Summary: Today we take a closer look at what Sirius 'Open Source' management said about unions. We have plenty left to say about Sirius 'Open Source' (many posts already; about 200!), so we expect this series to go on until next month. We'll show a lot more examples and evidence of scandals.

FOUR years ago I seriously considered leaving Sirius in light of the abuse suffered due to management being liars and manipulative bullies. The abuse started only weeks after the Gates Foundation had gotten involved, according to our records (we re-checked the dates recently). Earlier this winter or in autumn I had already made up my mind, having tentatively decided to do that around 12 months ago (leaving the company), but Rianne is another story. Rianne did not want to leave. My own motivations were explained in blog posts last year. Ethics were a key part of it, instrumental in the decision-making. The company ceased to be ethical.

"A boss who hoped to prove that Rianne had done something wrong ended up doing many wrong things himself."Earlier this month we showed that a boss had picked on my wife using non-evidence and non-facts. It was a total disaster (we previously showed Rianne's resignation letter and Rianne's departure message at tuxmachines.org). A boss who hoped to prove that Rianne had done something wrong ended up doing many wrong things himself. For more information see Anatomy of a Corporate Witch-Hunt, especially parts like these, which reveal the full chain of correspondence. People can assess that for themselves. Readers can form their own opinions.

"These gross omissions -- and more generally the unprofessional management style -- were consistent with what had been criticised for years already. This merely reinforced the legitimacy of the criticism."Here at Techrights we've been covering many union-related activities, especially at the EPO (since 2014, i.e. nearly a decade already). So we've spent more time studying this situation at Sirius, striving to accurately explain that "fluke". The gist of the story is, on November 18^th a letter was sent to Rianne, probably before the company was getting legal advice and before Rianne herself could seek legal advice. Rianne insisted that she should be given time to speak to a lawyer.

Then, on November 28^th, an entirely different letter was sent. Ever so suddenly the tone of the letter and content changed because the boss and the sidekick apparently spoke to actual HR people for the first time. They checked the law and realised they had left something out. These gross omissions -- and more generally the unprofessional management style -- were consistent with what had been criticised for years already. This merely reinforced the legitimacy of the criticism.

"My lawyer says I can be accompanied not only by a trade union person," Rianne wrote to the bully. "Sirius doesn't have a union."

The response came about a day later (after the revised letter):

Dear Rianne,

Thanks for your message.

As per our letter, you are entitled to be accompanied by either a work colleague or by a Trades Union representative.

Just to be clear, it is not Sirius' responsibility to run or operate a Union. Trades Unions are independent bodies that operate separately to employers so that they can work for the benefit of their members.

It is also not Sirius' responsibility to nominate a suitable Trades Union. It is a right under UK law for each employee to make an individual decision to choose whether or not they wish to join a Union. Sirius is an equal opportunity employer and makes no distinction at all between those who are members of a Trade Union and those who are not.

Kind regards,

There's a lot wrong with that response and an upcoming video will elaborate some more. Rianne responded by stating that it was a false dichotomy and moreover the boss admitted that he would "tinker" with the witness prior to any meeting and be in a position to even deny the request. This means that any impartial or sympathetic (to Rianne) witness is deemed disqualified or subject to judgement (or warning) from the accuser. Cushioning a 'kangaroo court' with more kangaroos does not improve things -- it merely gives the illusion of balance even where none exists. It's like those notorious compositions in internal appeals at the EPO -- compositions that were repeatedly deemed inadequate by the ILOAT.

Rianne never bothered with that stupid 'kangaroo court'. She had already suffered enough for 4 years. She wasn't planning to waste any more time in such a corrupt company. On Friday at 4PM a PDF was sent and on Saturday morning she formally resigned, having explained how she felt about the whole thing (see links in the relevant wiki for contents of the PDF).

"Sirius is a very fake company. It's run by phonies who lie to the staff and to clients."Our current plan is to explain these matters and in the coming fortnight or so we'll be publishing many more blog posts (they're semi-drafted already) -- with many more later, according to any further issues that arise (like the company trying to silence us). We cross-post, add to wiki etc. in order to better preserve access to all this information. We won't allow that to be censored. The long report, followed by a PDF version, was already seen by the company a very long time ago. They knew what was coming. They didn't know what to do. All the writing was done only after the bullying. In recent weeks we had to check with pension providers if the company was trying to 'punish' us through pensions. This is still under investigation (the pension provider opened a ticket for this and keeps updating us). This series has not been easy to publish as the company attempted to prevent access to our own E-mails! The company failed at it, so we still have access to evidence that vindicates us. We have some long articles on the way and maybe then some more blog posts (remaining notes, more embarrassing examples). We've meanwhile learned about the impact on the company. It can pretend all it wants that it doesn't care, but it hurts really badly. That's karma. Think before you shoot. Check the law before you leap to conclusions.

In the next part we'll take a look at Carbon Accounting, which is where Sirius claims to be based. As we showed before, not only the company Sirius but also its CEO use their accountants to pretend to have an office. Sirius is a very fake company. It's run by phonies who lie to the staff and to clients. ⬆