EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.08.09

Microsoft Confirms Mono is Not Safe, Stallman Agrees

Posted in GNU/Linux, GPL, Microsoft, Mono, Novell at 11:26 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Thank you, Microsoft.

No, really. Thank you.

Ignore the spin from Mono/Novell blogs and think what Microsoft has just formally acknowledged, even implicitly. To reuse a belated response sent to some journalists (it was hard to reply while absent), the gist goes like this:

1. Mono — like .NET — does not correspond to an ECMA standard because it brings with it more than just the core. It puts Microsoft in better charge of developers (as in “developers developers developers developers”). Patents were never the sole issue when it comes to Mono.
2. Deviation from the ECMAs is not allowed. This is a concern we highlighted too. This ensures that Microsoft stays in control (no independence, which it may describe as “fragmentation” just to justify this policy).
3. Additional parts of Mono will ultimately be used. Projects like Banshee are sponsored by Novell and Novell only has acquired protection with a patent deal (and that too will have expired for SLE* users by January 2012). Some projects already grab portions of the ‘restricted’ parts. We gave examples before.
4. FAT had Microsoft make similar promises that Microsoft did not keep or obey when it sued TomTom. FAT needed to spread first. It is simply called “patent ambush”.

It is very important for Microsoft to ensure Mono spreads, so it is hardly surprising that amid controversy it sought to lull things. This isn’t the first time, either.

As FFII’s president just told us, “Don’t rely on promises, get a patent RAND license at iplg@microsoft.com.

“I should launch a contest on the first guy who manage to get a copy of the RAND terms.”

And guess what? Richard Stallman does not appreciate Microsoft’s move either.

After one week of break (hoping that nothing significant would be missed around the US holiday), some catching up will certainly be required, so posts will probably resume tomorrow. Between the big news about Google’s OS and Mono ‘news’ (that was inflated), one very important item is this confirmatory observation which possibly shows Black Duck’s ulterior motives (maybe true colours). Did we warn about this Microsoft-sourced proprietary software company or did we not?

In the coming days we’ll post links from the past week’s news so as to encapsulate what was missed. When that’s all done, we shall resume Comes vs Microsoft exhibits. Wallclimber helps us a lot with it.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Slashdot

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

12 Comments

  1. niemau said,

    July 8, 2009 at 11:31 pm

    Gravatar

    one additional point to add:

    F-Spot and Banshee connect to sqlite via ADO.NET.

    ADO.NET is absolutely NOT covered by the supposed ‘promise’.

    please see:
    http://www.mono-project.com/SQLite

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Thanks. I caught that too.

    For erroneous reasons/purposes, at least in Fedora, Benshee and Tomboy also grab Winforms.

  2. eet said,

    July 8, 2009 at 11:51 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy; this is really poor. In another discussion I said jokingly that you would have to invest one or two hours of additionalo fact-twisting and truth-bending in order to portray Microsoft’s latest move as something that fits your conspiracy theory. It seems I have been right.

    But how you did it is really a coward’s way to talk around an argument. You simply ignore everything newsworthy – that the overwhelming part of Mono is now really SAVE TO USE and very likely will allow Mono being installed as a default by distributions after Mono has been split up in an ECMA and a non-ECMA version.

    Instead you reiterate what little remains of your conspiracy theories that will now make everyone laugh right away. But transferring all your distrust of Mono now onto the non-ECMA parts of it is just not credible.

    It would do you good to admit that ECMA-Mono, C# now is a save choice and an even contender among language.

    You will eventually have to face the fact that you cannot keep predicting doomsday for years (your latest prediction being January 2010…) without loosing all credibility, and, on a personal level, that you have ruined your career with all this nonsense.

    Jose_X Reply:

    Why do you waste people’s time here?

    Are you here to discuss issues or just repeat yourself?

    If you are here to discuss issues, then reply to what others say.

    Consider this just written: http://boycottnovell.com/2009/07/09/community-promise-sham/comment-page-1/#comment-69181

    Or this http://boycottnovell.com/2009/07/01/mono-poll-on-rms/comment-page-1/#comment-69144 or any of the other comments that address your comment in some way but to which you failed to reply.

    If you ignore our rebuttals, it suggests you cannot address the points or that you are purposely ignoring us. If the former, then please stop repeating your nonsense. If the latter, than you are asking to be ignored.

    I will continue to point to these sorts of comments until you address them. I get tired of replying repeatedly to nonsense reposted in different forms.

    Show me what you are saying is not nonsense. Reply to the rebuttals. If I am wrong, I want to be clued in.

    To be clear: mono use is a very risky proposition when we consider patent threats/Microsoft, and it is not smart to help grow dotnet use.

    Another link: http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/04/the-api-trap-part-1

    Jose_X Reply:

    Also eet, don’t be embarrassed to ask that I clarify. Part of the problem might be how I explained things (assuming what I was trying to say is legit). The other problem might be that you don’t have the background to follow along. In either case, I can help if you ask.

    Jose_X Reply:

    .. and also..

    I wrongly suggested you don’t discuss things. You obviously do discuss. However, when you say things like

    >> Instead you reiterate what little remains of your conspiracy theories that will now make everyone laugh right away. But transferring all your distrust of Mono now onto the non-ECMA parts of it is just not credible.

    You ignore all the material (posts and replies) that show that the distrust has been over a lot more than core mono and that the dangers of non-ECMA are very real.

    >> It would do you good to admit that ECMA-Mono, C# now is a save choice and an even contender among language.

    C is patent safe (let’s assume), yet new C apps continue to fall foul of patents (or at least could potentially).

    The patent problems do not end when you use the core of a computer language tool that is patent safe. No they do not. As soon as you start building things with the language you can once again start running into trouble with patents.

    The particular problem with some platforms/tools is that some patents can achieve their “innovation” and “prior art avoidance” by piggy-backing on these specific platform/tools. The ECMA standards in question serve as a foundation to Microsoft (their creator) for the many patents that can extend from it.

    boycottnovell has even quoted Microsoft execs speak just to such a strategy. Not that these quotes are needed, since these people are just recognizing how the broken patent system works and can be exploited, but it does suggest that the strategy was well known by top brass at least going back to just before dotnet was introduced.

    >> You will eventually have to face the fact that you cannot keep predicting doomsday for years (your latest prediction being January 2010…) without loosing all credibility

    No one can predict some things very well; however, making predictions doesn’t void the value of some of the analysis that led to such prediction. Predictions always assume way too many more things beyond the core points.

    I know it rains sometimes. That is a very sure thing. Yet if I try to predict it will rain over me starting exactly 3 hours from now (to the minute), then I will likely be wrong. And predicting the minute it will start raining (so far into the future) is much easier to do than predicting some other things that depend on human decision making.

  3. twitter said,

    July 9, 2009 at 12:21 am

    Gravatar

    Welcome back, Roy. Nice links, as usual.

  4. amd-linux said,

    July 9, 2009 at 12:57 am

    Gravatar

    Well done.

    Not to forget that a promise not to sue is a legal instrument that does not exist as such in most jurisdictions; it is neither a contract nor a waiver, and most likely, it will only bind Micro-Soft, but no third parties which might aquire IP from Micro-Soft under the promise.

    All it says is ” yes, we do claim IP on Mono; but will only enforce it outside court” – i.e., it is still possible to net claims for damages of a third party (OIN i.e.) against alleged damages from using Mono without license (in my jurisdiction). That is not suing but still enforcing their alleged Mono IP.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Microsoft routinely reminds that press that it is interested in striking more patent deals (Linux included), it does not want to sue. It prefers to settle/cross-license like it did with Brother and Samsung (behind closed doors), not like it did with TomTom (after TomTom had refused to pay… following prolonged pressure behind closed doors). It is all publicly-accessible information. There is even a Microsoft book about it (Burning the Ships).

  5. Luke said,

    July 9, 2009 at 1:34 am

    Gravatar

    As always, your analysis on all things Microsoft is amazing.
    It’s always a tough choice between you and The Onion on which will provide the greater laughs.

    Jose_X Reply:

    Another comment from an upset reader who avoids the topic in order to attack the site.

    At least your comment is funny (+1).

  6. vexorian said,

    July 9, 2009 at 6:45 pm

    Gravatar

    So, is anyone else unable to believe in coincidences?

    To me it seems pretty clear that the recent Mono events touched a nerve at Microsoft. It would appear like they are VERY interested in making sure ubuntu and major distros keep using Mono in their default.

    Why? Well, there are the issues with the small print and the fact that MS’ record does not make them the sort of people you would take a promise from… But it could actually be that they are more interested in using Mono and .net to embrace open source, FUD against the GPL and dominate the world a-la win32. Not that much in destroying Linux.

    But well, at least I never opposed to Mono solely on legal basis, the intrinsic problem with making the defaults depend on MS technology remains whether this addresses the legal concerns or not. (And it is not clear that it does)

What Else is New


  1. Links 29/9/2020: Fedora 33 Beta, Krita 4.4.0 Beta 2, Stellarium 0.20.3 and Mesa 20.2 Released; 20 Million Downloads From the LVFS

    Links for the day



  2. Another Day of ZDNet Being ZDNet, Calling Windows “Linux” (to Confuse People and Help Microsoft Sell Vista 10)

    Microsoft propaganda site ZDNet is keeping up with the tradition of presenting Windows as "Linux" and promoting Windows even in the "Linux" section of the site



  3. [Meme] It's Crazy Not to Eliminate Lame Words That Might Offend Somebody

    If the word “stupid” offends you, then maybe programming isn’t for you, in the same sense that submitting patches with Git over E-mail shouldn't be hard if/when you can develop decent code with sanity checks



  4. IBM Fought for 'Master Race' and Now It's Banning the Word 'Master'

    A lot of the current push to ban the word "master" came from Red Hat (soon IBM, helped by Intel and Microsoft for the most part); we take a hard look at IBM's history to better understand the incredible double standards and what the real motivations might be



  5. IBM's Founder, Mr. Watson (Yes, That Watson), Had “Very Keen Sense of Public Relations”

    "Watson" is a lot more offensive than those supposedly offensive words IBM is working to purge; think about those hundreds of Red Hat workers who are black and were never told about ethnic purges of blacks facilitated by IBM (their new boss)



  6. Under IBM's Leadership Red Hat Becomes a SPAM Marketing Operation, Sending Mass Mails Without Authorisation and Making It Impossible to Unsubscribe

    Red Hat seems incapable of respecting people's inboxes; it subscribes people to things which they never ever subscribed to and makes it impossible to unsubscribe; what has Red Hat become or succumbed to?



  7. EFF: Sitting on a Massive Pile of Money and Members Are Less Than a Third of the Revenue

    As part of our series which explores non-profits turning against their goals (sometimes in pursuit of money, even if that means sellout) we take a good look at the EFF in this age of unprecedented consolidation of wealth and power



  8. IRC Proceedings: Monday, September 28, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, September 28, 2020



  9. [Meme] Running Public (or Private) Interest Groups for Profit

    The Linux Foundation is picking up some more ‘surveillance capitalism’ money, in the name of… ‘helping’ Linux?



  10. The Concept of Martyrdom in Free Software and the Threat of Demonisation in the Media

    Leaders or figureheads of public interest advocacy are being dismissed as crazy and rude whilst corporations that maim and kill millions of people are spun as "professional" and even "altruistic"; don't fall for it



  11. More Money Does Not Necessarily Mean More Stable Organisations

    The corporate takeover of Free software (privatising the Commons) is a real problem that nobody in the media seems to be talking about, partly because this media is itself corporate and hence part of (participant in) the 'coup'



  12. EPO Management Looks for New and 'Innovative' Ways to Exploit Scientists and Distract From EPO Corruption

    EPO management is desperate for puff pieces, having just produced some greenwashing nonsense (about a dozen press items about this non-event) and now a bunch of self-promotional videos



  13. Before the New York Times Did a Number on Donald Trump It Changed Bill Gates' Tune

    When you speak strictly through a spokesperson it often means you're lying and/or hiding something; the Gates enigma remains unsolved more than a year later



  14. Links 28/9/2020: Linux 5.9 RC7, Review of Linuxfx 10.6, OpenSSH 8.4

    Links for the day



  15. Speaking Through Spokespeople is a Sign of Weakness, Such as Non-Denying and False Denials (or: Bill Gates Never Denied His Connections to MIT Through Jeffrey Epstein)

    Big liars lie shamelessly; the biggest liars lie through proxies and today we examine the evasive tactics of Bill Gates and his associates (who were closely connected to Jeffrey Epstein but refuse to even talk about that, except indirectly)



  16. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, September 27, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, September 27, 2020



  17. Accounting for Debconf 19 Travel... in 2020

    A deeper look or analysis of Debian expenditures, which grew more than twicefold for travel last year



  18. Don't Let Microsoft Make 'Open Source' Synonymous With Proprietary Monopoly GitHub

    Now that the OSI works for Microsoft instead of Open Source (no, GitHub isn’t Open Source; it’s inherently against Open Source) we need to understand the modus operandi and learn from old mistakes



  19. Links 27/9/2020: Puppy Linux 9.5, Nitrux 1.3.3

    Links for the day



  20. Public Relations and Tolerance Stunts Are Very, Very Cheap

    It's 2020 and people are asked to focus on superficial aspects of corporations rather than anything of substance (like the effects on society at large, notably exploitation and long-term harm)



  21. Open to Everything

    It always starts with good intentions...



  22. The OSI's President Apparently Does Not Know That His Own Employer (Salesforce) Works for ICE

    The hypocrisy (or double standard) of the OSI’s President is astounding; taking salaries paid in part by ICE budget (Salesforce works for ICE and similarly evil agencies) while protesting in a proprietary software platform of Microsoft (GitHub) about ICE (all this whilst actively participating in it regardless)



  23. [Meme] Communist Tactics

    To Microsoft, Linux is communism until Microsoft controls it (and then runs over it to crush it, the typical modus operandi)



  24. OSI President: Most or Half of the OSI's Money (Even Individual Donors' Money) Goes to a Microsoft-Led Initiative

    The OSI has turned from advocate of "Open Source" (a disingenuous attempt to set aside Free/libre software) to advocate of Microsoft and GitHub in just 3 years (since taking Microsoft's money/bribes)



  25. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, September 26, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, September 26, 2020



  26. The 24/7 'Tech' Worker (Babysitter of User-hostile Computing) and 'Expensive' Programmer

    The rights of workers are being reduced to nothing (many in their older years made redundant), even in an occupation that is indirectly responsible for automating and thus deprecating jobs in many other occupations



  27. Why Techrights is Totally Unexcited About the New Owner of Linux Journal

    Linux Journal might soon become an anti-Linux site (veiled hostility) if Slashdot's editorial preferences are anything to go by (Slashdot has just seized control of Linux Journal)



  28. The Cheapening of the Programmer is a Threat to Human Rights of All Computer Users

    From the era of computer experts (down to the low level of computing with transistors), mathematicians, physics gurus and respected technicians we've come to orders-following, user-apathetic engineers who are overworked, grossly underpaid, and way too fearful of raising ethical concerns (voicing disagreement can result in prompt dismissal, followed by perpetual unemployment) and this ensures digital oppression without checks and balances



  29. Links 26/9/2020: Wine 5.18, FreeBSD 12.2-BETA3 and Debian 10.6 Released

    Links for the day



  30. 'Appeal to Novelty' as a Lever for Proprietary Software Monopolies, Bloat (Planned Obsolescence) and More Surveillance

    Novelty is generally fine, but in many cases products are developed iteratively (not cumulatively) not to advance society or to objectively improve services, only to increase control over people (because emergent ‘freemium’-like business models nowadays revolve around addiction and subjugation, e.g. ‘brain-farming’ and manipulation of minds)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts