Bonum Certa Men Certa

EPO: Language of Conflict

posted by Roy Schestowitz on May 13, 2024,
updated May 14, 2024

Risks to interpreting services at the EPO

Central Staff Committee tables/charts

Some weeks ago interpretation services were reportedly crushed by EPO management. There's now a more detailed publication about it. It comes from the Central Staff Committee and it contains a lot of tables/charts.

The core of the message is, as per today's communication: "The EPO relies on freelance interpreters who are considered to be employees of the Office for the time they work for the Office. Their conditions of employment put in place since 2002 (CA/136/02) helped to build a pool of 160 highly qualified interpreters specialised in Patent Law.

"The Office is now proposing to abolish the conditions of employment of interpreters and requests the Budget and Finance Committee for their opinion on CA/35/24. The Office did not consult any of its interpreters before tabling the document in the General Consultative Committee (GCC) and does not provide the legal basis for the change. Upon learning of the proposal, the EPO interpreters expressed deep concern about the potential consequences.

"In this open letter to the delegations in the Budget and Finance Committee (BFC), the Central Staff Committee (CSC) explains the shortcomings of the reform and recommends that the delegations request to be presented with the document for information only, so that alternatives can be considered."

A letter about this has already been sent to António Campinos and Heads of Delegation in the Budget and Finance Committee (which historically had very profound conflict of interest [1, 2]). To quote the letter alone (no annexes except in the original):

European Patent Office
80298 Munich
Germany

Central Staff Committee
Comité central du personnel
Zentraler Personalausschuss

centralSTCOM@epo.org

Reference: sc24026cl

Date: 08/05/2024

European Patent Office | 80298 MUNICH | GERMANY

To: Heads of Delegation in the Budget and
Finance Committee

Cc: Mr António Campinos
President of the EPO

By email:
council@epo.org
president@epo.org

OPEN LETTER

Risks to interpretation services at the EPO

Dear Heads of Delegations in the Budget and Finance Committee,

The EPO shall offer interpretation services during oral proceedings in opposition proceedings1 and in appeal proceedings2. Interpretation services are also provided to the delegations during meetings of the Administrative Council.

Presently, the EPO relies on freelance interpreters who are considered to be employees of the Office for the time they work for the Office. Their conditions of employment put in place since 2002 (CA/136/02) helped to build a pool of 160 highly qualified interpreters specialised in Patent Law.

The Office is now proposing to abolish the conditions of employment of interpreters and requests the BFC for their opinion on (CA/35/24). The Office did not consult any of its interpreters before tabling the document in the General Consultative Committee and does not provide the legal basis for the change. Upon learning of the proposal, the EPO interpreters expressed deep concern about the potential consequences.

The document states that the tax authorities in a member state consider that interpreters should be covered by the EPO’s social security scheme, and as long as this is not the case, interpreters are covered under the national social security scheme of the member state in question for which

_______

1 Rule 4(5) Impl Reg. to Part I of the EPC

2 Article 7 RoP of the BoA


employers are obliged to pay employee insurance premiums for the benefit of their employees. In the GCC, reference was made to problems in the Netherlands where only 6 interpreters reside. Abolishing the conditions of employment for all interpreters is hence disproportionate and leads to several issues explained in a document prepared by a group of interpreters3:

First, if interpreters work for the EPO without employee status, they bear the risk of being considered under false (bogus) self-employment by the country where they reside. Interpreters would have to reduce their availability for the EPO to mitigate this risk4.

Second, if EPO interpreters’ fees become subject to national income tax, interpreters who optimise their income vis-à-vis national thresholds might limit their availability to the EPO. The proposed increase by 40% of the interpreters’ daily rates– according to them, would be insufficient to compensate the taxation5.

Third, the EPO would have to pay VAT in non-EU countries such as in the United Kingdom and Switzerland where 25% of interpreters are residents6.

Fourth, Article 14 of the PPI would no longer apply to interpreters. Interpreters would for example no longer enjoy the inviolability for all their official papers and documents, including EPO documents.

Fifth, the EPO would not be competitive in comparison with other international organisations still using a hybrid model like the one currently in place at the EPO (EU, UN, WTO, CoE…)7. The benchmark8 shows that the newly proposed model based on “framework contracts” would even put the EPO at the lowest place in the benchmark.

The specimen framework contract is not available. The reform is clearly not described in its entirety. In addition, the vast number of comments from the interpreters show that neither the legal nor the fiscal issues seem to have been properly considered in the document.

International institutions are already competing for a limited pool of interpreters. The EPO cannot afford to jeopardize its pool of interpreters specialised in Patent Law. A shortage of interpreters with the requisite skill set would ultimately result in risks to business continuity and quality of interpretation services for the users of the patent system.

The EPO should re-consider the planned change of the conditions due to the aforementioned shortcomings and properly consult the interpreters and the staff representation.

_____________

3 „EPO Accredited Interpreters Statement and Supporting Annexes“, 24-04-2024 [Annex 1]

4 see [Annex 1], page 10

5 see [Annex 1], page 7

6 see [Annex 1], page 5

7 see [Annex 1], page 2

8 “International organisations: comparative table” [Annex 2]


We recommend that the delegations request to be presented with document CA/35/24 for information only, so that alternatives can be considered.

Sincerely yours

Derek Kelly
Chairman of the Central Staff Committee

Annex 1: “Communication from EPO-accredited interpreters to Staff Representation”, 14-04-2024
Annex 2: “International organisations: comparative table”

One can hope that if more people (in this field) see this, the more resistance can - or will - intensify. With the illegal kangaroo court (UPC) not squashed yet, the greater the tragedy of unconstitutionality, based on language and so much more.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Links 27/05/2024: Chatbots Generate Hateful Output, TPM Performance Scrutinised
Links for the day
David Heinemeier Hansson (DHH) Realises What He Should Have Decades Ago
seeing that DHH is moving away from Apple is kind of a big deal
In the Pacific (Mostly Islands Around Oceania) GNU/Linux Grew a Lot
Microsoft cannot compete fairly
 
StatCounter (or statCounter) Has Been Broken for Nearly 24 Hours. Who Benefits? Microsoft.
StatCounter is broken right now and has been broken for nearly 24 hours already
Reinvigorating the Voice of GNU/Linux Users (Not Companies Whose Chiefs Don't Even Use GNU/Linux!)
Scott Ruecker has just announced his return
"Tech" in the Context of Even Bigger Issues
"Tech" (or technology) activism is important; but there's a bigger picture
A Decade of In-Depth Coverage of Corruption at the European Patent Office (EPO)
The world needs transparency and sunlight
Delayed Series About Dr. Richard Stallman
A lot of the attacks on him boil down to petty things
Hopefully Not Sunset for StatCounter
We hope that StatCounter will be back soon.
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 26, 2024
IRC logs for Sunday, May 26, 2024
Links 27/05/2024: Self-Publishing, Patent Monopolies, and Armed Conflicts
Links for the day
Gemini Links 27/05/2024: Tethering Connection and PFAs
Links for the day
Imagine Canada Enabling Rapists to Harass Their (Rape) Victims
This analogy is applicable because abusers are empowered against the abused
A 3-Year Campaign to Coerce/Intimidate Us Into Censorship: Targeting My Old "Tweets"
This was basically an act of vandalism no better and no worse than UEFI restricted boot
Links 26/05/2024: Google 'Search' Morphing Into Disinformation Factory, Discussion of Maze of the Prison Industrial Complex
Links for the day
A Toast to Tux Machines
Food ready for the party, no photos yet...
IBM/Red Hat Failing to Meet Its WARN Obligations in NC (STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA), or Perhaps It's Constantly Delaying the Layoffs
IBM isn't named even once
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 25, 2024
IRC logs for Saturday, May 25, 2024
GNU/Linux in Greenland
The sharp increases for GNU/Linux started last summer
The Sheer Absurdity of the EPO's Career System Explained by EPO Staff
"Staff representation has previously pointed this out to management, and the career system has been the reason for several industrial actions and litigation cases initiated by SUEPO."
[Meme] Productivity Champ Nellie Simon: It Takes Me 3+ Weeks to Write 6 Paragraphs
Congrats to Nellie Simon!
It Took EPO Management 3+ Weeks to Respond to a Letter About an Urgent Problem (Defunding of EPO Staff)
The funny thing about it is that Nellie Simon expects examiners to work day and night (which is illegal) while she herself takes 3+ weeks to write a 1-page letter
Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) in The Hague Taking Action to Rectify Cuts to Families of Workers
they "are active in challenging this measure via the legal system"
Links 25/05/2024: Microsoft Adds More DRM (Screenshot Blocking), Another Microsoft Outage Takes Down Everything
Links for the day
Gemini Links 25/05/2024: "Bill Smugs" and OpenBSD Mirror Over Tor / I2P
Links for the day
Microsoft #1 in Gaming Layoffs, Laid Off Workers Receive Another Insult From Microsoft
Many of them never chose to work for Microsoft
In New Caledonia Windows is Now Below 30% (It Used to be Over 90%)
Microsoft's Windows absolutely collapsing and the measures are relatively stable
Forget About India's and Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons and Armament Race, They Need to Abscond Windows and Microsoft (Security Swiss Cheese)
Both countries would be wise to remove Windows as soon as possible, irrespective of the local party politics
statCounter: GNU/Linux Rose From 0.2% to Over 3% in Pakistan
GNU/Linux "proper" (i.e. not ChromeOS) has the lion's share
Red tape: farmer concerns eerily similar to Debian suicide cluster deaths
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Galway street artists support social media concerns
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 25/05/2024: Section 230 and Right of Publicity Violations by Microsoft (Which Attacks Performance Artists)
Links for the day
[Meme] No Microsoft
For fun!
Microsoft Windows Falls to New Lows in Poland
It may mean people delete Windows from relatively new PC
A 3-Year Campaign to Coerce/Intimidate Us Into Censorship: An Introduction
The campaign of coercion (or worse) started in 2021
The "D" in Debian Stands for Dictatorship That Extends to Censorship at DNS Level
Of course the registrar, which charged for domains until 2025, just went along with it
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Getting Stacked by Microsoft
it lets Microsoft write policies
The Parasitic Nature of Microsoft Contracts
Stop feeding the beast
Gemini Links 25/05/2024: Emacs Windows 2000 Screenshots and Little Languages
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 24, 2024
IRC logs for Friday, May 24, 2024