EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.06.18

Patents Roundup: Nintendo, Watchtroll’s Lies, Judge Reyna’s Latest Decision (Disc Disease), and Bayh-Dole

Posted in Courtroom, Patents at 1:11 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

A massive column

Summary: Leftovers from this past week’s patent news, implicating Nintendo and various spinners who are trying to ‘oversell’ patents

THE END of another week is also the first weekend of this month and thus our first ‘sweep-up’ of USPTO news. We try to take stock of everything, knowing that patent matters impact a lot of things.

“It was a quiet week after a climatic week of Oil States, which patent maximalists hope we already forgot about (because it legitimises PTAB).”So what else has happened during this past week? Actually not much. It was a quiet week after a climatic week of Oil States, which patent maximalists hope we already forgot about (because it legitimises PTAB).

Nintendo

We last wrote about Nintendo in relation to patents just several weeks ago. Nintendo isn’t a company that’s truly aggressive with patents, except in some rarer circumstances. Sony is probably the only large Japanese company that deserves notoriety for its patent strategy.

The latest preliminary action (very far from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)) was mentioned some days ago in relation to an ITC invocation; the ITC is usually interested in embargo of non-US firms (or their products); it’s a sanctions agency which is lot less interested in actual justice or innovation. It even ignores other courts/tribunals like PTAB. Based on the report, some incognito “firm has filed another claim with the US International Trade Commission (ITC), which has now agreed to look further into the matter. The ITC has announced it is investigating, “certain portable gaming console systems with attachable handheld controllers and components thereof,” and that it, “has not yet made any decision on the merits of the case.” Gamevice is asking for the US to block all imports of Nintendo Switch based on said patent infringement, but Nintendo has a long history of beating these kinds of cases so it seems unlikely to cause the Big N too many issues or, ultimately, halt Switch imports in the US.”

“Gamevice Wants The US To Block Nintendo Switch Imports Because It Infringes On Its Patents,” says the headline. Will it be embargo by default? Who faces the burden of proof here? If patents are so great for ‘consumers’, then ITC staff will hold off until an actual legal case concludes (before doing anything).

Spinning the CAFC

Speaking of CAFC, this patent maximalist has oddly enough said: “The Federal Circuit [CAFC] recently ruled that Alice did not change the law of 101. Really? If the law remained the same post-Alice why was Alice a clear pivotal moment in software patent history? Seems the CAFC is out of touch.”

Or maybe the sources of such information are just crap. That’s linking to Watchtroll’s “Federal Circuit rules Alice did not alter the law governing 101″ — about the case Voter Verified, Inc. v Election Sys. & Software LLC. Watchtroll is basically spinning a CAFC case yet again, hoping that his spin will somehow incite, making it seem like software patents have legitimacy still (they don’t, not in high courts anyway). It has been 4 years since Alice and nothing has changed as far as the Supreme Court is concerned. This is what Watchtroll said:

On April 20, 2018, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Voter Verified, Inc. v. Election Sys. & Software LLC, a case arising from an appeal by Voter Verified, Inc. from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida’s dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) of its claim for patent infringement. The district court held that the claims of U.S. Reissue Patent RE40,449 (“the ‘449 patent”) are directed to patent-ineligible subject matter and, therefore, are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The Federal Circuit, in a decision authored by Judge Lourie, joined by Judges Newman and Reyna, affirmed.

Writing about the same CAFC case, Charles Bieneman (another patent maximalist) said this (with a more accurate headline):

A Federal Circuit panel (Judges Lourie, Newman, and Reyna) has rejected a district court’s statement that Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l., was “an intervening change in the law” that would “exempt a potential application of issue preclusion.” However, after finding that patent-eligibility was not previously litigated, the court held that issue preclusion did not prevent a determination that claims directed to “’auto-verification’ of a voter’s ballot” are patent-ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Voter Verified, Inc. v. Election Systems and Software, LLC., No. 2017-1930 (Fed. Cir. April 20, 2018) (precedential).

Notice the highlight which Watchtroll conveniently omitted (also from the headline). This is not accidental. Watchtroll just wanted a dramatic and misleading headline like “Federal Circuit rules Alice did not alter the law governing 101″ (without completing this sentence somehow this should be regarded as highly misleading). Compare a headline like “US rules out war on Iraq” to “US rules out war on Iraq using nuclear weapons to strike key targets” (clearly not the same thing).

If patent extremists like Watchtroll wish to know why they’re widely ridiculed (in circles we know and speak to at least), it’s stuff such as this. Not to mention Watchtroll’s judge-bashing antics…

Judge Reyna

Speaking of judge-bashing, after Dennis Crouch’s mockery of Judge Reyna (CAFC) we’re seeing some more polite posts. The other day he said that a “district court dismissed the [patent] case with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted,” then explaining Judge Reyna’s decision in some more details:

Disc Disease’s asserted patents relate to an inflatable air-brace for spinal support. U.S. Patent Nos. 8,012,113 and 7,618,509. The accused infringer sells three different inflatable spinal braces. However, after considering the complaint filed by Disc Disease, the district court dismissed the case with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (R.12(b)(6)). In the process, the district court rejected Disc Disease’s request to file a first amended complaint.

[...]

Judge Reyna’s [CAFC] decision here decides the case at hand, but does not provide substantial guide-posts beyond the general rule – Provide Fair Notice. What we do know is that in a simple case it will be sufficient to simply identify (1) the patents being asserted and (2) the products being accused.

Days later Dennis Crouch also recalled what Benjamin Henrion calls the “universities-as-trolls-act,” namely Bayh-Dole. He has reasons to believe that a “quarantine” is in order:

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (a branch of the Department of Commerce) has announced a new initiative to “improve federal technology transfer” along with a Request for Information (RFI) published in the Federal Register.

[...]

Looming large in the background of current Federal Policy is the the Bayh-Dole Act that allows universities and companies to privately patent the results of federally funded research. In two-years, Bayh-Dole will have its 40th Anniversary — thus the “quarantine” title.

Bayh-Dole has contributed a great deal to patent trolling in the United States. It’s nothing to be celebrated, only to be mocked. It’s an injustice when public money is misused for private gain and we wrote about Bayh-Dole many times over the years, e.g. in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Recall the paper below.

Bayh-Dole
Full paper [PDF]

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 11/12/2018: Tails 3.11, New Firefox, FreeBSD 12.0

    Links for the day



  2. Number of Filings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Highest in Almost Two Years

    Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs), which [cref 113718 typically invalidate software patents by citing 35 U.S.C. § 101], are withstanding negative rhetoric and hostility from Iancu



  3. With 'Brexit' in a Lot of Headlines Team UPC Takes the Unitary Patent Lies up a Notch

    Misinformation continues to run like water; people are expected to believe that the UPC, an inherently EU-centric construct, can magically come to fruition in the UK (or in Europe as a whole)



  4. The EPO Not Only Abandoned the EPC But Also the Biotech Directive

    Last week's decision (T1063/18, EPO Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.04) shows that there's still a long way to go before the Office and the Organisation as a whole fulfil their obligation to those who birthed the Organisation in the first placeLast week's decision (T1063/18, EPO Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.04) shows that there's still a long way to go before the Office and the Organisation as a whole fulfil their obligation to those who birthed the Organisation in the first place



  5. Patents on Abstract Things and on Life (or Patents Which Threaten Lives) Merely Threaten the Very Legitimacy of Patent Offices, Including EPO

    Patent Hubris and maximalism pose a threat or a major risk to the very system that they claim to be championing; by reducing the barrier to entry (i.e. introducing low-quality or socially detrimental patents) they merely embolden ardent critics who demand patent systems as a whole be abolished; the EPO is nowadays a leading example of it



  6. Links 10/12/2018: Linux 4.20 RC6 and Git 2.20

    Links for the day



  7. US Courts Make the United States' Patent System Sane Again

    35 U.S.C. § 101 (Section 101), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and other factors are making the patent system in the US a lot more sane



  8. Today's USPTO Grants a Lot of Fake Patents, Software Patents That Courts Would Invalidate

    The 35 U.S.C. § 101 effect is very much real; patents on abstract/nonphysical ideas get invalidated en masse (in courts/PTAB) and Director Andrei Iancu refuses to pay attention as if he's above the law and court rulings don't apply to him



  9. A Month After Microsoft Claimed Patent 'Truce' Its Patent Trolls Keep Attacking Microsoft's Rivals

    Microsoft's legal department relies on its vultures (to whom it passes money and patents) to sue its rivals; but other than that, Microsoft is a wonderful company!



  10. Good News: US Supreme Court Rejects Efforts to Revisit Alice, Most Software Patents to Remain Worthless

    35 U.S.C. § 101 will likely remain in tact for a long time to come; courts have come to grips with the status quo, as even the Federal Circuit approves the large majority of invalidations by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) panels, initiated by inter partes reviews (IPRs)



  11. Florian Müller's Article About SEPs and the EPO

    Report from the court in Munich, where the EPO is based



  12. EPO Vice-President Željko Topić in New Article About Corruption in Croatia

    The Croatian newspaper 7Dnevno has an outline of what Željko Topić has done in Croatia and in the EPO in Munich; it argues that this seriously erodes Croatia's national brand/identity



  13. The Quality of European Patents Continues to Deteriorate Under António Campinos and Software Patents Are Advocated Every Day

    The EPC in the European Patent Office and 35 U.S.C. § 101 in the USPTO annul most if not all software patents; under António Campinos, however, software patents are being granted in Europe and the USPTO exploits similar tricks



  14. Team UPC is Still Spreading False Rumours in an Effort to Trick Politicians and Pressure Judges

    Abuses at the European Patent Office, political turmoil and an obvious legislative coup by a self-serving occupation that produces nothing have already doomed the Unitary Patent or Unified Patent Court (UPC); so now we deal with complete fabrications from Team UPC as they're struggling to make something out of nothing, anonymously smearing opposition to the UPC and anonymously making stuff up



  15. Patents on Life and Patents That Kill the Poor Would Only Delegitimise the European Patent Office

    After Mayo, Myriad and other SCOTUS cases (the basis of 35 U.S.C. § 101) the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is reluctant to grant patents on life; the European Patent Office (EPO), however, goes in the opposite direction, even in defiance of the European Patent Convention



  16. EPO 'Untapped Potential'

    "Campinos is diligently looking for ways to further increase the Office’s output without increasing the number of examiners," says the EPO-FLIER team



  17. Links 9/12/2018: New Linux Stable Releases (Notably Linux 4.19.8), RC Coming, and Unifont 11.0.03

    Links for the day



  18. Links 8/12/2018: Mesa 18.3.0, Mageia 7 Beta, WordPress 5.0

    Links for the day



  19. The European Patent Organisation is Like a Private Club and Roland Grossenbacher is Back in It

    In the absence of Benoît Battistelli quality control at the EPO is still not effective; patents are being granted like the sole goal is to increase so-called 'production' (or profit), appeals are being subjected to threats from Office management, and external courts (courts that assess patents outside the jurisdiction of the Office/Organisation) are being targeted with a long-sought replacement like the Unified Patent Court, or UPC (Unitary Patent)



  20. Links 7/12/2018: GNU Guix, GuixSD 0.16.0, GCC 7.4, PHP 7.3.0 Released

    Links for the day



  21. The Federal Circuit's Decision on Ancora Technologies v HTC America is the Rare Exception, Not the Norm

    Even though the PTAB does not automatically reject every patent when 35 U.S.C. § 101 gets invoked we're supposed to think that somehow things are changing in favour of patent maximalists; but all they do is obsess over something old (as old as a month ago) and hardly controversial



  22. The European Patent Office Remains a Lawless Place Where Judges Are Afraid of the Banker in Chief

    With the former banker Campinos replacing the politician Battistelli and seeking to have far more powers it would be insane for the German Constitutional Court to ever allow anything remotely like the UPC; sites that are sponsored by Team UPC, however, try to influence outcomes, pushing patent maximalism and diminishing the role of patent judges



  23. Many of the Same People Are Still in Charge of the European Patent Office Even Though They Broke the Law

    "EPO’s art collection honoured with award," the EPO writes, choosing to distract from what actually goes on at the Office and has never been properly dealt with



  24. Links 6/12/2018: FreeNAS 11.2, Mesa 18.3 Later Today, Fedora Elections

    Links for the day



  25. EPO, in Its Patent Trolls-Infested Forum, Admits It is Granting Bogus Software Patents Under the Guise of 'Blockchain'

    Yesterday's embarrassing event of the EPO was a festival of the litigation giants and trolls, who shrewdly disguise patents on algorithms using all sorts of fashionable words that often don't mean anything (or deviate greatly from their original meanings)



  26. The Patent Litigation Bubble is Imploding in the US While the UPC Dies in Europe

    The meta-industry which profits from feuds, disputes, threats and blackmail isn't doing too well; even in Europe, where it worked hard for a number of years to institute a horrible litigation system which favours global plaintiffs (patent trolls, opportunists and monopolists), these things are going up in flames



  27. Links 5/12/2018: Epic Games Store, CrossOver 18.1.0, Important Kubernetes Patch

    Links for the day



  28. Links 4/12/2018: LibrePCB 0.1.0, SQLite 3.26.0, PhysX Code

    Links for the day



  29. EPO Management Keeps Embarrassing Itself, UPC More Dead Than Before, and Nokia Turns Aggressive

    The EPO’s race to the bottom of patent quality continues, it’s now complemented by direct association with patent trolls and law stands in their way (for they repeatedly violate the law)



  30. The Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) and IBM Are Part of the Software Patents Problem in the United States

    IBM's special role in lobbying for software patents (and against PTAB) needs to be highlighted; even Ethereum’s co-founder isn't happy about IBM's meddling in the blockchain space (with help from Hyperledger/Linux Foundation)


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts