EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.06.08

Why is Linux.com Promoting Microsoft/Novell’s Fork of OpenOffice.org?

Posted in Deception, Fork, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Mono, Novell, OpenOffice at 10:13 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Microsoft must be pleased with Novell’s disruption

Background

For Microsoft to provoke or to cause infighting is not something new [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. As the father of MINIX put it at the time (just a couple of years ago):

“A couple of years ago this guy called Ken Brown wrote a book saying that Linus stole Linux from me… It later came out that Microsoft had paid him to do this…”

Andrew S Tanenbaum

As Microsoft’s top secret presentation reveals:

“Gathering intelligence on enemy activities is critical to the success of the Slog. We need to know who their allies are and what differences exist between them and their allies (there are always sources of tension between allies), so that we can find ways to split ‘em apart. Reading the trade press, lurking on newsgroups, attending conferences, and (above all) talking to ISVs is essential to gathering this intelligence.”

The emphasis in red is ours. This is from Microsoft’s own mouth (in obligatory training seminars).

Promoting by Demotion

We turn our attention to Novell’s fork [1, 2, 3, 4] of a Sun Microsystems crown jewel, OpenOffice.org. It’s bad enough that Novell does this to incorporate Java-hostile, Microsoft-serving technologies like Mono into its fork, but the press that accompanies this merely ridicules OpenOffice.org, thus helping Novell and Microsoft.

Discs and fork
Go-OO: a fork is sometimes a pitchfork

Worth taking a glance at is this new Linux.com article about Go-OO (we don't trust Linux.com too much). It contains what seems like a promotional pitch. Not so long ago, Linux.com promoted the proprietary SoftMaker by dismissing OpenOffice.org as well.

Go-OO includes enhancements and functions that haven’t been accepted by Sun, and that may never be, because of licensing, business, or other reasons.

Low blow there.

Here is the first comment:

Since it’s Novell behind this move, I wonder if this is really an improvement or an attempt to get mono code integrated into OO.o
If so, no one with a functioning brain is wise to touch it. I don’t have much respect for Sun, but even less for the games Novell is playing on MS’ behalf.

Here is another comment among very many (they created some sort of a Sun/Novell flamewar):

The go-ooo fork of OpenOffice.org is very much a bleeding edge developers’ version, which has not been through the full QA process run by the OpenOffice.org folks. Reporting go-ooo bugs is a good way of winding up people on the genuine OpenOffice.org support forums :-)

As has been stated above, open-source purists might also worry about go-ooo’s origins in Novell, with their close links to Microsoft (and getting closer every day).

I’m amazed why so many otherwise sane distros continue to ship go-ooo in preference to genuine OpenOffice.org.

“This is a classic Microsoft action. Divide your enemies (not that I’d call Novell an enemy to Microsoft). It divides the community,” says one of our readers. “Microsoft would be happy with something that echoes the Unix wars.”

Instead of OpenOffice.org fighting Microsoft Office, part of what remains here is Novell fighting Sun and OpenOffice.org. In the same vein, it has been said that Novell is now targeting Red Hat instead of Windows.

For what it’s worth, Boycott Novell never intends to aggravate or to divide. It points out areas where the friction exists. It’s companies (i.e. managers) that instruct programmers who do the damage for a paycheck. Why has Novell decided to focus on .NET, for example? They routinely use money and favouritism to hurt Freedom.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

47 Comments

  1. Needs Sunlight said,

    December 6, 2008 at 10:37 am

    Gravatar

    Here is the link to the authentic version of OpenOffice:
    http://www.openoffice.org/

    Free Software & Open Standards are the core of the project.

    Some key points:
    OpenDocument Format support
    WordPerfect legacy format support
    Javascript macros
    Python macros
    no MS-based code

  2. stevetheFLY said,

    December 6, 2008 at 11:17 am

    Gravatar

    …because it isn’t a fork.

    :p

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  3. stevetheFLY said,

    December 6, 2008 at 11:24 am

    Gravatar

    …and by the way, your guys are really nuts, real, living & breathing 100% loonies.

    You really and seriously call a review of Novell’s patched OOo-version – a version that has been part of many distributions, like Debian and Ubuntu for years now – a ‘typical Microsoft action’?!?

    You do know that Novell is one of the main contributors to upstream OOo, together with IBM?

    Either you have been living behind the moon during the last decade, or you are simply trying to ly and deceive your readers – again.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 11:25 am

    Gravatar

    …because it isn’t a fork.

    It is.

  5. stevetheFLY said,

    December 6, 2008 at 11:30 am

    Gravatar

    It isn’t, the code goes upstream

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 11:35 am

    Gravatar

    Novell has turned their downstream build system at OO-Build into a fork of OpenOffice.org into which they are pushing Microsoft’s OOXML support and in which they make improvements to OO.o which aren’t often upstreamed to the main project. In particular, this isolates all improvements that are themselves made by contributors on most Linux platforms that use Novell’s build system, including Debian.

  7. stevetheFLY said,

    December 6, 2008 at 11:37 am

    Gravatar

    Novell has turned their downstream build system at OO-Build into a fork

    Claiming it doesn’t make it less false.

    Everything is upstreamed; if SUN doesn’t allow the code in, it’s not Novell failing to comply with their commitment to upstream everything.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  8. stevetheFLY said,

    December 6, 2008 at 11:44 am

    Gravatar

    BTW, as we now know that Linus Torvalds has been bribed by Micro$oft to steal Linux and put it into the enemies hand, when will we take legal action? When will the Linux community wake up and boycott Linux?

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  9. Needs Sunlight said,

    December 6, 2008 at 2:44 pm

    Gravatar

    No project maintainer is under any obligation to accept patches that are harmful, at cross purposes to the project, or substandard quality. So just because Novell *wants* a project to accept its changes, doesn’t mean that project has to or wants to.

    It’s the same with contracts. There is no obligation, despite what MSFTers go on about, for companies to sign contracts that weaken their position. Code is of the same strategic importance.

    Whining about it has gone on long enough that this appears more MS attacking Sun and OpenOffice.org via Novell than it is about anything else. Beneath it as is the fact that if MS loses the monopoly on office formats, then it loses the monopoly on productivity software and one of the last ties holding Windows on the corporate desktop. As whole countries continue to move to open formats, both Novell and MS will be recognized not only as irrelevant, but as having perpetrated long lasting harm.

    I say it’s good for us and makes Sun look good that they have not taken any crap from Novell. All the good coders, and some of the other staff, left Novell shortly after the MS – Novell patent contract.
    http://www.zdnet.com.au/tag/departure-novell.htm

    Keep up the good work, Roy. You can tell by the name calling that you have been hitting nerves.

  10. G. Michaels said,

    December 6, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    Gravatar

    I would be weary of believing any post here which includes references to comments on other websites that seem to back his arguments. One of his close collaborators and friends is a well-known Slashdot troll that maintains 14 accounts there, and uses them to actively manipulates the submission system to try to get Roy’s website (or stories from it) on the front page.

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  11. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    Gravatar

    Keep your obsessions with “twitter” in Slashdot where cyber-stalking is tolerated.

  12. pcolon said,

    December 6, 2008 at 3:38 pm

    Gravatar

    @G. Michaels. MichaelThere’s nothing in the post or the comments that point to slashdot except yours.

  13. jo Shields said,

    December 6, 2008 at 3:59 pm

    Gravatar

    into which they are pushing Microsoft’s OOXML

    One day, Roy, you might quit lying.

    OOo3, from openoffice.org, has OOXML support. You know this, yet keep pretending it isnt, because it hurts your lies.

    And please, stop citing yourself.

    Cite trustworthy sources. Boycottnovell is fiction, not fact

  14. G. Michaels said,

    December 6, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    Gravatar

    @Roy, by “twitter” you mean the guy whose home page says he’s not “twitter”?

    Besides, I’m not cyber-stalking anyone. I’m just warning your readers about the games played by you and your collaborators.

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  15. Goblin said,

    December 6, 2008 at 5:14 pm

    Gravatar

    Back again Jo?

    For someone who thinks Roy is dishonest and believes Boycott Novell is fiction you certainly spend alot of your time here.

    If you are so keen to bring “truth” to the web, you could start posting on some of the sites on the net that claim Aliens are real and the end of the world will occur when the Hadron Collider gets switched back on. You’d probably do more good, because except for the trolls, I dont see anyone else agreeing with you.

    Just out of interest, do you post on all sites which have a similar opinion to Roy or is it just Roys?

  16. jo Shields said,

    December 6, 2008 at 9:00 pm

    Gravatar

    Just out of interest, do you post on all sites which have a similar opinion to Roy or is it just Roys?

    If you can’t tell the difference between Roy’s crappy little blog and, say, Groklaw, then there’s very little anyone can do for you.

    No, I don’t have any specific objection to any sites which hold views counter to my own. I don’t even mind sites which are categorically, provably, full of lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie after lie.

    However, when I’m personally lied about, then I take offense. Prior to that, I read BN for the same reason I read Dilbert – for a good laugh.

    Roy started things when he decided to libel me. I decided to stick around for a while, then decided there was no point – then thought “sod it, it’s more fun than watching things compile”.

    I don’t have people on forums I frequent charge in talking about aliens or 9/11 or whatever – I *DO* see them quoting the equally disreputable and untrustworthy BN.

  17. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 9:02 pm

    Gravatar

    You don’t tolerate opposing views, do you?

  18. jo Shields said,

    December 6, 2008 at 9:07 pm

    Gravatar

    You don’t tolerate opposing views, do you?

    Pot calling kettle black doesn’t even come close to covering the irony of this little snippet.

    Of course I tolerate them. I encourage them. I’ve had fruitful and enlightening discussions with people in assorted places, on many of the topics you cover.

    I don’t tolerate using LIES TO PROMOTE THOSE VIEWS. That’s the argument, that’s always been the argument. You can successfully campaign against all the technologies you object to without lying, without demagogy, without name-calling, without childishness. Groklaw can do it, you can’t.

  19. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 9:23 pm

    Gravatar

    I don’t delete comments. I do encourage discussion and if assertions I made about you are not correct, then I apologise.

  20. BBlackmoor said,

    December 7, 2008 at 1:34 am

    Gravatar

    Personally, I do not really care if Novell is a villain or not. Forking OpenOffice.org as they have (yes, they have: get a clue) is simply a bad idea.

    Boycott Novell? Maybe.

    Boycott the go-OO fork of OpenOffice.org? Definitely.

  21. jo Shields said,

    December 7, 2008 at 6:39 am

    Gravatar

    Have you ever thought to ask “why do distributions all use go-oo”?

  22. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 6:50 am

    Gravatar

    It would be better if they didn’t.

  23. RyanT said,

    December 7, 2008 at 7:00 am

    Gravatar

    @ Jo

    The point is idealogical reasons and presumed intent, not technological merit.

    I will say for the first quote Roy that I don’t really see why it’s a low blow. It’s perfectly ordinary and true of any project.

  24. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 7:31 am

    Gravatar

    What I was thinking when I wrote this was QA. There are some reasons for prudence when it comes to selective patching and pacing of development.

    On the other hand, Go-OO does some commendable things.

  25. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 8:39 am

    Gravatar

    Needs Sunlight: The article you link to only mentions 1 or 2 engineers leaving Novell, how is that equivalent to your claim of “All the good coders, and some of the other staff, left Novell shortly after the MS – Novell patent contract” unless your assertion is that Jeremy Allison was the only good coder?

    I find that highly unlikely to be the case.

    Also, the reason some of Go-OO’s patches haven’t been accepted upstream is due to licenses. For example, Go-OO’s Solver is GPL and Sun rejected it because they want the ability to relicense it for use in the proprietary StarOffice. I do not recall ever reading that Sun rejected any Go-OO patches over code quality.

  26. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 8:49 am

    Gravatar

    Also, as has been noted already – but just to reiterate – upstream OOo has OOXML import support already (which is all Go-OO’s version had as well).

    For a list of the improvements that Go-OO 2.x had over OOo 2.x, see here:

    http://go-oo.org/discover/#docx-support

  27. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 8:49 am

    Gravatar

    Needs Sunlight: The article you link to only mentions 1 or 2 engineers leaving Novell…

    Not all departures are loudly announced.

    “When this happened, there was a lot of disillusionment in the market and a lot of Suse developers left on the principle that they wouldn’t work for a company that has these agreements with proprietary vendors,” Weiss says.

    “…a lot of Suse developers left..”

  28. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 8:56 am

    Gravatar

    What does “a lot” mean in this case? It could mean 3 or 4 for all you know.

    Also, the SUSE engineers weren’t the ones working on Go-OO, were they? Probably not, so it’s still irrelevant to the quality of the Go-OO team/patches.

  29. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:00 am

    Gravatar

    What does “a lot” mean in this case? It could mean 3 or 4 for all you know.

    Is that an opinion or fact? Did you know that OpenSUSE’s big evangelist (Ted Haeger) left because of the secrecy around the Novell/Microsoft deal?

    Also, the SUSE engineers weren’t the ones working on Go-OO, were they? Probably not, so it’s still irrelevant to the quality of the Go-OO team/patches.

    We don’t know the answer to do.

  30. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:30 am

    Gravatar

    Roy: the question is, what is “a lot”?

    Ted Haeger is 1 person. Jeremy Allison is 1 person. There was also one other guy from SAMBA team that left. That’s 3 people total that left because of the deal.

    By some definitions, that could be considered a lot, but not by my definition.

    Were there more that left? How many more? Who?

    Unless someone can shine some light on those questions, we can’t really assume that more than those 3 left due to the MS/Novell deal.

    As far as quality of the Go-OO team: the (7 of 12) names I recognize on the Go-OO team roster are high quality developers.

  31. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:35 am

    Gravatar

    Anyhow, that’s getting off-topic unless someone wants to claim that the reason Go-OO patches aren’t making it upstream to OOo is due to code quality (which I don’t think anyone can even argue).

  32. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:37 am

    Gravatar

    Based on what I’ve heard, Sun’s door open but the patches don’t make it through. Novell might not bother.

  33. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:40 am

    Gravatar

    Sun could always get them; it’s not like it doesn’t know where they are.

    What is depressing is that Sun appears to now be following Novell features – witness the recent announcement on UI refresh; when Novell have already been working on XML UI definitions.

    Somebody needs to knock Sun and Novell’s collective heads together.

  34. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:47 am

    Gravatar

    Clearly I need to pay closer attention, I thought the UI refresh was about OOo copying Microsoft Office’s ribbon UI?

  35. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:53 am

    Gravatar

    It’s more to do with “user-customised”. I posted some links about this recently.

  36. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:57 am

    Gravatar

    @Dan: whatever you want to do, you have to remove the UI declarations from the code.

    I doubt they will follow the ribbon, but we’ll see.

    @Roy: it’s about providing a better default UI, not about letting people tweak it more.

  37. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:00 am

    Gravatar

    Project “Renaissance” – Create a New User Interface for OOo

    Our Mission

    “Create a User interface so that OpenOffice.org becomes the users’ choice not only out of need but also out of desire.”

    http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/project_renaissance_kick_off1

  38. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:05 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy: which backs up my statement.

    Translate: create a UI that is functional and desirable.

    It says nothing about customisation.

  39. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:09 am

    Gravatar

    AlexH: ah, thanks.

  40. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:12 am

    Gravatar

    They’ll use collective feedback from users, I reckon.

  41. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:18 am

    Gravatar

    Given they already said that’s what they’re doing, that’s not the most insightful comment I’ve ever read :D

  42. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:25 am

    Gravatar

    Oh, come on, Alex. Scraping bottoms of barrels for cheap heckles?

  43. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:28 am

    Gravatar

    No, it was a joke, hence the smiley.

  44. jo Shields said,

    December 7, 2008 at 11:01 am

    Gravatar

    Somebody needs to knock Sun and Novell’s collective heads together.

    Both have problems.

    The problem with Sun is that they have no community involvement with OOo – decisions as to what to allow are made for opaque Sun business reasons and their bug tracker is an unwelcome place for those outside Sun,

    Distros use go-oo because go-oo is somewhere they can actually cooperate. Building OOo is very hard – and with every distro needing to apply identical tweaks which Sun doesn’t want to (as they don’t benefit Windows or Solaris), go-oo provides the “community” version of OOo which every distro maintainer wants and needs.

    At the same time, nobody doubts that there is some degree of Novell involvement in go-oo – but there’s no active censorship of patches, or convoluted copyright assignment required. In the end, what distros would /like* is a non-profit OOo foundation to look after this stuff – but go-oo is MUCH closer to that ideal than Sun’s ivory tower product

  45. Chris said,

    December 7, 2008 at 5:16 pm

    Gravatar

    Oh Boy, I’m not even going to start to argue with you why a patchset isn’t a fork but I honestly fail to find the bad Mono stuff that this evil “fork” apparently forces on my system.

    Please help me and tell me where it is because “rpm -qa | grep -i mono” returns nothing. But since you always tell the truth and I use version 3.0 of “that evil fork” ™ is has to be there.

    But where?

  46. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 6:23 pm

    Gravatar

    Novell engineers have cast a spell of invisibility on Mono to make it easier to force on unsuspecting users.

    Obviously.

  47. Jo Shields said,

    December 7, 2008 at 6:29 pm

    Gravatar

    Oh Boy, I’m not even going to start to argue with you why a patchset isn’t a fork

    Not even worth your time – Roy’s described the OpenSUSE/SLES kernel patches as a fork, and suggested that no other distro patches its kernel (!)

What Else is New


  1. Letter From the Dutch Institute of Patent Attorneys (Nederlandse Orde van Octrooigemachtigden) to the Administrative Council of the EPO

    The Netherlands Institute of Patent Attorneys, a group representing a large number of Dutch patent practitioners, is against Benoît Battistelli and his horrible behaviour at the European Patent Office (EPO)



  2. EPO's Board 28 Notes Battistelli's “Three Current Investigations/Disciplinary Proceedings Involving SUEPO Members in The Hague."

    The attack on SUEPO (EPO staff representatives) at The Hague appears to have been silently expanded to a third person, showing an obvious increase in Battistelli's attacks on truth-tellers



  3. Links 28/9/2016: Alpine Linux 3.4.4, Endless OS 3.0

    Links for the day



  4. Cementing Autocracy: The European Patent Office Against Democracy, Against Media, and Against the Rule of Law

    The European Patent Office (EPO) actively undermines democracy in Europe, it undermines the freedom of the press (by paying it for puff pieces), and it undermines the rule of law by giving one single tyrant total power in Eponia and immunity from outside Eponia (even when he breaks his own rules)



  5. Links 28/9/2016: New Red Hat Offices, Fedora 25 'Frozen'

    Links for the day



  6. Team Battistelli Intensifies the Attack on the Boards of Appeal Again

    The lawless state of the EPO, where the rule of law is basically reducible to Battistelli's ego and insecurities, is again demonstrated with an escalation and perhaps another fake 'trial' in the making (after guilt repeatedly fails to be established)



  7. After the EPO Paid the Financial Times to Produce Propaganda the Newspaper Continues to Produce UPC Puff Pieces, Just Ahead of EU Council Meeting

    How the media, including the Financial Times, has been used (and even paid!) by the EPO in exchange for self-serving (to the EPO) messages and articles



  8. Beware the Patent Law Firms Insinuating That Software Patents Are Back Because of McRO

    By repeatedly claiming (and then generalising) that CAFC accepted a software patent the patent microcosm (meta-industry) hopes to convince us that we should continue to pursue software patents in the US, i.e. pay them a lot more money for something of little/no value



  9. The US Supreme Court Might Soon Tighten Patent Scope in the United States Even Further, the USPTO Produces Patent Maximalism Propaganda

    A struggle brewing between the patent 'industry' (profiting from irrational saturation) and the highest US court, as well as the Government Accountability Office (GAO)



  10. Patent Trolling a Growing Problem in East Asia (Software Patents Also), Whereas in the US the Problem Goes Away Along With Software Patents

    A look at two contrasting stories, one in Asia where patent litigation and hype are on the rise (same in Europe due to the EPO) and another in the US where a lot of patents face growing uncertainty and a high invalidation rate



  11. The EPO's Continued Push for Software Patents, Marginalisation of Appeals (Reassessment), and Deviation From the EPC

    A roundup of new developments at the EPO, where things further exacerbate and patent quality continues its downward spiral



  12. The Battistelli Effect: “We Will be Gradually Forced to File Our Patent Applications Outside the EPO in the Interests of Our Clients”

    While the EPO dusts off old files and grants in haste without quality control (won't be sustainable for more than a couple more years) the applicants are moving away as trust in the EPO erodes rapidly and profoundly



  13. Links 27/9/2016: Lenovo Layoffs, OPNFV Third Software Release

    Links for the day



  14. The Moral Depravity of the European Patent Office Under Battistelli

    The European Patent Office (EPO) comes under heavy criticism from its very own employees, who also seem to recognise that lobbying for the UPC is a very bad idea which discredits the European Patent Organisation



  15. Links 26/9/2016: Linux 4.8 RC8, SuperTux 0.5

    Links for the day



  16. What Insiders Are Saying About the Sad State of the European Patent Office (EPO)

    Anonymous claims made by people who are intimately familiar with the European Patent Office (from the inside) shed light on how bad things have become



  17. The EPO Does Not Want Skilled (and 'Expensive') Staff, Layoffs a Growing Concern

    A somewhat pessimistic look (albeit increasingly realistic look) at the European Patent Office, where unions are under fire for raising legitimate concerns about the direction taken by the management since a largely French team was put in charge



  18. Patents Roundup: Accenture Software Patents, Patent Troll Against Apple, Willful Infringements, and Apple Against a Software Patent

    A quick look at various new articles of interest (about software patents) and what can be deduced from them, especially now that software patents are the primary barrier to Free/Libre Open Source software adoption



  19. Software Patents Propped Up by Patent Law Firms That Are Lying, Further Assisted by Rogue Elements Like David Kappos and Randall Rader (Revolving Doors)

    The sheer dishonesty of the patent microcosm (seeking to bring back software patents by misleading the public) and those who are helping this microcosm change the system from the inside, owing to intimate connections from their dubious days inside government



  20. Links 25/9/2016: Linux 4.7.5, 4.4.22; LXQt 0.11

    Links for the day



  21. Patent Quality and Patent Scope the Unspeakable Taboo at the EPO, as Both Are Guillotined by Benoît Battistelli for the Sake of Money

    The gradual destruction of the European Patent Office (EPO), which was once unanimously regarded as the world's best, by a neo-liberal autocrat from France, Benoît Battistelli



  22. Bristows LLP's Hatred/Disdain of UK/EU Democracy Demonstrated; Says “Not Only Will the Pressure for UK Ratification of the UPC Agreement Continue, But a Decision is Wanted Within Weeks.”

    Without even consulting the British public or the European public (both of whom would be severely harmed by the UPC), the flag bearers of the UPC continue to bamboozle and then pressure politicians, public servants and nontechnical representatives



  23. Released Late on a Friday, EPO Social 'Study' (Battistelli-Commissioned Propaganda) Attempts to Blame Staff for Everything

    The longstanding propaganda campaign (framing staff as happy or framing unhappy staff as a disgruntled minority) is out and the timing of the release is suspicious to say the least



  24. Links 23/9/2016: Latest Microsoft and Lenovo Spin (Now in ‘Damage Control’ Mode)

    Links for the day



  25. White Male-Dominated EPO Management Sinks to New Lows, Again

    Benoît Battistelli continues to make the EPO look like Europe's biggest laughing stock by attempting to tackle issues with corny photo ops rather than real change (like SUEPO recognition, diverse hiring, improved patent quality, and cessation of sheer abuses)



  26. Journalism 102: Do Not Become Like 'Managing IP' or IAM 'Magazine' (the Megaphones of the EPO’s Management)

    Another look at convergence between media and the EPO, which is spending virtually millions of Euros literally buying the media and ensuring that the EPO's abuses are scarcely covered (if ever mentioned at all)



  27. Journalism 101: Do Not Believe Anything That Benoît Battistelli and the EPO's Management Say (Also Don't Fall for the UPC Hype)

    A survey/review (or an overview) of recent articles about the EPO and why they're wrong (mostly because they parrot the official lies from Battistelli's department)



  28. Patent Law Firms, David Kappos, and IAM 'Magazine' Still Shelter Software Patents by Cherry-Picking and Lobbying

    Amid the gradual collapse of software patents in the United States there are disingenuous efforts to bring them back or maintain a perception that these patents are still potent



  29. Microsoft-Connected Patent Trolls Going Places and Suing Microsoft Rivals, Microsoft Wants More 'Linux Patent Tax'

    Microsoft-connected patent trolls like Larry Horn's MobileMedia are still attacking Microsoft rivals and Microsoft wants more money from Korea, after it attacked Linux with software patents over there (notably Samsung and LG)



  30. Links 22/9/2016: Linux Professional Institute Redesign, Red Hat Upgraded

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts