08.04.09

Gemini version available ♊︎

Microsoft Only Gave 14,010 Lines of Code

Posted in Courtroom, GNU/Linux, GPL, Kernel, Microsoft, Novell, SCO, Servers, UNIX, Virtualisation, Windows at 5:55 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Source code

Summary: 14,010 lines of actual Linux code, not 20,000 as Microsoft claimed

Microsoft has claimed that its self-serving loadable module for Linux [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], which only advances Microsoft’s interests by polluting the kernel with Microsoft APIs, comprises 20,000 lines of code. Not quite the case, alleges Slated, who has taken a look at the code. Last night he wrote about this patch (managed by a Novell employee by the way):

For those who might want to keep an eye on what the Vole is injecting into the software we use:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh..

The consolidated patch is here:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh…

This is essentially what it adds:

. Microsoft Hyper-V client drivers
. Microsoft Hyper-V virtual storage driver
. Microsoft Hyper-V virtual block driver
. Microsoft Hyper-V virtual network driver

The kernel config options are listed as:

. CONFIG_HYPERV
. CONFIG_HYPERV_STORAGE
. CONFIG_HYPERV_BLOCK
. CONFIG_HYPERV_NET

Here’s the license:

Copyright (c) 2009, Microsoft Corporation.

This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License, version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.

This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details.

You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place – Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA.

Authors:
Hank Janssen <hjanssen[at]microsoft.com>
######

Oh and BTW, after removing all the non-Microsoft copyrighted code from the above consolidated patch, all the diff declaration headers, and all the empty lines, the number of lines remaining (i.e. the actual code Microsoft generously “contributed”) is 14,010, which is a good six thousand lines short of Microsoft’s claim.

That’s OK though … it’s six thousand fewer lines for me to remove.

Microsoft contributes nothing to Linux, except lawsuits for the most part. Microsoft funded SCO’s lawsuit against Linux (more than once) and right now Microsoft is suing companies for using Linux (also more than once). People who do not yet know all of this ought to wake up and get the facts. Microsoft is always attacking Linux and the code mentioned above is no contribution. If Oracle writes a new file system for Linux (btrfs as the example in mind), then that file system is valuable also to IBM, to H-P and even to us home users. It really enriches Linux. Microsoft’s patch, on the other hand, is helping nothing but Windows, turning GNU/Linux servers into just a virtual appliance running under Windows.

“Microsoft funded SCO’s lawsuit against Linux (more than once) and right now Microsoft is suing companies for using Linux (also more than once).”Whenever Microsoft claims that it “contributes” to Linux, remember that its long-standing CEO, Steve Ballmer, said: “Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches.”

Ballmer never retracted that statement and under his leadership Microsoft has also paid SCO, as confirmed in the courtroom under oath. For background about the past month’s SCO developments (a little from June too), see:

More bizarre twists in the SCO case have only led to the point where, according to Pamela Jones, SCO is nearly finished for good.

So those are the various possibilities I see. Do you see any good ones, if you are SCO management? I don’t see even one. If we are marking on a curve, SCO’s suggestion in its letter is the least toxic, but none of the possibilities now are really ideal from SCO’s point of view, and how realistic do you think it is as a suggestion at this late date, considering all that came out in discovery and at the hearing?

I think this may be the very first time in the entire SCO saga where SCO seems to have no really good options on the table that I can see.

And that’s probably why after the hearing on the 27th, I was overwhelmed by the incandescent realization that we had just turned a real corner, one that changes everything, and that we’re in end-game territory, at last.

Microsoft may have moved on from SCO. Now it has Novell at its disposal — the company which is the real owner of UNIX. SCO — like Microsoft and Novell — also used to contribute to Linux before chaos began.

“Pamela Jones [...] has told Infoworld that Microsoft will be the next SCO Group”

Heise

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

8 Comments

  1. JohnD said,

    August 4, 2009 at 8:00 am

    Gravatar

    Talk about picking nits.
    I’m willing to bet that most developers look at the line count in their IDE to determine lines of code. I’m also willing to bet that if you take the same approach with other contributions, the lines “actually” contributed would drop as well.
    Does anyone really think that the community opinion of the M$ contribution will drastically change by finding out it was only 14k of “original” code? I doubt it.
    Looks like a slow news day to me.

    Jose_X Reply:

    I agree that this may not change anyone’s opinion, but, for accuracy’s sake, it’s quite off to count the diff program’s existing context lines and the repeating headers as your contribution. I think you can have diff spit our a larger number of context lines. If you do this, you can grow “your” contribution many-fold.

    JohnD Reply:

    Will the code work if you strip out the headers etc? Probably not.
    Is 30k of NEW code more worthy than 10k of new code? I don’t think so.
    When someone spouts off about how many lines of code they’ve written the first thing I wonder is – how much of it is bloat. I’m more impressed by code that works with as few lines as possible than anything else.
    If someone is measuring themselves by LOC, they have cranial-rectal inversion.
    A 5 line patch that fixes 100 bugs is more worthwhile then 50k lines of work around code.

    Jose_X Reply:

    Not C header files but the headings in the diff output.

    Eg, to patch a file, the patch program requires context lines and the file name to find out where to patch in the lines of code. These context lines (existing lines in the kernel) and file name headings are not source code to the kernel but rather are information created by “diff” for use by “patch” to carry out its work of patching the kernel properly. These lines are not written by Microsoft developers but are written by the diff program automatically using the existing kernel.

    I haven’t looked at the diff file but that is what I expect is going on here.

    zatoichi Reply:

    I haven’t looked at the diff file but that is what I expect is going on here.

    “I don’t actually know what I’m talking about, but that doesn’t stop me from talking about it anyway.”

  2. verofakto said,

    August 6, 2009 at 11:36 pm

    Gravatar

    How many lines of code have /you/ contributed to the Linux kernel, Roy?

    Just curious.

    zatoichi Reply:

    Roy hasn’t contributed any. Roy is an advocate. He “contributes” misinformation and slanted “news”—like this article—to a general reaction of derision amongst the folks who do actually contribute to FLOSS development.

    Roy is about “advocating” “freedom the way Roy tells you to.”

  3. zatoichi said,

    August 7, 2009 at 10:30 am

    Gravatar

    This is silly, Roy. As Linus has noted, Microsoft is no more “polluting the kernel with Microsoft APIs” by supplying these drivers than Intel is “polluting the kernel with Intel APIs” when they supply power management code for their CPUs.

    The fact is that you’re not in support of “Freedom Zero” here, the freedom to “run the program for any purpose“, Roy: you want to deny the folks who choose to run a Linux distro virtualized on a Windows Server 2008 system the liberty to do so.

    Why is that, Roy? (And do you support the FSF? If so, how, specifically? I’m still waiting to hear an answer on that one…)

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Virtually (i.e. Online) and for Only One Hour the EPO's Staff Representation Was Allowed to Discuss Many Lingering Concerns

    “Report on the LSCMN meeting with VP4 of 9 November 2022″ (i.e. one month ago) is being circulated this week; “On 9 November 2022,” says the union or the local officials (Staff Union of the EPO, or SUEPO for short, has overlaps), “the Local Staff Committee Munich (LSCMN) met with VP4, Ms Nellie Simon, to discuss a number of prevailing local matters in a virtual meeting which had been scheduled, as had the previous one, for one hour only.” (the usual; they intentionally don’t allocate sufficient time)



  2. [Meme] António Campinos-Controlled (EPO-Commissioned) Surveys Are Just for Show (to Help 'Validate' Lies)

    The real EPO survey is not that one conducted by (and for) António Campinos



  3. European Patent Office (EPO) on the Decline, According to the Fifth Edition of the Technologia Staff Survey

    Today we share some documents that circulated amongst EPO staff yesterday; it's about this year's staff survey that was not conducted by the EPO itself (to serve EPO management and its twisted agenda



  4. Free Software is So Robust That Its Opponents Need to Travel 12 Months Back in Time in Order to Find Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) Material

    Microsoft- and Linux Foundation-connected sites help smear or stigmatise Free software (citing hostile 'experts'); this week they borrow news from 12 months ago to make a point



  5. IDG Has Resorted to Microsoft Marketing SPAM Instead of Actual Journalism

    Microsoft puff pieces are published as "opinions", disguised as "news" while in fact serving no purpose other than marketing



  6. Open Invention Network (OIN) Protects Amazon and AWS From Activists Like Us Who Want to Abolish Software Patents Through Reforms of the Patent Systems

    The Open Invention Network (OIN) does not exist to serve the Free software community but to work against it; the latest joining (AWS) proves this



  7. Sirius ‘Open Source’ and the Money Missing From the Pension

    Sirius ‘Open Source’ is unable to cope with basic legal requirements such as sending payslips to staff (this hasn’t been done for months already!) and such issues have gone on for almost 4 years already



  8. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, December 07, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, December 07, 2022



  9. Links 07/12/2022: ArcoLinux Beta 23.01 and Cryostat 2.2

    Links for the day



  10. [Meme] Where Did the Money Go?

    Sirius ‘Open Source’ became a company that cannot even do accounting right; pertinent technical employees had to do a lot of chasing for years just to get the basics rectified



  11. Evidence of Sirius ‘Open Source’ (or Sirius Corporation) Failing to Pay Pensions, Failing to Inform Staff, Not Responding to Staff

    The job my wife and I left this past Friday (after about 21 years combined) had turned sour years ago; hoping that this serves as a cautionary tale to others, we've decided to show pension lapses, lack of payslips, and excuses that accompanied that for years



  12. Links 07/12/2022: Blender 3.4 and Apple GPU Drivers Now in Asahi Linux

    Links for the day



  13. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, December 06, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, December 06, 2022



  14. Links 07/12/2022: Kali Linux 2022.4, GNUnet 0.19.0, and Pgpool-II 4.4.0

    Links for the day



  15. Subsidising the Likes of Rupert Murdoch is Not Supporting Journalism

    There are yet more attempts to tax citations; not only does that make no practical or moral sense, it's being lumped in or joined together with a must-pass "defence" (military) bill in order to suppress opposition



  16. Microsoft Layoffs Again

    The company behind Windows is in a bad state, but it is being propped up by the taxpayers; if rumours are true, Microsoft might get a lot smaller next year



  17. Microsoft is Killing Hospital Patients With Its Insecure-by-design Windows Operating System

    Many people continue to needlessly die because many hospitals still foolishly deploy Windows on mission-critical life-saving machines



  18. Sirius ‘Open Source’ Failing at the Most Basic Employment Regulations

    The company we left behind last week was a repeat violator of employment laws; to make matters worse, it led to its long-term or long(time)-serving staff becoming very baffled, having to contact the pension provider for clarifications



  19. Sirius ‘Open Source’: When the Company Stops Paying Your Pension and You Don't Know Until the Pension Provider Keeps Sending Physical Post to Alert You

    Today we turn our attention to pension blunders at Sirius ‘Open Source’; in recent years even something basic like pension contributions wasn’t smooth sailing



  20. [Meme] Sirius Open Source, Closed-Minded Bossing

    At Sirius ‘Open Source’, decisions are made in the dark without consultation with staff and many things go wrong as a result; of course the culprits never hold themselves accountable



  21. Links 06/12/2022: LibreOffice 7.5 Alpha and digiKam 7.9.0

    Links for the day



  22. Rumour: Very Large Microsoft Layoffs (Another Round) Next Month, Lists Already Being Prepared





  23. Benoît Battistelli in 2015: EPO is Ready to Start Unified Patent Court (UPC), Expect UPC in 2016

    We’re almost in 2023 and UPC is being delayed again; this is what EPO President Benoît Battistelli said way back in 2015 (official video from the EPO; 3:45-4:34 cropped apart)



  24. IRC Proceedings: Monday, December 05, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, December 05, 2022



  25. Links 06/12/2022: FreeBSD 12.4 and Inkscape 1.2.2

    Links for the day



  26. Sirius Not-So-‘Open Source’: Cannot Talk to Colleagues, Cannot Speak About Work

    Cover-up and lies became a corporate pattern at the company where I had worked since 2011; it was time to go in order to avoid cooperation in unethical activities



  27. [Meme] Guilt by Association

    Sirius ‘Open Source’ has a history of hostility towards people with disabilities; the company got sued over this, but kept the lawsuit secret



  28. That Time Sirius 'Open Source' Fired a Blind Lady While Gagging Sympathetic Staff

    Sirius 'Open Source' was taken to court after it had wrongly fired a couple of employees, one of whom was blind; this was accompanied by lies about why the staff's communication server was shut down



  29. Links 05/12/2022: Gnoppix Linux 22.12 and Armbian 22.11

    Links for the day



  30. Unified Patent Court (UPC) is “Real Soon Now!” Since 2014

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) lobby is once again forced to admit issues and delays; we've seen this time and time again for nearly a decade already


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts