03.02.09

GNU/Linux Market Share: Why Gartner and IDC Must be Ignored

Posted in Deception, Finance, FUD, Servers, Windows at 2:12 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“Forty percent of servers run Windows, 60 percent run Linux…”

–Steve Ballmer, Microsoft CEO (September 2008)

CONTRARY to figures that account only for shipped volume and revenue (IDC), the installed base of GNU/Linux servers is very high. This is not to be confused with “market share”, whose definition gets changed so as to serve the vanity of companies which directly or indirectly fund such market surveys. There is a lot of selective research and cherry-picking of methodologies.

GNU/Linux is very commonplace on servers. Virtualisation requires those servers to communicate between and within one another, either through open standards or ‘interoperability’, which is typically a two-way bridge. Microsoft is fiddling with companies like XenSource (now absorbed by Citrix) and VMware (now run by former Softies) to interfere.

In order to understand how GNU/Linux is doing against Windows on the server, a market survey would be required which is global. It is harder and more expensive to conduct a survey based on actual deployments (global in particular), as opposed to assembling and aggregating numbers of shipments from market leaders.

“In order to understand how GNU/Linux is doing against Windows on the server, a market survey would be required which is global.”One indicator of the success of Linux on the server is internal intelligence conducted and/or used by Microsoft. The company calls this — albeit just internally — “Linux heat map” (we have a copy of a court exhibit from Comes vs Microsoft [PDF]). Publicly, realisation of the GNU/Linux threat to Microsoft can be arrived at by interpreting the company’s rhetoric and actions, such as threats of litigation, secret deals with Fortune 500 companies that pay Microsoft for their use of GNU/Linux (this is scarcely reported in the press and the companies refuse to identify themselves), and also disinformation initiatives such as “Get the Facts” and “Linux Personas” (defunct just days after debut).

GNOME server FS Internal documents which were revealed in the Comes vs Microsoft case not only reveal figures about market share in several areas. They also show the company’s executives running frantic about what they called "Linux infestation". They said they were not on a path to win against "Linux", so they tried to manipulate Dell into dropping or neglecting GNU/Linux (on servers) and they also decided to commission studies which show GNU/Linux to be more expensive [1, 2]. Failing the first time, Microsoft argued, they can simply try again. This methodology fits well with tactics that are presented in internal Microsoft talks about "Effective Evangelism". One of the tactics is to manufacture evidence that you need and then reference it. Analysts can be compensated in many ways that escape the public eye, as detailed in the company’s presentations (all endorsed by Bill Gates by the way).

In one of the documents disclosed in Comes vs Microsoft, Microsoft was seen explicitly asking IDC to remove signs of its sponsorship of a study. This study accidentally showed GNU/Linux (server) to be superior. Microsoft had similar studies conducted with market research groups like Yankee and Gartner.

It is worth emphasising that what challenges Microsoft is not just the market share of GNU/Linux. It’s more complicated than that. As netbooks (sub-notebooks) have demonstrated, tough competition from Linux not necessarily leads to erosion of Windows’ market share; instead, it rapidly leads to erosion of margins. Sources suggest that Windows has become virtually free (gratis) for some form factors, whereas in the case of servers, Microsoft has promotional means for advancing Windows not only through advertising campaigns. I have heard personally from Web hosts who were offered Windows for free so that they migrate away from GNU/Linux. In one case, the source was offered subsidies of hardware as well.

All in all, this comes to show that it’s a multi-faceted issue which can be addressed and treated by considering questions like:

How has GNU/Linux affected Microsoft’s/Windows market share?
How is market share defined?
How has GNU/Linux affected Windows margins?
What is the difference between perceptual GNU/Linux quality/market share compared to reality? There is room for distortion here and it is actively being exploited, as shown by authentic court evidence.
How failure-proof is GNU/Linux? How many companies are involved in developing and supporting it? Symbian and Palm OS, for example, have a single breaking point.

As Chris DiBona from Google put it, “every time you use Google, you’re using a machine running the Linux kernel.” █

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink Mail Send this to a friend

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

A Single Comment

Frank Earl said,

March 5, 2009 at 1:10 pm

You mention PalmOS as an embedded choice with a single breaking point. It’s worth noting that PalmOS is being dropped like a hot potato by it’s maker for a Linux variant called WebOS.

What Else is New

The Tide Has Turned Against the Unified Patent Court (UPC) and It Finally Looks as 'Alive' as TPP

The UPC is now stuck if not dead because officials are realising -- however belatedly -- that this entire charade was from start to finish just a coup d'état of the patent 'industry'
Potential Targets of European Patent Office (EPO) Whistleblowing

Priorities for whistleblowing at the European Patent Office (EPO), which operates secretly and occasionally illegally, too
Links 23/6/2017: Wine 2.11 Released, HPC Domination by GNU/Linux

Links for the day
Primer to the Crisis and Scandals at the European Patent Office (EPO)

An introduction to the chaotic state of what used to be the world's leading patent office and quickly became Europe's biggest embarrassment
Workers of the European Patent Office (EPO) Are Going on Strike Again, Almost 90% Voted in Favour

Thousands of brave EPO employees chose to cast a vote and make it known that they are in favour of another strike
Benoît Battistelli Has Lost the Election at the EPO

FFPE candidates (or moles from the yellow union) failed to enter the Central Staff Committee in spite of Battistelli's attempt to help them get in
Emerging Threat to Patent Reforms at the USPTO

Our plan of returning to coverage of US patent affairs in the wake of powerful lobbies that pursue patent maximalism
You Know That the Unitary Patent (UPC) is in Huge Peril When Its Biggest Fans Admit It's Unlikely to Happen Even Next Year

The tactics of Team UPC turn ugly as they personally target anyone who stands in their way, even a professor/judge who is courageous enough to state the obvious
More Than Six Human Casualties Under Battistelli at the EPO, But the Human Toll Can Become a Lot Worse

The bigger or much broader picture detailing the high cost of autocracy and mental torture at the EPO, where lives are ruined not only when these are ended and some key buildings pose severe threat to a lot of workers
EPO's Elodie Bergot Calls Staff Suicide Just 'Passing Away', Pretends to Care

How the EPO continues to mislead if not lie to staff, even when staff commits suicide -- a growing problem for Team Battistelli, whom some insiders hold accountable for these deaths
The Administrative Tribunal of ILO Will Deliver EPO Judgments in Six Days

Despite its old age (nearly a century), ILO's tradition when it comes to enforcing the law is anything but sterling, yet one can hope that it will stop its unproductive cat-and-mouse game with the EPO, where compliance is rare and actual judgments (not deferrals/referrals) are even rarer
Links 21/6/2017: Red Hat's Numbers Are Up, New Debian Being Studied

Links for the day
Another Suicide Reported at the EPO While the Paid-for Media Focuses on 'European Inventor Award' Charade

Puff pieces for Benoît Battistelli published aplenty while the European media refuses to deal with the reality -- not paid-for illusions -- at the European Patent Office
Links 20/6/2017: Chuwi Lapbook, Linux 4.12 RC6, Mesa 17.1.3

Links for the day
At the European Inventor Award Ceremony Benoît Battistelli Lied to a Lot of Scientists and “Media Partners” About the UPC

The Liar in Chief, Benoît Battistelli, still lives in a fantasy world or simply lies intentionally, which would be worse
Contact Details for the EPO's Administrative Council Delegations

List of Heads of Delegation and their E-mail addresses (used to be public information before Benoît Battistelli's oppressive regime or coup)
Don't Forget to Vote for EPO Strike This Week (Thursday)

A reminder that there's a vote on a strike at the European Patent Office later this week, giving an opportunity to rebut the "vocal minority" myth which Benoît Battistelli likes to spread
European Patent Office (EPO) Whistleblowing Guidelines: Motivation and Impact of Leaks

Advice on when to leak and what to leak for the desired effect, which is reformatory (though transparency and accountability)
Links 18/6/2017: New Debian Release, Catchup With a Lot of News

Links for the day
Appalling Press Coverage Regarding the Unitary Patent (UPC)

How the media has lied (and keeps lying) about the UPC, which the European public neither needs nor wants, putting aside serious constitutional issues that are associated with the UPC
The Writings on the Wall at the European Patent Office: Number of Directors May Soon Decline From 150 to Just 65-70

Battistelli is seizing more direct and indirect control over the European Patent Office (EPO), which is supposed to eject him with a proposal for replacement already formally prepared for publication
European Patent Office (EPO) Whistleblowing Guidelines

The first part of a series which offers tips for sending us material/evidence, specifically from the European Patent Office (EPO)
General Consultative Committee of the EPO Warns About Battistelli's Plans

The General Consultative Committee (GCC) issues a long document (176 pages) which explains to the overseer of the Office how internal rule changes make things even worse
Links 16/6/2017: New Atom Release, Firefox 55 Beta

Links for the day
Leaked: European Patent Office Still Uses Microsoft Windows XP... in 2017

The EPO continues to rely on inherently insecure (by design) platforms and Mr. Kraft, Battistelli's CIO, bragged that the actions of the Office "prevented any damage to the EPO and its reputation"
Unitary Patent (UPC) Will Start “Real Soon” Now... Said Team UPC For So Many Years

The Unitary Patent or Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA) is going nowhere fast, but those who spent time and money promoting it for self gain continue to lie to the press with overly optimistic predictions, unrealistic timelines, and Kool-Aid about the supposed 'benefits' of the Unified Patent Court (UPC)
EPO Management Wastes Millions of Euros on a Silly, Gratuitous, Self-Serving Festival While EPO Staff is Planning Another Strike

Unrest at the European Patent Office (EPO) is growing again, with plans of a strike resulting in a formal vote for a strike next week
Links 15/6/2017: Mir 0.26.3, FreeNAS 11.0

Links for the day
Software Patents in Europe Are Still Promoted by the EPO, Even in Defiance of the Ban

The European Patent Office continues to ignore the directive on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions, which had software patents disallowed with an overwhelming majority of 648 to 14 votes at the European Parliament
Leaked: Job Advertisement for Removing Battistelli From the European Patent Office

In spite of rumours that Benoît Battistelli would pursue elongation of his term, in clear defiance of the rules (again), paperwork is being put forth to replace him