Bonum Certa Men Certa

Why You Should Quit YouTube - Part 7: The 'Creators' as the Enemies of YouTube

Series parts:

  1. New Series: Why People Everywhere Should Quit YouTube
  2. YouTube's New Management: Time's Up, Start Paying and Watch Ads, Don't Use Free Software
  3. Why You Should Quit YouTube - Part 3: Google Exploits Creators, It'll Get Even Worse
  4. Why You Should Quit YouTube - Part 4: Financial Crunch Time
  5. Why You Should Quit YouTube - Part 5: The Real Enemy Has Become Sanity of Users
  6. in the last part
  7. YOU ARE HERE ☞ The 'Creators' as the Enemies of YouTube


Summary: 'Creators' in YouTube are basically serfs and even so-called 'influencers' gradually find out that revenue prospects were at best temporary; on top of this there's a lot of censorship without due process

MOST people who use YouTube are only ever watching material, not contributing any material of their own (except perhaps comments on videos). The reasons for these people to leave YouTube were covered in the last part. Today we focus on people who upload videos, i.e. "creators" and sometimes self-styled 'influencers' (fancier term for marketers).

"Today we focus on people who upload videos, i.e. "creators" and sometimes self-styled 'influencers' (fancier term for marketers)."The main issues are free speech and 'monetisation' or distribution of rewards/awards. Alphabet claims to have over 5 billion dollars a year in YouTube revenue (not the same as actual profit), so where does all this money go?

YouTube has, over the years, promoted various kinds of paid subscriptions to YouTube. These didn't seem to succeed in the business sense, so YouTube keeps trying again and again. Twitter had the same perils (e.g. "Blue") as debt piled up and the company struggled to make actual profits.

It should be noted upfront that users who pay for YouTube will not see any of that money funnelled to actual creators. It all goes to YouTube, the company, i.e. to rich Google/Alphabet shareholders.

"It should be noted upfront that users who pay for YouTube will not see any of that money funnelled to actual creators."We'll come back to monetary issues in just a moment.

One major issue in YouTube is censorship. The rules change all the time (range of "permissible" speech) and sanctions may vary from shadowbanning to demonetisation. In some cases, videos can be forcibly removed (blackmail/coercion is common; remove this, or else!) and entire channels can be suspended if not permanently removed. There's no lack of examples of that. We previously mentioned how 'underfunded' Google does not handle actual appeals and seldom overturns decisions even when mistakes are made (unless there's significant backlash in another platform, such as Twitter). Google or YouTube moreover retroactively applies new speech restrictions to old videos, then issues a strike against them. This means that videos published today may get you banned in the future, even if they were in compliance with the rules at the time they were initially published.

According to what people told us, GNU/Linux content is being demonetised almost immediately. There's also strong evidence and material, based on channels that focus on the theme. Since there's no transparency in moderation (faceless censors who call "misinformation" anything not deemed "advertiser-friendly"), they can always deny that this is happening, in effect gaslighting people whom they're muzzling with impunity.

"According to what people told us, GNU/Linux content is being demonetised almost immediately.""I think I remember a case," one person said in IRC this week, "where a 12 year old kid hated a channel so much [that] he registered a fake company with YouTube's content ID to take down every video; how easy it is to take down videos [sic] than to appeal it because appealing it would do nothing but dox you to the person who took down your video..."

And "what I hate about the content ID system," he added, is that "anyone can make up a fucking company and not prove the legal existence of it... and take down videos. I mean, all it took is a 12 year old kid, who wanted to do mass censorship on YouTube, to do it [...] the lesson here is that counter-claims in YouTube are shit [...] you might as well just hire a lawyer to sue YouTube and the kid [...] and then they'll back down."

Quite a few popular channels were completely destroyed this way. In some cases, the people who ran the channels gave up and stopped producing new material. It just wasn't worth the trouble anymore.

"There are a lot of fake DCMA take-downs and YouTube toes the line," another person told us. "If you are a "creator" on the other hand, tough."

Here are some examples:



"Then there are the complaints that "creators" get basically no money for their YouTube videos regardless of how many viewers the video brings in," the person added. Louis "Rossmann has gone over the numbers several times but never has any text that stands on its own. [Bryan] Lunduke and DT [Derek Taylor/DistroTube] have both complained repeatedly as well. There are nonetheless a lot of economic reasons not to promote YouTube. The people who make videos tend to get nothing or almost nothing. Then, as Lunduke and some others have pointed out, the string "Linux" in the title ensures demonetization at least during the peak where at least a little money might have come in."

"The person points out that advertising does not require JavaScript and malware-laden scripts are so common in advertisements that they are known as malvertisements.""The guys who ran the Swedish site GnuHeter would have been interesting to interview if they still remember anything. They tried to make the site ad-based and it was loaded with ads but the ad company always refused to pay them claiming they were false clicks. Similar to how DT and Lunduke and other have reported demonitizaton of YouTube videos containing the string "Linux". LF [Linux Foundation] should have gotten in and pressured Google about that, that's another thing you can fault LF for."

The person points out that advertising does not require JavaScript and malware-laden scripts are so common in advertisements that they are known as malvertisements. It has afflicted even big name companies, not just dodgy sites. That is because the ads are served by a third party which gets its ads from yet another entity. No part of the chain has accountability.

For more information see:



In short, prospects of being paid for the work become grimmer (more and more over time) and even the ability to keep one's videos (or channel) online rather than offline -- as there are arbitrary reasons to take down whole channels -- should be considered a priori. Google is not a charity and choosing YouTube as a video host is very risky. Over time it puts off users, i.e. channel audiences, and things have further deteriorated this year. As ZedHedTed put it last night, "the fact that the official YouTube app is the worst YouTube experience, the censorship of crypto channels pushing those channels to Odysee, and I heard they recently started putting ads on videos that uploader didn't monetize & then took all the money for themselves."

"It's a trap; you must accept everything that comes later (changes to YouTube policy) or lose all your work."Yes, YouTube started putting ads in videos I uploaded over a decade ago. I didn't allow ads in those. They're howtos for Free software.

As ZedHedTed put it last night, YouTube says something along the lines of, "don't wanna monetize your video? we'll monetize it for you and give you 0% of the cut!"...

Whatever you're consenting to with YouTube today isn't the same agreement that applies to you years down the line. You're forced to accept whatever change they make later (or lose the whole channel). It's a trap; you must accept everything that comes later (changes to YouTube policy) or lose all your work.

What sane person who put up with it, in retrospect?

Recent Techrights' Posts

A Year Ago, Only a Few Weeks After We Countersued the 'Hulk Hogan of UEFI', Our Webhost Came Under Attack
At the end of September 2024 our webhost received several threats
The Register - Kissing the hand that feeds it
hired to manage the publication several people connected to Microsoft, including the new Editor in Chief
Next Step: Find Out Who's Funding the 'Hulk Hogan of UEFI' to SLAPP Us
We now have the 'Hulk Hogan of UEFI' working alongside a strangler of women, who as a Microsoft employee spent time in prison for it
Web Sites That Are Independent Are Also Like Software Projects (Sometimes Literally So)
Roll out your own 'stack'
 
Links 28/09/2025: Moldova Elections, LLM Slop Failing Again to Accomplish Anything
Links for the day
Links 28/09/2025: Slop Does More Harm, Newly Released Epstein Estate Documents
Links for the day
Links 28/09/2025: Fentanylware (TikTok) 'Going Private' (the Dictator's Media Allies) and UK Mirror Lays Off More Journalists
Links for the day
If Only Someone Warned Us About This...
Ubuntu is committing suicide with Rusty code
The Myths of "Linux" and of "Intelligence"
As noted this morning
People Remembered GNU's Birthday (Which Helps Remind People It All Started in 1983, Not 1991)
Have the FSF and GNU earned the respect they deserve?
Slopwatch: Ponzi Schemes Promoted by Media Companies, Linux Journal Turning Its 30-Year Reputation to Dust, and Serial Slopper Brian Fagioli Plagiarising, As Usual
This bubble will end up very badly
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, September 27, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, September 27, 2025
Links 27/09/2025: Squashing Software Patents and When Hospitals Become For-Profit
Links for the day
Gemini Links 27/09/2025: Young Feet and Online Bots
Links for the day
GNU Project Turns 42
In 2033 it'll be 50
Pieter Hintjens on Codes of Misconduct a Decade Ago
original is still online
Links 27/09/2025: Australia Might Ban Microsoft GitHub for Young People, Likely Illegal Executive Order Turns TikTok Into Cheeto Propaganda
Links for the day
Repeating the Lies to Promote a Ponzi Scheme is Not OK Because "Many Other Sites Do This" (Including Slopfarms)
They already work on the next Ponzi scheme
The Register MS (Situation Publishing) is Participating in a Ponzi Scheme
The market in "tech" seems awful when a lot of it sells a fraud and journalism about this market is part of the fraud
Glimmer of Hope: More People Realise and Come to Accept "AI" is Just a Giant, Elaborate Ponzi/Pyramid Scheme That Will Leave Everyone Worse Off (Except the "Top of the Pyramid")
quoting Einhorn and some comments
Mass Layoffs in Starbucks... and Society Loses Nothing of Value
Society might even be better off if Starbucks shuts down entirely
Do Your Job and Demand Your Compensation - But in That Order.
We'll do our best to convince the Judge to award all costs to us (lawyers, barrister, LIP bills etc.) plus judgements against them, for abusive litigation and needless suffering associated with that abuse
Matthew J. Garrett Behaved in a Similar Fashion to 4Chan and Kiwi Farms
Opposites attract? Are they opposites at all?
Drew DeVault Suggests "CoC Enhancement", Starts Trolling Projects in Microsoft GitHub
And it backfires immediately
Like Nazi Germany and Volkswagen
Tell us all about "freedom" when your government runs a Ponzi scheme
Microsoft Sponsored This Man, Microsoft Sponsored His Behaviour (and He Controls Microsoft)
They get what they paid for
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, September 26, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, September 26, 2025
He Talks Too Much, He Says Dumb Things
only British when that suits him
Slopwatch: FUD and Plagiarism (Working Against Linux) Promoted and Rewarded by Google News
Shame on Google News
Reminder: We're Unloading Some Publications to Tux Machines
About 15 years ago I was struggling to keep up with TechDirt
The E-mail Protocol is for Text
bad netiquette
Gemini Links 26/09/2025: Slop in OpenStreetMap and MOPML (My Own Private Markup Language)
Links for the day
Links 26/09/2025: More Provocations Against NATO by Russia (Near Alaska, USA), Microsoft Booster Accenture Has Mass Layoffs
Links for the day
Links 26/09/2025: Hardware, Security, Health, and Nuclear Armament
Links for the day
Links 26/09/2025: "Digital Fatigue" and Slop Frenzy (Hype) Ruining Work Productivity, Culture, Languages
Links for the day
Brett Wilson LLP Unwilling to Disclose or Explain How 'Hulk Hogan of UEFI' Pays for His SLAPPs Against Us (He Cannot Afford These), So We Are Escalating
Escalated in the British authorities
What 'Hulk Hogan of UEFI' Could Learn From Jimmy Kimmel About the 'Streisand Effect'
Lawyering up is risky and is usually doesn't work
Linux is Replacing Apple
Apple is money down the drain. Not only are the gadgets overpriced; they cost a lot to maintain and keep going over time
"We don't have that kind of relationship with Microsoft. The only public key that every UEFI firmware is guaranteed to have is Microsoft's, and only Microsoft owns the private key."
This is how to sabotage GNU/Linux distros that Microsoft does not control
Slopwatch: linuxconfig.org, linuxsecurity.com, and Google's Promotion of the Worst and Most Prolific Slopfarms
Over in Google News it has been quite chaotic this past day
Gemini Links 26/09/2025: Reading RSS Feeds, ROOPHLOCH 202
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, September 25, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, September 25, 2025