Bonum Certa Men Certa

“One Promises You Heaven and the Other Prepares You for the Grave”

"Pearly Gates and Em-Ballmer
One promises you heaven and the other prepares you for the grave."

--Ray Noorda, Novell



Yesterday we witnessed another new example of Microsoft's strategic play. Its goal is to rob GNU/Linux from its killer applications -- or have the platform neglected and development for it curtailed -- and shift focus to Windows.



The reactions to this were not enthusiastic at all. LXer, for instance, has a nice headline to describe this. It reads: "Microsoft's Plan to Colonise Open Source." It sums it up nicely and we wrote about it several hours ago. We have already identified several people who are silently 'colonising' FOSS and trying to persuade clients, for whom they consult, what licences to choose, what business model to adopt (including policy on software patents), and what platforms to serve.

Penguin Pete takes it further and describes Microsoft's latest invitation as an act of AstroTurfing.

Evidently, a "Senior Marketing Manager" has the responsibility of:

* "assisting in defining and driving core marketing initiatives – most specifically online & offline community-building" * "further the dialogue on the value of the Microsoft platform to open source audiences" * "be a cornerstone for a global thought leadership website and will be regularly featured in industry press around the world" * "act as a visible external evangelist for Microsoft"

Wow! That's all direct quotes from the job description. It is so blatant, I'm beginning to wonder if it's some kind of joke. Particularly the 'evangelist' line.

Kind of like the famous Halloween documents, this posting really tips Microsoft's hand and shows us exactly what they're thinking. After all the smoke and mirrors over the deals with Linux distros Suse, Linspire, Xandross, and Turbo Linux, this shows that those distros were in fact acquired in order to be killed. It's not Linux that Microsoft wants, it's the customers.


A sort of follow-up article comes to accompany Glyn's initial interpretation of the above. It talks about vapourware, but its key point, as summed up by the headline "Microsoft Admits Being Half-Open Doesn't Work," shows just how reluctant Microsoft has been in adopting openness. It just wants to exploit "Open Source". No more, no less.

Telling people what is going on isn't a problem for GNU/Linux, of course, because the entire process is conducted out in the open. If information “changes”, people know about it the second that change becomes apparent – not “later”.


It's all about transparency at the end, but to stray a little off topic here, consider what Microsoft Watch has been saying about Microsoft's latest promises:

Are These Windows Transparent or Translucent?



[...]

Besides myth busting, there is Microsoft's desperate need to get out something positive about Windows. That's not easy with all the negative Web chatter about Vista and the constant nitpicking of Apple "Get a Mac" TV commercials. Silence is golden only when there is no other noise. Given how bad the Vista talk is, perhaps Microsoft executives think that they can get away with talking Seven without causing too much sales harm to the current operating system.

That said, including today's reaffirmation of a ship date—"approximately three years after the general availability of Windows Vista," according to Chris' credited blog—any information risks freezing sales. I see extremes rather than middle ground. Either Microsoft executives see that even limited information disclosure can do little more harm, or they don't care—meaning they've already given up on Windows Vista.


Here is what Joe WIlcox said only yesterday.

1. Windows 7 won't be much different from Windows Vista...

2. There's no new kernel or modular design...

3. The user interface won't radically change....


So, a long, long time before the mythical thing is even released, most/many of the promised features have already been dropped, confirming that by all means we have another case of vapourware in our hands. Does Microsoft expect to earn people's trust when it asks people to port projects to Windows? Which version? Will it be adopted at all? What about the promise of ODF support [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]? Will it hold water? Just a lot of hot steam?

In case you wish to know more about Windows 7, which fellow advocates have already labeled "Windows ME3". then see:



Windows 7 will be a minor update to Vista — with “minor,” here, meaning as less disruptive as possible to users and their applications. Microsoft has said Windows 7 will use the same driver model that Vista did.




Going back on topic (about Microsoft promising the world to FOSS developers) over at USENET, we poke some fun by breaking down this latest job offer from Microsoft. Quoted below are Microsoft's words' (in red), Slated, and 'Ghost in the Machine':




> This bizniz-speak gibberish requires closer scrutiny:

Gotta love it.

> > "You will have the opportunity to help drive the strategy" > > I.e. make decisions.

How does one drive a strategy? Is that like driving an automobile? (And I thought the "paradigm shift" of HP in the mid-90's was bad.)

> > "for customer-driven marketing" > > I.e. feedback

Too much feedback in the wrong phase and the circuit oscillates. ;-)

> > "designed to further the dialogue" > > I.e. marketing > > "on the value of the Microsoft platform" > > I.e. convince them it works

To be fair, Microsoft Windows *does* work; it's just that solutions based on Linux such as Ubuntu and/or OpenOffice tend to work a lot more reliably. ;-)

As someone once put it.... Microsoft *just* works, but Linux just *works*.

> > "to open source audiences. You will work regularly with technical R&D > teams and business strategy owners" > > WTF is a "business strategy owner"? > > Does anyone out their /own/ a business strategy?

One would hope that they can at least explain it. Dunno whether that equates to ownership. ;-)

"Uhh...yeah, we went with Microsoft because they're a respectable vendor who...uh...*whips out English-to-bizspeak dictionary*...facilitates the transference of value from our ... erm, I mean, *to* our customers of our services..."

> > "to define customer requirements" > > Erm, surely it's the /customers/ who "define" their > own requirements, not the vendors.

It's a complicated issue. Part of this is indeed customers defining what they need from a company, but part of it might be a company trying to find customers and markets by convincing them that they need something that they've never needed -- or heard of -- before.

> > "and drive customer-ready evidence" > > LOL! That's a new one. "Customer-ready evidence" ... honest m'lud.

It's an interesting selection of verbiage. Sounds like something along the lines of finding new markets and/or convincing prospects that they really need this new gizmo/software/process.

(Who, me cynical?)

> > "to arm customers" > > BANG! Ra-ta-ta-ta-tat! The Vole just can't suppress its criminal ethos, > can it?

One of the uglier ethical issues is arms suppliers supplying both sides of a conflict. Granted, that wanders a bit from this NG's Charter (not to mention this subthread!).

> > "and partners with the benefits of Microsoft platforms and open source > stacks." > > I.e. fscking kill Linux, by moving all that FOSS "cancer" to Windows. > > "Your work will be a cornerstone for a global thought leadership website" > > OMFG how pompous. "I declare this Website is a cornerstone, yes, a > cornerstone. I lead all thought - none shall think but I. I command thee > to follow my thoughts. Look into my eyes. You are feeling very sleepy".

A cornerstone? What about all the other stones? One of the problems I have with Windows is that I get the feeling they don't build with stones, they build with construction paper -- and if they're lucky, the glue doesn't explode.

> > "and will be regularly featured in industry press around the world." > > Eh ... "*will* be featured" ... "*will*". How the fsck do they know?

Market channel. Microsoft obviously will try to push this conerstone into the faces of the outside-of-Microsoft publicity machine (if not the *owned-by-Microsoft* one). Of course one is reminded a bit of Sysiphus; if they aren't careful it might drop on their heads.

(Might be the best place for it.)

> Again, bloody pompous at best, and probably corrupt (own the news) > at worst.

MSNBC, anyone?

> > "You will also be responsible for ensuring that WW field sales &

Gods...a marketdroid that actually got it *right*! I hate seeing "insured" everywhere, unless one's referring to certain fiduciaries. Give him a point for that...though at this point he's down 10,001 points anyway.

*ahem* Now back to your rant... ;-)

> marketing teams have the right message and content to effectively > communicate value to customers."

"Right message"? *snort* Depends on who defines the notion, methinks.

> > Gah! there's that stupid bloody phrase again. "Communicate value" ... > "deliver value" ... "give value". WTF are these pointy-hairs on about.

Delivering value = "convincing the mark that he's better off going with us than with our strawman evildoer." OK, that's a bit strong, but it's clearly salesmanship.

> Something ... anything only has "value" in terms exchange of ownership > (unless they're referring to /sentimental/ "value", which I sincerely > doubt). What is this "giving value" bollocks. AFAICT what they really > mean is "make a sale".

Correct.

> > "Give value" my ass. >

Microsoft. Where do you want to be led today?

Recent Techrights' Posts

Someone Should Remind Microsoft Lunduke That Microsoft Hires Many Sexual Criminals and Pedophiles as Well
Microsoft Lunduke on an "expedition" to find one or more perverts, then generalise to everyone in the "community"
Cash Machines (ATMs) Make Mistakes and They're Proprietary Software
Correcting mistakes is a colossal challenge
Yes, Microsoft is the Problem
"I am no MS shill."
Another Failed Use Case for Chatbots (LLM): Legal Advice and Analysis
They're just some self-discrediting toy that costs way too much to operate
Nonfree Software in My Bank, by Richard Stallman
Updated 8 hours ago
 
Links 29/07/2025: Data Brokers Gone Wrong/Rogue and "Copyright Thicket"
Links for the day
Slopwatch: Linuxconfig.org, Linuxsecurity.com, Fagioli, The Register
Today's "Slopwatch" isn't the first article about LLM slop
We Cover Topics Other Sites Are Too Afraid to Cover (Even When They Know the Facts)
It's not that they doubt the truth, they just realise there may be consequences for talking about it
They Try to Tell Us the Free Software Foundation Inc is Dying, But Its Revenue Doubled Since the Dot-Com Bubble Burst
Being in "Activism" is never easy; but it does positive things for society
It's About the Cost of Workers, Not the Fictional Skills Shortage (That Does Not Exist, the Media Spreads False and Sometimes Self-Fulfilling Narratives)
This issue isn't limited to computing, some dub it "globalism"
Links 29/07/2025: More Pushbacks Against Slop and More Praises of Tom Lehrer
Links for the day
Gemini Links 29/07/2025: Purple Yarrow and Understanding Op Amps
Links for the day
This Monday WebProNews Absolutely Flooded the Web With Fake (LLM Slop) 'Articles' About "Linux", Google News Promoted Them as Legitimate
All of the following are fake articles attributed to pseudonyms or authors that don't exist; the images are also slop. Why does Google promote these?
Linuxiac is Not a Slopfarm, But at Least Some of Its Articles Are Machine-Generated Fakes
what we said about it was correct
Expect More Microsoft Layoffs
"Are more job cuts coming?"
Microsoft Behaving Like It's Running Out of Money to Pay Salaries
Does that seem like the behaviour expected from a company which claims it is "worth" trillions?
LWN Downtime Due to Linode, Not LLM Bots
"I’ve received an email letting me know that there is a potential for data loss."
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, July 28, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, July 28, 2025
Links 28/07/2025: Science, Health, and Conflicts
Links for the day
Gemini Links 28/07/2025: Healthy Self-Image With Autism and a "New Life"
Links for the day
Links 28/07/2025: COVID-19 Sped up Brain Aging, "Circumvention is More Popular Than Compliance"
Links for the day
Richard Stallman is Usually Right Because He Thinks "Outside the Box"
he is able to observe society (mores and norms) as somewhat of an outsider
LWN Has Been Down for a Long Time, Another Casualty of LLM Bots?
Time will tell. How much time though?
Slopfarms Versus 'Linux' (and Against People Who Write Real Articles About GNU/Linux)
LLM slop in slopfarms by Brian Fagioli and Redazione RHC
Gemini Links 28/07/2025: Bila Yarrudhanggalangdhuray and Running pkgsrc in a FreeBSD Jail
Links for the day
Microsoft Turns News Sites Into Spamfarms
Is the site The Register MS the next IDG?
The Register MS/The Register US
On Saturday I contacted them for a comment (before issuing criticism)
Hacking revelations at Vatican Jubilee of Digital Missionaries
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, July 27, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, July 27, 2025
The Week to Come
Planning ahead
LLM Slop Has Only Been a Boon for Misinformation Online
The very same companies that were supposed to maintain quality (again, not limited to Google with PageRank) are now actively participating in generating and spreading slop
When They Tell You It's Free, Does That Mean No Charges (If So, Who's Paying and Why)?
there's "no free lunch"
We're Going to Focus Less on the Molotov Cocktail-Throwing Microsofters and More on Patents
We can get back to focusing on what we wanted to focus on all along
Just Trying to Keep Web Sites Honest (Journalistic Integrity)
the latest articles in LinuxIac are real
Links 27/07/2025: Political Affairs, Data Breaches, Attacks on Freedom of the Press
Links for the day
Gemini Links 27/07/2025: Hot in Japan and Terminal Escape Codes
Links for the day
Links 27/07/2025: More Microsoft Layoffs Coming, Science and Hardware News
Links for the day
Links 27/07/2025: FSF Hackathon and "Hulk Hogan Was a Very Bad Man"
Links for the day
Gemini Links 27/07/2025: DAW Mixer Chains and Simple Software
Links for the day
The Register MS is Inventing or Giving Air Time to New Conspiracy Theories so as to Distort the Narrative As High-Profile Agencies Fall Prey to Microsoft Holes
But the problem is holes, i.e. Microsoft making bad products; the problem is Microsoft
Most Editors at The Register Are American, Including the Editor in Chief, a Decade-Long Microsoft Stenographer (Writing Prose to Sell Microsoft)
It's not easy to tell where the site is based (we tried) because it's hiding behind ClownFlare and CrimeFlare hasn't been well lately
Pushers of systemd Rewrite History (Richard Stallman Said UNIX "Was Portable and Seemed Fairly Clean")
Unlike systemd
"New Techrights" Soon Turns 2 (A Few Days Before the FSF Turns 40)
We have a lot more to say about LLM bots
When Silence Says So Much
Garrett, a 'secure' boot pusher, will need to defend himself in the UK High Court
The Register in Trouble
There is not much that can be done at this point
Trajectory of The Register: From News Site/s Into "B2B"... and Into Microsoft Salespeople
Something isn't right at The Register
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, July 26, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, July 26, 2025
Misinformation in Social Control Media
Social control media passes around all sorts of tropes
Slopwatch: Fake Linux 'Articles' and Slopfarms With "Linux" in Their Names/Domains
throwing bots at "Linux" to make some fake articles