Microsoft Death Watch -- GNU/Linux to Blame
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2009-01-24 14:48:09 UTC
- Modified: 2009-01-24 14:48:09 UTC
"Client software felt the slump in PC sales, and was further harmed by the shift to netbooks; many of these run Linux, which helps Microsoft not at all."
--Ars Technica
"Microsoft, like much of the IT industry, was caught off-guard by the rapid rise of the netbook category, but moved quickly to offer a netbook-specific version of XP Home to stem the tide of Linux on netbooks. When one considers that getting some revenue is better than getting none, that was a wise move."
--CRN
"Search engines be da**ed, it's the OS that generates money - if the world switches to linux, it will switch to OpenOffice too."
--Motley Fool (heavily Microsoft-influenced)
"Microsoft can't charge $80 or $100 when there's Linux for free on netbooks," Rosoff said. On regular PC sales, Microsoft's profit margins are typically about 70 percent to 80 percent, he explained."
--Microsoft Press
WE WROTE ABOUT Microsoft's latest defeat several days ago [
1,
2] and will continue to do so later. Apart from the new quotes above, worth paying attention to is
the following article, which predicts that "There may not be much left [of Microsoft] in two years time."
Here is the prediction I'm hesitant about. Always in the past when software with substantial installed base has finally been supplanted the fall has not been gradual: Lotus and Wordperfect went from world-beaters to also rans in just a few years. I think Microsoft may surprise us by falling equally fast. There may not be much left in two years time.
Could
Microsoft be heading towards $4?
Everything is possible. Just witness how quickly giants like Sun Microsystems have fallen; none of this is linear, much like the network effect. Proprietary software loses its margin advantage very rapidly and a panicky shift to Free software is in some situations a case of "too little, too late." Novell understands this too.
⬆
Comments
Needs Sunlight
2009-01-24 18:01:25
When things are that bad, especially in consideration of the pathetic quality, then it may be time to bring in racketeering charges for Gates and his cohort.
Roy Schestowitz
2009-01-24 20:15:59
From a national perspective it's seen differently (despite abominable tax breaks). That's why Europe and Asia must respond more effectively. The US is too lax.
twitter
2009-01-26 01:32:11
The end is probably nearer than we think. I'm keeping a little log of Microsoft's failure that is much like my Vista failure and Windows 7 failure logs. Vista failed the way Windows should have failed long ago, but the speed and totality of that failure took me by surprise. M$'s propaganda machine is so strong that even I'm surprised by how bad field conditions usually are. For example, a relative spent three weeks exchanging email with M$ "support" before that advice reduced their Vista machine to a single line of blinking, unbootable error message. An analogous condition probably exists with their murky finances - they are liars and reality is always worse than you think it is after talking to them.
ram
2009-01-26 02:19:14
Roy Schestowitz
2009-01-26 08:26:25
`Do not fall prey to software monopolies'
Jim Lee
2009-01-27 00:44:57
Ram, I must take offense at that last sentence. Steve Ballmer is not representative of all Americans, nor do all Yanks suck at the teat of M$ (it might surprise you to know this Yank is posting this message on a Debian laptop - will wonders never cease?)
ram
2009-01-27 05:06:57
Jim Lee
2009-01-28 22:30:30
It pains me that these guys are seen as the face of American business, and I usually bristle at the thought of being even remotely associated with them. At least the majority of the world has (thus far) refused to drink the Microsoft "Kool-Aid".
Roy Schestowitz
2009-01-28 22:41:45