08.03.19

Patent Trolls’ Paradise: The EPO is a Rubber-Stamping Machine, So Why Not Automatically Generate Patent Applications?

Posted in Europe, Patents at 11:32 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

The more patents, the merrier, right? A Busy Beaver of a patent office…

Tianjin/EPO's so-called 'production'
Tianjin. So-called ‘production’ that ends up in flames due to poor regulation and misgovernment (stockpiling).

Summary: Running a patent office where quality does not really matter is “great” business; one can set up a script to generate billions of patents a day and grant them on the same day as well; but the EPO’s sick obsession with so-called ‘production’ seems to have attracted automated application and the EPO isn’t sure how to cope with the associated publicity

THERE’S a real problem in our hands when Europe’s largest patent office, the EPO, sidles with outlaws. Battistelli was a classic outlaw and António Campinos keeps defending him (see Haar). Moreover, he promotes illegal patents and meets patent trolls, whose business model is akin to extortion. Just before the weekend the EPO posted this tweet about Licensing Executives Society International (LESI). The managers of the EPO are working closely together with a front group of patent trolls. It’s a collaboration. They have joint events.

“The managers of the EPO are working closely together with a front group of patent trolls. It’s a collaboration.”Around the same time/day the EPO was promoting software patents agenda under the guise of "blockchain" (events with patent trolls on the panel) by retweeing this nonsense about the EPO: “Combining forces with Dr. Nigel Clarke, Head of Patent Information Research for @EPOorg , the @Derwent team hosted a webinar focused on blockchain fundamentals—information every IP professional should know. Download the key webinar takeaways…”

Well, it’s widely known that webinars are just ads. We’ve also just seen this new tidbit about an “Advisor on Blockchain Patent Prosecution”. A blockchain patent is a fake patent because those are software patents that are not valid anymore. He can help patent trolls though. They rely on not even going to court, instead settling behind closed doors. These are the actors standing to benefit the most from the EPO’s insane policy and gross deviations from the law.

“They rely on not even going to court, instead settling behind closed doors.”Days ago we saw WIPO and EUIPO mentioned in relation to "hey hi" and patents. Patent maximalists engaged both:

Managing IP speaks to the directors of WIPO and the EUIPO to gauge their views on AI, asking how the technology can help the offices be more efficient and whether job losses are inevitable

This whole “hey hi” nonsense soon thereafter spread further from an EPO-bribed publication, the Financial Times. “Patent agencies challenged to accept AI inventor,” the headline said, followed by another piece that implicated the UKIPO. This particular “hey hi” nonsense (in this case gaming the application process rather than patents on algorithms) cited Francis Gurry:

According to a statement from the University of Surrey, the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) and the European Patent Office (EPO) “have already indicated these applications appear new, inventive and industrially applicable, which are the primary requirements for an invention to receive a patent”.

UKIPO held an event that specifically focused on the issue of AI and inventions created by AI in June. There, speakers clashed over whether AIs should be granted applications for works they have generated.

UK Supreme Court justice Lord David Kitchin said AI holds “profound” potentials and shouldn’t be feared, whereas Francis Gurry, the director general of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), said he sees “no value whatsoever in attributing inventorship rights to a machine”.

Just before the weekend the BBC quoted the EPO’s spokespeople/PR people (5 whole paragraphs about this, but the BBC spikes negative stories about EPO abuses). Leo Kelion (technology desk editor) wrote:

A spokeswoman for the European Patent Office indicated that it would be a complex matter.

“It is a global consensus that an inventor can only be a person who makes a contribution to the invention’s conception in the form of devising an idea or a plan in the mind,” she explained.

“The current state of technological development suggests that, for the foreseeable future, AI is… a tool used by a human inventor.

“Any change… [would] have implications reaching far beyond patent law, ie to authors’ rights under copyright laws, civil liability and data protection.

“The EPO is, of course, aware of discussions in interested circles and the wider public about whether AI could qualify as inventor.”

It does not name the spokeswoman, but it might be Mittermaier. Tech Wire Asia, citing BBC, then wrote:

BBC News also spoke to a spokesperson for the European Patent Office (EPO) about the matter who confirmed that while the body is aware of the issue, the filing will be complicated given current regulations.

“The current state of technological development suggests that, for the foreseeable future, AI is… a tool used by a human inventor.”

The patent system may soon deal with computer-generated stuff, assessed by computer stuff that’s supposed to replace actual examiners but has been proven to be worse than useless. What’s the point of such a system?

World Intellectual Property Review (WIPR) covered this as well:

A team of researchers has now asked the European Patent Office (EPO), US Patent and Trademark Office, and the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) to grant protection to patent applications listing Dabus as the sole inventor of the new technologies.

Ryan Abbott, professor of law and health sciences at the University of Surrey, led the team behind the patent applications.

Speaking to WIPR, Abbott said the move was “unprecedented” and that patent offices had “no rules for handling something like this”.

[...]

In a statement sent to WIPR, the EPO said that it could not comment on pending patent applications.

Commenting more generally on the issue of AI inventorship, however, the EPO said it was the “global consensus that an inventor can only be a person who makes a contribution to the invention’s conception in the form of devising an idea or a plan in the mind”.

The purpose of the patent system, the EPO said, was to incentivise innovation and afford rights to protect an inventor’s work.

“These rights are tailored for natural persons, i.e. humans,” the EPO said.

Has this person (applicant behind the machine) ‘trolled’ the EPO to show the EPO how ridiculous patent quality is becoming? Futurism cited the BBC:

A spokeswoman from the European Patent Office told BBC that it’s hesitant to grant patents to AI because doing so would likely set create unforeseen legal precedents — the office doesn’t take upending existing patent law lightly.

The requirement for a human inventor behind every patent is meant to keep patents in the hands of inventors instead of corporations, per the BBC. But this sort of worker protection wasn’t crafted with the future of AI in mind — the human requirement in the U.K., for example, comes from a patent law written in 1977.

The EPO has been happy to promote “hey hi” as means by which to allow illegal patents on software, but when it’s not about legal loopholes and when the whole credibility of the system is at the stake the EPO is suddenly speechless and puts up resistance?

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2019/08/03/so-called-production/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 21/6/2021: Linux 5.13 RC7, IRC.com by Freenode

    Links for the day



  2. Virtual Injustice -- Part 13: Let the Games Continue…

    "It would be nice to think that the events of 28 May have given the Enlarged Board pause for thought."



  3. Links 20/6/2021: Akademy 2021 Underway and Linux Foundation Blasted

    Links for the day



  4. EPO: Fake Patents, Fake (Paid-for) Patent Coverage, and Fake Awards for Public Relations Purposes

    The media has been thoroughly corrupted, patent legitimacy has been severely damaged (far too many European Patents aren't in compliance with the EPC anymore), and Team UPC is trying to undermine the EPC and turn Europe into another Texas



  5. Changes in IRC and New Features Over Gemini Protocol or the World Wide Web

    We examine more closely some of the latest changes in the site and the capsule (Web and Gemini, respectively); we show that it’s possible to keep abreast of IRC using nothing but a text editor, a Gemini client… or even the command line alone



  6. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, June 19, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, June 19, 2021



  7. We Need and Deserve a Saner Patent System in Europe

    The laughing stock that the patent system, the patent law firms, and patent media became (over the past few years) must be replaced; at the moment we have a cabal connected to a bunch of criminals running the entire show and the public understandably grows impatient (at least people who are sufficiently informed; the criminals have already intimidated and bribed a lot of the media and they're still bribing more of it, as we shall demonstrate later today)



  8. [Meme] IRC Wars in a Nutshell

    In terms of large IRC networks, we’re in trouble (unless we self-host) because they seem to be dividing themselves along political lines rather than anything technical or something of an on-topic/relevant substance. Using networks for Free software projects/organisations to push one’s political agenda is not acceptable because it’s starting to seem like in IRC space, FN has become the Front Nationale (French) and LC is Liberal Coalition. Both FreeNode and Libera Chat have managed to turn from technical platforms into political parties, in effect using technical networks (intended for technical projects) to push someone's political agenda and thus misusing them for personal gain. There’s no free lunch. As it turns out, FreeNode’s new owner (Andrew Lee) has just outed himself as a huge Donald Trump supporter who speaks of “these fuckers who stole that shit” (he meant the election, which he insists Trump actually won in 2020).



  9. IBM Handles More Removals of Signatures From Its Hate Letter Against Richard Stallman

    Less than a day ago IBM processed a request for removal (from its hate letter); as someone put it in a letter to us, also less than a day ago: “When all of this started in 2019, the Red Hat GNU developers showed off their colours. The best way to attack an organisation is from the inside. Using GNU developers was a dead giveaway. Google and Microsoft are very much on the team with IBM. I believe they’ve made headway into the Free/Libre software community and have persuaded senior Debianties to go along with them.” That same message, from an anonymous GNU maintainer, said: “The strategy to target major distributions is clear and present danger. I’m not sure what arguments of persuasion are being used, but I’m pretty sure their main tool is currency. RMS needs a lot of strategic support from experts who will rally to the Free Software cause. He needs great lawyers, some corporate minds, and intelligence specialists.” Sometimes it seems or feels like by simply buying Red Hat (the staff) IBM infiltrated the GNU Project and now it is vainly making claims like 'GNU is IBM' and thus IBM et al can command/tell the FSF who should run FSF, not only GNU. Such entryism isn’t hard to see; “An open letter in support of Richard Matthew Stallman being reinstated by the Free Software Foundation” has meanwhile garnered 6,758 signatures. The opposite letter is only decreasing in support (signatures lost).



  10. Links 20/6/2021: Debian GNU/Linux 10.10 “Buster” Released and LF Revisionism Resumes

    Links for the day



  11. The EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal Has Already Lost the Case in the Court of Public Opinion

    Personal views on the sordid state of the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBoA), which by extension bodes poorly for the perception of independence in every Board of Appeal (BoA); the patent tribunals have been captured by patent maximalists who either stack the panels or intimidate judges into ruling in a particular way



  12. Virtual Injustice -- Part 12: Carl Josefsson – Down But Not Out!

    António Campinos still controls Josefsson, who controls all the judges, so in effect all the legal cases (including some about European software patents) are manipulated by the Office the judges are supposed to judge



  13. Links 19/6/2021: Wine 6.11 and Proton 6.3-5 RC

    Links for the day



  14. IRC Proceedings: Friday, June 18, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, June 18, 2021



  15. Virtual Injustice -- Part 11: Perceptive Comments and Caustic Criticism

    The EPO‘s management managed to silence a lot of the critical media (handouts and threats from Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos), but silencing comments is a lot harder; though we don’t know which ones were moderated out of existence…



  16. Links 18/6/2021: Mir 2.4, ActivityWatch 0.11, Microsoft Breaks Its Own Repos

    Links for the day



  17. [Meme] When the 'Court' Drops

    As the EPO sneakily outsourced courts to American companies and parties in dispute depend on their ISP for “access to justice” there’s a catastrophic impact on the very concept of justice or the right to be heard (sometimes you don’t hear anything and/or cannot be heard)



  18. The EPO's Virtual Injustice and Virtual ('News') Media

    A discussion of this morning's post (part 10 in a series) about the shallow media/blog coverage that followed or accompanied last month's notorious EPO hearing



  19. Links 18/6/2021: LibreOffice 7.2 Beta, Elementary OS 6.0 Beta 2, and Linux Mint 20.2 “Uma” Beta

    Links for the day



  20. The Self-Hosting Song

    Cautionary tales about outsourcing one's systems to companies that could not care less about anyone but themselves



  21. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, June 17, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, June 17, 2021



  22. [Meme] Swedish Justice

    The EPO‘s patent tribunals have been mostly symbolic under the Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos regimes; giving them back their autonomy (and removing those who help Battistelli and Campinos attack their autonomy) is the only way to go now



  23. Virtual Injustice -- Part 10: Vapid and Superficial Coverage in the 'IP' Blogosphere

    The media has come under attack by Benoît Battistelli; during the term of António Campinos most of the media critical of the EPO has mostly vanished already; so one needs to look carefully at comments and social control media



  24. Links 18/6/2021: RasPad 3 and Pushing Rust Into the Linux Kernel

    Links for the day



  25. Heli Pihlajamaa Promoting Software Patents to Patent Maximalists

    "Ms Pyjamas" from the EPO is promoting illegal software patents to a bunch of patent zealots (CIPA)



  26. The Lying by Team UPC, Led Again by Kevin Mooney

    Team UPC, or specifically Mr. Mooney, lies to the public about the prospects of the UPC; similarly, EPO and EU officials keep bringing up false claims about the UPC, so while the UPC itself has likely died for good the lies have not



  27. Links 17/6/2021: Cutelyst 3 and Lenovo Move Towards ThinkPad BIOS Configuration From Within Linux

    Links for the day



  28. Too Much Noise and/or Distraction and General Loss of Focus (on the Real and Urgent Issues, Such as the Ongoing Anti-FSF 'Coup')

    The media is full of Microsoft fluff and technical blog posts still focus on the Freenode fiasco, among other things that don't matter all that much; but we certainly need to talk about steps undertaken to undermine the FSF's power because long-term ramifications may be huge



  29. [Meme] The Enlarged Bored People With Presidential Decrees

    The laughable state of the EPO‘s EBA (or EBoA) is rarely commented on anymore, not even in so-called ‘IP’ blogs; maybe they’re just so eager to see patents on everything, even European software patents, so tyrants who destroy the courts (with UPC lobbying and removal of EBA independence) don’t bother them so much anymore



  30. Response to Misinformation From EPO Officials

    Opponents of European software patents are clearly being mischaracterised by EPO officials, who also use meaningless buzzwords to promote such patents; as an aside or footnote that relates to our ongoing series we’re making this quick video, which is days late


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts