05.22.08
Posted in News Roundup at 11:48 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
GNU/Linux
- Famelix and the dangers of combating Windows
As with any GNU/Linux distribution, exact figures for use are hard to come by for Famelix. However, other users of the distribution include 62 military units, and schools and digital inclusion centers throughout South America. On its home site, the distribution has had more than 22 million downloads — at least 14 million of them in the last 12 months, thanks mainly to the first releases to support German, English, and Italian in addition to the original Spanish and Portugese. By any standard, the distribution seems a success.
- Home media system runs open source Linux
A company called Fiire is shipping a home automation, media control, and security system based on the open source LinuxMCE distro. Built around a dual-core AMD Athlon X2-based box called the Fiire Engine, the Fiire system also includes FiireStation thin clients and a Z-Wave-based FiireChief controller.
- Buntu Family Theater [video]
- PCLinuxOS
- Comparing Linux USB flash disk distros
- CeBIT – Red Hat champions open source market education
- New Enhancements for Red Hat Enterprise Linux
F/OSS
GPUs
Leftovers
Share this post:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Permalink 
Send this to a friend
If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.
Pages that cross-reference this one
What Else is New
Links 24/5/2013: Fedora ‘Pidora’, CIvil Rights Debated in the US
Links for the day
Bill Gates Still Getting Richer Through For-Profit Investments, Now Wants to Brainwash Children in Schools in Favour of His Investments
Some of the latest strategies used by the world's richest man to protect his investments and amass yet more money, adding to an ever-growing wealth while pretending it's a charity
Microsoft Entryism and Its Effects on Corporate and Public Policy
An aspect of Microsoft culture that ought not be overlooked because of its profound effect on society (private and public)
Red Hat Should Follow Google's and Twitter's Footsteps on Patents to Avoid Becoming the Next Novell
Red Hat continues to ignore my plea to defang the software patents it is applying for, potentially making them weaponised like Novell's and Sun's patents (e.g. Java at Oracle) upon buyout or another major event
CAFC Decision Still Overridden by Overzealous Patent Lawyers in the Press, The Guardian and Other Corporate Press (CBS and AFP Included) Still Guard the Establishment
Analysis of a sceptical kind of corporate press coverage regarding software patents in the US; great examples of how Microsoft- and Gates-funded press outlets tend to get it all wrong on the facts, smearing digital freedom fighters
Software Patents Debate Still Open in New Zealand and the US
In spite of distraction attempts, the debate over software patents continues to stress that there is a real danger
WebM is No Ogg, It is Not Freedom-Respecting Anymore, Even in Countries That Have No Software Patents
Why Google needs to fix the licence of VP9, or simply stop pretending that it should be the only de facto standard for multimedia
Microsoft Violates Google Licences
The champion of 'IP' and licensing (extortion) is not much of a champion after all, based on new reports, not just a lot of old ones
Skype Teaches Us That All Microsoft Software Should be Assumed Spyware Unless Proven Otherwise
The broader implications of Microsoft adding spying 'features' to Skype
Links 23/5/2013: Threat to Civil Rights in UK, KDE 4.11 LTS
Links for the day
Links 22/5/2013: Debian GNU/Hurd, New Go Language Release
Links for the day
The FRAND Apple-Microsoft Conspiracy Attempts to Destroy Android/Linux, Ban Imports
How Microsoft and Apple are using patents in bulk (sometimes acquired in unison, e.g. from Novell and Nortel) to artificially lower market saturation of the Android operating system or drive costs up
Gates Foundation: Buying Influence for Bill's Ego and Bill's Profit
New examples of power being acquired and investments (i.e. for profit) being funnelled into the beneficiaries
Bill Gates Enters Financial Centres With His Goons Becoming US Budget Chief, Top Bankers
How Bill Gates' staff is entering positions of financial power, indirectly giving Gates power over US (national and international) finance
IBM Ignores Small Companies' Interests, Denies Patent Scope is a Problem, Focusing on Its Own Problems (Trolls) Instead
How David Kappos and IBM (his longtime employer) continue to ignore the obvious problem which kills small businesses and everyone is complaining about
The New York Times Publishes Factually-Flawed Patent Propaganda Benefiting Microsoft and Apple
Eamonn Fingleton is rewriting history in the US' top newspaper, insinuating that patents contributed to the rise of software duopolists
Software Patents Eligibility Likely to be Decided by SCOTUS
Analyses suggest that an escalation by appeal to SCOTUS is likely to be the next stage in 'Bilski 2.0'
Does Bill Gates Try to Flush GNU/Linux Down the Toilet in Kerala?
Renting Microsoft software rather than using Free (as in freedom, or libre) software?
Links 21/5/2013: Handbrake Turns 0.9.9, NetBSD 6.1
Links for the day
Links 20/5/2013: First Salifish Smartphone, Mageia 3 Released
Links for the day
Microsoft Corruption (Illegal Tenders) Stopped by European Court
Microsoft cannot bypass public tenders, based on a ruling from a court of law in Europe
Not Satire: Microsoft Wants to Show the World How Security is Done
Software security 'standard' to be led by the company which made insecurity an acceptable engineering practice?
Microsoft is Struggling to Maintain Industry 'Standards'
With Microsoft's common carrier and browser share down considerably Microsoft finds itself increasingly irrelevant and it tries subversive means of making another comeback
Microsoft Entryism and Bribery Get the Microsoft Way Implemented
A recollection of very dirty tactics from Microsoft, which uses money to oppress, overthrow, and even hijack its opposition
Patent Policy Laundering in the European Union and New Zealand
How the so-called 'free' trade agreements help spread patent policy which favours software patents
Ongoing Focus on Patent Litigation and Patent Trolls Reduces Focus on Software Patents
The problem with increased focus on the players that use software patents litigiously and the litigation itself
Andrew Y. Schroeder Shows That Patent Lawyers Are Sociopaths
Bully and law misuser is trying to get his way with foul language, intimidation, and sheer lack of professionalism
IBM-backed Book on 'Open Innovation'
OpenForum Europe (OFE), which helps IBM's turf wars in Europe, releases a new book filled with its talking point
Joseph E. Stiglitz Criticises the Patent System
More critical words about the patent system and the way it is harming lives
Senator Schumer Should Focus on Software Patents, Leaving Patent Trolls (Side Effect) Aside
Reform in the USPTO and the US courts should focus on patent scope and not patent holders
LinuxIsFun said,
May 23, 2008 at 2:05 am
http://www.digistan.org
The founders of the Digital Standards Organization, and others, will sign the Hague Declaration on 21 May 2008 in the Hague. The signing ceremony will be held in the Dutch Royal Library.
Any updates on this….???????????????
Roy Schestowitz said,
May 23, 2008 at 2:10 am
Nothing that I’ve come across in the past couple of days. However, some interesting articles crop up about the EU’s reaction to Microsoft’s policy (they don’t say “embrace”) on ODF.
There have also been some interesting E-mails on the ODF Discussion List, such as this one from half an hours ago:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:37 PM, marbux wrote:
> The more interesting part to me was Phipps’ closing:
> “Of course, I might also reflect on the fact they are finally doing
> exactly what Stephe Walli said they ought to do to kill ODF.
This is potentially so huge I can’t even get my mind around it. Why would Microsoft do this? What is in it for them? How will they seek to turn it to their advantage?
Some suggestions as to why:
1) because they are being investigated by the EU for their coercion in getting OOXML passed.
2) because they want to extend, embrace, and extinguish:
http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/12/how_microsoft_s.html
3) because they recognize that they have lost some important ground the format wars, and that governments really do resent being forced to use MOOXML the way that Microsoft forced it on them with proposed ISO 29500.
4) because they succeeded in using dirty procedural tricks to get MOOX approved as an ISO standard, and now they see that they need to get Microsoft reps on standards bodies if they are going to control and ultimately subvert those standards bodies as they did with ISO.
IMHO, we really need to all bookmark Stephen Walli’s blog below, and read it frequently, and maybe even read it aloud to one one another occasionally at meetings, because we are not out of the dark as long as Microsoft has billions to burn to defend its monopoly. I have often heard it said that the rational monopoly will, at some point, be willing to spend the provable future value of the company minus one dollar defending its monopoly status. They owe it to their shareholders to be as vicious as we all know that they have been for decades now.
> If one reads the linked piece from 2005 by former Microsoft exec
> Stephen Walli, > < http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/12/how_microsoft_s.html>,
Let’s all remember what Microsoft did in staking the ISO vote; and how it packed rooms to block out Sun and IBM participation in Spain. We have one an important procedural step, but the competition for open document standards is only just now beginning. Please remember, too, what a Microsoft Exec once said about stacking panels:
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/01/30/evangelism-is-war-memo/
Thanks to Roy Schestowitz for uncovering and posting that revealing “Evangelism is war” presentation by James Plamondon, Technical Evangelist, Microsoft Developer Relations Group, which is linked above.
Expect more procedural tricks from Microsoft. Exercise caution in watching meeting agendas and lists of participants. Here is a cut-and-paste from Roy Schestowitz’s posting of Microsoft Evangelist James Plamondon’s screed on how to stack panels:
**********
I have mentioned before the “stacked panel.” Panel discussions naturally favor alliances of relatively weak partners — our usual opposition. For example, an “unbiased” panel on OLE vs. OpenDoc would contain representatives of the backers of OLE (Microsoft) and the Backers of OpenDoc (Apple, IBM, Novell, WordPerfect, OMG, etc.). Thus, we find ourselves outnumbered in almost every “naturally occurring” panel debate.
A stacked panel, on the other hand, is like a stacked deck: it is packed with people who, on the face of things, should be neutral, but who are in fact strong supporters of our technology. The key to stacking a panel is being able to choose the moderator. Most conference organizers allow the moderator to select die panel, so if you can pick the moderator, you win. Since you can’t expect representatives of our competitors to speak on your behalf, you have to get the moderator to agree to having only “independent ISVs” on the panel. No one from Microsoft or any other formal backer of the competing technologies would be allowed -just ISVs who have to use this stuff in the “real world.” Sounds marvellously independent doesn’t it? In feet, it allows us to stack the panel with ISVs that back our cause. Thus, the “independent” panel ends up telling the audience that our technology beats the others hands down. Get the press to cover this panel, and you’ve got a major win on your hands.
Finding a moderator is key to setting up a stacked panel
************************