EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.27.19

The European Patent Scope is a Lost Cause, Does Not Exist Anymore

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 8:01 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

What does exist is not being obeyed/honoured, so patent certainty evaporates

EPO white flag

Summary: The European system is mimicking China’s; it seems like the sole goal is just to grant as many patents as possible irrespective of the broader consequences (externalities)

IT TAKES neither a scientific genius nor a patents guru to see that Europe’s patent regime is defunct. The European Patent Office (EPO) is part of the problem — a problem it wishes to exacerbate with UPC. Justice isn’t the goal. Scientific advancement isn’t the goal either. An academic paper was published about it earlier this week (“Unconstitutional Supranational Arrangements for Patent Law: Leaving Out the Elected Legislators and the People’s Participatory Rights”).

Earlier today we saw Team UPC’s (Bristows LLP) Claire Phipps-Jones ‘covering’ “The Supreme Court decision in Actavis v ICOS”.

“And how much leverage does an SME get from a few patents compared to large corporations, which have dedicated legal departments and together account for the lion’s share of European Patents (the EPO keeps pushing the “results” spiel, even today, framing it like a corporate competition that measures quantity)?”The scare quotes are there because it’s not really covering. That’s not journalism. It was reposted/published again elsewhere (probably for a fee), pushing their financial agenda, as usual. Later on a colleague from Bristows published something similar in Kluwer Patent Blog, soon to be followed by this propaganda by “Kluwer Patent blogger” (likely Bristows). It’s promoting the EPO mantra. More monopolies on things just mean more restrictions on things one can do, let alone invent. But that’s not how patent maximalists choose to see it or publicly advertise it. Here is something the EPO wrote some hours ago (pretending it speaks “for SMEs”): “Strong patents aligned with a company’s products help secure exclusivity in core markets.”

Well, exclusivity or monopoly? And how much leverage does an SME get from a few patents compared to large corporations, which have dedicated legal departments and together account for the lion’s share of European Patents (the EPO keeps pushing the “results” spiel, even today, framing it like a corporate competition that measures quantity)?

What is the actual meaning of all this patent maximalism? What is the end goal/eventuality? Remember the Teff scandal? Headlines from 2020 may herald EPO-granted European Patents on embryos, European Patents on saliva, European Patents on stools…

“Headlines from 2020 may herald EPO-granted European Patents on embryos, European Patents on saliva, European Patents on stools…”As the EPO already grants patents on chewing gums, a hair salon, anything labeled “AI” (undefined) and so on, why not every single thing in nature? I mean, don’t more patents imply greater inventiveness? Won’t the act of putting all these Commons in “private hands” help stop the “piracy” of “orphaned” works? Some of these patents represent actual theft or ‘piracy’. They take away what’s public (or natural) and lock it away. The public domain gets ‘looted’. There are many other suitable metaphors and these sorts of arguments aren’t entirely new.

Ealier today Taylor Wessing’s Paul England wrote about the granting of patents on life and nature and IPPro Magazine, recalling the likes of those Carlsberg patents, wrote again about “No Patents on Seeds” (second time in about a week). To quote:

The European Patent Office (EPO) has been criticised for being “wholly structured” towards serving the interests of industry and patent attorneys.
On the same day as a protest against patents covering conventional plant breeding at the EPO, Joanna Eckhardt of No Patents on Seeds claimed that the EPO was ignoring the interests of the broader public.

Along with a three-metre inflatable melon, groups including No Patents on Seeds, Arbeitsgemeinschaft bäuerliche Landwirtschaft (AbL), Gen-ethisches Netzwerk, and WeMove Europe participated in the public demonstrations.

According to No Patents on Seeds, the protest is against the EPO has allegedly granting patents for melons, tomatoes, and even daisy flowers that are all produced without using methods of genetic engineering and was scheduled to coincide with a meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council.

Such patent types are prohibited by rule 28(2) for the interpretation of the European Patent Convention (EPC).

A new comment has meanwhile shown up at IP Kat to say: “An amazing patent has been granted by the German Patent and Trademark Office on a hollowed out loaf of bread filled with cheese. Claim 18 serves as an example (English translation of the German original): “Ready-to-serve cheese dish (1) having a substantially terrine-shaped bread loaf lower part (3) which has an underside and which has a slicing surface (7) on the top opposite the underside and a cavity (6) which is filled with cheese (10) and is introduced from the slicing surface (7) to form a bread dough vessel (7).””

“A lot of people publicly voice their concerns; they recognise that the patent system has gone all wrong.”That’s Germany, where the EPO too is based. Another adjacent comment (almost the same time, but posted in a different thread) says: “It’s only an equivalent if it is obvious to the skilled person… this works backwards too. If the variant predates the patent the patent must be obvious over the variant. So any infringement by equivalence of a product predating the patent is impossible? Is that right?”

A lot of people publicly voice their concerns; they recognise that the patent system has gone all wrong. How about yesterday’s GlobeNewswire (press release) item about the EPO granting patents on nature again? To quote:

BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ: BCLI), a leading developer of adult stem cell therapeutics for neurodegenerative diseases, today announced that the European Patent Office (“EPO”) has granted a European-wide patent titled ‘Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the treatment of CNS Diseases.’ The European Patent Application will be published in the European Patent Bulletin 19/13 on 27 March 2019, under Patent No. 2620493.

Yes, stem cells. What next? Sperm? Embryos? Sexual prose and sex positions? Where does it stop? Does patent scope even mean anything anymore? Days ago we mentioned patents on tastes and smells (“aroma”), never mind shapes.

It’s worth noting that cordial European patent examiners habitually tell us about those things. They’re not happy. Their job no longer feels rewarding or a source of personal/professional pride.

“It’s worth noting that cordial European patent examiners habitually tell us about those things. They’re not happy. Their job no longer feels rewarding or a source of personal/professional pride.”Barney Dixon has just explained that SUEPO can clearly see that new EPO President Campinos is all words, but no actions. Another Battistelli, sans the crudeness. As we’ve been pointing out for more than half a year, Campinos promotes software patents in Europe even more than Battistelli did. His attitude and failure to act? “SUEPO put this down to possible interference from the former president Benoît Battistelli’s administration officials,” says Dixon at IPPro Magazine. This article was mentioned the following day by SUEPO along with Kurioser Streit ums Europäische Patentamt entbrannt (“IPCom for a procedure for operating a mobile network,” Benjamin Henrion quoted and remarked on this, calling it “a well known patent troll”). Yes, earlier this week we mentioned that the EPO's new policies are well geared towards attracting patent trolls.

Here is the part where Dixon quotes part of SUEPO’s letter: (if any of our readers has the full letter, please pass a copy for us to publish)

Three such cases have already been declared unlawful by the International Labour Organization’s Administrative Tribunal.

However, the letter explained that “no clear action has been taken in this direction”.

It read: “It should not be forgotten that Mr Battistelli’s concerted actions against these staff representatives not only ruined their lives but also severely tarnished [the] EPO’s reputation in the public.”

“After nine months of a new presidency, it is not unreasonable to expect that now, more serious and effective actions will be taken to indicate a change in the administration’s attitude towards the staff representatives, including by rightfully restoring the rights of all our colleagues unfairly sanctioned.”

The letter concluded: “We hope that Mr Campinos will now act swiftly to once and for all close the darkest chapter in the EPO’s history.”

He won’t. Never. What has he actually done so far to “defy” Battistelli? Nothing. After nine months. He’s all lipstick on a pig.

We’ve meanwhile noticed that James Nurton (Battistelli’s ‘buddy’) is writing about the UPC again. This time in Watchtroll, not Managing IP (which helped Battistelli promote the UPC). He still maintains the misleading jingoism he’s paid for and here are relevant parts/the relevant paragraphs:

The UK is remaining part of the European Patent Organization, so there will be no change to registered or pending European patents (which are often referred to as a bundle of national rights). The EPO covers 38 countries, including all 28 (current) EU member states. UK patent attorneys will continue to act before the EPO and disputes involving European patents will continue to come before the UK courts.
The UK Government has said it still intends to take part in the proposed Unified Patent Court (including hosting one of the three branches of the central division) and unitary patent. The UK ratified the UPC Agreement on April 26, 2018. However, it is not clear whether this will be possible. In any case, the UPC and unitary patent are currently on hold pending a challenge before Germany’s constitutional court. Whatever the outcome of that, most patent practitioners expect that the proposed system will need to be re-negotiated for the UK to take part. Don’t expect any news soon.
There are some aspects of patent law that are affected by Brexit, the main one being Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) for patented pharmaceutical and plant protection products. In the short term, the UK plans to maintain the current SPC framework including in the event of no deal (see the guidance here).

Lots of falsehoods above — ones that we debunked several dozens of times before. It’s titled “Brexit Q&A: What Now and What Next?” but it’s not an honest set of answers. There’s also this new article titled “Bracing for Brexit – pharmaceuticals and medical devices regulation if there is “no deal”” (which seems unlikely to many, but one cannot be sure these days; they keep delaying until the end of (Theresa) May).

“The UK Government has acknowledged that the Brexit process is in “crisis”” says law firm Taylor Wessing in an article that mostly promotes the firm and its interests.

“It’s just enriching a bunch of law firms and EPO administrators, such as Battistelli who stole money from it (while exploiting immunity to get away with such crimes).”As noted at the top (the article about “No Patents on Seeds”), the EPO is “criticised for being “wholly structured” towards serving the interests of industry and patent attorneys. On the same day as a protest against patents covering conventional plant breeding at the EPO, Joanna Eckhardt of No Patents on Seeds claimed that the EPO was ignoring the interests of the broader public.”

Of course it does; just like Team UPC. This is why, as we said at the very start, today’s European patent system has become really defunct. It does nothing to serve its original purposes. Nothing. It’s just enriching a bunch of law firms and EPO administrators, such as Battistelli who stole money from it (while exploiting immunity to get away with such crimes).

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Slashdot

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. EPO Management Looks for New and 'Innovative' Ways to Exploit Scientists and Distract From EPO Corruption

    EPO management is desperate for puff pieces, having just produced some greenwashing nonsense (about a dozen press items about this non-event) and now a bunch of self-promotional videos



  2. Before the New York Times Did a Number on Donald Trump It Changed Bill Gates' Tune

    When you speak strictly through a spokesperson it often means you're lying and/or hiding something; the Gates enigma remains unsolved more than a year later



  3. Links 28/9/2020: Linux 5.9 RC7, Review of Linuxfx 10.6, OpenSSH 8.4

    Links for the day



  4. Speaking Through Spokespeople is a Sign of Weakness, Such as Non-Denying and False Denials (or: Bill Gates Never Denied His Connections to MIT Through Jeffrey Epstein)

    Big liars lie shamelessly; the biggest liars lie through proxies and today we examine the evasive tactics of Bill Gates and his associates (who were closely connected to Jeffrey Epstein but refuse to even talk about that, except indirectly)



  5. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, September 27, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, September 27, 2020



  6. Accounting for Debconf 19 Travel... in 2020

    A deeper look or analysis of Debian expenditures, which grew more than twicefold for travel last year



  7. Don't Let Microsoft Make 'Open Source' Synonymous With Proprietary Monopoly GitHub

    Now that the OSI works for Microsoft instead of Open Source (no, GitHub isn’t Open Source; it’s inherently against Open Source) we need to understand the modus operandi and learn from old mistakes



  8. Links 27/9/2020: Puppy Linux 9.5, Nitrux 1.3.3

    Links for the day



  9. Public Relations and Tolerance Stunts Are Very, Very Cheap

    It's 2020 and people are asked to focus on superficial aspects of corporations rather than anything of substance (like the effects on society at large, notably exploitation and long-term harm)



  10. Open to Everything

    It always starts with good intentions...



  11. The OSI's President Apparently Does Not Know That His Own Employer (Salesforce) Works for ICE

    The hypocrisy (or double standard) of the OSI’s President is astounding; taking salaries paid in part by ICE budget (Salesforce works for ICE and similarly evil agencies) while protesting in a proprietary software platform of Microsoft (GitHub) about ICE (all this whilst actively participating in it regardless)



  12. [Meme] Communist Tactics

    To Microsoft, Linux is communism until Microsoft controls it (and then runs over it to crush it, the typical modus operandi)



  13. OSI President: Most or Half of the OSI's Money (Even Individual Donors' Money) Goes to a Microsoft-Led Initiative

    The OSI has turned from advocate of "Open Source" (a disingenuous attempt to set aside Free/libre software) to advocate of Microsoft and GitHub in just 3 years (since taking Microsoft's money/bribes)



  14. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, September 26, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, September 26, 2020



  15. The 24/7 'Tech' Worker (Babysitter of User-hostile Computing) and 'Expensive' Programmer

    The rights of workers are being reduced to nothing (many in their older years made redundant), even in an occupation that is indirectly responsible for automating and thus deprecating jobs in many other occupations



  16. Why Techrights is Totally Unexcited About the New Owner of Linux Journal

    Linux Journal might soon become an anti-Linux site (veiled hostility) if Slashdot's editorial preferences are anything to go by (Slashdot has just seized control of Linux Journal)



  17. The Cheapening of the Programmer is a Threat to Human Rights of All Computer Users

    From the era of computer experts (down to the low level of computing with transistors), mathematicians, physics gurus and respected technicians we've come to orders-following, user-apathetic engineers who are overworked, grossly underpaid, and way too fearful of raising ethical concerns (voicing disagreement can result in prompt dismissal, followed by perpetual unemployment) and this ensures digital oppression without checks and balances



  18. Links 26/9/2020: Wine 5.18, FreeBSD 12.2-BETA3 and Debian 10.6 Released

    Links for the day



  19. 'Appeal to Novelty' as a Lever for Proprietary Software Monopolies, Bloat (Planned Obsolescence) and More Surveillance

    Novelty is generally fine, but in many cases products are developed iteratively (not cumulatively) not to advance society or to objectively improve services, only to increase control over people (because emergent ‘freemium’-like business models nowadays revolve around addiction and subjugation, e.g. ‘brain-farming’ and manipulation of minds)



  20. IRC Proceedings: Friday, September 25, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, September 25, 2020



  21. Microsoft Windows is Obsolete

    The so-called 'leak' of old Windows code (almost 20 years old) is rather meaningless and useless; the world is moving past Windows, plus old Windows code cannot be used (due to the licence) and is barely used anymore, even in binary form



  22. [Meme] Conflating Critics of Corporate/Class Abuse With Womanisers and Chauvinists (and Now Doing the Same to Influential Women)

    It's regretful to see real victims of discrimination having their grievances and legitimate causes hijacked by opportunistic corporate media, which rallies a bunch of Internet trolls while oligarchs sponsor the whole thing, emboldening attacks on critics of powerful people (the likes of Jordan Peterson are a distraction; even women are nowadays being targeted using the very same tricks)



  23. Losing the Battle for Rights/Justice, Freedom/Liberty, and Emancipation Potential

    We're losing our most basic rights amid transition to "digital"; too little is being done to push back against this worrisome trend, which necessarily means reduction in both our freedom and our fundamental human rights



  24. Response to Eric Raymond (ESR) on “Last Phase of the Desktop Wars”

    Eric Raymond (ESR) talks about Microsoft's "embrace"; but there are many misunderstandings and misconceptions in his blog post, as we'll explain patiently, based on known facts



  25. Links 25/9/2020: Calibre 5.0, Fedora 33 Beta Days Away, Snap Setback

    Links for the day



  26. Faking 'Progress' to Distract From True Justice or From a Full, Meaningful Reform

    Activism for truly meaningful change doesn't stop at superficialities and cosmetic changes (which merely give a false sense/impression of accomplishment, resulting in inaction); we need to regularly consider how to dismantle injustice, not based on the criteria set by oligarchs-owned media, rallying gullible mobs to appease only big egos



  27. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, September 24, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, September 24, 2020



  28. Richard Stallman: New Interview About Privacy (Published This Morning)

    “The last few months have put data protection back in the spotlight. During a crisis of this kind, do we have to choose between safety and privacy? We talked about this with Richard Stallman, digital privacy activist and the founder of the Free Software Movement,” RT says



  29. Links 25/9/2020: PostgreSQL 13, DragonFly 5.8.2 and Python 3.8.6

    Links for the day



  30. Code of Ethics Versus Code of Conduct in Action

    Reprinted from Daniel Pocock's Web site


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts