Bonum Certa Men Certa

EPO Isolates Workers, EPO Workers Speak Out About Their Experiences

Treating workers like prisoners on probation.

Klaus Grabinski: We'll be the Wagner private military company (PMC) of patents
The kangaroo court of Klaus Grabinski just needs a bunch of "examiner fodder" now



1984 deskd



1984 desk



1984 desk personal



Summary: Only one in 12 workers of the EPO favours the new system dubbed Bringing Teams Together (BTT), based on an internal survey of sorts

LAST week the EPO's Local Staff Committee of Munich and Brussels (LSCMN) wrote to staff about the misleadingly-named Bringing Teams Together (BTT) initiative; its very own creators or pushers are among its casualties. It was a very dumb idea, maybe a bad idea by design (to drive out the workforce without paying severance). António Campinos and his cronies seem to be "finishing the job" of Benoît Battistelli, who already revoked permanent contracts. So what will be left of the EPO? Scabs and contractors like Serco [1, 2, 3]? How low does this go and what about complying with the European Patent Convention (EPC)? The EPC is intentionally being violated, according to EPO staff [1, 2].



"Thankfully, owing to anonymity and unionisation, staff of the EPO can speak out and strike back."The EPO's management has built a system of corrupt autocracy, adjusting the standards to something one might expect in the underworld. Thankfully, owing to anonymity and unionisation, staff of the EPO can speak out and strike back. Here's the message LSCMN sent to staff last week:

Bringing Teams Together: Your feedback



Dear colleagues,

We would like to thank you for the feedback that you have provided in response to our call for feedback "Has BTT improved your life in the Office?" We received over 100 detailed E-mails. We will make sure that your feedback is passed on to management in anonymized form. Around 8% expressed an overall positive view, 6% were neutral and 86% expressed an overall negative view.

In this paper we provide a list of the issues you reported to us.

We would like to invite the Office to a dedicated meeting on this crucial topic. We already asked for this, in March, in an open letter (still unanswered).

We believe that much could have been done better in regard to BTT and much money could have been saved had management only listened more carefully to staff.

Your Local Staff Committee of Munich and Brussels - LSCMN


Here's what they got based on over 100 workers:

Munich, 28.06.2023 sc23014mp

Your feedback on the Bringing Teams Together (BTT) project



Part 1: Problems

Dear colleagues,

We warmly thank you for the feedback that you have provided in response to our publication of 16 May 2023, “Has BTT improved your life in the Office?”. Among the very quickly received answers (most of them within 1 day) were over 100 detailed E-mails, from a first cohort of respondents, for us to evaluate. We will make sure that your feedback is passed on to management in anonymized form.

Your replies allowed us to produce a fairly detailed picture of the situation from both a qualitative and a quantitative viewpoint: this publication relates to the qualitative viewpoint and a second publication will follow shortly on the quantitative aspects. Around 8% of response expressed an overall positive view, 6% were neutral and 86% expressed an overall negative view.

Hereinbelow is a list of problems (or groups of problems) that we could compile, based on your feedback, starting from those mainly or exclusively related to the Workplaces for a Day, listed in decreasing frequency of occurrence. For some of the secondary issues, solutions are being tested in some units and may be applied more generally, using the principle of best practice. However, for the fundamental issues we believe that there is no other solution than providing significantly more workspace in the buildings for staff, (which is, anyway, abundantly available), in particular by allocating a fixed office to all colleagues working at least 3 days per week in the Office in line with the statements made by VP4 in front of the Administrative Council. We already asked for this, in March, in an open letter.

We will continue to concentrate our efforts in achieving this objective, which would be of benefit for both staff and the Office. We would also like to invite the Office to a dedicated meeting on this crucial topic. We believe that much could have been done better and much money could have been saved had management only listened more carefully to staff. We will, of course, continue to make your voices heard by the management.

[Redacted]




A) Issues mainly related to the Workplaces for a day



Very common issues related to Workplace for a day

1. Disconnection from team members and/or the Office (even feeling not welcome)

2. Daily adjustment of working space (displays, audio, chair, and table)

3. Booking issues (e.g. double-booking, unallowable booking, booked but not used, clumsy booking tool, inability to book close to other team members; need to book at least one week/10 days in advance; complicated tool; booking tool not remembering preferred locations; competition in booking with the colleagues; Workplaces for a Day assigned to a team not yet bookable; anonymous booking being allowed; no distinction between “public” Workplaces for a day and those allocated to a unit; need to book a Workplaces for a day while still on leave)

Common issues related to Workplace for a day

4. Colleagues cannot easily be found with Workplaces for a Day, even team members are difficult to find

5. Feeling as “second class” staff

6. Workplaces for a Day are very impersonal – making staff not want to come to the office

7. Not knowing who is occupying neighbouring offices

8. Hygiene issues (comprising cleaning staff arriving too early)

9. Workplaces for a Day being ergonomically inappropriate (e.g., too small, inappropriate chairs)

10. Too few Workplaces for a Day being close to the location of the team

11. Needing to find first the Workplaces for a Day / forgetting where to work on a given day

12. Too few single offices and too many double offices (working with strangers in double rooms, problems during meetings, difficulties in concentrating; OP in examination not possible since they are not public)




Occasional issues related to Workplace for a day

13. Lockers too small or even missing

14. Need to gather personal belongings from and returning them to the lockers

15. Printer issues (how to find them and their ID, far away)

16. Hardware not working (e.g. being unable to connect the laptop, monitors not functioning)

17. Personal items being lost (also in the removal)

18. Sense of insecurity for personal items as offices cannot be locked

19. Stale air in offices for a day

20. Basic office material missing (paper, pen, stapler, etc.)

21. Needing to lock the laptop when leaving the office

22. Some colleagues reported stopping dealing with oppositions (due to the extra stress related to Workplaces for a Day)

23. Negative mutual control on the use of booked Workplaces for a Day

24. Colleagues opening the door of your Workplace for a Day, also without knocking, to check if it is free

25. Fighting for scarce resources

26. No keys being available for the cupboards

Occasional issues related to Workplace for a day and related to a specific location

27. Lack of privacy and worse room quality (Isar rooms)

28. One directorate does not use the booking tool - offices are allocated on a first come first served basis. Some colleagues commented that they are losing 10 minutes each day trying to get an office; anxiety since it might be that no room will be available (ISAR)

29. BT8 rooms worse than rooms in BT 1-4

30. No Workplace for a Day available, but permanently allocated workplaces remain unoccupied (TH)




B) General issues



31. Disillusionment: Some colleagues found BTT initially compelling but have now changed their minds. The alleged objectives of Bringing Teams Together and enhancing team spirit and collaboration have not been met.

32. Poor management communication on BTT

33. Room issues (bad sound isolation, noisy room, too small, double room instead of single one)

34. Health issues, more stress, up to depression, psychological pressure when living and working at home

35. Chaotic planning and implementation of BTT

36. Lack of respect from higher management

37. Loss of efficiency; in general, due to too many changes and too quickly

38. Pigeonholes: unordered, far away, too small, cannot send confidential mail

39. Unfair distribution of offices among the teams

40. Not knowing where the emergency exit is located

41. Degradation of the relation with the line manager

42. Some colleagues have not received a fixed office despite working 4 or even 5 days a week in the Office

43. Perception that costs are being shifted from Office to staff

44. No ViCo rooms for OP in opposition for division members


"Some colleagues reported stopping dealing with oppositions (due to the extra stress related to Workplaces for a Day)" shows the impact on patent quality (and validity or compliance). Maybe the actual goal of all this is to demoralise staff, drive away staff, then claim a lack of "demand" for desks. Heck, maybe they want to outsource the whole thing to some private company, the EU, or even low-cost labour in another country (like Campinos did in Alicante just before he joined the EPO as "President" almost exactly 5 years ago).

Recent Techrights' Posts

Rust People: Drain the Swap, You're Holding It Wrong
Does Rust make sense?
Slopwatch: LinuxSecurity, linuxconfig.org, and Plagiarised Phoronix
Many articles out there are nowadays fake
European Patent Office Illegally Gutting and Outsourcing Its Functions, Acting Like an Above-the-Law Commercial Business (It Won't Stop at Formalities Officers (FOs) and Classification Slop at the EPO)
breaking/violating laws and conventions
Links 19/09/2025: Lobbyist of American GAFAM Becomes Data Protection Commissioner in Europe
Links for the day
The Right to Punch People (Apparently)
At Brett Wilson, Brett's job title is "Head of Crime" and Wilson normalises calls for violence
 
About 700 New Gemini Capsules in 13 Months (or 54 Per Month)
4.8K would represent a 20% increase
Techrights the Name Turns 15
About 6 weeks from now we turn 19
Microsoft is Running Out of Time and Floating Fake Figures, Fake Projects, Fake Narratives, Fake Excuses
Also, a lot of Microsoft's "revenue" claims are circular financing (i.e. Microsoft buying from itself, which means Ponzi-like fraud)
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, September 19, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, September 19, 2025
Gemini Links 20/09/2025: Navigating the Pressures of Modern Life and SpellBinding Accidentally Wrote Another Gemini Server
Links for the day
Links 19/09/2025: Press Freedom Dying in US, Anti-Austerity Strikes in France, and Alan Rusbridger to Leave 'Prospect'
Links for the day
Offloading to the Sister Site
In the interest of not overwhelming readers
Links 19/09/2025: Coffee Club and "SpellBinding is Now Absurdly Fast"
Links for the day
Links 19/09/2025: Media Freedom Ceases to Exist in US, "Consider Dropping Twitter/X"
Links for the day
Gemini Links 19/09/2025: Thinking and Insect Bites
Links for the day
Microsoft E.E.E.: Git Will Now (or Very Soon) Fully Depend on Rust, Which is Controlled by Microsoft
Microsoft now makes Git dependent on Rust, or making Git dependent on GitHub, which is proprietary
Slop or Fake Articles Have Turned Linux Journal From a Pioneering/Trailblazing "Linux" Magazine Into a Nuisance
some sites with former reputation - good reputation - turn into cesspools
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, September 18, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, September 18, 2025
Brett Wilson LLP Seem to Have Had Only One Litigation Client in 2025, He Was Previously Charged, Just Like the Serial Strangler From Microsoft (Whom They Now Represent)
Karma is superstition, regulators are not
Project 2030 to Cover How "Project 2025"-Styled Anti-Media Zealots From America Targeted Techrights and Tux Machines
The common denominator is also their attacks on women
Brett Wilson LLP Failed to Meet Deadlines Set by Judge 7 Months Earlier, Tried to Ruin Our Holiday, Then Had the Audacity to Ask Us for Over 3,000 Pounds for Its Own Lateness
As a matter of principle we will never respond to assassin while we are on holiday
On Claims That After Bluewashing Red Hat Will Increasingly Become an Indian Company
Discussed this week (long and detailed)
Americans Attacking British Sites Only Months After They Leave America
We find it kind of funny if not ironic that this site, originally an American site, got legal harassment only from Americans and only months after it had moved to the UK
Despite Losing Over a Quarter Million Dollars a Year Software in the Public Interest (SPI) Gives Helping Hand to Libreboot
SPI's financial state depends a lot on its public image or its reputation
Slopwatch: Google Helps Plagiarism and Sends Traffic to Ripoff Artists
That Google as a company helps spamfarms is noteworthy
If You Want to Know the Future, Listen to the Free Software Foundation (FSF) and Andy Farnell
We're sure the FSF will have plenty of its own output
Links 18/09/2025: A Taliban Ban on Internet Access and Troubled US Job Market
Links for the day
Gemini Links 18/09/2025: Computer Literacy and Accessing Alhena's Database
Links for the day
Links 18/09/2025: US War on Media (Truth Banned, Cancel Culture by the Hard Right), NYT Chief Executive Warns Cheeto is Deploying ‘Anti-press Playbook'
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, September 17, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, September 17, 2025