EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

04.11.12

Apple Problems Can Accelerate Linux Domination in Tablets

Posted in Apple, GNU/Linux, Hardware at 12:30 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Capacitors

Summary: Reports suggest that there are systemic issues with the hypePad 3

APPLE QUALITY leaves much to be desired, but Apple uses its deep pockets to conceal evidence of this. Not every company is able to do so much marketing, co-opt the police forces, and shut down sites that it does not like. But that’s the side of Apple many people just don’t know about.

According to this new report, the hypePad 3 defects are probably real and widespread:

A tsunami of complaints about Apple’s “The new iPad” – aka the iPad 3 – are filling Cupertino’s discussion forums, claiming that the 3G and 4G connectivity of Apple’s überpopular fondleslab is bollixed.

“The new iPad has unstable 3G connection” is the title of one forum thread in which the thread-initiator reports: “3G icon is visible and signal is strong but safari tells no connection (other programs don’t have connection as well). Switching to airplane mode and back doesnt help and reset (off and on) always helps, but problem appears again after some period.”

Other users in the same thread agree. “I have the same issue,” says one. “Same here … [I] even resetted my network settings to no avail,” says another, joined by “Same problem” or some variant of the same grievance voiced by others.

What exactly is Apple going to do other than replace one unit with an identical one (as we showed before)? Evidence cannot be hidden forever. Apple tends to deny problems until some class action lawsuit is filed and Apple then settles. The bottom line is, when Apple suffers in this space it’s usually Android that gains. Good for Linux it sure is.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

5 Comments

  1. mcinsand said,

    April 11, 2012 at 1:32 pm

    Gravatar

    >>APPLE QUALITY leaves much to be desired, …

    That depends. If your ego is tied up in buying overpriced shiny, then Apple does have a decent quality, for now. At least, that will hold until people realize that Apple_Fanboy=sucker. Or, if you like to see others’ innovations repackaged and marketed, then Apple does a great job of repackaging and hyping. Another area where Apple succeeds is in exterminating choice among their customers. So, if we define quality in those terms, then Apple’s quality holds.

    However, if performance, value, innovation, and flexibility matter, then Apple is truly the bottom of the barrel, just as they’ve always been. They’ll always have a niche cult following, but I don’t see how they’ll keep existing market share if either MS implodes, and Windows is no longer around to make them look good, or if Linux gains traction, to show that customers can have far more without being overcharged/underchoiced.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    There is also a rich market for overpriced cars and jewelery. There’s a small but lucrative pool out there of people with more money than sense, or insecurity that justifies affiliating with ‘famous’ brands (paying for the marketing/fame).

    NotZed Reply:

    Although ‘perceived quality’ is subjective, actual quality is not.

    e.g. apple 2 used extra cheap plastic that turned wee-yellow after a short time, even though it sold at 3-4x the price of contemporary and more capable hardware.

    When you make a hand-held device that only needs to last until the next model comes out, it’s easy to skimp on quality and not be noticed.

    e.g. the ipad looks and feels nice, but they skimped on hardware performance, internal design, expensive sockets or even removable battery slots and other similar things that one should have expected for such a pricey device.

    The ipad3 obviously wasn’t tested enough, and it’s using a huge chip which was probably cheaper to fab at 45nm than something more modern – which uses more power and generates more heat than the truly cutting edge that people think they’re buying (and certainly paying for) should be.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    iPhone 4 also seems like it was rushed out, due to LG/HTC/Samsung (Android’s pressure with cutting-edge hardware).

  2. Michael said,

    April 11, 2012 at 8:13 pm

    Gravatar

    Apple products, as with all products, are not perfect. But Apple, generally, understand better than any of their competitors that the goal of a product is to serve a need – not have the highest specs or the most boxes checked on some list of checkboxes.

    This is shown by how Apple is able to almost consistently *earn* the highest user satisfaction ratings for all of their product categories: OS X devices, iOS devices, the software that they ship with such devices, etc.

    This does not mean they are perfect – they are far from it. But nobody is able to beat them in serving the needs of the customers. It is by serving the needs so well, and not focusing on the specs and checkmarks, that they have gained such “deep pockets”.

    You have admitted to feeling envious of them. And it shows every time you post about them. Android devices are somewhat behind Apple in terms of user satisfaction and desktop Linux devices are far behind. On servers things are different: there Linux has earned a reputation for being excellent and it serves people well… same with many embedded devices. You do not see people who use or like Apple products whining about this or showing the type of envy and anger you show, Roy.

    Encourage the OSS community to compete better with Apple and the likes. I know… I know… you and your crew will claim I am a horrible troll for noting these things… but largely what I am saying is echoed by Mark Shuttleworth:

    Question:

    What do you see as the main obstacles holding back the
    success of the Linux desktop?

    Shuttleworth

    I think we don’t yet deliver a good enough user experience. I
    think we deliver a user experience for people that have a
    reason to want to be on the Linux platform, either because of
    price or because of freedom. If that was your primary reason,
    Linux is the right answer.
    But if you are somebody who is not too concerned about price,
    who is not too concerned about freedom, I don’t think we can
    say the Linux desktop offers the very best experience. And
    that’s something we have to change, that’s something I’m
    committed to work on, focusing increasing amounts of
    resources of Canonical on figuring out on how we actually
    move the desktop experience forward to compete with Mac OS X.

    Shuttleworth:

    I think the Apple guys have a very good point when they say
    we should let designers lead the definition of the user
    experience.

    If you need help finding out who Mark Shuttleworth is and why he (and those who agree with him) are not trolling against Linux just ask… or accuse me of being a troll and prove you do not know and I will help you find out. Always amazes me how little Roy and crew understand about the OSS ecosystem and how much they claim the people with the most knowledge and influence in it are spreading anti-Linux “trolling” information about it.

What Else is New


  1. Links 18/6/2019: Linux 5.2 RC5 and OpenMandriva Lx 4

    Links for the day



  2. Weaponising Russophobia Against One's Critics

    Response to smears and various whispering campaigns whose sole purpose is to deplete the support base for particular causes and people; these sorts of things have gotten out of control in recent years



  3. When the EPO is Run by Politicians It's Expected to Be Aggressive and Corrupt Like Purely Political Establishments

    António 'Photo Op' Campinos will have marked his one-year anniversary in July; he has failed to demonstrate morality, respect for the law, understanding of the sciences, leadership by example and even the most basic honesty (he lies a lot)



  4. Links 16/6/2019: Tmax OS and New Features for KDE.org

    Links for the day



  5. Stuffed/Stacked Panels Sent Back Packing After One-Sided Patent Hearings That Will Convince Nobody, Just Preach to the Choir

    Almost a week ago the 'world tour' of patent lobbyists in US Senate finally ended; it was an utterly ridiculous case study in panel stacking and bribery (attempts to buy laws)



  6. 2019 H1: American Software Patents Are as Worthless as They Were Last Year and Still Susceptible to Invalidation

    With a fortnight left before the second half of the year it seems evident that software patents aren't coming back; the courts have not changed their position at all



  7. As European Patent Office Management Covers up Collapse in Patent Quality Don't Expect UPC to Ever Kick Off

    It would be madness to allow EPO-granted patents to become 'unitary' (bypassing sovereignty of nations that actually still value patent quality); it seems clear that rogue EPO management has, in effect, not only doomed UPC ambitions but also European Patents (or their perceived legitimacy, presumption of validity)



  8. António Campinos -- Unlike His Father -- Engages in Imperialism (Using Invalid Patents)

    Despite some similarities to his father (not positive similarities), António Campinos is actively engaged in imperialistic agenda that defies even European law; the EPO not only illegally grants patents but also urges other patent offices to do the same



  9. António Campinos Takes EPO Waste and Corruption to Unprecedented Levels and Scale

    The “B” word (billions) is thrown around at Europe’s second-largest institution because a mischievous former EUIPO chief (not Archambeau) is ‘partying’ with about half of the EPO’s all-time savings, which are supposed to be reserved for pensions and other vital programmes, not presidential palaces and gambling



  10. Links 15/6/2019: Astra Linux in Russia, FreeBSD 11.3 RC

    Links for the day



  11. Code of Conduct Explained: Partial Transcript - August 10th, 2018 - Episode 80, The Truth About Southeast Linuxfest

    "Ask Noah" and the debate on how a 'Code of Conduct' is forcibly imposed on events



  12. Links 14/6/2019: Xfce-Related Releases, PHP 7.4.0 Alpha

    Links for the day



  13. The EPO is a Patent Troll's Wet Dream

    The makers of software and games in Europe will have to spend a lot of money just keeping patent trolls off their backs — a fact that seems to never bother EPO management because it profits from it



  14. EPO Spreading Patent Extremists' Ideology to the Whole World, Now to South Korea

    The EPO’s footprint around the world's patent systems is an exceptionally dangerous one; The EPO amplifies the most zealous voices of the patents and litigation ‘industry’ while totally ignoring the views and interests of the European public, rendering the EPO an ‘agent of corporate occupation’



  15. Guest Post: Notes on Free Speech, and a Line in the Sand

    We received this anonymous letter and have published it as a follow-up to "Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF"



  16. Links 13/6/2019: CERN Dumps Microsoft, GIMP 2.10.12 Released

    Links for the day



  17. Links 12/6/2019: Mesa 19.1.0, KDE neon 5.16, Endless OS 3.6.0 and BackBox Linux 6

    Links for the day



  18. Leaked Financial 'Study' Document Shows EPO Management and Mercer Engaging in an Elaborate “Hoax”

    How the European Patent Office (EPO) lies to its own staff to harm that staff; thankfully, the staff isn't easily fooled and this whole affair will merely obliterate any remnants of "benefit of the doubt" the President thus far enjoyed



  19. Measuring Patent Quality and Employer Quality in Europe

    Comparing the once-famous and respected EPO to today's joke of an office, which grants loads of bogus patents on just about anything including fruit and mathematics



  20. Granting More Fundamentally Wrong Patents Will Mean Reduced Certainty, Not Increased Certainty

    Law firms that are accustomed to making money from low-quality and abstract patents try to overcome barriers by bribing politicians; this will backfire because they show sheer disregard for the patent system's integrity and merely lower the legal certainty associated with granted (by greedy offices) patents



  21. Links 11/6/2019: Wine 4.10, Plasma 5.16

    Links for the day



  22. Chapter 10: Moving Forward -- Getting the Best Results From Open Source With Your Monopoly

    “the gradual shift in public consciousness from their branding towards our own, is the next best thing to owning them outright.”



  23. Chapter 9: Ownership Through Branding -- Change the Names, and Change the World

    The goal for those fighting against Open source, against the true openness (let's call it the yet unexploited opportunities) of Open source, has to be first to figuratively own the Linux brand, then literally own or destroy the brand, then to move the public awareness of the Linux brand to something like Azure, or whatever IBM is going to do with Red Hat.



  24. Links 10/6/2019: VLC 3.0.7, KDE Future Plans

    Links for the day



  25. Patent Quality Continues to Slip in Europe and We Know Who Will Profit From That (and Distract From It)

    The corporate media and large companies don't speak about it (like Red Hat did before entering a relationship with IBM), but Europe is being littered and saturated with a lot of bogus software patents -- abstract patents that European courts would almost certainly throw out; this utter failure of the media to do journalism gets exploited by the "big litigation" lobby and EPO management that's granting loads of invalid European Patents (whose invalidation goes underreported or unreported in the media)



  26. Corporate Front Groups Like OIN and the Linux Foundation Need to Combat Software Patents If They Really Care About Linux

    The absurdity of having groups that claim to defend Linux but in practice defend software patents, if not actively then passively (by refusing to comment on this matter)



  27. Links 9/6/2019: Arrest of Microsoft Peter, Linux 5.2 RC4, Ubuntu Touch Update

    Links for the day



  28. Chapter 8: A Foot in the Door -- How to Train Sympathetic Developers and Infiltrate Other Projects

    How to train sympathetic developers and infiltrate other projects



  29. Chapter 7: Patent War -- Use Low-Quality Patents to Prove That All Software Rips Off Your Company

    Patents in the United States last for 20 years from the time of filing. Prior to 1994, the patent term was 17 years from when the patent was issued.



  30. The Linux Foundation in 2019: Over 100 Million Dollars in Income, But Cannot Maintain Linux.com?

    Today’s Linux Foundation gets about 0.1 billion dollars per year (as explained in our previous post), so why can’t it spend about 0.1% of that money on people who write for and maintain a site that actually promotes GNU/Linux?


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts