EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

11.05.08

OOXML Convenor Might be Shooting the Messenger (Groklaw)

Posted in Microsoft, Open XML, OpenDocument at 7:33 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

The disparity of rules for PAS, Fast-Track and ISO committee generated standards is fast making ISO a laughing stock in IT circles. The days of open standards development are fast disappearing. Instead we are getting “standardization by corporation”, something I have been fighting against for the 20 years I have served on ISO committees.”

Martin Bryan, Former Convenor, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34 WG1

ALEX Brown, a major participant in Microsoft cronyism inside ISO [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22], is not so interested in facts and evidence, such as the simple observation that Microsoft is attempting to grab control ODF [1, 2, 3, 4], having attacked it viciously before.

To make matters worse, smears appear to be making a comeback [1, 2 and they came from Brown’s mouth. He not only denied the obvious but he also dismissed their source, which is typical of Microsoft employees, saying that Groklaw is “unfair”.

However, Alex Brown, the convener of SC34, told ZDNet Asia sister site ZDNet UK at the time that Jones’s post was “chock-full of misinformation and spin”.

When will the posturing end, if ever?

“…Microsoft wished to promote SCO and its pending lawsuit against IBM and the Linux operating system. But Microsoft did not want to be seen as attacking IBM or Linux.”

Larry Goldfarb, investor in SCO

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

11 Comments

  1. Alex Brown said,

    November 6, 2008 at 9:24 am

    Gravatar

    Roy Roy Roy Roy Roy,

    Look – if I wrote (and I would not) “Roy Schestowitz is an idiotic liar”, now *that* would be a personal attack, a “smear”. However, if I wrote “Roy Schestowitz’s blog entry at http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/05/ooxml-convenor-denial/ contains idiotic lies” then that would be an attack on the *content*. Quite different. It also has the merit of being something that any reasonable person can verify for themselves by reading that content.

    Basic rule of enlightened debate: attack the piece (as much as you want), not the person. A rule you very obviously and repeatedly choose to ignore, as here.

    So when I am quoted as saying “Jones’s post was ‘chock-full of misinformation and spin’” that’s fine, and is not (as is inaccurately stated by you) a “smear”, but an attack on the a particular groklaw *post*, which was – yes – a piece of writing that was full of shit.

    - Alex.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 6, 2008 at 9:32 am

    Gravatar

    How is a list of the participants “full of shit”?

    For the uninitiated, here is the post from Groklaw:

    http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080825162905645

  3. Alex Brown said,

    November 6, 2008 at 10:00 am

    Gravatar

    Roy

    Life is too short to correct Groklaw’s multitude of mistakes. However, as a special favour, just this once, let us consider your point about the “list of participants”.

    Groklaw stated:

    “Look at this, will you? It has a list of participants in the July meeting in Japan of the SC 34 committee”

    with a link to http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1055.htm for the word “this”.

    How many mistakes, of fact an analysis, can such a short sentence have? Let’s see shall we.

    First, mistakes of basic fact:

    #1 Groklaw says this was a meeting in Japan. Wrong, it was in London (read the document).

    #2 Groklaw says this was a meeting of SC 34. Wrong, it was a meeting of an “ad hoc group” open to a much wider constituency, and which was was not empowered to make decisions (it was an advisory group who could only advise its convenor – who was me).

    Second, mistakes of analysis:

    #3 Groklaw implies this proves MS controls SC 34. Wrong for two reasons: first this was not a meeting of SC 34. Second MS (and Ecma) have no votes or decision making powers in any meeting under JTC 1. (And no voting took place in any case, since this was an advisory group).

    #4 Groklaw implies MS/Ecma had some kind of untoward interest in this meeting. Errr, the purpose of this meeting was to decide on the maintenance arrangements for OOXML, so Ecma most certainly should have been interested — SC 34 had *invited* them to participate.

    If you just scale this mistake level up to the whole article, you’ll get a very good idea of its overall quality: shit.

    - Alex.

  4. twitter said,

    November 6, 2008 at 10:07 am

    Gravatar

    Enlighten me Alex. You are saying SC 34 does not want to maintain ODF? OOXML is not a laughing stock or byword for corruption?

    If you want to talk about smears, you should be familiar with your company’s other work. Here an example of a typical hit job on Roy in Slashdot. These kinds of people follow his posts on news groups and everywhere else free software advocates go. Here’s a little list of M$ abuse. There’s much more than the few people here have time to document but the spirit of things can be found in M$’s own words Directly and through proxies, M$ is one of the ugliest and most offensive companies in the world.

    Debate tip: get to the point.

  5. twitter said,

    November 6, 2008 at 10:12 am

    Gravatar

    LOL, Alex, SC 34 does not act in M$’s interest. Tell me another one, like why the world needs another document format standard after ISO approved ODF.

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 6, 2008 at 10:20 am

    Gravatar

    #1 Groklaw says this was a meeting in Japan. Wrong, it was in London (read the document).

    True, but this does not make a difference because venue is quite irrelevant to the agenda (that’s almost nitpicking). I can recall this meeting clearly because I initially read about it here.

    #3 Groklaw implies this proves MS controls SC 34. Wrong for two reasons: first this was not a meeting of SC 34. Second MS (and Ecma) have no votes or decision making powers in any meeting under JTC 1. (And no voting took place in any case, since this was an advisory group).

    Semantics and procedural details do not change the simple fact that this panel played a role in the process as a whole. Attending the meeting:

    Adam Farquhar (Ecma)
    Alex Brown (UK)
    Benjamin Henrion (BE)
    Brett Roberts (NZ)
    Dave Welsh (US)
    Doug Mahugh (Ecma)
    Francis Cave (GB)
    Isabelle Valet-Harper (Ecma)
    Istvan Sebestyen (Ecma)
    Jasper Hedegaard Bojsen (DK)
    Jean Paoli (Ecma)
    Jean Stride (GB)
    Jesper Lund Stocholm (DK)
    Jirka Kosek (CZ)
    Keld Simonsen (NO)
    Ken Holman (CA)
    Kimmo Bergius (FI)
    Manu Setälä (FI)
    Michiel Leenaars (NL)
    Murata Makoto (JP)
    Patrick Durusau (US)
    Pia Elleby Lange (DK)
    Rex Jaeschke (Ecma)
    Shahzad Rana (NO)
    Wemba Opota (CI)

    From Rob Weir:

    So a quick tally shows that there will be 25 participants, of which 12 are Ecma TC45 members (as listed) or Microsoft employees (Brett Roberts, Dave Welsh, Jasper Bojsen, Kimmo Bergius, Shahzad Rana and Wemba Opota).

    #4 Groklaw implies MS/Ecma had some kind of untoward interest in this meeting.

    That’s what ECMA is paid for, no? That’s what may define the future of multi-million-dollar products from Microsoft, no? But hey, let’s forget about the money. Microsoft and ECMA do this for the empowerment of society, I’m sure.

    Errr, the purpose of this meeting was to decide on the maintenance arrangements for OOXML, so Ecma most certainly should have been interested — SC 34 had *invited* them to participate.

    Who in SC34? And why? The quote from Martin Bryan speaks volumes. With the recent appointment of Jesper Lund Stocholm, it is clear that ISO is a lost cause. Long live OASIS.

  7. twitter said,

    November 6, 2008 at 10:47 am

    Gravatar

    Alex Brown is not an idiotic liar, but the things he writes are full shit and idiotic lies.

  8. twitter said,

    November 6, 2008 at 10:51 am

    Gravatar

    (08:44:21 AM) twitter: So, is that really Alex Brown or some impostor?
    (08:44:37 AM) schestowitz: It’s him
    (08:44:46 AM) twitter: How do you know?
    (08:44:48 AM) schestowitz: waltz.griffinbrown.co.uk

    I still can’t believe the above is really in charge of an ISO group. Someone must have baggy pants him. unless ISO has really gone down the tube lately.

  9. G. Michaels said,

    November 7, 2008 at 2:52 am

    Gravatar

    @Alex: I can’t really help you with Roy, but you can safely dismiss this ‘twitter’ person, he’s a well-known Slashdot troll and nymshifter that operates dozens of accounts over there, and uses them to disrupt discussions and general crapflooding:

    http://slashdot.org/~SockDisclosure/journal/214377

    ‘twitter’ basically appears to function now as BoycottNovell’s little attack poodle, resorting to kindergarten insults and ad hominems where Roy would rather pretend he’s being civil with people who disagree with him. They use his IRC channel to coordinate all this. Read his posts on this blog to get an idea of the quality he’s brought over from Slashdot. He’s just an unemployed armchair “evangelist” whose main achievements include getting laughed out of the Baton Rouge LUG (and Slashdot of course):

    http://www.brlug.net/pipermail/newbies_brlug.net/2007-April/001636.html

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  10. twitter said,

    November 7, 2008 at 11:33 am

    Gravatar

    Interesting, G. I mocked Alex Brown for calling Roy an idiot and a liar, and you took it as something aimed at yourself. Are you name shifting as you accuse me of the same?

    As Roy has noticed, that’s all you do here, so I’m force to conclude that you are simply part of M$’s regular program of abuse. Yes, that means you are paid by M$ to harass and smear people because M$’s products can’t speak for themselves.

    I’ve explained my reasons for using more than one account on Slashdot before. For those who have not seen it, visit this 2004 journal entry, this one from 2005, the troll zoo. Roy does not approve, I can live with that.

    If the person above really is Alex Brown, it’s safe to dismiss ISO. It’s long been safe to dismiss M$ for any purpose. Roy has done a good job documenting the sad destruction of ISO.

  11. André said,

    November 19, 2008 at 3:05 am

    Gravatar

    Alex is right that your communication style is over the top and you are a quick shooter to make direct personal allegations. He seems to be quite wrong on any other issues:

    #3 Groklaw implies this proves MS controls SC 34. Wrong for two reasons: first this was not a meeting of SC 34. Second MS (and Ecma) have no votes or decision making powers in any meeting under JTC 1. (And no voting took place in any case, since this was an advisory group).

    Our experience shows that it doesn’t matter in which name these persons operate. In no way does formal representation of other bodies restrain participants to directly follow the commercial interests of a particular vendor.

    The assumption that they have “no votes or decision powers in any meeting under JTC1″ is an odd presentation of facts. In particular as the past behaviour has shown that these members do not have any independence in their decision making and expertise. Sure it is not Japan that votes for its wale hunting, it is the national representative of the Bongo Bongo Islands that puts forward a proposal written by… and … says we endorse the Bongo Bongo proposal.

    #4 Groklaw implies MS/Ecma had some kind of untoward interest in this meeting. Errr, the purpose of this meeting was to decide on the maintenance arrangements for OOXML, so Ecma most certainly should have been interested — SC 34 had *invited* them to participate.

    As ECMA is de-facto a commercial proxy with no organisational independence it doesn’t matter. It just means that yet another person of the same vendor participates in the meeting under the ECMA label. This is why many persons advocate to revoke the a-liaision status of ECMA.

What Else is New


  1. EPO Board of Appeal Has an Opportunity to Stop Controversial Patents on Life

    Patent maximalism at the EPO can be pushed aback slightly if the European appeal board decides to curtail CRISPR patents in a matter of days



  2. Links 16/1/2018: More on Barcelona, OSI at 20

    Links for the day



  3. 2018 Will be an Even Worse Year for Software Patents Because the US Supreme Court Shields Alice

    The latest picks (reviewed cases) of the Supreme Court of the United States signal another year with little or no hope for the software patents lobby; PTAB too is expected to endure after a record-breaking year, in which it invalidated a lot of software patents that had been erroneously granted



  4. Patent Trolls (Euphemised as “Public IP Companies”) Are Dying in the United States, But the Trouble Isn't Over

    The demise of various types of patent trolls, including publicly-traded trolls, is good news; but we take stock of the latest developments in order to better assess the remaining threat



  5. EPO Management and Team UPC Carry on Lying About Unified Patent Court, Sinking to New Lows in the Process

    At a loss for words over the loss of the Unitary Patent, Team UPC and Team Battistelli now blatantly lie and even get together with professional liars such as Watchtroll



  6. China Tightens Its Knot of Restrictive Rules and Patents

    Overzealous patent aggressors and patent trolls in China, in addition to an explosion in low-quality patents, may simply discourage companies from doing production/manufacturing there



  7. Microsoft's Patent Racket Has Just Been Broadened to Threaten GNU/Linux Users Who Don't Pay Microsoft 'Rents'

    Microsoft revisits its aggressive patent strategy which it failed to properly implement 12 years ago with Novell; it wants to 'collect' a patent tax on GNU/Linux and it uses patent trolls to make that easier



  8. EPO Scandals Played a Considerable Role in Sinking the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

    Today's press coverage about the UPC reinforces the idea that the EPO saga, culminating in despicable attacks on Patrick Corcoran (a judge), may doom the UPC once and for all (unless one believes Team UPC)



  9. J Nicholas Gross Thinks Professors Stop Being Professors If They're Not Patent Extremists Like Him

    The below-the-belt tactics of patent trolls and their allies show no signs of abatement and their tone reveals growing irritation and frustration (inability to sue and extort companies as easily as they used to)



  10. The US Supreme Court Has Just Denied Another Chance to Deal With a Case Similar to Alice (Potentially Impacting § 101)

    There is no sign that software patents will be rendered worthwhile any time in the near future, but proponents of software patents don't give up



  11. Litigation Roundup: Nintendo, TiVo, Apple, Samsung, Huawei, Philips, UMC

    The latest high-profile legal battles, spanning a growing number of nations and increasingly representing a political shift as well



  12. Roundup of Patent News From Canada, South America and Australia

    A few bits and pieces of news from around the world, serving to highlight patent trends in parts of the world where the patent offices haven't much international clout/impact



  13. Links 15/1/2018: Linux 4.15 RC8, Wine 3.0 RC6

    Links for the day



  14. PTAB is Being Demeaned, But Only by the Very Entities One Ought to Expect (Because They Hate Patent Justice/Quality)

    The latest rants/scorn against PTAB -- leaning on cases such as Wi-Fi One v Broadcom or entities like Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, Apple etc. -- are all coming from firms and people who profit from low-quality patents



  15. If Ericsson and Its Patent Trolls (Like Avanci and Unwired Planet) Cannot Make It, the Patent Microcosm Will Perish

    The demise of patent-asserting/patent assertion business models (trolling or enforcement by proxy) may see front groups/media supportive of it diminishing as well; this appears to be happening already



  16. European Patent Office Causes Physical Harm to Employees, Then Fires Them

    Another one (among many) EPO documents about the alarming physical wellbeing of EPO employees and the management’s attitude towards the issue



  17. Battistelli Was Always (Right From the Start and Since Candidacy) All About Money

    “I have always admired creative people, inventors, those who, through their passion and their work, bring about scientific progress or artistic evolution. I was not blessed with such talent myself,” explained the EPO‘s President when pursuing his current job (for which he was barely qualified and probably not eligible because of his political work)



  18. “Under the Intergovernmental EPC System It is Difficult to Speak of a Functional Separation of Powers”

    An illustration of the glaring deficiency that now prevails and cannot be tolerated as long as the goal is to ensure democratic functionality; absence of the role of Separation of Powers (or Rule of Law) at the EPO is evident now that Battistelli not only controls the Council (using EPO budget) but also blatantly attacks the independence of the Boards of Appeal



  19. The Patent Microcosm Thinks It's Wonderful That IP3 is Selling Stupid Patents, Ignores Far More Important News

    IP3, which we've always considered to be nothing but a parasite, does what it does best and those who love stupid patents consider it to be some sort of victory



  20. Automotives, Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things and Industry 4.0 Among the Buzz Terms Used to Bypass Alice and the EPC Nowadays

    In order to make prior art search a lot harder and in order to make software patents look legitimate (even in various courtrooms) the patent microcosm and greedy patent offices embrace buzzwords



  21. Blockchain Becomes the Target Not Only of Financial Institutions With Software Patents But Also Trolls

    Blockchain software, which is growing in importance and has become ubiquitous in various domains other than finance, is perceived as an opportunity for disruption and also patent litigation; CNBC continues to publish puff pieces for Erich Spangenberg (amid stockpiling of such patents)



  22. EPC Foresaw the Administrative Council Overseeing the Patent Office, Jesper Kongstad Made It “Working Together”

    An old open letter from the EPO shows the famous moment when Jesper Kongstad and Battistelli came up with a plan to empower both, rendering the Administrative Council almost subservient to the Office (complete inversion of the desired topology)



  23. 2010: Blaming the Messenger (SUEPO) for Staff Unhappiness at the European Patent Office (EPO)

    Tactics of SUEPO (EPO union) blaming go further back than Battistelli and can be found in the previous administration as well



  24. 2010: Deterioration of Working Conditions (e.g. Office Space) for EPO Staff

    Old EPO proposals which suggested the reduction of office space for EPO staff (among other things) — something which later happened to DG3, following the ‘exile’ to Haar



  25. Budget at the EPO Decided Before Consultation

    An old consultation meeting (GAC) at the EPO coincided with a meeting (MAC) which is perceived as ignoring the actual consultation — something which clearly should not be happening



  26. Less Than Half a Year in the Job, Battistelli Already Disobeys/Disregards Rulings From ILO's Tribunal

    As EPO President, Battistelli shows poor comprehension or lack of respect for the rule of law just months after taking the job



  27. Only Half a Year in the Job, Battistelli Breaks EPO Nomination Rules

    oing back to the dawn of the Battistelli era, irregularities appear very early on



  28. Patent Troll Finjan Manages to Defend a Patent (on Appeal) and the Trolls' Lobby is Loving It

    Blue Coat (now owned by Symantec) has attempted — and failed — to invalidate all of Finjan’s patents using Section 101/Alice; those who are in the business of trolling view that as particularly good news because the judgment came from Timothy Dyk and Todd Hughes (much younger and appointed a few years ago)



  29. Top Rank at USPTO Goes to the Biggest Patent Bully, IBM

    With 2017 figures coming to light (and to the mainstream/corporate media), we scrutinise what has received the most attention and why it's detrimental to the reputation of the US patent system



  30. Dr. Derk Visser's Book About the European Patent Convention (EPC) Explains What Battistelli Has Done

    With quality of European Patents (EPs) and of EPO staff in rapid decline if not a freefall, we look back at the best-selling book from Visser, who warned that the Council/Organisation and the Office would "have other priorities than the role of law" if the Boards don't enjoy true independence (which they no longer do)


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts