. HQ–and one against two European Apple entities. The older ones of the four patents-in-suit (too old to be challenged before the European Patent Office post-grant, but they are being challenged in the Federal Patent Court of Germany), EP1956806 and EP1955529, are not infringed–for the aforementioned reason (no “standby”). That disposes of four of the eight cases. Qualcomm can appeal, but the “standby” question appears to be an insurmountable hurdle for Qualcomm, and the EPO opinion on the other two patents, while neither final nor binding on the Federal Patent Court of Germany, strongly suggests that the entire patent family is doomed to be invalidated.

Non-infringement was successfully argued for Apple by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer’s Prince Wolrad of Waldeck and Pyrmont.

Instead of outright ordering a stay of the other four cases (over the two younger patents the EPO deems invalid on a preliminary basis), the court made the procedural decision to give Qualcomm a chance—by way of a reopening of the proceedings–to respond to the EPO’s preliminary findings of invalidity. That’s because the EPO opinion came in so shortly (just about a week) before today’s ruling date in the infringement cases.

[...]

Also, the EPO’s opposition hearings will take place later this year, so if the Munich I Regional Court allowed enforcement (which wouldn’t matter because iOS 12 contains a workaround) but the EPO issued a final (though appealable) revocation decision later, it wouldn’t look good, while the EPO’s preliminary opinion justifies a stay of those four cases (short of a silver bullet on Qualcomm’s part), and should the EPO change mind, Qualcomm wouldn’t have lost much time for enforcement.

We previously covered some rejected (in German courts) European Patents and yesterday Kluwer Patent Blog and IP Kat mentioned a FRAND-related ruling in Germany and SEP in England (those two things are closely related). Reading between the lines, it seems like the EPO is totally disconnected from the rule of law and courts’ decisions reflect/show this. What good is a patent that courts do not care for? It’s just a piece of paper, usable for extortion purposes at ‘best’. Patent trolls would benefit from this the most because this is their business model. They just ‘monetise’ things of no market/real-world value.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 6/4/2020: New Red Hat CEO, elementary OS Hera Updates

    Links for the day



  2. When the Decision is OK and the Judge's Motivations Are Also OK

    Justice Huber made the right call; but the bullies and charlatans who conspired to undermine laws and constitutions will never be satisfied



  3. The Fall of the UPC - Part XII: Doing the Unthinkable by Blaming the Judge's (Justice's) Wife?

    Team UPC and its media partners never cease to amaze us; anybody who stands in their way is either portrayed as a Russian stooge or too ignorant to be worth talking to



  4. The Fall of the UPC - Part XI: Lies Told by Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (BDI) in Süddeutsche Zeitung

    Today we look at misleading claims (or lies) published by Süddeutsche Zeitung after the Germans' constitutional court (FCC) had pointed out the obvious, namely that UPC ratification would be in violation of the German constitution



  5. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, April 05, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, April 05, 2020



  6. Links 5/4/2020: MindSpore, Covid-19 Projects and More

    Links for the day



  7. EPO is Just Like Some Cruel Political Party and Not a Patent Office

    The "cabal" which runs today's EPO (even the word "Mafia" seems suitable here) isn't acting -- not even remotely -- like a patent office; it's a patent-printing operation ("protection money" as income) that uses shallow political stunts to manufacture consent with the EU's 'generous' assistance



  8. Digitalisation and Digital Technologies as a Ploy to Justify Illegal Software Patents

    Say "hello" to the next weasel word/s; from the "hey hi" hype wave we've now moved to something "digital" (which can mean just about anything, including algorithms of all sorts)



  9. The Fall of the UPC - Part X: How We Shall Catalogue UPC Lies

    The cult that Team UPC became (one member lying to another member, maintaining a false version of reality) will be judged based on underlying facts, not lying about facts; we start with a token of contempt for IP Kat and Bristows LLP (there are overlaps)



  10. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, April 04, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, April 04, 2020



  11. Major Revelation: Microsoft Blackmail Against LAMP (GNU/Linux and Free Stacks for Servers) Goes At Least 16 Years Back, Predating the Novell Patent Deal

    (Techno-)Anthropological analyses of Microsoft's patent war on Free/libre software must take into account what Microsoft did to MySQL, a Swedish company at the time



  12. Links 4/4/2020: Sparky 5.11, Firefox 74.0.1, POCL 1.5

    Links for the day



  13. IRC Proceedings: Friday, April 03, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, April 03, 2020



  14. Links 3/4/2020: Ubuntu Beta, GNOME 3.36.1, ExTiX LXQt Mini, NetBSD 8.2 Released

    Links for the day



  15. Digital Communication, Digitalisation and Videogaming Among the EPO's Latest Smokescreens for Illegal and Abstract Patents on Algorithms

    The EPO keeps liaising with the EU to promote patents which EU officials have themselves said were illegal; to make matters worse, the EPO's violations of its own laws inspire the United States to do the same



  16. Emotional Blackmail for Illegal Software Patents

    Semantic tactics the European Patent Office (EPO) uses to promote software patents in Europe and may theoretically use in the future (satire)



  17. Clear Linux is to GNU/Linux What Clearly Defined is to Open Source

    The idea that we need Intel to take GNU/Linux ‘mainstream’ is ludicrous; as OSDL co-founder (now succeeded in the flesh of the Corporate Linux Foundation), Intel is more about Linux (with DRM, “secure boot” and everything that lets it be remotely controlled) than about GNU and it’s not too keen on GPL (copyleft), either



  18. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, April 02, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, April 02, 2020



  19. Links 2/4/2020: Linux 5.6.2, Qt Creator 4.11.2, LineageOS ROM Based on Android 10

    Links for the day



  20. OIN in 2020 Resembles Linux Foundation in 2020 (Corporate Front Group Piggybacking the Linux Brand)

    We regret to say that the Open Invention Network seems not to care at all about Software Freedom; to make matters worse, it is a proponent of software patents and a voice for companies like IBM and Microsoft, not the "Community" it fancies misrepresenting



  21. Inside the Free Software Foundation (FSF) - Part IX: Semi-Happy Ending

    Richard Stallman is here to stay and the FSF will let him stay (as chief of GNU); we want to close the series on a positive note



  22. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, April 01, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, April 01, 2020



  23. Upcoming Articles and Research Areas

    Although we've failed to write as much as usual, we're still preparing some in-depth articles and maintaining Daily Links (in spite of unforeseen ordeals like a forced laptop migration)



  24. Links 2/4/2020: ProtonMail Bridge for Linux, GTK 3.98.2 and Red Hat DNF 4.2.21

    Links for the day



  25. Links 1/4/2020: Linux 5.7 Merges, Qt 5.14.2, GhostBSD 20.03, Linux Mint 20 Ulyana Plans, WordPress 5.4 “Adderley”

    Links for the day



  26. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, March 31, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, March 31, 2020



  27. Techrights to Delete Articles From All Past Years to Save Disk Space

    What if we deleted over 25,000 posts?



  28. IRC Proceedings: Monday, March 30, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, March 30, 2020



  29. Links 30/3/2020: GNU Linux-libre 5.6, WireGuard 1.0.0

    Links for the day



  30. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, March 29, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, March 29, 2020


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts