“...the most effective way to address this phenomenon is perhaps to name and shame the 'usual suspects'.”In general, there are many mouthpieces out there and the most effective way to address this phenomenon is perhaps to name and shame the 'usual suspects'. Another recent example is the Burton Group, which we have studied carefully for a while. Some of them cross-reference their colleagues and friends who have a similar agenda (parroting is common also). See, for example, Roughly Drafted's writings on the flirts between Rob Enderle and Dan Lyons). Citations of Enderle, for example, have come to an end in most respectable publications and he was rarely worth paying attention to anyway. The embargos on him came because of business affiliation (Microsoft is his client), deception, and deliberate bait. It's quite clear that many of the above (find more here) merely serve as mouthpieces and it's sometimes a case of seeing 3+ parties in just passing their chatter onto 'the other side' or to the journalists. They give an illusion of a peer-reviewing crowd by amassing a presence where one echoes another.
As for the second point, one must know the domain being discussed and sometimes be an active part of it. To explain what Linux and ODF are all about, journalists are advised to spend some time with them and learn the fundamental differences w.r.t. things that they used to know. There are many journalists who tip their toes in Linux for a few days and then publish their finds in places with wide circulation, essentially spreading myths and wrong assertions. They also fail to understand the profound differences between Free software and Microsoft, which is significantly more profound than the difference between Microsoft and Apple, for instance. ⬆
Comments
Puppesurferen
2008-05-01 15:40:51
Roy Schestowitz
2008-05-01 15:46:42
http://boycottnovell.com/credibility-index/
If we missed someone out, then you can help us a lot by suggesting updates.
twitter
2008-12-03 02:37:03
G. Michaels
2008-12-03 03:46:12
That's very interesting, twitter. These terrible actions being perpetrated against Slashdot are almost as bad as these. Wouldn't you agree?
Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.