Neelie Kroes of the European Commission Discusses Microsoft (Video) (Updated)
Dr. Roy Schestowitz
2007-09-16 01:39:58 UTC
Modified: 2007-09-16 02:04:20 UTC
The following clip was dumped onto YouTube just 9 hours ago. The Commission's ruling is due tomorrow.
For those who cannot watch the video, the segment which begins a minute and a half after the start says that Europe is unimpressed by Microsoft's quantity of documentation. It requires quality. This is particularly relevant not only because of Novell's (let alone Linux) discussion about protocols and interoperability, but also because of OOXML, which introduces similar issues.
Microsoft is said to have dumped over 30,000 pages of documentation on the EC a few months ago. This was reported by Market Watch. Such complex documents overwhelm those who try to criticise because any criticism can then be described as "nitpicking" (on a proportional scale). To a company that wishes to implement compatible software, this is akin to a denial-of-service attack. The documentation is overly complicated because there is no reuse of existing standards, which makes it hard to reuse free open source components and have systems properly integrated. Other concerns involve cost, legal risk, technical changes, and decentralised control.
Update: here is a more recent video which talks about Monday's decision.
The consensus in comments we see is, IBM is a terrible place to work in, treatment of its workers is appalling, it's utterly foolish to relocate in an effort to retain a job at IBM, and it's foolish to join the company in the first place
Yesterday we read that it was quite cruel how IBM (or Red Hat) compelled staff to pretend to be happily leaving or "retiring" when the reality was, they had been pushed out with some "package"
If patent law had been applied to novels in the 1880s, great books would not have been written. If the EU applies it to software, every computer user will be restricted, says Richard Stallman
So the real extent of layoffs is greater than what's publicly stated (there are silent layoffs) [...] Whatever IBM says about the scope, scale, or magnitude of the "RAs", it doesn't tell the full story