EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.08.09

Microsoft Confirms Mono is Not Safe, Stallman Agrees

Posted in GNU/Linux, GPL, Microsoft, Mono, Novell at 11:26 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Thank you, Microsoft.

No, really. Thank you.

Ignore the spin from Mono/Novell blogs and think what Microsoft has just formally acknowledged, even implicitly. To reuse a belated response sent to some journalists (it was hard to reply while absent), the gist goes like this:

1. Mono — like .NET — does not correspond to an ECMA standard because it brings with it more than just the core. It puts Microsoft in better charge of developers (as in “developers developers developers developers”). Patents were never the sole issue when it comes to Mono.
2. Deviation from the ECMAs is not allowed. This is a concern we highlighted too. This ensures that Microsoft stays in control (no independence, which it may describe as “fragmentation” just to justify this policy).
3. Additional parts of Mono will ultimately be used. Projects like Banshee are sponsored by Novell and Novell only has acquired protection with a patent deal (and that too will have expired for SLE* users by January 2012). Some projects already grab portions of the ‘restricted’ parts. We gave examples before.
4. FAT had Microsoft make similar promises that Microsoft did not keep or obey when it sued TomTom. FAT needed to spread first. It is simply called “patent ambush”.

It is very important for Microsoft to ensure Mono spreads, so it is hardly surprising that amid controversy it sought to lull things. This isn’t the first time, either.

As FFII’s president just told us, “Don’t rely on promises, get a patent RAND license at iplg@microsoft.com.

“I should launch a contest on the first guy who manage to get a copy of the RAND terms.”

And guess what? Richard Stallman does not appreciate Microsoft’s move either.

After one week of break (hoping that nothing significant would be missed around the US holiday), some catching up will certainly be required, so posts will probably resume tomorrow. Between the big news about Google’s OS and Mono ‘news’ (that was inflated), one very important item is this confirmatory observation which possibly shows Black Duck’s ulterior motives (maybe true colours). Did we warn about this Microsoft-sourced proprietary software company or did we not?

In the coming days we’ll post links from the past week’s news so as to encapsulate what was missed. When that’s all done, we shall resume Comes vs Microsoft exhibits. Wallclimber helps us a lot with it.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

12 Comments

  1. niemau said,

    July 8, 2009 at 11:31 pm

    Gravatar

    one additional point to add:

    F-Spot and Banshee connect to sqlite via ADO.NET.

    ADO.NET is absolutely NOT covered by the supposed ‘promise’.

    please see:
    http://www.mono-project.com/SQLite

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Thanks. I caught that too.

    For erroneous reasons/purposes, at least in Fedora, Benshee and Tomboy also grab Winforms.

  2. eet said,

    July 8, 2009 at 11:51 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy; this is really poor. In another discussion I said jokingly that you would have to invest one or two hours of additionalo fact-twisting and truth-bending in order to portray Microsoft’s latest move as something that fits your conspiracy theory. It seems I have been right.

    But how you did it is really a coward’s way to talk around an argument. You simply ignore everything newsworthy – that the overwhelming part of Mono is now really SAVE TO USE and very likely will allow Mono being installed as a default by distributions after Mono has been split up in an ECMA and a non-ECMA version.

    Instead you reiterate what little remains of your conspiracy theories that will now make everyone laugh right away. But transferring all your distrust of Mono now onto the non-ECMA parts of it is just not credible.

    It would do you good to admit that ECMA-Mono, C# now is a save choice and an even contender among language.

    You will eventually have to face the fact that you cannot keep predicting doomsday for years (your latest prediction being January 2010…) without loosing all credibility, and, on a personal level, that you have ruined your career with all this nonsense.

    Jose_X Reply:

    Why do you waste people’s time here?

    Are you here to discuss issues or just repeat yourself?

    If you are here to discuss issues, then reply to what others say.

    Consider this just written: http://boycottnovell.com/2009/07/09/community-promise-sham/comment-page-1/#comment-69181

    Or this http://boycottnovell.com/2009/07/01/mono-poll-on-rms/comment-page-1/#comment-69144 or any of the other comments that address your comment in some way but to which you failed to reply.

    If you ignore our rebuttals, it suggests you cannot address the points or that you are purposely ignoring us. If the former, then please stop repeating your nonsense. If the latter, than you are asking to be ignored.

    I will continue to point to these sorts of comments until you address them. I get tired of replying repeatedly to nonsense reposted in different forms.

    Show me what you are saying is not nonsense. Reply to the rebuttals. If I am wrong, I want to be clued in.

    To be clear: mono use is a very risky proposition when we consider patent threats/Microsoft, and it is not smart to help grow dotnet use.

    Another link: http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/04/the-api-trap-part-1

    Jose_X Reply:

    Also eet, don’t be embarrassed to ask that I clarify. Part of the problem might be how I explained things (assuming what I was trying to say is legit). The other problem might be that you don’t have the background to follow along. In either case, I can help if you ask.

    Jose_X Reply:

    .. and also..

    I wrongly suggested you don’t discuss things. You obviously do discuss. However, when you say things like

    >> Instead you reiterate what little remains of your conspiracy theories that will now make everyone laugh right away. But transferring all your distrust of Mono now onto the non-ECMA parts of it is just not credible.

    You ignore all the material (posts and replies) that show that the distrust has been over a lot more than core mono and that the dangers of non-ECMA are very real.

    >> It would do you good to admit that ECMA-Mono, C# now is a save choice and an even contender among language.

    C is patent safe (let’s assume), yet new C apps continue to fall foul of patents (or at least could potentially).

    The patent problems do not end when you use the core of a computer language tool that is patent safe. No they do not. As soon as you start building things with the language you can once again start running into trouble with patents.

    The particular problem with some platforms/tools is that some patents can achieve their “innovation” and “prior art avoidance” by piggy-backing on these specific platform/tools. The ECMA standards in question serve as a foundation to Microsoft (their creator) for the many patents that can extend from it.

    boycottnovell has even quoted Microsoft execs speak just to such a strategy. Not that these quotes are needed, since these people are just recognizing how the broken patent system works and can be exploited, but it does suggest that the strategy was well known by top brass at least going back to just before dotnet was introduced.

    >> You will eventually have to face the fact that you cannot keep predicting doomsday for years (your latest prediction being January 2010…) without loosing all credibility

    No one can predict some things very well; however, making predictions doesn’t void the value of some of the analysis that led to such prediction. Predictions always assume way too many more things beyond the core points.

    I know it rains sometimes. That is a very sure thing. Yet if I try to predict it will rain over me starting exactly 3 hours from now (to the minute), then I will likely be wrong. And predicting the minute it will start raining (so far into the future) is much easier to do than predicting some other things that depend on human decision making.

  3. twitter said,

    July 9, 2009 at 12:21 am

    Gravatar

    Welcome back, Roy. Nice links, as usual.

  4. amd-linux said,

    July 9, 2009 at 12:57 am

    Gravatar

    Well done.

    Not to forget that a promise not to sue is a legal instrument that does not exist as such in most jurisdictions; it is neither a contract nor a waiver, and most likely, it will only bind Micro-Soft, but no third parties which might aquire IP from Micro-Soft under the promise.

    All it says is ” yes, we do claim IP on Mono; but will only enforce it outside court” – i.e., it is still possible to net claims for damages of a third party (OIN i.e.) against alleged damages from using Mono without license (in my jurisdiction). That is not suing but still enforcing their alleged Mono IP.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Microsoft routinely reminds that press that it is interested in striking more patent deals (Linux included), it does not want to sue. It prefers to settle/cross-license like it did with Brother and Samsung (behind closed doors), not like it did with TomTom (after TomTom had refused to pay… following prolonged pressure behind closed doors). It is all publicly-accessible information. There is even a Microsoft book about it (Burning the Ships).

  5. Luke said,

    July 9, 2009 at 1:34 am

    Gravatar

    As always, your analysis on all things Microsoft is amazing.
    It’s always a tough choice between you and The Onion on which will provide the greater laughs.

    Jose_X Reply:

    Another comment from an upset reader who avoids the topic in order to attack the site.

    At least your comment is funny (+1).

  6. vexorian said,

    July 9, 2009 at 6:45 pm

    Gravatar

    So, is anyone else unable to believe in coincidences?

    To me it seems pretty clear that the recent Mono events touched a nerve at Microsoft. It would appear like they are VERY interested in making sure ubuntu and major distros keep using Mono in their default.

    Why? Well, there are the issues with the small print and the fact that MS’ record does not make them the sort of people you would take a promise from… But it could actually be that they are more interested in using Mono and .net to embrace open source, FUD against the GPL and dominate the world a-la win32. Not that much in destroying Linux.

    But well, at least I never opposed to Mono solely on legal basis, the intrinsic problem with making the defaults depend on MS technology remains whether this addresses the legal concerns or not. (And it is not clear that it does)

What Else is New


  1. Brand Dilution in Action

    Microsoft's proprietary software which spies on people and businesses is getting a "free ride" on the "Linux" brand; and nobody seems to care, nobody seems to notice how perverse that it



  2. At the EPO Money -- Not Quality -- is King

    Financiers are ruining quality



  3. The EPO's Strategic Failure 2023

    Potemkin social dialogue



  4. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, December 11, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, December 11, 2019



  5. EPO Promoting Software Patents in Countries Where These Are Illegal

    The EPO's vision of 'unitary' software patents (patents on algorithms in countries that disallow such patents, as per their national laws) won't materialise, but in the meantime a lot of Invalid Patents (IPs) are granted in the form of European Patents (EPs) and this is wrong



  6. We Support GNU and the FSF But Remain Sceptical and Occasionally Worry About an RMS-less FSF

    Richard Stallman (RMS) is not in charge of the FSF anymore (it's Stallman who created the FSF) and there's risk the decisions will be made by people who don't share Stallman's ethics or the FSF's spirit



  7. Links 11/12/2019: Huawei Lobbied by Microsoft (Because of GNU/Linux) and Microsoft Still Googlebombs Linux to Promote 'Teams'

    Links for the day



  8. Links 11/12/2019: Edge Native Working Group, CrossOver 19.0 Released

    Links for the day



  9. Instead of Fixing Bug #1 Canonical/Ubuntu Contributes to Making the Bug Even More Severe (WSL/EEE)

    Following one seminal report about Canonical financially contributing to Microsoft's EEE efforts — celebrated openly by GNU/Linux opponentsclosing bug #1 Ubuntu basically decided not that it was fixed but that it would no longer attempt to fix it (“wontfix”)



  10. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, December 10, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, December 10, 2019



  11. Today's Example of Microsoft's Faked 'Love'

    “On 7 September 2017, users began noticing a message that stated “Skype for Business is now Microsoft Teams”. This was confirmed on 25 September 2017, at Microsoft’s annual Ignite conference,” according to Wikipedia



  12. Links 10/12/2019: Kubernetes 1.17, Debian Init Systems GR

    Links for the day



  13. 'Cancel Culture' as 'Thoughtpolice' Creep

    Richard Stallman spoke about an important aspect of censorship more than 2 decades ago (before “Open Source” even existed); it was published in Datamation (“Censoring My Software”) 23 years before a campaign of defamation on the Internet was used to remove him from MIT and FSF (censoring or ‘canceling’ Stallman himself)



  14. Microsoft Still Hates GNU/Linux and Mark Shuttleworth Knows It (But He is Desperate for Money)

    We're supposed to believe that a PR or image management (reputation laundering) campaign alone can turn Microsoft from GNU/Linux foe into friend/ally



  15. Actions Against EPO Corruption and Unitary Patent (UPC) Injustice/Lobbying

    The EPO is apparently going on strike again and an action against the UPC is scheduled for later this week (protest in Brussels)



  16. “The Fifth Freedom as a Meme”

    The issue with systemd (or SystemD) has provoked or at least stimulated discussions about the limits of the famous Four Freedoms



  17. IRC Proceedings: Monday, December 09, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, December 09, 2019



  18. Demonstration Against Unitary Software Patents, Thursday 12 Dec in Brussels

    FFII's call to demonstrate against the UPC



  19. Links 9/12/2019: China on GNU/Linux, Canonical Wants Help to Improve Ubuntu

    Links for the day



  20. Links 9/12/2019: Linux 5.5 RC1, EasyOS Buster 2.1.9

    Links for the day



  21. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, December 08, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, December 08, 2019



  22. Mandatory Education for Those Who Use and Misuse Buzzwords Would Go a Long Way

    In an age of substitution — where marketing terms replace meaningful words and concepts — it has gotten more difficult to have honest debates, for example about the scope of patents



  23. Once Upon a Time Banter Was Allowed on Mailing Lists

    Hours ago Torvalds announced RC1 of the next Linux (kernel) release; it has been a while since he last said something ‘controversial’ (following his month at the penalty box); free speech deficit can make us weaker, not stronger (advantage to those who work in the dark)



  24. Links 8/12/2019: Debian Init Systems GR, NomadBSD 1.3

    Links for the day



  25. Can We Quit Celebrating DRM in GNU/Linux?

    Over the past couple of days various news sites and "Linux" sites expressed great satisfaction [1-5] over the passive embrace of Disney's DRM ploy (Disney+), even when Disney itself rejects DRM, seeing the harms practically caused by it [6,7]



  26. You Know WSL is Bad for GNU/Linux Because Anti-Linux People, Microsoft and Its Propagandists, Want People to Use That

    Microsoft and its boosters (and media partners) haven’t grown tired of spreading falsehoods to stigmatise and take control of GNU/Linux by creating their own versions and traps for it



  27. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, December 07, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, December 07, 2019



  28. 5 Years Ago the Linux Foundation Turned Linux.com Into a Non-Linux Site

    One can leverage the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine to better understand how, over time, the Foundation called “Linux” deviated or diverged away from its mission statement for the sole purpose of raising corporate funds and selling influence to corporations (passing the community’s hard work to them — a form of tacit privatisation)



  29. Microsoft Redefining Ownership and Identity of GNU/Linux

    The idea that “Microsoft loves Linux” is as insane as it gets; but the lie which is “Microsoft loves Linux” is a powerful enabler of Microsoft entryism, e.g. if Greg steps down, does a Microsoft employee become the deputy of Linus Torvalds?



  30. Things That Cannot Be Said

    The limits on what we can say are mostly defined by what sources permit us to say publicly (for the sake of source protection)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts