WE wrote about the personal contributions from Steve Ballmer and Bill Gates to politicians only about a fortnight ago. This leaves a lot of room for political corruption, which comes in the form of favours or bribes. Nepotism and favouritism are to blame. On many occasions we also explained the degree of political manipulation in the Yahoo! saga. Microsoft just has too much control over the government, and it shows.
In Jerry Yang's last stand he not only discovered but also pretty much confessed that Microsoft had ruined his planned deal with Google (Susan Decker was involved too). Microsoft virtually runs the country -- at least in its area or scope -- because it invariantly shoots down all sorts of peripheral deals which it does not like, as we showed many times before [1, 2, 3].
What a change. Back in the late 1990s, when Microsoft was busy fending off hordes of government antitrust lawyers, the company took a remarkable step: it actually asked Congress to reduce funding for the Justice Department's antitrust division.
Gates, who previously reported a 5.5 percent stake in AutoNation, said on Friday that his Cascade Investment LLC owned 9.4 million shares in AutoNation and that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust holds more than 8.3 million shares.
For example, the summary of Microsoft's meeting with several Gartner analysts in October of 2006 is fascinating, and made more so by Jamin Spitzer, group manager of Worldwide Analyst Relations at Microsoft, who suggests that two objectives of the meeting with Gartner were to create "confidence in the Vista product, OEM/Retail channel, and device/app compatibility," as well as "provide Gartner 'wiggle room'."
[...]
More generally, these emails as well as the others demonstrate that Microsoft does a good job of managing the media, including analysts and reporters. I think it would be too strong to suggest that Microsoft manipulates the media; if anything, the emails reveal a collegial but respectful interaction with the media.
Cronyism at its finest