Quote of the Day: Bradley M. Kuhn (SFLC) on Microsoft
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2008-12-25 19:18:16 UTC
- Modified: 2008-12-28 10:23:01 UTC
Bradley Kuhn, who works at the SFLC, is one of the most senior (and thus respected) people in the Free software world and yesterday he published
this essay, which remarks on Microsoft and "open source".
I thought immediately of Microsoft's presence at OSCON this year and the launch of their campaign to pretend they haven't spent the last ten years trying destroy all of Free Software and Open Source.
[...]
Microsoft is unique among proprietary software companies: they are the only ones who have actively tried to kill Open Source and Free Software. It's not often someone wants to be your friend after trying to kill you for ten years, but such change is cause for suspicion.
He is reminding people
why Microsoft tries to buy the hearts of open source projects. Some of them sold out, but we won't name them here as it would seem confrontational or abrasive.
⬆
Related posts:
"Microsoft representatives generally try to establish a world view sympathetic to their own by talking as if the accepted distinction in the open-source arena is between commercial and non-commercial. That definition is inaccurate and its intent is to damage."
--Mark Taylor
Comments
twitter
2008-12-25 22:16:15
Ask Novell and Xandros, the deals are a sham. Some saw these things earlier than others. Here's RMS's excellent 1992 essay on why software should be free. This is a newer Linux FAQ that addresses the Novell issues directly:
Hubert
2008-12-26 01:35:19
We were talking about you the other day on IRC.
pcolon
2008-12-26 02:04:24
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-26 02:14:30
pcolon
2008-12-26 03:40:27
Every once in a while we get together and discuss basics; What was the reason for becoming FOSS advocates, and therefore, not lose sight of what brought us together in the first place.
”If thought can corrupt language, then language can also corrupt thought.” –George Orwell.
This is the campaign waged against FOSS today.
twitter
2008-12-26 06:11:08
Here's a nice Christmas present that I overlooked - According to the November (Fall) FSF Bulletin, BadVista.org has declared victory. Business acceptance of the sorry OS is under 6% and badvista.org continues to be in the first page of search results for "Windows Vista." Slime does not sell.
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-26 09:21:21
twitter
2008-12-26 14:59:29
Jose_X
2009-01-02 01:49:58
..the simple ability to recognize an investment. Today we have what we have because of many investments made in the past.
Caution on two items:
1 -- In general, no FOSS app is more important to its own future than is the rest of FOSS. Gaining a little for that app while losing a little (or a lot) for a great many other apps will lead to a net loss for that app after the short-term effects have run their course.
2 -- Short term gains can become costly further on down the line. A war analogy: destroying the plant that makes ammunition in exchange for gaining a town. Wars are won/lost based on key strategic decisions way before most of the battles are fought. Superior position means you can lose and lose and lose battles and eventually win the war. Microsoft surely knows how to play that game of being patient and working for strategic advantage over adversaries. Do not take Microsoft for granted.
Microsoft is more focused today to address and meet the FOSS challenge. The quote "first they ignore you.. then you win" is great but doesn't happen if we diverge from our superior long-term game plan.
Want a FOSS environment that produces a lot more than what we manage today? ..work to eliminate the Microsoft levers. [eg, work to spread Linux against the Windows monopolies http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/25/jose-on-mono/#comment-39977 ]
Think of the app as an individual of a species. Some actions help the app while hurting its species. If this species gets ravaged, the future will be less interesting and less enjoyable for many (for devs and for "end" users).
Jose_X
2009-01-02 01:53:28
Roy Schestowitz
2009-01-02 07:51:49