EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.06.08

Why is Linux.com Promoting Microsoft/Novell’s Fork of OpenOffice.org?

Posted in Deception, Fork, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Mono, Novell, OpenOffice at 10:13 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Microsoft must be pleased with Novell’s disruption

Background

For Microsoft to provoke or to cause infighting is not something new [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. As the father of MINIX put it at the time (just a couple of years ago):

“A couple of years ago this guy called Ken Brown wrote a book saying that Linus stole Linux from me… It later came out that Microsoft had paid him to do this…”

Andrew S Tanenbaum

As Microsoft’s top secret presentation reveals:

“Gathering intelligence on enemy activities is critical to the success of the Slog. We need to know who their allies are and what differences exist between them and their allies (there are always sources of tension between allies), so that we can find ways to split ‘em apart. Reading the trade press, lurking on newsgroups, attending conferences, and (above all) talking to ISVs is essential to gathering this intelligence.”

The emphasis in red is ours. This is from Microsoft’s own mouth (in obligatory training seminars).

Promoting by Demotion

We turn our attention to Novell’s fork [1, 2, 3, 4] of a Sun Microsystems crown jewel, OpenOffice.org. It’s bad enough that Novell does this to incorporate Java-hostile, Microsoft-serving technologies like Mono into its fork, but the press that accompanies this merely ridicules OpenOffice.org, thus helping Novell and Microsoft.

Discs and fork
Go-OO: a fork is sometimes a pitchfork

Worth taking a glance at is this new Linux.com article about Go-OO (we don't trust Linux.com too much). It contains what seems like a promotional pitch. Not so long ago, Linux.com promoted the proprietary SoftMaker by dismissing OpenOffice.org as well.

Go-OO includes enhancements and functions that haven’t been accepted by Sun, and that may never be, because of licensing, business, or other reasons.

Low blow there.

Here is the first comment:

Since it’s Novell behind this move, I wonder if this is really an improvement or an attempt to get mono code integrated into OO.o
If so, no one with a functioning brain is wise to touch it. I don’t have much respect for Sun, but even less for the games Novell is playing on MS’ behalf.

Here is another comment among very many (they created some sort of a Sun/Novell flamewar):

The go-ooo fork of OpenOffice.org is very much a bleeding edge developers’ version, which has not been through the full QA process run by the OpenOffice.org folks. Reporting go-ooo bugs is a good way of winding up people on the genuine OpenOffice.org support forums :-)

As has been stated above, open-source purists might also worry about go-ooo’s origins in Novell, with their close links to Microsoft (and getting closer every day).

I’m amazed why so many otherwise sane distros continue to ship go-ooo in preference to genuine OpenOffice.org.

“This is a classic Microsoft action. Divide your enemies (not that I’d call Novell an enemy to Microsoft). It divides the community,” says one of our readers. “Microsoft would be happy with something that echoes the Unix wars.”

Instead of OpenOffice.org fighting Microsoft Office, part of what remains here is Novell fighting Sun and OpenOffice.org. In the same vein, it has been said that Novell is now targeting Red Hat instead of Windows.

For what it’s worth, Boycott Novell never intends to aggravate or to divide. It points out areas where the friction exists. It’s companies (i.e. managers) that instruct programmers who do the damage for a paycheck. Why has Novell decided to focus on .NET, for example? They routinely use money and favouritism to hurt Freedom.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

47 Comments

  1. Needs Sunlight said,

    December 6, 2008 at 10:37 am

    Gravatar

    Here is the link to the authentic version of OpenOffice:
    http://www.openoffice.org/

    Free Software & Open Standards are the core of the project.

    Some key points:
    OpenDocument Format support
    WordPerfect legacy format support
    Javascript macros
    Python macros
    no MS-based code

  2. stevetheFLY said,

    December 6, 2008 at 11:17 am

    Gravatar

    …because it isn’t a fork.

    :p

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  3. stevetheFLY said,

    December 6, 2008 at 11:24 am

    Gravatar

    …and by the way, your guys are really nuts, real, living & breathing 100% loonies.

    You really and seriously call a review of Novell’s patched OOo-version – a version that has been part of many distributions, like Debian and Ubuntu for years now – a ‘typical Microsoft action’?!?

    You do know that Novell is one of the main contributors to upstream OOo, together with IBM?

    Either you have been living behind the moon during the last decade, or you are simply trying to ly and deceive your readers – again.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 11:25 am

    Gravatar

    …because it isn’t a fork.

    It is.

  5. stevetheFLY said,

    December 6, 2008 at 11:30 am

    Gravatar

    It isn’t, the code goes upstream

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 11:35 am

    Gravatar

    Novell has turned their downstream build system at OO-Build into a fork of OpenOffice.org into which they are pushing Microsoft’s OOXML support and in which they make improvements to OO.o which aren’t often upstreamed to the main project. In particular, this isolates all improvements that are themselves made by contributors on most Linux platforms that use Novell’s build system, including Debian.

  7. stevetheFLY said,

    December 6, 2008 at 11:37 am

    Gravatar

    Novell has turned their downstream build system at OO-Build into a fork

    Claiming it doesn’t make it less false.

    Everything is upstreamed; if SUN doesn’t allow the code in, it’s not Novell failing to comply with their commitment to upstream everything.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  8. stevetheFLY said,

    December 6, 2008 at 11:44 am

    Gravatar

    BTW, as we now know that Linus Torvalds has been bribed by Micro$oft to steal Linux and put it into the enemies hand, when will we take legal action? When will the Linux community wake up and boycott Linux?

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  9. Needs Sunlight said,

    December 6, 2008 at 2:44 pm

    Gravatar

    No project maintainer is under any obligation to accept patches that are harmful, at cross purposes to the project, or substandard quality. So just because Novell *wants* a project to accept its changes, doesn’t mean that project has to or wants to.

    It’s the same with contracts. There is no obligation, despite what MSFTers go on about, for companies to sign contracts that weaken their position. Code is of the same strategic importance.

    Whining about it has gone on long enough that this appears more MS attacking Sun and OpenOffice.org via Novell than it is about anything else. Beneath it as is the fact that if MS loses the monopoly on office formats, then it loses the monopoly on productivity software and one of the last ties holding Windows on the corporate desktop. As whole countries continue to move to open formats, both Novell and MS will be recognized not only as irrelevant, but as having perpetrated long lasting harm.

    I say it’s good for us and makes Sun look good that they have not taken any crap from Novell. All the good coders, and some of the other staff, left Novell shortly after the MS – Novell patent contract.
    http://www.zdnet.com.au/tag/departure-novell.htm

    Keep up the good work, Roy. You can tell by the name calling that you have been hitting nerves.

  10. G. Michaels said,

    December 6, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    Gravatar

    I would be weary of believing any post here which includes references to comments on other websites that seem to back his arguments. One of his close collaborators and friends is a well-known Slashdot troll that maintains 14 accounts there, and uses them to actively manipulates the submission system to try to get Roy’s website (or stories from it) on the front page.

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  11. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    Gravatar

    Keep your obsessions with “twitter” in Slashdot where cyber-stalking is tolerated.

  12. pcolon said,

    December 6, 2008 at 3:38 pm

    Gravatar

    @G. Michaels. MichaelThere’s nothing in the post or the comments that point to slashdot except yours.

  13. jo Shields said,

    December 6, 2008 at 3:59 pm

    Gravatar

    into which they are pushing Microsoft’s OOXML

    One day, Roy, you might quit lying.

    OOo3, from openoffice.org, has OOXML support. You know this, yet keep pretending it isnt, because it hurts your lies.

    And please, stop citing yourself.

    Cite trustworthy sources. Boycottnovell is fiction, not fact

  14. G. Michaels said,

    December 6, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    Gravatar

    @Roy, by “twitter” you mean the guy whose home page says he’s not “twitter”?

    Besides, I’m not cyber-stalking anyone. I’m just warning your readers about the games played by you and your collaborators.

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  15. Goblin said,

    December 6, 2008 at 5:14 pm

    Gravatar

    Back again Jo?

    For someone who thinks Roy is dishonest and believes Boycott Novell is fiction you certainly spend alot of your time here.

    If you are so keen to bring “truth” to the web, you could start posting on some of the sites on the net that claim Aliens are real and the end of the world will occur when the Hadron Collider gets switched back on. You’d probably do more good, because except for the trolls, I dont see anyone else agreeing with you.

    Just out of interest, do you post on all sites which have a similar opinion to Roy or is it just Roys?

  16. jo Shields said,

    December 6, 2008 at 9:00 pm

    Gravatar

    Just out of interest, do you post on all sites which have a similar opinion to Roy or is it just Roys?

    If you can’t tell the difference between Roy’s crappy little blog and, say, Groklaw, then there’s very little anyone can do for you.

    No, I don’t have any specific objection to any sites which hold views counter to my own. I don’t even mind sites which are categorically, provably, full of lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie.

    However, when I’m personally lied about, then I take offense. Prior to that, I read BN for the same reason I read Dilbert – for a good laugh.

    Roy started things when he decided to libel me. I decided to stick around for a while, then decided there was no point – then thought “sod it, it’s more fun than watching things compile”.

    I don’t have people on forums I frequent charge in talking about aliens or 9/11 or whatever – I *DO* see them quoting the equally disreputable and untrustworthy BN.

  17. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 9:02 pm

    Gravatar

    You don’t tolerate opposing views, do you?

  18. jo Shields said,

    December 6, 2008 at 9:07 pm

    Gravatar

    You don’t tolerate opposing views, do you?

    Pot calling kettle black doesn’t even come close to covering the irony of this little snippet.

    Of course I tolerate them. I encourage them. I’ve had fruitful and enlightening discussions with people in assorted places, on many of the topics you cover.

    I don’t tolerate using LIES TO PROMOTE THOSE VIEWS. That’s the argument, that’s always been the argument. You can successfully campaign against all the technologies you object to without lying, without demagogy, without name-calling, without childishness. Groklaw can do it, you can’t.

  19. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 9:23 pm

    Gravatar

    I don’t delete comments. I do encourage discussion and if assertions I made about you are not correct, then I apologise.

  20. BBlackmoor said,

    December 7, 2008 at 1:34 am

    Gravatar

    Personally, I do not really care if Novell is a villain or not. Forking OpenOffice.org as they have (yes, they have: get a clue) is simply a bad idea.

    Boycott Novell? Maybe.

    Boycott the go-OO fork of OpenOffice.org? Definitely.

  21. jo Shields said,

    December 7, 2008 at 6:39 am

    Gravatar

    Have you ever thought to ask “why do distributions all use go-oo”?

  22. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 6:50 am

    Gravatar

    It would be better if they didn’t.

  23. RyanT said,

    December 7, 2008 at 7:00 am

    Gravatar

    @ Jo

    The point is idealogical reasons and presumed intent, not technological merit.

    I will say for the first quote Roy that I don’t really see why it’s a low blow. It’s perfectly ordinary and true of any project.

  24. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 7:31 am

    Gravatar

    What I was thinking when I wrote this was QA. There are some reasons for prudence when it comes to selective patching and pacing of development.

    On the other hand, Go-OO does some commendable things.

  25. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 8:39 am

    Gravatar

    Needs Sunlight: The article you link to only mentions 1 or 2 engineers leaving Novell, how is that equivalent to your claim of “All the good coders, and some of the other staff, left Novell shortly after the MS – Novell patent contract” unless your assertion is that Jeremy Allison was the only good coder?

    I find that highly unlikely to be the case.

    Also, the reason some of Go-OO’s patches haven’t been accepted upstream is due to licenses. For example, Go-OO’s Solver is GPL and Sun rejected it because they want the ability to relicense it for use in the proprietary StarOffice. I do not recall ever reading that Sun rejected any Go-OO patches over code quality.

  26. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 8:49 am

    Gravatar

    Also, as has been noted already – but just to reiterate – upstream OOo has OOXML import support already (which is all Go-OO’s version had as well).

    For a list of the improvements that Go-OO 2.x had over OOo 2.x, see here:

    http://go-oo.org/discover/#docx-support

  27. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 8:49 am

    Gravatar

    Needs Sunlight: The article you link to only mentions 1 or 2 engineers leaving Novell…

    Not all departures are loudly announced.

    “When this happened, there was a lot of disillusionment in the market and a lot of Suse developers left on the principle that they wouldn’t work for a company that has these agreements with proprietary vendors,” Weiss says.

    “…a lot of Suse developers left..”

  28. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 8:56 am

    Gravatar

    What does “a lot” mean in this case? It could mean 3 or 4 for all you know.

    Also, the SUSE engineers weren’t the ones working on Go-OO, were they? Probably not, so it’s still irrelevant to the quality of the Go-OO team/patches.

  29. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:00 am

    Gravatar

    What does “a lot” mean in this case? It could mean 3 or 4 for all you know.

    Is that an opinion or fact? Did you know that OpenSUSE’s big evangelist (Ted Haeger) left because of the secrecy around the Novell/Microsoft deal?

    Also, the SUSE engineers weren’t the ones working on Go-OO, were they? Probably not, so it’s still irrelevant to the quality of the Go-OO team/patches.

    We don’t know the answer to do.

  30. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:30 am

    Gravatar

    Roy: the question is, what is “a lot”?

    Ted Haeger is 1 person. Jeremy Allison is 1 person. There was also one other guy from SAMBA team that left. That’s 3 people total that left because of the deal.

    By some definitions, that could be considered a lot, but not by my definition.

    Were there more that left? How many more? Who?

    Unless someone can shine some light on those questions, we can’t really assume that more than those 3 left due to the MS/Novell deal.

    As far as quality of the Go-OO team: the (7 of 12) names I recognize on the Go-OO team roster are high quality developers.

  31. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:35 am

    Gravatar

    Anyhow, that’s getting off-topic unless someone wants to claim that the reason Go-OO patches aren’t making it upstream to OOo is due to code quality (which I don’t think anyone can even argue).

  32. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:37 am

    Gravatar

    Based on what I’ve heard, Sun’s door open but the patches don’t make it through. Novell might not bother.

  33. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:40 am

    Gravatar

    Sun could always get them; it’s not like it doesn’t know where they are.

    What is depressing is that Sun appears to now be following Novell features – witness the recent announcement on UI refresh; when Novell have already been working on XML UI definitions.

    Somebody needs to knock Sun and Novell’s collective heads together.

  34. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:47 am

    Gravatar

    Clearly I need to pay closer attention, I thought the UI refresh was about OOo copying Microsoft Office’s ribbon UI?

  35. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:53 am

    Gravatar

    It’s more to do with “user-customised”. I posted some links about this recently.

  36. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:57 am

    Gravatar

    @Dan: whatever you want to do, you have to remove the UI declarations from the code.

    I doubt they will follow the ribbon, but we’ll see.

    @Roy: it’s about providing a better default UI, not about letting people tweak it more.

  37. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:00 am

    Gravatar

    Project “Renaissance” – Create a New User Interface for OOo

    Our Mission

    “Create a User interface so that OpenOffice.org becomes the users’ choice not only out of need but also out of desire.”

    http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/project_renaissance_kick_off1

  38. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:05 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy: which backs up my statement.

    Translate: create a UI that is functional and desirable.

    It says nothing about customisation.

  39. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:09 am

    Gravatar

    AlexH: ah, thanks.

  40. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:12 am

    Gravatar

    They’ll use collective feedback from users, I reckon.

  41. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:18 am

    Gravatar

    Given they already said that’s what they’re doing, that’s not the most insightful comment I’ve ever read :D

  42. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:25 am

    Gravatar

    Oh, come on, Alex. Scraping bottoms of barrels for cheap heckles?

  43. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:28 am

    Gravatar

    No, it was a joke, hence the smiley.

  44. jo Shields said,

    December 7, 2008 at 11:01 am

    Gravatar

    Somebody needs to knock Sun and Novell’s collective heads together.

    Both have problems.

    The problem with Sun is that they have no community involvement with OOo – decisions as to what to allow are made for opaque Sun business reasons and their bug tracker is an unwelcome place for those outside Sun,

    Distros use go-oo because go-oo is somewhere they can actually cooperate. Building OOo is very hard – and with every distro needing to apply identical tweaks which Sun doesn’t want to (as they don’t benefit Windows or Solaris), go-oo provides the “community” version of OOo which every distro maintainer wants and needs.

    At the same time, nobody doubts that there is some degree of Novell involvement in go-oo – but there’s no active censorship of patches, or convoluted copyright assignment required. In the end, what distros would /like* is a non-profit OOo foundation to look after this stuff – but go-oo is MUCH closer to that ideal than Sun’s ivory tower product

  45. Chris said,

    December 7, 2008 at 5:16 pm

    Gravatar

    Oh Boy, I’m not even going to start to argue with you why a patchset isn’t a fork but I honestly fail to find the bad Mono stuff that this evil “fork” apparently forces on my system.

    Please help me and tell me where it is because “rpm -qa | grep -i mono” returns nothing. But since you always tell the truth and I use version 3.0 of “that evil fork” ™ is has to be there.

    But where?

  46. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 6:23 pm

    Gravatar

    Novell engineers have cast a spell of invisibility on Mono to make it easier to force on unsuspecting users.

    Obviously.

  47. Jo Shields said,

    December 7, 2008 at 6:29 pm

    Gravatar

    Oh Boy, I’m not even going to start to argue with you why a patchset isn’t a fork

    Not even worth your time – Roy’s described the OpenSUSE/SLES kernel patches as a fork, and suggested that no other distro patches its kernel (!)

What Else is New


  1. The Linux Foundation is Not About Linux

    Linux Foundation (LF) objectives/missions do not resemble what the Open Source Development Labs, Inc. (OSDL) was founded to accomplish; this puts at grave threat the very raison d'être of both GNU and Linux



  2. Guest Post: The Linux Foundation Needs to Define “Support”

    Part of an ongoing series of articles we do about the Linux Foundation



  3. Dimitris Xenos on Unconstitutional Supranational Arrangements for Patent Law: Leaving Out the Elected Legislators and the People’s Participatory Rights

    A new paper from a British scholar proves to be timely because of the EPO's violations of the European Patent Convention (EPC) and failed push to force-feed Europe with the unconstitutional Unified Patent Court (UPC)



  4. The Campinos-Battistelli Strategy is Working: Patent Trolls Are Coming to Europe!

    It cannot be any less obvious that today's European Patent Organisation (and Office) works for patent offices and for those who pay these patent offices (law firms) rather than for science, technology and the public (including the European public)



  5. Links 25/3/2019: Linux 5.1 RC2, Nano 4.0, PyPy 7.1

    Links for the day



  6. Links 24/3/2019: Microsoft Does Not Change; Lots of FOSS Leftovers

    Links for the day



  7. Just Published: Irrational Ignorance at the Patent Office

    Iancu and his fellow Trump-appointed "swamp" at the USPTO are urged to consult academics rather than law firms in order to improve patent quality in the United States



  8. Microsoft Paid the Open Source Initiative. Now (a Year Later) Microsoft is in the Board of the Open Source Initiative.

    The progression of Microsoft entryism in FOSS-centric institutions (while buying key "assets" such as GitHub) isn't indicative of FOSS "winning" but of FOSS being infiltrated (to be undermined)



  9. Jim Zemlin's Linux Foundation Still Does Not Care About Linux Desktops

    We are saddened to see that the largest body associated with Linux (the kernel and more) is not really eager to see GNU/Linux success; it's mostly concerned about its bottom line (about $100,000,000 per annum)



  10. Links 23/3/2019: Falkon 3.1.0 and Tails 3.13.1

    Links for the day



  11. The Unified Patent Court is Dead, But Doubts Remain Over the EPO's Appeal Boards' Ability to Rule Independently Against Patents on Nature and Code

    Patents used to cover physical inventions (such as engines); nowadays this just isn't the case anymore and judges who can clarify these questions lack the freedom to think outside the box (and disobey patent maximalists' dogma)



  12. Patent Law Firms Still Desperate to Find New Ways to Resurrect Dead Software Patents in the United States

    There's no rebound and no profound changes that favour software patents; in fact, judging by caselaw, there's nothing even remotely like that



  13. Links 22/3/2019: Libinput 1.13 RC2 and Facebook's Latest Security Scandal

    Links for the day



  14. Why the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK-IPO) Cannot Ignore Judges, Whereas the EPO Can (and Does)

    The European Patent Convention (EPC) ceased to matter, judges' interpretation of it no longer matters either; the EPO exploits this to grant hundreds of thousands of dodgy software patents, then trumpet "growth"



  15. The European Patent Office Needs to Put Lives Before Profits

    Patents that pertain to health have always posed an ethical dilemma; the EPO apparently tackled this dilemma by altogether ignoring the rights and needs of patients (in favour of large corporations that benefit financially from poor people's mortality)



  16. “Criminal Organisation”

    Brazil's ex-President, Temer, is arrested (like other former presidents of Brazil); will the EPO's ex-President Battistelli ever be arrested (now that he lacks diplomatic immunity and hides at CEIPI)?



  17. Links 21/3/2019: Wayland 1.17.0, Samba 4.10.0, OpenShot 2.4.4 and Zorin Beta

    Links for the day



  18. Team UPC (Unitary Patent) is a Headless Chicken

    Team UPC's propaganda about the Unified Patent Court (UPC) has become so ridiculous that the pertinent firms do not wish to be identified



  19. António Campinos Makes Up Claims About Patent Quality, Only to be Rebutted by Examiners, Union (Anyone But the 'Puff Pieces' Industry)

    Battistelli's propagandistic style and self-serving 'studies' carry on; the notion of patent quality has been totally discarded and is nowadays lied about as facts get 'manufactured', then disseminated internally and externally



  20. Links 20/3/2019: Google Announces ‘Stadia’, Tails 3.13

    Links for the day



  21. CEN and CENELEC Agreement With the EPO Shows That It's Definitely the European Commission's 'Department'

    With headlines such as “EPO to collaborate on raising SEP awareness” it is clear to see that the Office lacks impartiality and the European Commission cannot pretend that the EPO is “dafür bin ich nicht zuständig” or “da kenne ich mich nicht aus”



  22. Decisions Made Inside the European Patent Organisation (EPO) Lack Credibility Because Examiners and Judges Lack Independence

    The lawless, merciless, Mafia-like culture left by Battistelli continues to haunt judges and examiners; how can one ever trust the Office (or the Organisation at large) to deliver true justice in adherence or compliance with the EPC?



  23. Team UPC Buries Its Credibility Deeper in the Grave

    The three Frenchmen at the top do not mention the UPC anymore; but those who promote it for a living (because they gambled on leveraging it for litigation galore) aren't giving up and in the process they perpetuate falsehoods



  24. The EPO Has Sadly Taken a Side and It's the Patent Trolls' Side

    Abandoning the whole rationale behind patents, the Office now led for almost a year by António Campinos prioritises neither science nor technology; it's all about granting as many patents (European monopolies) as possible for legal activity (applications, litigation and so on)



  25. Where the USPTO Stands on the Subject of Abstract Software Patents

    Not much is changing as we approach Easter and software patents are still fool's gold in the United States, no matter if they get granted or not



  26. Links 19/3/2019: Jetson/JetBot, Linux 5.0.3, Kodi Foundation Joins The Linux Foundation, and Firefox 66

    Links for the day



  27. Links 18/3/2019: Solus 4, Linux 5.1 RC1, Mesa 18.3.5, OSI Individual Member Election Won by Microsoft

    Links for the day



  28. Microsoft and Its Patent Trolls Continue Their Patent War, Including the War on Linux

    Microsoft is still preying on GNU/Linux using patents, notably software patents; it wants billions of dollars served on a silver platter in spite of claims that it reached a “truce” by joining the Open Invention Network and joining the LOT Network



  29. Director Iancu Generally Viewed as a Lapdog of Patent Trolls

    As Director of the Office, Mr. Iancu, a Trump appointee, not only fails to curb patent trolls; he actively defends them and he lowers barriers in order to better equip them with bogus patents that courts would reject (if the targets of extortion could afford a day in court)



  30. Links 17/3/2019: Google Console and IBM-Red Hat Merger Delay?

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts