Zigrīds Aumeisters headed the Latvian Patent Office between March 1992 and June 2010.
The Latvian Patent Office was officially re-established by law on 26 November 1991 and it started operations under its new Director-General Zigrīds Aumeisters on 2 March 1992.
Jekaterina Macuka ended up as ad interim head of the Latvian Patent Office following Aumeisters' departure.
[PDF]
[PDF]
to the position of Director-General of the Patent Office following a competitive selection procedure in which Bērziņš was the highest scoring candidate.
It fell to Reinis Bērziņš to recover the missing funds.
[PDF]
"The Swiss bank account opened in 1999 was used for receiving payments from the WIPO in Geneva and the German bank account opened in 2005 was used for receiving payments from the EPO in Munich."One of the accounts was opened in Switzerland in 1999 and the other in Germany in 2005.
These dates are not coincidental. They correspond respectively to the date of Latvia's accession to the Madrid Trademark Agreement administered by WIPO (5 October 1999) and the date of Latvia's accession to the EPO (1 July 2005).
The Swiss bank account opened in 1999 was used for receiving payments from the WIPO in Geneva and the German bank account opened in 2005 was used for receiving payments from the EPO in Munich.
These secret bank accounts were private accounts under the personal control of Aumeisters. According to Latvian press reports, when the existence of the accounts was discovered in 2011 they contained around € 1.4 million in total.
"In the next part we shall see how there has been a high of turnover at the top of the Latvian Patent Office over the last decade with no less than six directors or “acting directors” since Aumeisters’ departure in June 2010."Aumeisters explained that he had held the funds in foreign bank accounts because it was needed for the Patent Office's operations and for improvements in information technology. He said that state funding was scarce and would not have been sufficient to meet the requirements of the institution.
Criminal proceedings were initiated against Aumeisters but the outcome is not known. It's more than likely that he got off with a slap on the wrist as a reward for cooperating with the authorities and assisting them in their efforts to reclaim the funds.
In the next part we shall see how there has been a high of turnover at the top of the Latvian Patent Office over the last decade with no less than six directors or "acting directors" since Aumeisters' departure in June 2010. ⬆