EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

04.11.12

Apple Problems Can Accelerate Linux Domination in Tablets

Posted in Apple, GNU/Linux, Hardware at 12:30 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Capacitors

Summary: Reports suggest that there are systemic issues with the hypePad 3

APPLE QUALITY leaves much to be desired, but Apple uses its deep pockets to conceal evidence of this. Not every company is able to do so much marketing, co-opt the police forces, and shut down sites that it does not like. But that’s the side of Apple many people just don’t know about.

According to this new report, the hypePad 3 defects are probably real and widespread:

A tsunami of complaints about Apple’s “The new iPad” – aka the iPad 3 – are filling Cupertino’s discussion forums, claiming that the 3G and 4G connectivity of Apple’s überpopular fondleslab is bollixed.

“The new iPad has unstable 3G connection” is the title of one forum thread in which the thread-initiator reports: “3G icon is visible and signal is strong but safari tells no connection (other programs don’t have connection as well). Switching to airplane mode and back doesnt help and reset (off and on) always helps, but problem appears again after some period.”

Other users in the same thread agree. “I have the same issue,” says one. “Same here … [I] even resetted my network settings to no avail,” says another, joined by “Same problem” or some variant of the same grievance voiced by others.

What exactly is Apple going to do other than replace one unit with an identical one (as we showed before)? Evidence cannot be hidden forever. Apple tends to deny problems until some class action lawsuit is filed and Apple then settles. The bottom line is, when Apple suffers in this space it’s usually Android that gains. Good for Linux it sure is.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

5 Comments

  1. mcinsand said,

    April 11, 2012 at 1:32 pm

    Gravatar

    >>APPLE QUALITY leaves much to be desired, …

    That depends. If your ego is tied up in buying overpriced shiny, then Apple does have a decent quality, for now. At least, that will hold until people realize that Apple_Fanboy=sucker. Or, if you like to see others’ innovations repackaged and marketed, then Apple does a great job of repackaging and hyping. Another area where Apple succeeds is in exterminating choice among their customers. So, if we define quality in those terms, then Apple’s quality holds.

    However, if performance, value, innovation, and flexibility matter, then Apple is truly the bottom of the barrel, just as they’ve always been. They’ll always have a niche cult following, but I don’t see how they’ll keep existing market share if either MS implodes, and Windows is no longer around to make them look good, or if Linux gains traction, to show that customers can have far more without being overcharged/underchoiced.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    There is also a rich market for overpriced cars and jewelery. There’s a small but lucrative pool out there of people with more money than sense, or insecurity that justifies affiliating with ‘famous’ brands (paying for the marketing/fame).

    NotZed Reply:

    Although ‘perceived quality’ is subjective, actual quality is not.

    e.g. apple 2 used extra cheap plastic that turned wee-yellow after a short time, even though it sold at 3-4x the price of contemporary and more capable hardware.

    When you make a hand-held device that only needs to last until the next model comes out, it’s easy to skimp on quality and not be noticed.

    e.g. the ipad looks and feels nice, but they skimped on hardware performance, internal design, expensive sockets or even removable battery slots and other similar things that one should have expected for such a pricey device.

    The ipad3 obviously wasn’t tested enough, and it’s using a huge chip which was probably cheaper to fab at 45nm than something more modern – which uses more power and generates more heat than the truly cutting edge that people think they’re buying (and certainly paying for) should be.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    iPhone 4 also seems like it was rushed out, due to LG/HTC/Samsung (Android’s pressure with cutting-edge hardware).

  2. Michael said,

    April 11, 2012 at 8:13 pm

    Gravatar

    Apple products, as with all products, are not perfect. But Apple, generally, understand better than any of their competitors that the goal of a product is to serve a need – not have the highest specs or the most boxes checked on some list of checkboxes.

    This is shown by how Apple is able to almost consistently *earn* the highest user satisfaction ratings for all of their product categories: OS X devices, iOS devices, the software that they ship with such devices, etc.

    This does not mean they are perfect – they are far from it. But nobody is able to beat them in serving the needs of the customers. It is by serving the needs so well, and not focusing on the specs and checkmarks, that they have gained such “deep pockets”.

    You have admitted to feeling envious of them. And it shows every time you post about them. Android devices are somewhat behind Apple in terms of user satisfaction and desktop Linux devices are far behind. On servers things are different: there Linux has earned a reputation for being excellent and it serves people well… same with many embedded devices. You do not see people who use or like Apple products whining about this or showing the type of envy and anger you show, Roy.

    Encourage the OSS community to compete better with Apple and the likes. I know… I know… you and your crew will claim I am a horrible troll for noting these things… but largely what I am saying is echoed by Mark Shuttleworth:

    Question:

    What do you see as the main obstacles holding back the
    success of the Linux desktop?

    Shuttleworth

    I think we don’t yet deliver a good enough user experience. I
    think we deliver a user experience for people that have a
    reason to want to be on the Linux platform, either because of
    price or because of freedom. If that was your primary reason,
    Linux is the right answer.
    But if you are somebody who is not too concerned about price,
    who is not too concerned about freedom, I don’t think we can
    say the Linux desktop offers the very best experience. And
    that’s something we have to change, that’s something I’m
    committed to work on, focusing increasing amounts of
    resources of Canonical on figuring out on how we actually
    move the desktop experience forward to compete with Mac OS X.

    Shuttleworth:

    I think the Apple guys have a very good point when they say
    we should let designers lead the definition of the user
    experience.

    If you need help finding out who Mark Shuttleworth is and why he (and those who agree with him) are not trolling against Linux just ask… or accuse me of being a troll and prove you do not know and I will help you find out. Always amazes me how little Roy and crew understand about the OSS ecosystem and how much they claim the people with the most knowledge and influence in it are spreading anti-Linux “trolling” information about it.

What Else is New


  1. Links 23/10/2018: Mesa 18.3 Planned, RISC OS Adopts Apache Licence, Mozilla Firefox 63.0 Available

    Links for the day



  2. Microsoft's Patent Troll Intellectual Ventures Still Suing Microsoft's Rivals, Microsoft Gags Its Staff Regarding Patent Matters

    Microsoft says it's pursuing "truce"; the patent trolls it has created and backed (Bill Gates still backs them at a personal capacity) feel differently



  3. The EPO Under António Campinos Has Opened More Doors to Software Patents and Only Litigators Are Happy

    António Campinos continues Battistelli's tradition of shredding the Convention on the Grant of European Patents (EPC); it's all about generating as much assertion (e.g. litigation, shakedown) activity as possible, serving to bring Europe's productive industries to a halt



  4. German Court on UPC Constitutional Complaint: “No Oral Hearing is Currently Scheduled. A Decision Date is Not Foreseeable at Present.”

    More bad news for Team UPC as there's no sign of Germany signing/ratifying the UPCA and none of the underlying issues (noted in the complaint) have been addressed at all



  5. Links 22/10/2018: New Kernel Release and Linus Torvalds is Back in Charge

    Links for the day



  6. Lack of Patent Quality Means Lack of Patent Validity and Lack of Legal Certainty

    35 U.S.C. § 101 at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) -- like the European Patent Convention (EPC) on the Grant of European Patents -- stresses patent quality and scope; will patent offices get things right before it's too late or too expensive to undo?



  7. Data Engine Technologies (DET) Just One Among Many Microsoft-Connected Patent Trolls That Pick on Microsoft's Biggest Competitors

    Lawyers' articles/blog posts continue to obscure the fact that Data Engine Technologies is merely a satellite or unit (one among many) of patent trolling giant Acacia Research Corp., connected to Microsoft and sporting a long history of lawsuits against GNU/Linux



  8. Alice/Mayo and Hatch-Influenced US Patent Office

    The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) seems to be serving those who pay the most to define the scope or limits of patenting; this means that even nature and life are being 'privatised' (or turned into someone's "intellectual" property)



  9. Funded by the Public to Prey on the Public: The Absurdity of Patent Sales and 'Enforcement' by Government

    Government or US Government-funded entities are looking to tax private companies using patents that were actually funded by the public; in practice this helps private firms or insiders (individuals) personally gain from something that the public subsidised and should thus be in the public domain



  10. Lockpath Patents Demonstrate That the US Patent Office -- Unlike US Courts -- Keeps Ignoring 35 U.S.C. § 101/Alice

    35 U.S.C. § 101 isn’t being entirely followed by examiners of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO); in fact, evidence suggests that mathematics are still becoming monopolies of private firms — something which should never happen



  11. The Eastern District of Texas and Its Patent Trolls Affinity Not a Solved Issue

    The American patent system continues to distribute monopolies on algorithms and some of these cause litigation to reach courts that are notorious for intolerance of 35 U.S.C. § 101, resulting in unnecessary payments to lawyers and patent trolls



  12. More 'Blockchain' Nonsense in Pursuit of Bogus, Nonsensical Software Patents

    The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is still granting abstract software patents because words like "blockchain" get mentioned in the applications; companies that do this hope to shield themselves from disruptive technology and possibly facilitate future patent blackmail



  13. A Warning About MPEG-G, the Latest Software Patents Trap That Threatens Innovation Everywhere

    Combining patents on software and on life, MPEG-G assembles a malicious pool with malignant ramifications for bioinformatics



  14. MIT and the Prior Art Archive Perpetuate Existing Problems

    Large companies with many tens of thousands of patents (each) would have us believe that broadening access/reach of prior art (e.g. to patent examiners) would solve the issues; This may very well work for these large companies, but it overlooks the broader picture



  15. Links 20/10/2018: Mesa 18.2.3 Released, FreeBSD 12.0 Beta 1

    Links for the day



  16. Unified Patents Demolishes Some More Notorious Patent Trolls and Offers Bounties to Take Down More of Them

    Even though the new management of the US patent office treats patent trolls as a non-issue, groups that represent technology firms work hard to improve things (except for the litigation zealots)



  17. The Identity Crisis of the European Patent Office, Wrongly Believing It Exists to Serve Lawyers and Patent Trolls Outside Europe

    The European Patent Office doesn’t even feel like it’s European anymore; it’s just an international patent office that happens to be based (primarily) in Munich; insiders and outsiders alike need to ask themselves what these ‘European’ officials (employing firms outside Europe) have turned the Office into



  18. Links 19/10/2018: OpenBSD 6.4 and OpenSSH 7.9 Released

    Links for the day



  19. Ingve Björn Stjerna Has Just Warned That If Team UPC and the European Patent Office Rigged the Proceedings of the German Constitutional Court, Consequences Would be Significant

    The EPO is back to mentioning the Unified Patent Court and it keeps making it abundantly clear that it is only working for the litigation 'industry' rather than for science and technology (or "innovation" as they like to euphemise it)



  20. Links 18/10/2018: New Ubuntu and Postgres

    Links for the day



  21. It's Almost 2019 and Team UPC is Still Pretending Unitary Patent (UPC) Exists, Merely Waiting for Britain to Join

    Refusing to accept that the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA) has reached its death or is at a dead end, UPC proponents — i.e. lawyers looking to profit from frivolous litigation — resort to outright lies and gymnastics in logic/intellectual gymnastics



  22. IAM and IP Kat Are Still Megaphones of Battistelli and His Agenda

    IAM reaffirms its commitment to corrupt Battistelli and IP Kat maintains its stance, which is basically not caring at all about EPO corruption (to the point of actively deleting blog comments that mention such corruption, i.e. 'sanitising' facts)



  23. The EPO Under António Campinos Relaxes the Rules on Software Patenting and the Litigation 'Industry' Loves That

    EPO management, which is nontechnical, found new terms by which to refer to software patents -- terms that even the marketing departments can endorse (having propped them up); they just call it all AI, augmented intelligence and so on



  24. Links 17/10/2018: Elementary OS 5.0 “Juno” Released, MongoDB’s Server Side Public Licence

    Links for the day



  25. Improving US Patent Quality Through Reassessments of Patents and Courts' Transparency

    Transparency in US courts and more public participation in the patent process (examination, litigation etc.) would help demonstrate that many patents are being granted — and sometimes asserted — that are totally bunk, bogus, fake



  26. Ask OIN How It Intends to Deal With Microsoft Proxies Such as Patent Trolls

    OIN continues to miss the key point (or intentionally avoid speaking about it); Microsoft is still selling 'protection' from the very same patent trolls that it is funding, arming, and sometimes even instructing (who to pass patents to and sue)



  27. Links 1610/2018: Linux 4.19 RC8, Xfce Screensaver 0.1.0 Released

    Links for the day



  28. Judge-Bashing Tactics, Undermining PTAB, and Iancu's Warpath for the Litigation and Insurance 'Industries'

    Many inter partes reviews (IPRs) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) leverage 35 U.S.C. § 101 against software patents; instead of putting an end to such patents Director Iancu decides to just serve the 'industry' he came from (a meta-industry where his firm had worked for Donald Trump)



  29. 'Cloud', 'AI' and Other Buzzwords as Excuses for Granting Fake Patents on Software

    With resurgence of rather meaningless terms like so-called 'clouds' (servers/hosting) and 'AI' (typically anything in code which does something clever, including management of patents) the debate is being shifted away from 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Section 101); but courts would still see past such façade



  30. Corporate Media's Failure to Cover Patents Properly and Our New Hosting Woes

    A status update about EPO affairs and our Web host's plan to shut down (as a whole) very soon, leaving us orphaned or having to pay heavy bills


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts