EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.01.19

The Reputation of the EPO is Ruined But Now It Ruins the Lives of Staff and Europeans

Posted in Europe, Patents at 4:26 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

A single incident if not a few incidents can be highly corrosive to an institution’s name

EPO pepper spray

Summary: Team Campinos, formerly known as Team Battistelli, is failing to show that things have changed at the European Patent Office (EPO) because software patents are being advocated every day, even patents on life/nature/animals/plants/seeds/beverages

“EPO study reveals the trends in self-driving vehicle innovation and the massive growth in European patent applications in this field in recent years,” the EPO wrote yesterday. I personally wrote some software to that effect, so it bothers me to see the EPO promoting buzzwords (see the remainder of this tweet) to describe what I know to be mostly statistics and geometry, i.e. mathematics.

“The confidence in European Patents will continue to erode if they work around the law or violate the law.”“We have just published this summary of our conference on patenting #artificialintelligence,” the EPO then added, using that old foolish buzzword “AIpatents”, which is very obviously software patents or patents on algorithms. Who do they think they’re fooling?

The 'Battistelli of WIPO', Mr. Gurry, is meanwhile propping up this same software patents agenda using the “AI” buzzword — the same dirty trick as “AIpatents” from the EPO. As IP Watch put it yesterday:

WIPO Sheds Lights On Artificial Intelligence Patenting Trends In New Report

The World Intellectual Property Organization today released its first report on artificial intelligence showing a sharp rise in patenting activities over the last few years. WIPO Director General Francis Gurry called artificial intelligence a “game changer” during a press briefing yesterday and said WIPO hopes to spark a conversation on the issue among its member states this year. As in most other fields, leading patent offices are the United States and China.

We previously showed how the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had worked around 35 U.S.C. § 101/Alice (SCOTUS) by copying “AI” from the EPO. It copied some other buzzwords from the EPO.

“The EPO should never grant patents on life and on maths. Never.”The confidence in European Patents will continue to erode if they work around the law or violate the law. Courts aren’t in the business of granting patents but delivering justice, grounded in underlying laws. The EPO should never grant patents on life and on maths. Never. As this article from EUbusiness in 2017 (and also a couple of months ago, “Headlong rush on UTP directive is jettisoning EU principles – and won’t help any farmer”), there’s a growing perception that the EU and the EPO are against small businesses, farmers, etc. It’s hard to disagree because this perception is correct. IPPro Magazine wrote this article yesterday. “Controversial tomato patent revoked following Syngenta withdrawal,” the headline said, followed by:

Syngenta has withdrawn a controversial European patent on a tomato plant derived from conventional breeding following massive public outcry.

Following Syngenta’s withdrawal, the European Patent Office (EPO) has officially revoked patent EP1515600 which claimed tomato seeds, plants and fruits as its invention.

The aspect the patent claimed to invent was not genetically engineered but was derived from conventional breeding.

The pressure group No Patents on Seeds, which is a vocal opponent to the EPO’s stance on animal and plant related patents, said some 65,000 individuals from nearly 60 countries and 32 organisations participated in the opposition.

Why was it granted in the first place? Whose idea was it to allow such patents? The appeal boards that are being intimidated by Office management? Whose independence is virtually non-existent (not free to judge without fear of consequences any longer)?

“Patent trolls would benefit from this the most because this is their business model.”As we’ve demonstrated using many new examples over the past week (even yesterday), including some from the highest British court, upon closer inspection a lot of European Patents turn out to be bunk and patent courts in Europe do not tolerate these.

Florian Müller‘s many posts (as of late) about Qualcomm culminated in this one yesterday:

Four Qualcomm patent suits against Apple dismissed by Munich court, four others in zombie mode

[...]

These are eight cases because there are two cases for each of the four patents, always one against Apple Inc.–the U.S. HQ–and one against two European Apple entities. The older ones of the four patents-in-suit (too old to be challenged before the European Patent Office post-grant, but they are being challenged in the Federal Patent Court of Germany), EP1956806 and EP1955529, are not infringed–for the aforementioned reason (no “standby”). That disposes of four of the eight cases. Qualcomm can appeal, but the “standby” question appears to be an insurmountable hurdle for Qualcomm, and the EPO opinion on the other two patents, while neither final nor binding on the Federal Patent Court of Germany, strongly suggests that the entire patent family is doomed to be invalidated.

Non-infringement was successfully argued for Apple by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer’s Prince Wolrad of Waldeck and Pyrmont.

Instead of outright ordering a stay of the other four cases (over the two younger patents the EPO deems invalid on a preliminary basis), the court made the procedural decision to give Qualcomm a chance—by way of a reopening of the proceedings–to respond to the EPO’s preliminary findings of invalidity. That’s because the EPO opinion came in so shortly (just about a week) before today’s ruling date in the infringement cases.

[...]

Also, the EPO’s opposition hearings will take place later this year, so if the Munich I Regional Court allowed enforcement (which wouldn’t matter because iOS 12 contains a workaround) but the EPO issued a final (though appealable) revocation decision later, it wouldn’t look good, while the EPO’s preliminary opinion justifies a stay of those four cases (short of a silver bullet on Qualcomm’s part), and should the EPO change mind, Qualcomm wouldn’t have lost much time for enforcement.

We previously covered some rejected (in German courts) European Patents and yesterday Kluwer Patent Blog and IP Kat mentioned a FRAND-related ruling in Germany and SEP in England (those two things are closely related). Reading between the lines, it seems like the EPO is totally disconnected from the rule of law and courts’ decisions reflect/show this. What good is a patent that courts do not care for? It’s just a piece of paper, usable for extortion purposes at ‘best’. Patent trolls would benefit from this the most because this is their business model. They just ‘monetise’ things of no market/real-world value.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 26/4/2019: Best GNU/Linux Laptops and More

    Links for the day



  2. Research Into Who's Putting DRM Inside Linux

    Back doors may be hard to detect (requires understanding a lot of underlying code), but how about malicious 'features' or antifeatures that are put in the kernel to serve Hollywood at the expense of the kernel's users?



  3. "Dia da Liberdade" in Portugal -- Wilted Carnations in EPOnia

    "Reliable sources report that the discontent continues to simmer among the EPOnian peasantry and that the steam is slowly but inexorably building up inside the pressure cooker," tells us a guest writer



  4. The Quality of Patents is Connected to the Quality of Life of Patent Examiners

    EPO staff is not happy (a new President has not changed things) and the problems associated with low quality of patents become more visible in courtrooms



  5. American Patent Courts Keep Narrowing Patent Scope, No Matter What Few Politicians Are Doing on Behalf of Litigation Firms and Patent Trolls

    Acts of desperation in the patent microcosm of the United States, where judges now overwhelmingly reject software patents at all levels (tribunals, lower courts, higher courts)



  6. Links 25/4/2019: Rancher Labs Releases Slim OS, OpenBSD 6.5 is Ready

    Links for the day



  7. Links 24/4/2019: Chrome 74, QEMU 4.0 Released

    Links for the day



  8. Supreme Court of the UK, Which Habitually Throws Out European Patents, May Overturn Troublesome Unwired Planet v Huawei Decision

    A lot of European Patents are facing growing scrutiny from courts (Team UPC, including Bristows, publicly complains about it this month) and "greenwashing" of the Office won't be enough to paint/frame these patents as "ethical"



  9. German Federal Patent Court Curbs the Patent Maximalism of the EPO, Which Promotes Patents on Nature and/or Maths Every Single Day

    European courts are restraining the EPO, which has been trying to bypass or replace such courts (with the UPC); it certainly seems as though European Patents rapidly lose their legitimacy or much-needed presumption of validity



  10. Any 'Linux' Foundation Needs to Be Managed by Geeks, Not Politicians and PR People

    Linux bureaucracy has put profits way ahead of technical merits and this poses a growing threat or constitutes risk to the direction of the project, not to mention its ownership



  11. Links 23/4/2019: Kodi 'Leia' 18.2 and DeX Everywhere

    Links for the day



  12. Code of Coercion

    Entryism is visible for all to see, but pointing it out is becoming a risky gambit because of the "be nice!" (or "be polite!") crowd, which shields the perpetrators of a slow and gradual corporate takeover



  13. António Campinos Would Not Refer to the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal If He Did Not Control the Outcomes

    António Campinos and his ilk aren’t interested in patent quality because his former ‘boss’, who publicly denied there were issues and vainly rejected patent quality concerns as illegitimate, is now controlled by him (reversal of roles) and many new appointees at the top are "yes men" (or women) of Campinos, former colleagues whom he bossed at EUIPO (as expected)



  14. Links 22/4/2019: Linux 5.1 RC6, New Release of Netrunner and End of Scientific Linux

    Links for the day



  15. USPTO and EPO Both Slammed for Abandoning Patent Quality and Violating the Law/Caselaw in Order to Grant Illegitimate Patents on Life/Nature and Mathematics

    Mr. Iancu, the ‘American Battistelli’ (appointed owing to nepotism), mirrors the ‘Battistelli operandi’, which boils down to treating judges like they’re stooges and justices like an ignorable nuisance — all this in the name of litigation profits, which necessitate constant wars over illegitimate patents (it is expensive to prove their illegitimacy)



  16. IRC Proceedings: January 27th, 2019 – March 24th, 2019

    Many IRC logs



  17. IRC Proceedings: December 2nd, 2018 – January 26th, 2019

    Many IRC logs



  18. Links 21/4/2019: SuperTuxKart's 1.0 Release, Sam Hartman Is Debian’s Newest Project Leader (DPL)

    Links for the day



  19. The EPO's Use of Phrases Like “High-Quality Patent Services” Means They Know High-Quality European Patents Are 'Bygones'

    The EPO does a really poor job hiding the fact that its last remaining objective is to grant as many European Patents as possible (and as fast as possible), conveniently conflating quality with pace



  20. A Reader's Suggestion: Directions for Techrights

    Guest post by figosdev



  21. Links 20/4/2019: Weblate 3.6 and Pop!_OS 19.04

    Links for the day



  22. The Likes of Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA), Team Campinos and Team UPC Don't Represent Europe But Hurt Europe

    The abject disinterest in patent quality and patent validity (as judged by courts) threatens Europe but not to the detriment of those who are in the 'business' of suing and printing lots of worthless patents



  23. The Linux Foundation Needs to Change Course Before GNU/Linux (as a Free Operating System) is Dead

    The issues associated with the Linux Foundation are not entirely new; but Linux now incorporates so many restrictions and contains so many binary blobs that one begins to wonder what "Linux" even means



  24. Largest Patent Offices Try to Leave Courts in a State of Disarray to Enable the Granting of Fake Patents in the US and Europe

    Like a monarchy that effectively runs all branches of government the management of the EPO is trying to work around the judiciary; the same is increasingly happening (or at least attempted) in the United States



  25. Links 19/4/2019: PyPy 7.1.1, LabPlot 2.6, Kipi Plugins 5.9.1 Released

    Links for the day



  26. Links 18/4/2019: Ubuntu and Derivatives Have Releases, digiKam 6.1.0, OpenSSH 8.0 and LibreOffice 6.2.3

    Links for the day



  27. Freedom is Not a Business and Those Who Make 'Business' by Giving it Away Deserve Naming

    Free software is being parceled and sold to private monopolisers; those who facilitate the process enrich themselves and pose a growing threat to freedom in general — a subject we intend to tackle in the near future



  28. Concluding the Linux Foundation (LF) “Putting the CON in Conference!” (Part 3)

    Conferences constructed or put together based on payments rather than merit pose a risk to the freedom of free software; we conclude our series about events set up by the largest of culprits, which profits from this erosion of freedom



  29. “Mention the War” (of Microsoft Against GNU/Linux)

    The GNU/Linux desktop (or laptops) seems to be languishing or deteriorating, making way for proprietary takeover in the form of Vista 10 and Chrome OS and “web apps” (surveillance); nobody seems too bothered — certainly not the Linux Foundation — by the fact that GNU/Linux itself is being relegated or demoted to a mere “app” on these surveillance platforms (WSL, Croûton and so on)



  30. The European Patent Office Does Not Care About the Law, Today's Management Constantly Attempts to Bypass the Law

    Many EPs (European Patents) are actually "IPs" (invalid patents); the EPO doesn't seem to care and it is again paying for corrupt scholars to toe the party line


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts