Tha*k You Too, Joseph
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2008-12-28 15:28:04 UTC
- Modified: 2008-12-28 15:28:04 UTC
"Know what? Fuck it, and fuck you. I’m done."
--jo Shields
Recent Techrights' Posts
- Techrights' Statement on Code of Censorship (CoC) and Kent Overstreet: This Was the Real Purpose of Censorship Agreements All Along
- Bombing people is OK (if you sponsor the key organisations), opposing bombings is not (a CoC in a nutshell)
- [Meme] The Most Liberal Company
- "Insurrection? What insurrection?"
- apple.com Traffic Down Over 7%, Says One Spyware Firm; Apple's Liabilities Increased Over 6% to $308,030,000,000
- Apple is also about 120 billion dollars in debt
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Saturday, November 23, 2024
- IRC logs for Saturday, November 23, 2024
- [Meme] GAFAMfox
- Mozilla Firefox in a state of extreme distress
- Google Can Kill Mozilla Any Time It Wants
- That gives Google far too much power over its rival... There are already many sites that refuse to work with Firefox or explicitly say Firefox isn't supported
- Free (as in Freedom) Software Helps Tackle the Software Liability Issue, It Lets Users Exercise Greater Control Over Programs
- Microsofters have been trying to ban or exclude Free software
- In the US, Patent Laws Are Up for Sale
- This problem is a lot bigger than just patents
- ESET Finds Rootkits, Does Not Explain How They Get Installed, Media Says It Means "Previously Unknown Linux Backdoors" (Useful Distraction From CALEA and CALEA2)
- FUD watch
- Techdirt Loses Its Objectivity in Pursuit of Money
- The more concerning aspects are coverage of GAFAM and Microsoft in particular
- Links 23/11/2024: Press Sold to Vultures, New LLM Blunders
- Links for the day
- Links 23/11/2024: "Relationship with Oneself" and Yretek.com is Back
- Links for the day
- Links 23/11/2024: "Real World" Cracked and UK Online Safety Act is Law
- Links for the day
- Links 23/11/2024: Celebrating Proprietary Bluesky (False Choice, Same Issues) and Software Patents Squashed
- Links for the day
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Friday, November 22, 2024
- IRC logs for Friday, November 22, 2024
- Gemini Links 23/11/2024: 150 Day Streak in Duolingo and ICBMs
- Links for the day
- Links 22/11/2024: Dynamic Pricing Practice and Monopoly Abuses
- Links for the day
- Topics We Lacked Time to Cover
- Due to a Microsoft event (an annual malware fest for lobbying and marketing purposes) there was also a lot of Microsoft propaganda
- Microsofters Try to Defund the Free Software Foundation (by Attacking Its Founder This Week) and They Tell People to Instead Give Money to Microsoft Front Groups
- Microsoft people try to outspend their critics and harass them
- [Meme] EPO for the Kids' Future (or Lack of It)
- Patents can last two decades and grow with (or catch up with) the kids
- EPO Education: Workers Resort to Legal Actions (Many Cases) Against the Administration
- At the moment the casualties of EPO corruption include the EPO's own staff
- Gemini Links 22/11/2024: ChromeOS, Search Engines, Regular Expressions
- Links for the day
- This Month is the 11th Month of This Year With Mass Layoffs at Microsoft (So Far It's Happening Every Month This Year, More Announced Hours Ago)
- Now they even admit it
- Links 22/11/2024: Software Patents Squashed, Russia Starts Using ICBMs
- Links for the day
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Thursday, November 21, 2024
- IRC logs for Thursday, November 21, 2024
Comments
Diamond Wakizashi
2008-12-28 16:13:05
Shane Coyle
2008-12-28 16:13:51
This all way-too-closely resembles "Fight Club" for me - when we had folks in India being arrested over Novell protests, or whatever that was, I really had to rethink where this was all headed.
I was recently invited to take a look through the archives, and frankly - more often than not - the "peanut gallery" was/is right. I haven't spent nearly enough time here to properly guide the site in the direction I wanted.
Lately, it seems the program is to eradicate all contrary opinion, even those who are armed with facts, and to cajole and antagonize them - accusing them of astroturfing or worse, all the while ignoring their facts until they finally give up and leave, muttering to themselves.
I wanted to take part in intelligent discussions on the Microsoft-Novell deal and it's subtle (yet severe) implications. Guess I'll have to go to slashdot for that... So, just pull my pic from the front page - leave my articles for the archives, although I suppose this comment will not make it through the new censorship policy.
Have a happy New Year to all, I'm going away until after the 5th. After that, perhaps I will stop in to see what y'all have done with the place.
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-28 16:35:09
The Novell deal has always been a controversial one and to expect no backlash here is to also expect no backlash from a site like Groklaw. Because Novell was 'closer' to the community than SCO was prior to the act means that there are some folks who are not sure what to think.
If we were not on target, then we would not have one of the better-known pro-GNU/Linux sites list us among top blogs of 2008.
Josh Bell
2008-12-28 16:37:20
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-28 16:40:01
You've always just heckled this Web site. it's not as though you changed your mind.
Ian
2008-12-28 16:50:27
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-28 17:00:19
They are not pro Microsoft, but by failing to recognise how Microsoft tries to weaken Free software (e.g. by changing the meaning of "open source", demanding payments for patents, etc.) they allow themselves to be led to the point where they actually help Microsoft cause damage. They just don't realise it yet. Remember that EEE comes in 3 phases. The first one is romanticism.
True, and we don't censor comments, despite some readers' suggestions that we do. Groklaw, on the other hand, does censor comments and PJ advised me to do the same here (but I don't, because I'm no Beranger and I'm open to discussion).
There are some characters here who come only to attack readers and messengers. Their intention is to have others agonise and to make things unpleasant for everyone.
AlexH
2008-12-28 17:03:49
But there is so much dross and so many attacks on minorities in the free software community, I do wish that would stop. You can believe that Mono isn't going to eat people's babies without being a Microsoft "shill".
I'm sad to see Shane go. I remember a number of recent converations we've had and I would have liked to see more articles from someone other than Roy. With just Roy reposting stuff, it is a blog which just tries to achieve quantity by reposting anything matching a few keywords. People can use Google Alerts and get the exact same stuff.
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-28 17:18:46
AlexH
2008-12-28 17:35:54
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-28 17:38:14
Well, it's not an article.
AlexH
2008-12-28 18:11:31
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-28 20:18:35
By the way, we've received so much comment spam recently (over 500 a day) and it took too long to check, so I disabled new comments for posts before Xmas. I hope Shane won't mind.
G. Michaels
2008-12-28 23:19:58
Judging from what he just said, I don't think he will. At all.
Is this the point where you start insinuating he might work for Microsoft, invoke glitzy-sounding quotes, call him a shill and a heckler and unleash your attack poodles on him, or does that come later? Funny red text cannot be far behind :)
Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.
Dan O'Brian
2008-12-29 01:01:27
Dan O'Brian
2008-12-29 01:02:37
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-29 01:17:25
As for Shane, he too was attacked by readers who cursed back in the early days. There is no way to run such a site with such a statement and name without a level of friction.
G. Michaels
2008-12-29 01:25:58
Yes well, that's certainly one way to spin it.
I am left wondering though, why he didn't do this through an email or some other sort of private communication instead of a very public statement?
I can almost picture you desperately pulling up the WP admin interface to check the IP address on that post and suddenly realizing your worst fear :)
Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.
twitter
2008-12-29 05:43:16
Novell had people in India arrested, not Boycott Novell, of course. If that really is you Shane, shame on yourself for not paying enough attention to Roy to be able to understand him before condeming him. Roy has made this place a real resource and deserves better than this.
Todd Razuri
2008-12-29 07:22:35
And I don't see how that comment was condemning anything. You and Roy really need to get over yourselves. The credibility of this site is going down the drain fast, along with the traffic I'm sure.
stevetheFLY
2008-12-29 12:26:48
Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-29 14:05:29
No, it's not a fake. Shane and I will discuss it by E-mail.
Just some minor clarifications/corrections:
* There is no moderation policy and we never deleted comments (a few were delayed because they were in the filter).
* The protest in India had nothing to do with us. I didn't even know about until after it had happened.
I understand that running this site comes with a degree of liability, so I can understand why Shane feels this way. If you look at Groklaw's members-only post (in the front page), then you'll see that PJ had similar concerns. She hasn't posted in almost one month.
Shane Coyle
2008-12-29 14:48:05
Liability concerns aside, of which there are many, this post in particular seemed to exemplify how this site has degenerated more into personal attacks and arguments in both directions than substantive discussions on the issues.
Maybe I just desperately need a vacation. See y'all on the 5th (and it is me ).
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-29 14:56:27
twitter
2008-12-29 15:48:49
Have a good time on vacation Shane, I hope it gives you the reset you need to recognize the Slog against BN. When you come back, try hanging out in IRC where the real discussion and back and forth takes place. Hecklers get the boot there and the discusions are sane and friendly without them. You can look at the heckler histories to see that the abuse and nit pick to fact ratio is close to unity and from that you might understand Roy's attitude. The more you read of Roy's material, the better you think of his credibility. A casual observer is easily misled.
The solution to M$ heckling is not to shut down, it's to publish more. The more sites there are, the more costly it is for M$ to spam them all. The defeat of Groklaw and Technocrat free those resources for attacks against Slashdot, Boycott Novell and other sites.
I can respect you not wanting to be involved in this Shane but I don't think Fight Club jokes are funny. That is exactly the image M$ would like to project on Boycott Novell and free software advocates in general. Coverage of free software, the fight against software patents, OOXML and other corruption all point to the main thrust of Roy's work and show that the site is positive reinforcement for the free software community. There's no other site out there collecting as much useful information as Roy does. Why would you want to compare that to Fight Club - a hapless handfull of people beating the crap out of each other on the directions of an insane person? Because one or two professional hecklers say so?
twitter
2008-12-29 15:50:54
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-29 17:18:34
1. I've just been told that PJ might permanently step out of Groklaw.
2. We don't kick hecklers out of IRC. twitter was incorrect where he was suggesting this, but hecklers just don't choose IRC as the medium for heckling.
3. I receive E-mails from very important people whom I can't name. Although they never comment, they agree with what I publish here and commend it.
Here is is message I received half an hour ago. I don't know how you'll interpret it, but take it as it is.
"I read, first with alarm and then with relief, Shane's recent posts on BN. His first post gave the impression that he no longer supports you and that he blames you for the seemingly endless threads which degenerate to insults. In that case, I would consider that an overreaction. It seems to me that someone probably wrote to him to complain, he scanned the archives and made an initial quick assessment that he thought your detractors were factually right on a frequent basis. His quick assessment may even be correct, but I personally haven't kept track of that because it's not important to me to keep any kind of score."
"Overall, I consider that the hecklers sometimes make valid points but those points often do not invalid your overall argument. In those cases, it doesn't hurt to concede their point. More often, they are only trying to convey their opinion and, when you don't agree, they get frustrated and start repeated ad hominem attacks in hopes that some may be impressed by their sheer repetition and that you would lose credibility. They likely justify themselves by thinking that "the opposition is no better." The trouble is that they cheapen their own arguments and they lose credibility themselves. You haven't lowered yourself to their level, but their behaviour does cause a problem because it lowers the level of discourse on the forum.
"I wish I knew the proper responce. I was a bit heartened by Shane's most recent post where he clarifies himself. I hope that, once he meditates on things some more, that he can have some constructive ideas on how to raise the level of discussion in the forum. The answer is not easy because there are some who only want to disrupt the forum and there are some others who have some vested interests and are not receptive to the ideas that Novell and Microsoft are behaving improperly, that contributing to Mono/go-oo is harmful, etc. Perhaps the answer is to continue to take the high road and leave the insults to others. Whatever you decide, I continue to support your effort."
homburg-hansen
2008-12-29 17:34:03
My guess is, they are so utterly unimportant that you'd rather not tell.
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-29 17:39:13
homburg-hansen
2008-12-29 17:43:45
'Very important people' and 'afraid' doesn't go together well, does it?
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-29 17:51:28
Discrediting by exaggeration. Well known troll tactic...
homburg-hansen
2008-12-29 18:15:32
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-29 18:15:59
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-29 18:19:39
Well, I hardly believe you ever read the Web site because you never commented here before.
I also find it curious that many of those who come here with negativity are geographical neighbours of S.u.S.E (Germany).
Ian
2008-12-29 18:39:31
The Eagles knocked the Cowboys out of playoff contention last night too. I don't see how either are relevant.
At any rate, I don't blame her. Groklaw had a focus and did a very good job at reporting on facts and deciphering much of the legal cruft for us layman. With SCO basically a smoldering heap and everything on that topic pretty much wrapped up or being tied off, I'd probably walk away too.
twitter
2008-12-29 20:39:21
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-29 20:44:53
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_(Internet)
"The key difference between a sockpuppet and a regular pseudonym (sometimes termed an "alt" which is short for alternate, as in alternate identity) is the pretense that the puppet is a third party who is not affiliated with the puppeteer."
Chris
2008-12-31 19:49:48
But hey, you just annoyed one of "the regular hecklers" who dared to point out some incorrect claims and even tried to argue with you based on facts. No wonder he got totally fed up with that mission impossible. How the hell could he dare? Good job Boy!
Last but not least I had a good laugh when you pointed "twitter" to the sockpuppet definition. I mean, he is pretty much the inventor of sockpuppets. His trolling on slashdot is so notorious that every post about twitter (the service) has more replies talking about twitter (the troll)
See http://slashdot.org/~SockDisclosure/journal/214377 for details.
Will
2009-01-01 16:56:21
C.J.
2009-01-05 23:10:22
I think this site brings up some important points, but I think maybe there's a little "aluminum hat" syndrome going on as well.
I hope Shane's departure has a positive effect on the blog, but I have a feeling we're in for more of the same...
Roy Schestowitz
2009-01-05 23:16:43
Show me where I was rude to people who only come here to heckle endlessly. If I am doubtful about people who get their wage from Microsoft, who is to blame?
G. Michaels
2009-01-06 00:11:53
Have you noticed you have an unfortunate tendency to invariably respond to people with the wrong questions?
Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.