FOR ALMOST TWO years we have shown Novell trying to popularise C# inside Android [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Android does not need Mono, it already has Java.
Google’s Android continues to generate headlines for rapid growth in the smartphone market. MonoTouch already supports one of the industry’s most popular smartphones, the Apple iPhone. Now we’re working on support for Android with a beta product named MonoDroid.
We are currently leaning towards using VS2008/2010 for Windows during the beta and later MonoDevelop on Linux/Mac.
“Why does Novell keep helping Microsoft, even at the expense of neutral programming for Linux phones?”The above is problematic because Mono is again being used to market and even require proprietary software from a convicted monopolist with associated software patents and an ongoing campaign of patent lawsuits (latest example is Salesforce, which complained about Microsoft's racketeering [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]).
Why does Novell keep helping Microsoft, even at the expense of neutral programming for Linux phones? Interestingly enough, there still exists an apparent divide between OpenSUSE and the Mono/Moonlight team.
Over at the OpenSUSE Web site, the OpenSUSE GNOME team does not mention Mono and the strategy meeting -- like most meetings -- does not involve the Microsoft fanfare from Novell at Massachusetts. The "M" words (Microsoft, Mono, Moonlight) rarely come up in Germany.
Why does Novell put Mono and Moonlight before OpenSUSE and Linux development? With countdown and downtime and even burnout reported, Novell ought to set its priorities straight. By encouraging C# development (on Windows/Visual Studio) Novell is not helping OpenSUSE's cause, which does extend to other distributions and can usually be commended. Whose side is Novell really on? ⬆