EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.01.19

The Reputation of the EPO is Ruined But Now It Ruins the Lives of Staff and Europeans

Posted in Europe, Patents at 4:26 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

A single incident if not a few incidents can be highly corrosive to an institution’s name

EPO pepper spray

Summary: Team Campinos, formerly known as Team Battistelli, is failing to show that things have changed at the European Patent Office (EPO) because software patents are being advocated every day, even patents on life/nature/animals/plants/seeds/beverages

“EPO study reveals the trends in self-driving vehicle innovation and the massive growth in European patent applications in this field in recent years,” the EPO wrote yesterday. I personally wrote some software to that effect, so it bothers me to see the EPO promoting buzzwords (see the remainder of this tweet) to describe what I know to be mostly statistics and geometry, i.e. mathematics.

“The confidence in European Patents will continue to erode if they work around the law or violate the law.”“We have just published this summary of our conference on patenting #artificialintelligence,” the EPO then added, using that old foolish buzzword “AIpatents”, which is very obviously software patents or patents on algorithms. Who do they think they’re fooling?

The 'Battistelli of WIPO', Mr. Gurry, is meanwhile propping up this same software patents agenda using the “AI” buzzword — the same dirty trick as “AIpatents” from the EPO. As IP Watch put it yesterday:

WIPO Sheds Lights On Artificial Intelligence Patenting Trends In New Report

The World Intellectual Property Organization today released its first report on artificial intelligence showing a sharp rise in patenting activities over the last few years. WIPO Director General Francis Gurry called artificial intelligence a “game changer” during a press briefing yesterday and said WIPO hopes to spark a conversation on the issue among its member states this year. As in most other fields, leading patent offices are the United States and China.

We previously showed how the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had worked around 35 U.S.C. § 101/Alice (SCOTUS) by copying “AI” from the EPO. It copied some other buzzwords from the EPO.

“The EPO should never grant patents on life and on maths. Never.”The confidence in European Patents will continue to erode if they work around the law or violate the law. Courts aren’t in the business of granting patents but delivering justice, grounded in underlying laws. The EPO should never grant patents on life and on maths. Never. As this article from EUbusiness in 2017 (and also a couple of months ago, “Headlong rush on UTP directive is jettisoning EU principles – and won’t help any farmer”), there’s a growing perception that the EU and the EPO are against small businesses, farmers, etc. It’s hard to disagree because this perception is correct. IPPro Magazine wrote this article yesterday. “Controversial tomato patent revoked following Syngenta withdrawal,” the headline said, followed by:

Syngenta has withdrawn a controversial European patent on a tomato plant derived from conventional breeding following massive public outcry.

Following Syngenta’s withdrawal, the European Patent Office (EPO) has officially revoked patent EP1515600 which claimed tomato seeds, plants and fruits as its invention.

The aspect the patent claimed to invent was not genetically engineered but was derived from conventional breeding.

The pressure group No Patents on Seeds, which is a vocal opponent to the EPO’s stance on animal and plant related patents, said some 65,000 individuals from nearly 60 countries and 32 organisations participated in the opposition.

Why was it granted in the first place? Whose idea was it to allow such patents? The appeal boards that are being intimidated by Office management? Whose independence is virtually non-existent (not free to judge without fear of consequences any longer)?

“Patent trolls would benefit from this the most because this is their business model.”As we’ve demonstrated using many new examples over the past week (even yesterday), including some from the highest British court, upon closer inspection a lot of European Patents turn out to be bunk and patent courts in Europe do not tolerate these.

Florian Müller‘s many posts (as of late) about Qualcomm culminated in this one yesterday:

Four Qualcomm patent suits against Apple dismissed by Munich court, four others in zombie mode

[...]

These are eight cases because there are two cases for each of the four patents, always one against Apple Inc.–the U.S. HQ–and one against two European Apple entities. The older ones of the four patents-in-suit (too old to be challenged before the European Patent Office post-grant, but they are being challenged in the Federal Patent Court of Germany), EP1956806 and EP1955529, are not infringed–for the aforementioned reason (no “standby”). That disposes of four of the eight cases. Qualcomm can appeal, but the “standby” question appears to be an insurmountable hurdle for Qualcomm, and the EPO opinion on the other two patents, while neither final nor binding on the Federal Patent Court of Germany, strongly suggests that the entire patent family is doomed to be invalidated.

Non-infringement was successfully argued for Apple by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer’s Prince Wolrad of Waldeck and Pyrmont.

Instead of outright ordering a stay of the other four cases (over the two younger patents the EPO deems invalid on a preliminary basis), the court made the procedural decision to give Qualcomm a chance—by way of a reopening of the proceedings–to respond to the EPO’s preliminary findings of invalidity. That’s because the EPO opinion came in so shortly (just about a week) before today’s ruling date in the infringement cases.

[...]

Also, the EPO’s opposition hearings will take place later this year, so if the Munich I Regional Court allowed enforcement (which wouldn’t matter because iOS 12 contains a workaround) but the EPO issued a final (though appealable) revocation decision later, it wouldn’t look good, while the EPO’s preliminary opinion justifies a stay of those four cases (short of a silver bullet on Qualcomm’s part), and should the EPO change mind, Qualcomm wouldn’t have lost much time for enforcement.

We previously covered some rejected (in German courts) European Patents and yesterday Kluwer Patent Blog and IP Kat mentioned a FRAND-related ruling in Germany and SEP in England (those two things are closely related). Reading between the lines, it seems like the EPO is totally disconnected from the rule of law and courts’ decisions reflect/show this. What good is a patent that courts do not care for? It’s just a piece of paper, usable for extortion purposes at ‘best’. Patent trolls would benefit from this the most because this is their business model. They just ‘monetise’ things of no market/real-world value.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 20/2/2019: digiKam 6.0.0, Cockpit 188, Mesa 19.0 RC5

    Links for the day



  2. How Long Can the EPO Bend the Rules Before the Avalanche of Invalid Software Patents?

    A 35 U.S.C. § 101/SCOTUS moment in Europe will likely squash loads of abstract European Patents granted by the EPO; shouldn’t the EPO foresee this and immediately cease granting such obviously bogus patents, whose main beneficiary is a bunch of patent trolls?



  3. Battistelli Trashed 223 Millions (of Stakeholders' Euros) on a System That Destroyed the European Patent Office and Made Few Private Corporations a Lot Richer

    A quarter of a billion euros later the EPO finally admits in private that this was a massive failure



  4. Links 19/2/2019: Mesa 18.3.4, Cutelyst 2.7.0, Plasma Pass 1.0.0

    Links for the day



  5. What Happened in the United States Now Happens in Europe: Lots of Patents Turn Out to Be Bunk, Fake, Bogus, Invalid and Thus Worthless

    Worthless patents — not opposition to such patents — are the greatest threat to the legitimacy of the patent system, yet bureaucrats fail to heed the warning in the name of short-term profits



  6. Stephen Rowan's and Nellie Simon's Letter to EPO Staff: eDossier Has “Not Reached the Required Quality Levels.”

    We've just commented on it; here is the raw letter in full, explaining that eDossier and related frameworks will be abandoned entirely and indefinitely within less than a fortnight



  7. Search Matters Not at the European Patent Office

    The EPO has found out that "System Battistelli" has been catastrophic for the quality of patents; it stops short of openly admitting it as such and in fact it keeps the message strictly confidential (explained to insiders, who will inevitably notice a system being abandoned)



  8. António Campinos Still Needs to Undo Battistelli's Union-Busting Activities at the EPO

    Solidarity and support for Laurent Prunier are needed because the new French president lacks empathy even for fellow Frenchmen whose sole 'crime' is that they represented EPO staff



  9. Links 18/2/2019: Linux 5.0 RC7, RISC-V Spreading Fast

    Links for the day



  10. António Campinos Still Needs to Hold Team Battistelli Accountable for Illegally Bringing Weapons to the EPO

    It is imperative that, in order to repair the reputation of the European Patent Office (EPO), António Campinos should pursue accountability for the managers who brought Benalla and firearms to the Office (very serious breach of German law, jail sentence included)



  11. Links 17/2/2019: Compiz 0.9.14.0, Geary 0.13.0, GNU FreeDink 109.6, Debian 9.8, Texinfo 6.6

    Links for the day



  12. Amazon's Patent Policy Should be Enough of a Reason to Boycott Amazon and AWS

    There are many things to criticise Amazon and its founder for; but rarely does the mainstream media bring up the company's appalling patent policy



  13. Don't Use Cloudflare Because You Impose This on People Who Least Want It

    Reasons to stop making the World Wide Web so heavily dependent on some dubious companies like Cloudflare, which already has a worrisome track record



  14. How Many/Most EPO Examiners View 'President' António Campinos

    Based on what readers/insiders have told us, there’s a prevalent perception that António Campinos is afraid of (thus controlled/directed by) Bergot, who is still doing Battistelli’s biddings at the European Patent Office (EPO)



  15. Techrights' Priorities Over the Years

    An old priority of ours, eliminating software patents in the United States, is no longer quite so relevant because such patents are perishing in US courts, with or without outside intervention such as activism



  16. Courts in Disagreement: Warning on Wrongly-Granted European Patents and the Looming Collapse of All Software Patents in Europe

    By devaluing patents and reducing their perceived worth (as is happening in China and Europe) patent offices risk decreasing participation in the very system they fundamentally depend on



  17. Computing Will Not Necessarily Make the World a Better Place

    The vision of "happy world" (because each person has a so-called 'smart' 'phone') is a yuppie delusion that overlooks business models and corporate interests



  18. EPO Grants Fake European Patents -- Including Software Patents -- and European Courts Keep Rejecting These

    The demise of the legitimacy or perceived validity of European Patents is measurable and the system isn't the same anymore; the EPO makes no effort to change this for the better, either



  19. Nobody But Patent Trolls and Litigators Will Benefit From the Corruption of the European Patent Office

    IAM, EPO leadership, Iancu and the rest of these raiders are enabling corruption and facilitating or supporting a racket; that money they collect comes at the expense of future victims of their "clients" or "customers" (that's what they call applicants, to whom they grant dubious monopolies as a matter of urgency)



  20. WSL is a Misleading Acronym/Name Because There's No Linux in It, It's Just Windows

    When Microsoft says "Linux" (as in "Microsoft loves Linux") what it actually means is Windows and/or Azure



  21. Links 16/2/2019: Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS, PyCharm 2019.1 EAP 4

    Links for the day



  22. Outline/Index of the Alexandre Benalla/Battistelli Scandal

    Our writings about the scandals implicating Benalla and the European Patent Office (EPO)



  23. Reading Techrights on a Mobile Device Running Android

    A new Android app for reading this site is being tested



  24. Links 14/2/2019: “I Love Free Software Day” and Mesa 19.0 RC4 Released

    Links for the day



  25. “EPO Lawlessness Again”

    Blackberry uses bogus European Patents (on software) for lawsuits; "all of them pure software patents. Patents on programs for computers as such," as Müller puts it



  26. Unitary Patent (UPC) is All About Imposing Patent Maximalists' Ideology of Greed and Self Interest on Courts in the Name of 'Unification' or 'Consistency' or 'Community'

    Pushers of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) are upset that they don’t always get their way when independent judges get to decide; as it turns out, many European Patents are just fake patents, more so under António Campinos



  27. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part V: Mediapart Explains the 'Raid' Attempt, Reporters Without Borders Involved

    Mediapart, an investigative site that unearths a lot of incriminating things about Battistelli's former bodyguard Alexandre Benalla, was the target of a raid attempt some weeks ago



  28. Links 13/2/2019: Tails 3.12.1, MongoDB Being Dumped

    Links for the day



  29. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part IV: Suspected Offenses of Forgery and Possible Falsification

    In a very underworld fashion, Benalla continues to break the law and create yet more scandals



  30. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part III: Mars, France Close Protection (Benalla's Family), and Russian Oligarchy

    An article which examines the business background of Benalla, the outrageous salaries, the severance indemnity pay, and contract with a Russian oligarch close to Vladimir Putin


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts