Bonum Certa Men Certa

LINUX.COM Managed by Apple’s MacOS Users, Open Source Managed and Covered by People Who Reject Open Source

Swapnil Zemlin



Summary: The narratives are being hijacked; people who we're supposed to assume speak for Linux and for Open Source support neither of these things; they're only in it for the money

IT wouldn't be the first time we note this; openwashing is a fast-moving, rapidly-growing problem. Nobody seems to want to tackle it. The media seems to even cheer for it, to egg on the culprits. GitHub, for example, is proprietary software that takes Torvalds' Free/libre project and 'entraps'/'booby traps' it, adding lock-in to it (proprietary extensions). Does the media ever mention that? No, not really. Does the Linux Foundation realise that this is proprietary software that has nothing to do with Linux? Nope. Even though Microsoft owns and controls it the Foundation is happy and very much eager to promote it. Never mind the fact that Microsoft pays the Foundation through GitHub (don't call it a bribe! That's impolite!)...



"Never mind the fact that Microsoft pays the Foundation through GitHub (don't call it a bribe! That's impolite!)..."Yesterday we saw the Foundation linking to this article about proprietary software that has nothing to do with Linux. Sadly it has become quite 'normal'... the sole editor of LINUX.COM continues pushing proprietary software in a site called after "Linux". In his personal site he's pushing Apple stuff (proprietary software for a proprietary platform). Here's an example from less than a day ago. These jokesters who work for the Foundation don't care about Linux. All they care about is money.

Incidentally, there's this new article, "The Software is Now Open Source or It Is Not" (what a strange title; "you are tall or you are not tall"). This article starts by saying "[p]roprietary software providers" lose grip, then mentions GitHub as if it's a substitute to these even though Microsoft hijacked and corrupted it. And it's part of the problem, not the solution. GitHub also encourages proprietary software; it is itself proprietary. Those "[p]roprietary software providers" are not embracing FOSS but hijacking it to push their proprietary software under the guise of "open"; this gross openwashing is basically the abduction of their resistance or competition to diffuse and confuse. Does it work? Certainly. Look what disruption Microsoft's takeover of GitHub has already caused. From the article:

Proprietary software providers like IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP, and Blackboard have dominated the technology scene for years. Not anymore.

Publicly accessible open-source has transformed how software is developed and delivered in the last two decades. It is getting increasingly popular, with 30 million developers exchanging code and ideas and collaborating at GitHub.

[...]

Another one of Google’s most successful open-source projects in recent years is machine learning (ML) library TensorFlow. Its widespread use has created a large, engaged community, resulting in contributions from many independent developers.

With thousands of developers contributing, Google and other tech giants such as Microsoft, IBM, Intel and Facebook — none of which are open-source companies — benefit from the free developer input and direct user feedback. This allows organizations to build better software faster.


Notice how they're openwashing some of the most hostile companies -- those that put back doors in everything and keep their 'crown jewels' proprietary. What weakens FOSS isn't a bunch of people who criticise phony companies that claim they're "Open Source" but those who play along with the lie, allowing if not actively facilitating the watering down of the term. Unless we start calling out companies that are openwashing and reject those who do openwashing for these companies (for a profit) "Open Source" will become so meaningless that it's almost synonymous with proprietary software plus a little code on GitHub (the marketing or bait). This is anattack on FOSS that is basically misuse of the term by those looking to portray non-FOSS as "open enough" or "kind of open" or "look! We put some code on Microsoft GitHub, so we're ethical!"

The bottom line is, the Linux Foundation now actively participates in this agenda. Perhaps more so than anyone else. This means that the Foundation too is a big part of the problem. It's a threat to Software Freedom.

Recent Techrights' Posts

GNU/Linux Adoption in Africa, a Passageway Towards Freedom From Neo-Colonialism
Digi(tal)-Colonialism and/or Techolonialism are a thing. Can Africa flee the trap?
 
There's Nothing "Funny" About Attacking Free Speech and Software Freedom
persistent focus on the principal issues is very important
Professor Eben Moglen Explained How Software Patent Threats Had Changed Around 2014 (Alice Case) and What Would Happen Till 2025
clip aged reasonably well
CNN Contributes to Demolition of the Open Web
Reprinted with permission from Ryan Farmer
Eben Moglen on Encryption and Anonymity
The alternate net we need, and how we can build it ourselves
Yet More Microsofters Inside the Board of Mozilla (Which Has Just Outsourced Firefox Development to Microsoft's Proprietary Prison)
Do you want a browser controlled (and spied on) by such a company?
IRC Proceedings: Monday, December 04, 2023
IRC logs for Monday, December 04, 2023
GNU/Linux Now Exceeds 3.6% Market Share on Desktops/Laptops, According to statCounter
things have changed for Windows in China
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news
Links 05/12/2023: Debt Brake in Germany and Layoffs at Condé Nast (Reddit, Wired, Ars Technica and More)
Links for the day
[Meme] Social Control Media Giants Shaping Debates on BSDs and GNU/Linux
listening to random people in Social Control Media
Reddit (Condé Nast), Which Has Another Round of Layoffs This Month, Incited People Against GNU/Linux Users (Divide and Rule, It's 2003 All Over Again!)
Does somebody (perhaps a third party) fan the flames?
Who Will Hold the Open Source Initiative (OSI) Accountable for Taking Bribes From Microsoft and Selling Out to Enable/Endorse Massive Copyright Infringement?
it does Microsoft advocacy
Using Gemini to Moan About Linux and Spread .NET
Toxic, acidic post in Gemini
Web Monopolist, Google, 'Pulls a Microsoft' by Hijacking/Overriding the Name of Competitor and Alternative to the Web
Gulag 'hijacking' 'Gemini'
Links 04/12/2023: Mass Layoffs at Spotify (Debt, Losses, Bubble) Once Again
Links for the day
ChatGPT Hype/Vapourware (and 'Bing') Has Failed, Google Maintains Dominance in Search
a growing mountain of debt and crises
[Meme] Every Real Paralegal Knows This
how copyright law works
Forging IRC Logs and Impersonating Professors: the Lengths to Which Anti-Free Software Militants Would Go
Impersonating people in IRC, too
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, December 03, 2023
IRC logs for Sunday, December 03, 2023
GNU/Linux Popularity Surging, So Why Did MakeUseOf Quit Covering It About 10 Days Ago?
It's particularly sad because some of the best articles about GNU/Linux came from that site, both technical articles and advocacy-centric pieces
Links 04/12/2023: COVID-19 Data Misused Again, Anti-Consumerism Activism
Links for the day
GNOME Foundation is in Reliable Hands (Executive Director)
Growing some good in one's garden
Links 03/12/2023: New 'Hey Hi' (AI) Vapouware and Palantir/NHS Collusion to Spy on Patients Comes Under Legal Challenge
Links for the day
'Confidential Computing'? More Like a Giant Back Door.
CacheWarp AMD CPU Attack Grants Root Access in Linux VMs
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, December 02, 2023
IRC logs for Saturday, December 02, 2023
Links 03/12/2023: CRISPR as Patented Minefield, Lots of Greenwashing Abound
Links for the day