Photo from the Presidential Press and Information Office
YESTERDAY'S main newspapers (here in the UK) dared to scrutinise what they called "US spying", showing their hypocrisy as the UK is the right-man hand in all this. The UK has several NSA bases/offshoots (at least one in Yorkshire and one in Gloucestershire) which help the US spy on Europe and also spy on Americans (bypassing US law).
"The UK has several NSA bases/offshoots (at least one in Yorkshire and one in Gloucestershire) which help the US spy on Europe and also spy on Americans (bypassing US law)."According to French watchdog La Quadrature du Net [6-9], Europe only pretends to care for citizens' privacy, so it seems like we can depend on no government in the world. Governments loathe citizens' privacy because without surveillance it is harder for a government to defend itself from citizens, who are clearly perceived as an enemy rather than a kind of client.
What we end up having to do is rely on privacy-preserving software, which is mostly Free software like Mozilla Firefox [10] and underlying platforms such as Linux [11]. Never believe that the government will protect your privacy. The only entity that can protect your privacy is yourself, and having Free software that you and others can control in true transparency is essential for guaranteeing privacy. ⬆
Related/contextual items from the news:
American privacy advocates aren't the only ones taking their own government to court over domestic spying programs. On Tuesday, Canadian activists announced they were suing Canada's equivalent of the National Security Agency.
A coalition of Internet and privacy groups represented by the British Columbia Civil Liberties Union filed suit Tuesday against the Communications Security Establishment Canada.
Is the negotiating edge that secret eavesdropping gives the US worth the immense reputational damage it is now suffering?
Glenn Greenwald, the lawyer-turned-journalist-turned-global headline for his reporting on leaked NSA documents, says there is about to be a revolution that will radically change how news organizations cover governments and other big institutions.
The change, he insists, is inevitable because of the pervasiveness of digital content, which has already remade the global economy by allowing instant access to vast troves of information. “Government and businesses cannot function without enormous amounts of data, and many people have to have access to that data,” Greenwald says, adding that it only takes one person with access and an assaulted conscience to leak, no matter what controls are in place.
Information that governments, companies, and associations would rather keep private, especially when it contradicts what they tell the public, can be quickly downloaded and spirited away, as shown by the Edward Snowden National Security Agency files and the diplomatic and military files leaked by Army Private Chelsea Manning.
White House and State Department officials cooperated extensively on background with a New York Times journalist during the period that he broke confidential national security information in a series of leaks that prompted outrage from lawmakers, according to unearthed 2011 and 2012 emails.
Democratic leaders are full-fledged players in the national surveillance state, right along with Republicans.
Few days before a crucial vote on the protection of our privacy, citizens supported by La Quadrature du Net start a campaign and information website: reclaimyourdata.eu. This site clearly shows the issues of this Regulation and proposes solutions to allow citizens to reclaim control over their personal data.
The “Civil Liberties” (LIBE) Committee has just voted its report on Data Protection, led by Jan Philipp Albrecht. Despite some improvements, major loopholes – especially on “legitimate interest” and “pseudonymous” data – and the adoption of the secrete tripartite negotiation mandate (trilogue) could make the final text totally ineffective at protecting citizens. During these forthcoming negotiations, representatives of the Parliament should secure strong safeguards for citizens fundamental right to privacy.
Back in 1993 I was asked to look into how unions were using computer networks and email.
The result was my 1996 book on the labour movement and the internet — and after that, LabourStart.
Twenty years on and I’ve been looking into how we in the trade union movement use the new communications tools — smartphones and tablets — and the result is a new book I’ve just co-authored with Jeremy Green, “Firefox OS for Activists“.
Comments
salparadise
2013-10-26 13:43:16
None of this is a criticism, I think the site's great and it's good to see someone tackling the Corporate/security agency net that we're increasingly ensnared in.
I was just wondering...
Dr. Roy Schestowitz
2013-10-27 08:50:11
http://techrights.org/home/distributions
"Techrights takes the position that if a distribution contains proprietary software, then it cannot be trusted. It can contain back doors (voluntary or involuntary). Therefore, the FSF's list of Free/libre GNU/Linux distributions is worth a look. We do not endorse any particular distribution."