10.08.21

Gemini version available ♊︎

The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part VI: A Distinct Lack of Dutch Courage

Posted in Europe, Patents at 5:24 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Series parts:

  1. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part I: Let the Sunshine In!
  2. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part II: A “Unanimous” Endorsement?
  3. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part III: Three Missing Votes
  4. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IV: The Founding States
  5. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part V: Germany Says “Ja”
  6. YOU ARE HERE ☞ A Distinct Lack of Dutch Courage

Guus Broesterhuizen and his deputies Paul van Beukering and Derk-Jan de Groot
The Netherlands delegation: Guus Broesterhuizen and his deputies Paul van Beukering and Derk-Jan de Groot.

Summary: The “Strike Regulations” long protected by António Campinos (for more than 3 years) were supported by the Dutch delegation despite being unlawful; we take a look back at the people who made these illegal policies possible

We now turn to the delegation representing the EPO‘s second host state, the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

In June 2013 the Dutch delegation was headed by Guus Broesterhuizen, director of the Netherlands IPO.

“In June 2013 the Dutch delegation was headed by Guus Broesterhuizen, director of the Netherlands IPO.”At the 136th Meeting of the Administrative Council, Broesterhuizen was accompanied by his deputy Paul van Beukering from the Ministry of Economic Affairs and his designated successor Derk-Jan de Groot, head of the Patent Division at the Netherlands IPO.

Given that the Dutch delegation developed a reputation for being openly critical of Benoît Battistelli‘s “reign of terror” at the EPO and his nefarious influence over the smaller contracting states, it’s a bit surprising at first glance to see that they voted in favour of the “Strike Regulations” in June 2013.

The most likely explanation here is that this was due to the influence of the head of the delegation at the time, Guus Broesterhuizen.

Battistelli-and-Kongstad-in-the-Hague
Broesterhuizen (right) whooping it up with Battistelli and Kongstad in the Hague in 2010 [PDF] accompanied by Chris Buijink (left) from the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs.

Broesterhuizen was a member of the Council’s “old guard”. He was a longtime chairman of the Administrative Council’s Budget and Finance Committee and he seems to have been “best buddies” with Battistelli and Kongstad.

“Broesterhuizen was a member of the Council’s “old guard”. He was a longtime chairman of the Administrative Council’s Budget and Finance Committee and he seems to have been “best buddies” with Battistelli and Kongstad.”For example, just after Battistelli had taken up his new post at the head of the EPO, Broesterhuizen organised an event to celebrate one hundred years of Dutch Patent Law where he played host to Battistelli and Kongstad. This event took place on the margins of the 125th meeting of the Council held in The Hague in October 2010. [PDF]

The key fact to be noted here is that the 136th meeting of the Council in June 2013 was Broesterhuizen’s last EPO engagement before his retirement the following month. Back in those days, retiring Council delegates didn’t normally go on to be appointed as EPO Vice-Presidents.

The minutes of the meeting record that “the Chairman [Kongstad] and the President [Battistelli], on behalf of the Council and the Office respectively, paid tribute to Guus Broesterhuizen, head of the Netherlands delegation and former chairman of the Budget and Finance Committee (June 2009 to June 2012), who was attending his final Council meeting before retirement, and wished him well for the future”.

Kongstad’s speech in honour of Broesterhuizen is annexed to the minutes.

“The key fact to be noted here is that the 136th meeting of the Council in June 2013 was Broesterhuizen’s last EPO engagement before his retirement the following month.”Broesterhuizen was succeeded as head of delegation by the new director of the Netherlands IPO, Derk-Jan de Groot. Paul van Beukering from the Ministry of Economic Affairs continues to serve as the deputy head of delegation.

The critical stance of the Dutch delegation towards Battistelli’s France-Télécom-style excesses at the EPO is something which really only developed after Broesterhuizen’s departure.

It should not be forgotten that back in June 2013 – the Netherlands was doing quite nicely from Battistelli’s presidency.

Wim van der Eijk
Wim van der Eijk, the successful Dutch candidate for the position of Vice-President in charge of the Boards of Appeal was appointed to this position in 2011.

To begin with, back in November 2011, the Netherlands had succeeded in getting its candidate selected for one of the top EPO management positions when Wim Van der Eijk was appointed as Vice-President of the Boards of Appeal. [PDF]

EPO-New-Main-building-in-Rijswijk
Laying of the foundation stone for the EPO’s New Main building in Rijswijk in June 2014. [PDF]
The tendering process was well under way by mid-2013.

In addition to this, the “New Main” building project in The Hague was in the pipeline.

“It should not be forgotten that back in June 2013 – the Netherlands was doing quite nicely from Battistelli’s presidency.”Although the foundation stone would not be laid for another year (on 25 June 2014), the tendering process [PDF] was well under way in mid-2013 and the contract would be eventually signed in September of that year. [PDF]

Battistelli-Dutch-Queen
Battistelli trots behind the Dutch Queen at the European Inventor Award ceremony in Amsterdam on 28 May 2013.

Finally, in 2013 the Netherlands was a beneficiary of Battistelli’s European Inventor Award boondoggle which took place in Amsterdam [PDF] on 28 May, shortly before the 136th Meeting of the Administrative Council in June.

“The social conflict inside the EPO, although simmering in the background, had not yet boiled over into the public domain to any noticeable extent.”So in June 2013 the Dutch delegation had much reason to be satisfied with the interim “results” of Battistelli’s presidency and had no major grounds for complaint.

The social conflict inside the EPO, although simmering in the background, had not yet boiled over into the public domain to any noticeable extent.

The Dutch vote in favour of Battistelli’s “Strike Regulations” at the 136th meeting of the Administrative Council in June 2013 seems to have been a final act of loyalty on the part of Broesterhuizen towards his old “buddies” Battistelli and Kongstad.

Broesterhuizen’s little favour to his “buddies” subsequently contributed to a huge amount of political fallout in his home country.

“During the litigation procedure, the Gerechtshof den Haag (Appeal Court of The Hague) decided that breaches of fundamental rights by EPO management were so severe that they justified lifting the organisation’s immunity from jurisdiction.”The controversial “Strike Regulations” which Broesterhuizen helped to rubber-stamp in 2013 were one of a long litany of grievances which the EPO staff union SUEPO attempted to litigate before national courts in the Netherlands.

During the litigation procedure, the Gerechtshof den Haag (Appeal Court of The Hague) decided that breaches of fundamental rights by EPO management were so severe that they justified lifting the organisation’s immunity from jurisdiction.

In a judgment delivered on 17 February 2015, the Appeal Court ordered the EPO [PDF] to rescind several amendments to the organisation’s staff regulations, including undue restrictions on industrial actions imposed by the “Strike Regulations” of 2013.

“This judgment was a major source of public embarrassment to Battistelli.”In addition to this, the EPO was ordered by the court to uphold the rule-of-law and social dialogue standards in line with the European Convention on Human Rights and ILO Conventions No. 87, on the right to organise in trade unions, and No. 98 on the right to collective bargaining. [PDF]

This judgment was a major source of public embarrassment to Battistelli. In a bizarre and absurdly comical “damage limitation” exercise, he got his senior management team to subscribe to a statement under the heading “No, the EPO is not violating fundamental human rights” (warning: epo.org link) which was published on the EPO’s website on 18 March 2015.

In addition to Battistelli, the statement [PDF] was signed by EPO Vice-Presidents Guillaume Minnoye, Alberto Casado, Željko Topić and Raimund Lutz, the Principal Director of Human Resources Elodie Bergot, as well as Francisco del Pozo (Principal Director Finance), René Kraft (Chief Information Officer) and Aidan Kendrick (Principal Director Controlling Office).

“This long-drawn-out high-profile legal affair had revealed the serious and ongoing breaches of fundamental rights by EPO management and exposed them to the glare of public scrutiny.”The Appeal Court judgment was a thorn in the flesh not only for Battistelli but also for the Dutch government because it set an uncomfortable precedent with respect to the limits of the “immunity” enjoyed by the large number of international organisations which are based in the Netherlands.

In the end the Dutch government joined forces with the EPO in support of an application for “cassation” of the Appeal Court judgment. Finally, on January 2017, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that Dutch courts had no jurisdiction in the EPO dispute.

Although SUEPO ultimately lost the legal battle before the Dutch courts, it nevertheless won a significant moral victory. This long-drawn-out high-profile legal affair had revealed the serious and ongoing breaches of fundamental rights by EPO management and exposed them to the glare of public scrutiny.

The affair also seems to have played a significant role in convincing Broesterhuizen’s successor on the EPO’s Administrative Council, Derk-Jan de Groot, that Battistelli was not to be trusted.

“The finding of the Appeal Court to the effect that Battistelli’s “Strike Regulations” were incompatible with international legal standards was ultimately vindicated by the ILOAT over six years later when the Tribunal struck down these manifestly unlawful measures on 7 July 2021.”It’s also important to realise that the ruling of the Dutch Supreme Court did not negate the material findings of the Appeal Court concerning breaches of fundamental rights by EPO management. It simply said that the Appeal Court should have refrained from adjudicating the matter and that it should not have decided to lift the EPO’s immunity.

The finding of the Appeal Court to the effect that Battistelli’s “Strike Regulations” were incompatible with international legal standards was ultimately vindicated by the ILOAT over six years later when the Tribunal struck down these manifestly unlawful measures on 7 July 2021.

By that time Broesterhuizen had long since sailed off into the sunset and was devoting his time and energy to various worthy activities, including as acting as a “Certified OCG Gateway reviewer” and a member of the notoriously dysfunctional EPO Internal Appeals Committee.

“In the next part we will take a look at the delegation representing the Netherlands’ smaller neighbour, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.”In addition to that, he acts as treasurer for the Leiden branch of the Dutch Red Cross and as a chairman of the board of Stichting govroam, an initiative similar to eduroam which aims to provide wireless/Wi-Fi roaming service for public services and governmental administrations.

As he enjoys his retirement in the Netherlands, Brotesterhuizen is probably not even aware of the damage which his actions as an Administrative Council delegate caused – both to the reputation of the EPO and to the legitimate interests of its staff.

In the next part we will take a look at the delegation representing the Netherlands’ smaller neighbour, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 03/02/2023: OpenSSH 9.2 and OBS Studio 29.0.1

    Links for the day



  2. Links 03/02/2023: GNU C Library 2.37

    Links for the day



  3. Sirius Finished

    Yesterday I was sent a letter approving my resignation from Sirius ‘Open Source’, two months after I had already announced that I was resigning with immediate effect; they sent an identical letter to my wife (this time, unlike before, they remembered to also change the names!!)



  4. The Collapse of Sirius in a Nutshell: How to Identify the Symptoms and Decide When to Leave

    Sirius is finished, but it's important to share the lessons learned with other people; there might be other "pretenders" out there and they need to be abandoned



  5. Links 03/02/2023: WINE 8.1 and RapidDisk 9.0.0

    Links for the day



  6. Links 02/02/2023: KDE Gear 22.12.2 and LibreOffice 7.5

    Links for the day



  7. Linux News or Marketing Platform?

    Ads everywhere: Phoronix puts them at the top, bottom, navigation bar, left, and right just to read some Microsoft junk (puff pieces about something that nobody other than Microsoft even uses); in addition there are pop-ups asking for consent to send visitors’ data to hundreds of data brokers



  8. Daily Links at Techrights Turn 15, Time to Give Them an Upgrade

    This year we have several 15-year anniversaries; one of them is Daily Links (it turned 15 earlier this week) and we've been working to improve these batches of links, making them a lot more extensive and somewhat better structured/clustered



  9. Back to Focusing on Unified Patent Court (UPC) Crimes and Illegal Patent Agenda, Including the EPO's

    The EPO's (European Patent Office, Europe's second-largest institution) violations of constitutions, laws and so on merit more coverage, seeing that what's left of the "media" not only fails to cover scandalous things but is actively cheering for criminals (in exchange for money)



  10. European Patent Office Staff Votes in Favour of Freedom of Association (97% of Voters in Support)

    The Central Staff Committee (CSC) at the EPO makes a strong case for António Campinos to stop breaking and law and actually start obeying court orders (he’s no better than Benoît Battistelli and he uses worse language already)



  11. Links 02/02/2023: Glibc 2.37 and Go 1.20

    Links for the day



  12. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, February 01, 2023

    IRC logs for Wednesday, February 01, 2023



  13. Links 01/02/2023: Security Problems, Unrest, and More

    Links for the day



  14. Links 01/02/2023: Stables Kernels and Upcoming COSMIC From System76

    Links for the day



  15. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 31, 2023

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 31, 2023



  16. Links 31/01/2023: Catchup Again, Wayland in Xfce 4.20

    Links for the day



  17. Links 31/01/2023: elementary OS 7

    Links for the day



  18. Intimidation Against Nitrux Development Team Upsets the Community and Makes the Media Less Trustworthy

    Nitrux is being criticised for being “very unappealing”; but a look behind the scenes reveals an angry reviewer (habitual mouthpiece of the Linux Foundation and Linux foes) trying to intimidate Nitrux developers, who are unpaid volunteers rather than “corporate” developers



  19. Links 31/01/2023: GNOME 44 Wallpapers and Alpha

    Links for the day



  20. Free and Open Source Software Developers' European Meeting (FOSDEM) and KU Leuven Boosting Americans and Cancellers of the Father of Free Software

    The Free Software Foundation (FSF) and its founder, Richard M. Stallman (RMS), along with the SFLC one might add, have been under a siege by the trademark-abusing FSFE and SFC; Belgium helps legitimise the ‘fakes’



  21. Techrights in the Next 5 or 10 Years

    Now that I’m free from the shackles of a company (it deteriorated a lot after grabbing Gates Foundation money under an NDA) the site Techrights can flourish and become more active



  22. 60 Days of Articles About Sirius 'Open Source' and the Long Road Ahead

    The Sirius ‘Open Source’ series ended after 60 days (parts published every day except the day my SSD died completely and very suddenly); the video above explains what’s to come and what lessons can be learned from the 21-year collective experience (my wife and I; work periods combined) in a company that still claims, in vain, to be “Open Source”



  23. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 30, 2023

    IRC logs for Monday, January 30, 2023



  24. Taking Techrights to the Next Level in 2023

    I've reached a state of "closure" when it comes to my employer (almost 12 years for me, 9+ years for my wife); expect Techrights to become more active than ever before and belatedly publish important articles, based on longstanding investigations that take a lot of effort



  25. The ISO Delusion: When the Employer Doesn’t Realise That Outsourcing Clients' Passwords to LassPass After Security Breaches Is a Terrible Idea

    The mentality or the general mindset at Sirius ‘Open Source’ was not compatible with that of security conscientiousness and it seemed abundantly clear that paper mills (e.g. ISO certification) cannot compensate for that



  26. Links 30/01/2023: Plasma Mobile 23.01 and GNU Taler 0.9.1

    Links for the day



  27. EPO Management Isn't Listening to Staff, It's Just Trying to Divide and Demoralise the Staff Instead

    “On 18 January 2023,” the staff representatives tell European Patent Office (EPO) colleagues, “the staff representation met with the administration in a Working Group on the project “Bringing Teams Together”. It was the first meeting since the departure of PD General Administration and the radical changes made to the project. We voiced the major concerns of staff, the organization chaos and unrest caused by the project among teams and made concrete proposals.”



  28. Links 30/01/2023: Coreboot 4.19 and Budgie 10.7

    Links for the day



  29. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 29, 2023

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 29, 2023



  30. [Meme] With Superheroes Like These...

    Ever since the new managers arrived the talent has fled the company that falsely credits itself with "Open Source"


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts