EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.15.11

The Fall of Quanta and Microsoft Florian (Two-Faced Lobbyist)

Posted in Deception, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Patents at 2:08 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Microsoft Florian

Summary: How Microsoft managed to corner another company which distributes Linux and how it became known that Microsoft is funding lobbyists to attack Android, Linux, and all those things that are free/libre

THE PEOPLE of the United States (99%) are strongly against software patents, but Microsoft is strongly in favour and so are patent parasites who think that patents should be treated like products. Microsoft uses these to drive up the price of products, especially those where price points are crucial.

What products are most heavily affected?

“Florian is an imposter and just like Microsoft’s front group Association for Competitive Technology he pretends to be the opposite of what he is.”Not Microsoft’s. Microsoft found another victim for easy extortion of Linux and this was covered rather poorly in the corporate press. It neglects to remark on the fact that what Microsoft does is racketeering. This angle got suppressed over time. The Microsoft boosters ‘normalised it through repetition plus headline-jacking and Microsoft-funded lobbyists do the unthinkable by trying to make Google look like the villain and not quite commenting on Microsoft patent trolls attacking Android (instead, the Microsoft-funded lobbyists pretend that Google funds those trolls). The other day we wrote about the Intellectual Ventures antitrust-related letter of complaint. There is great anger over this lawsuit from Intellectual Ventures (IV) suing not only small companies but also extorting large companies. Don’t expect Microsoft lobbyists to comment on this.

The Microsoft-funded lobbyist Florian Müller. (who spams journalists to tweak the news) carries on with his usual disgusting behaviour of blaming Google for merely being a victim of litigation from Microsoft and its ilk. Microsoft uses excuses to pass him some bribes and it has become rather clear now that his Quanta deal raves are just “part of the package” (I lost another post that I wrote about it, but the anti-Linux rhetoric continues). Any journalist who still quotes this man in articles that involve Microsoft or Android should be told off for not stating that there is a conflict of interest and that Florian is really just a lobbyist pretending to be an “analyst” (among other masks). Florian is an imposter and just like Microsoft’s front group Association for Competitive Technology he pretends to be the opposite of what he is.

But getting back to the main point, Microsoft’s extortion continues, but there is just a PR/lobbying angle to it which we must be aware of. This short story is, our list of vendors to avoid will now include Quanta. We need to reward vendors who do not pay Microsoft. It’s the most effective action.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

9 Comments

  1. Michael said,

    October 15, 2011 at 3:15 pm

    Gravatar

    You say “THE PEOPLE of the United States (99%) are strongly against software patents” but then link to a page which does not support that claim.

    You then claim the only ones who support such patents are Microsoft and “patent parasites”.

    You then continue whining and offer *no* solution at all to the problem. For example, if you want to end patents, what should be used to protect companies and individuals from having others “slavishly copy” their ideas?

    Or do you think that is fine – given how often the open source community does so (without permission)?

    And if you think going against the IP owners wishes are fine, then why should anyone, including Microsoft, have to abide by the GPL on any code? Why not just ignore the GPL and use the code as they wish? If they follow your logic they should be able to.

    quickuser Reply:

    patents and licenses are two different things. Educate yourself, please.

    Michael Reply:

    I think people should respect the wishes of the holder of IP – it does not matter what category it is plopped into.

    Of course, there are limits to that – and asking people to not be inspired by your work is simply not reasonable. And I think Apple sometimes crosses this like – yes, they take existing tech, add some to it, and make products that are unique and show they have a better understanding of people’s needs than most people.

    But no matter how much Apple might want to keep this to their own products, others will learn from Apple (as Apple has learned from others). And they push things like saying the term “App Store” is there own. So in these ways I agree with Roy when he talks about Apple taking things too far… but I also see the need for Apple to protects its largest asset – seeing the world in a way no other company does… having insight that others do not.

    There is not a good, solid line to draw.

    walterbyrd Reply:

    Excuse me for saying so, but you seem to be, almost suspiciously, straining on gnats, and swallowing camels. Techrights has uncovered another vicious anti-completive scam from a convicted monopolist, and all you can do is get anal about the 99% figure. Comparing the GPL to Microsoft’s patent trolling scam is beyond silly. Microsoft is not “protecting it’s IP.” Microsoft is abusing the US patent system, and legal system, to unfairly compete. Microsoft is indeed racketeering, and MS only gets away with because the US system has become so thoroughly corrupt.

    Michael Reply:

    Without circular evidence (pointing back to his own site), what has Roy really pointed out? I am not going to say it is not *anything*, but it is not much. He makes lots and lots of accusations but rarely actually supports anything, and what he does support gets lost in his BS paranoid rants about Apple and Microsoft begin some massive “duopoly”, his bizarre insistence that anyone who has ever had anything to do with MS is one of their drones and must be heavily biased for them, his absurd claims that anyone who defends their IP *must* be wrong (unless it is the GPL they are using to defend their IP), etc.

    I sincerely look forward to your response: point to what Techrights has “uncovered” and done so in a reasonable way.

    Good luck hunting!

  2. walterbyrd said,

    October 17, 2011 at 3:32 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy doesn’t support anything? Excuse me, but I see links all over the place. And no, those links do not all point to this site. The truth is: Florian is just another proven Microsoft scam – one of many *many* proven Microsoft scams. Why does it so anger you when Microsoft is exposed for what they really are? And why do you work so hard to digress from the real issue?

    Michael Reply:

    By all means, quote several things you think Roy has supported well.

    Please note: I am not denying he has – but my point is as you look for these things you will find that he largely points back to his own site, he makes tons of accusations which are pretty silly, he posts paranoid rants about how people are agents for Microsoft, he calls MS and Apple a “duopoly”, he insists that people who protect their own IP are “aggressors” unless it is the GPL they are are protecting, etc.

  3. walterbyrd said,

    October 17, 2011 at 4:03 pm

    Gravatar

    Paranoid rants? I’m sorry but the Florian scam proves Microsoft does employ “secret agents.” Enderle also admits working for Microsoft – on his blog, not in his articles.

    Please specify what Roy claims that consider so silly? How about Microsoft caught red-handed lying to the US DoJ? How about Microsoft caught red-handing bribing officials in the OOXML scam? How about Microsoft creating letters from dead people in one of Microsoft’s astroturfing scams? How about Microsoft secretly supporting the scox-scam? Yes, Virginia, Microsoft really does that kind of stuff.

    Do you really think that most of the public would support Microsoft’s shameful abuse of the US patent system, and legal system? Do you think the public would see the Florian scam as anything other than shamefully dishonest?

    I would say that Roy’s main points tend to be dead on accurate.

    Michael Reply:

    > Paranoid rants? I’m sorry but the Florian scam proves
    > Microsoft does employ “secret agents.” Enderle also
    > admits working for Microsoft – on his blog, not in
    > his articles.

    Are you denying Roy spews the paranoid rants I mentioned?

    * about how people are agents of Microsoft
    * where he calls MS and Apple a duopoly
    * where he insists that people who protect their own IP are “aggressors” unless it is the GPL they are are protecting

    If you are, I can find examples for you.

    > Please specify what Roy claims that consider so
    > silly? How about Microsoft caught red-handed lying to
    > the US DoJ? How about Microsoft caught red-handing
    > bribing officials in the OOXML scam? How about
    > Microsoft creating letters from dead people in one of
    > Microsoft’s astroturfing scams? How about Microsoft
    > secretly supporting the scox-scam? Yes, Virginia,
    > Microsoft really does that kind of stuff.

    Roy sees conspiracies everywhere, as noted above. This is no a defense of Microsoft or a claim they do no wrong.

    > Do you really think that most of the public would
    > support Microsoft’s shameful abuse of the US patent
    > system, and legal system? Do you think the public
    > would see the Florian scam as anything other than
    > shamefully dishonest?

    I think the whole IP system is miserably broken.

    > I would say that Roy’s main points tend to be dead on
    > accurate

    Sure, but I prefer to look at evidence. To each their own – I support choice.

What Else is New


  1. The EFF Back to Tackling Software Patents, Not Just Patent Trolls

    Electronic Frontier Foundation lawyers start targeting large companies that exploit patents for intimidation and extortion, not just patent trolling



  2. Microsoft Wants to Devour the Competition (Linux), Devour People's Data

    Refuting the "new Microsoft" propaganda and some ludicrous concept that Microsoft is now "playing nice"



  3. Benoît Battistelli Thinks 'President' is Above the Law, Decides to Ignore the Court's Ruling

    Staff of the EPO is given yet more reasons to protest tomorrow at the British Consulate, for the so-called 'President' of the EPO reminds everyone of the very raison d'être for the protest -- a vain disregard for the rule of law



  4. Links 24/2/2015: Xfce 4.12 a Week Away, GNOME 3.16 Previewed

    Links for the day



  5. Links 23/2/2015: Ubuntu Kylin 14.04.2 LTS, Cinnamon 2.6 Previews

    Links for the day



  6. IRC Proceedings: February 8th - February 21st, 2015





  7. The EPO's Sham 'Internal Investigation' of EPO Vice-President Željko Topić's Affairs

    The EPO never investigated the Željko Topić affair, it only pretends to have investigated (one small aspect, i.e. cherry-picking) using a Benoît Battistelli-controlled group



  8. Links 21/2/2015: GNOME 3.15.90, Google Wins Android Lawsuit

    Links for the day



  9. Microsoft AstroTurfing War on GNU/Linux is Still Going On, But Hidden Better, Uses API as Instrument of Lock-in

    The corruptible press continues to describe blatant attacks (Embrace, Extend, Extinguish) against GNU/Linux and Free software as Microsoft 'embracing' Open Source



  10. Lenovo's Superfish Scandal is Spyware on Top of Spyware (Microsoft Windows), the Problem is Inherently Proprietary Software

    Shifting focus to the root problem, which is neither Lenovo nor its laptops but the non-free programs installed on hardware



  11. Benoît Battistelli Once Again Threatens EPO Staff That 'Dares' to Protest, Battistelli Exploits Terror Attacks to Pretend to Respect Free Speech

    The European Patent Office (EPO) President, Benoît Battistelli, reportedly started threatening -- as before -- staff that decides to exercise the right to assemble and protest against abuses, including the abuses of President Battistelli himself



  12. Links 20/2/2015: Android Studio v1.1, GDB 7.9

    Links for the day



  13. Links 20/2/2015: Bloomberg Joins Linux Foundation, ClearOS Community 6.6.0

    Links for the day



  14. The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys Slams the European Patent Office for Structural Failings

    An important letter which we overlooked while writing yesterday's 4 articles about the European Patent Office (EPO); yet another key stakeholder complains



  15. Links 19/2/2015: Hewlett-Packard on Cumulus Linux, Previews of GNOME 3.16 Beta

    Links for the day



  16. Techrights Under Attack Again, Shortly After Important EPO Articles

    Techrights highlights a pattern that is months old; Site faces availability issues shortly after reports about the European Patent Office and its abuses



  17. EPO Staff Protests Against Benoît Battistelli’s Lowering of Patents Quality (Scope Expansion and Software Patents for Profit)

    A protest in Munich in less than 6 days will target Mr. Sean Dennehey, who has helped Battistelli cover up his abuses and crush legitimate critics, whom he deemed illegal opposition as if the EPO is an authoritarian regime as opposed to a public service which taxpayers are reluctantly (but forcibly) funding



  18. Breaking: European Patent Office Sued by Its Own Staff in The Hague, Must Unblock Staff's Voices

    The crooked management of the European Patent Office (EPO) gets in legal trouble after repeated attempts to cover up abuses and suppress criticism



  19. Željko Topić's History in SIPO Leaves a Legacy of Alleged DZIV Vehicles (Bribes), Authorship Abuses, and Intimidation Against Reporters

    Another deep look at Željko Topić's background in Croatia, preceding his very notorious appointment to the EPO where he now serves as Benoît Battistelli's most controversial attack dog



  20. The Old Obsession With Patent Trolls Continues to Distract From Debate About Software Patenting

    A roundup of recent coverage about monopolies on algorithms in the United States



  21. Links 19/2/2015: 64-bit ARM Linux, Chinese New Year

    Links for the day



  22. Links 18/2/2015: Linux Report, FlightGear 3.4

    Links for the day



  23. EPO Scandals: The Story So Far

    An overview of articles about mischief, misconduct and breach of laws at the EPO



  24. Links 17/2/2015: TripleO, Pivotal

    Links for the day



  25. Links 17/2/2015: SystemD 219, Frugalware 2.0 (Rigel) Released

    Links for the day



  26. Željko Peratović Slammed for Whitewashing Željko Topić After Publishing Important Piece on Behalf of Key Sources

    Response from Ivan Kabalin to Zeljko Peratovic's so-called "apology" which is both mysterious and seemingly inadequate as it does nothing to actually explain what was wrong (if anything)



  27. Benoît Battistelli Has Made Oversight of European Patent Office Absolutely Impossible





  28. Microsoft Already Killed Nokia, Don't Let It Kill Android Players Too

    Microsoft's strategy against Android mirrors the company's evil strategy that derailed MeeGo and Nokia



  29. Intel Continues to Attack Software Freedom Through UEFI

    The Trojan horse that Microsoft uses to cement its monopoly on desktops and laptops (making it hard or impossible to install and run GNU/Linux) is also being misused to block Coreboot



  30. Links 16/2/2015: Netrunner 15, Bridge Linux

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts