02.07.21

Informatics, Progress, and Technocracy — Part I: “It’s a Technical Problem, Stupid”

Posted in Free/Libre Software, GNU/Linux at 2:46 pm by Guest Editorial Team

By Daniel Cantarín. Original version in Spanish here. Introduction in English here.

Warning

Summary: Part I of Daniel Cantarín’s article “Informática, progreso, y tecnocracia”

This phrase which I’m using as a title for this section is today a legendary meme.

But whatever the iteration, both as a meme or in its original version (as intelligent condensed concept for an electoral campaign), the phrase is coined to install an immediate common sense that purposely replaces a debate with a conclusion.

I hate this phrase. I consider its success to be a mere symptom of a good chunk of our contemporary problems in our world. That, and the popularity of capitalist realism. And it happens to be the case that the economy is at the heart of our era. The whole XX century was organised around the fight over what’s the ultimate economic system for humanity. And we know how that went.

“The whole XX century was organised around the fight over what’s the ultimate economic system for humanity. And we know how that went.”That phrase also introduces the gloom evil of technocracy behind a veil of smart and kinda funny. But, at this point, it is so wrong to find that phrase funny (or worse, correct) as it would be to like confusing Ku Klux Klan members with happy people in some ghost festivity. That phrase is used to impart violence, subdue peoples, and seize a power that belong to others. Let’s check this out, continuing with the economics example, which is today one of the fundamental references of technocracy worldwide.

I believe everyone will agree that we need strict production and distribution plans in times of scarcity in order to avoid resource waste and creepy situations like famines. Right? And I also imagine that everyone would agree that such plans should be a top priority in societal planing. In front of which economics theory certainly has things to say, and they’re all most welcome.

“Whatever the case, that’s how economics theory renews its centrality in society.”However, all of our big modern crises were about speculation and overproduction. And not only that, but at no single moment we stopped to suffer scarcity problems, even when literally we have millions of tons of extra food, and literally have tech that solved every logistical problem. The novelty is that our modern scarcities are synthetic: we now create scarcities where there’s none. Interestingly enough, we actually do that to sustain that “economic system” which generated that overproduction in the first place. But in any case it often happens that, given that it’s a production problem, even by common sense it should be an economic problem. And that’s how everybody quickly comes to some conclusions like these: “well, then the problem is that somebody did a bad economic plan, or perhaps bad implementations”. Or even stuff like, “then we need to change the economic system,” and discussions then veer off towards stuff like capitalism vs communism. Whatever the case, that’s how economics theory renews its centrality in society.

And yet, once again… again and again, economic plans achieve somehow catastrophic systematic failures, at least for wide sectors of world population. And there are a few things we need to take note of and consider about that. The first one is that an absolutely marginal fragment of the world’s population has never stopped getting richer, and in fact gets even more affluent when “economic system” failures happen. In the second place, everyone insists on reaching hypothetical states of purity (in ‘planification’, in execution, in system participants’ honesty, etc) that never get attained/reached, and yet that’s the only place where hope for a better future seems to always be. And the third thing to note is that both capitalism and communism (the two antagonistic big XX century “economic systems”) had similar failures: small privileged sectors of society, with massive groups of people damaged to scandalous and inhumane levels.

“With all that in mind, before we keep on asking anything of relevance and entrust all else to economics, I believe we most likely need to check their credentials.”That way, as it always happens with ideas that pretend to reach too much, sooner than was ever necessary or sooner rather than later they begin to show their obvious problems, and suddenly the previous common sense needs great rational efforts and very well-formed specialists to survive. It’s the case of the economy today: at the same time we’re asked to accept it as some obvious, common sense stuff, specially in times of elections; while we’re also asked at the same time that we keep our opinions about all of this suppressed because we’re not specialists in the matter, and thus we shouldn’t get to babbling bullshit about it. And at the very same time, it happens between specialists that they throw shit to each others, calling others stuff like “ignorant” or “idiot”, when their speculations about what’s going on and what to do just don’t match between or among peers. Of course, no matter who’s speaking or what each person may be saying, economists’ arguments are always defined as “objective”, and they always have “progress” as horizon.

With all that in mind, before we keep on asking anything of relevance and entrust all else to economics, I believe we most likely need to check their credentials.

The trick is to understand that “economic systems” are no such things but cultural orders. It’s absolutely ridiculous to think nowadays (more so today, in 2021) of “economics” as an isolated thing — something truly isolated from geography, biology, history, physics, linguistics, and who knows what else. In fact, nobody talks today about economics when they speak of economics: they talk politics. Nobody says stuff like “communism”, “capitalism”, “socialism”, “free market”, “interventionism” and so on, as if those things (‘old’ stuff) were just some technical production and logistics conditions: everybody uses those terms as flags in an ideological battlefield that insists and persists for centuries (since at least 150 years until now, and the XX century took that up to the level of war).

“And at the same time, we still seem to be forced to ask economists for permission when we try to think about possible future worlds.”And the reason for that is what both “economic systems”, capitalism and communism, have something to say about being human. It happens to be the case that, even when they say different things, they both share the centrality of economics. This way, nobody says something like “I don’t know, let’s try a few decades, and then we evaluate in detail”. No country or state seems to agree on things like “this region should try this system, this other region ought to try this other one, and we can compare experiences”. The idea sounds ridiculous, idealistic in a bad sense, or even alien, no matter that the most basic and elemental use of reason easily allows anybody to consider that as an obvious way to go. And at the same time, we still seem to be forced to ask economists for permission when we try to think about possible future worlds.

What happens is that economics is barely a single component of a much more complex social system. The fantasy that “everything is economical”, or that “economy is the mother of all problems”, is nothing but that: a fantasy. Economics is not more or less important than physics, biology, or sociology, per se; it depends on what are you talking about. Every discipline is a tool for solving problems. But in no way do economics have any objective authority over other components of the system. That’s why it’s in constant and infinite conflict with basically any human action in a modernised society: because everything we do questions the weak points of economics, that again and again gets where it doesn’t belong, and at the same time it doesn’t handle the stuff it should handle.

“Economics as the centre of the social debate is ideology.”All of this stuff about contemporary economics is in fact a pretty general map of what constitutes a technocracy: an ideological bias, manifested in a central bureaucratic area of power, which can only be accessed with curated credentials, and that everyone else submits to. Economics as the centre of the social debate is ideology. The technical qualification as a condition for social debate, is ideology. The need (instead of desirability) for technical terminology, in order to speak about real life conditions, is ideology. And ideology is politics. That’s what both economists and business people do in contemporary societies: politics, and nothing else. And that’s how economics is not only not solving any real problem anywhere in the world, but it’s also generating a deep discredit of politics by taking its place.

In case the reader didn’t figure it out just yet, informatics communities are full of those tecnocratic biases. I invite anybody to go and check out comments in discussions about any IT issue in general.

Of course I could put here an infinite number of examples, especially when it comes to the more heated issues that frequently end up generating decades of flamewars and conflict. But allow me to let slip in just a single, short one, in order to be brief about it in this otherwise very long text. It’s a 2015 article about why somebody considers it a good idea to stop ‘talking shit’ about PHP, and even talking shit in general when it has something to do with others.

Then look at the responses in Reddit, where PHP people are even accused of “anti-intellectualism”, of course calling “objectivity” as credentials for saying such thing.

“And to nobody’s surprise, during the last decade at least, our field began to characterise or gear itself towards creating problems where there weren’t any before, affecting/inflicting entire communities with forced and unwanted changes, creating synthetic scarcities by means of programmed obsolescence (as is the scandalous case with i386 deprecation), submitting all to corporate agendas at breakneck speed as if we had no history, to deny political conditioning at the same time we use grandiloquent titles such as “democratic” or “open”, and so many nasty extra things/stuff.”All of our fields/domains are behaving in that way, since some time ago until now. And to nobody’s surprise, during the last decade at least, our field began to characterise or gear itself towards creating problems where there weren’t any before, affecting/inflicting entire communities with forced and unwanted changes, creating synthetic scarcities by means of programmed obsolescence (as is the scandalous case with i386 deprecation), submitting all to corporate agendas at breakneck speed as if we had no history, to deny political conditioning at the same time we use grandiloquent titles such as “democratic” or “open”, and so many nasty extra things/stuff. And all of this is always done with the flags of objectivity and progress.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2021/02/07/technical-problem/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 4/8/2021: Mesa 21.2 and Kaisen Linux Rolling 1.8

    Links for the day



  2. Links 4/8/2021: Audacity as Spyware and PCLinuxOS Updates

    Links for the day



  3. Destroying Freenode Was Not the Objective, But That's Just What Happened

    Killing Freenode was certainly not what Andrew Lee wanted, but Lee will be remembered as the person whose takeover basically led to the end of Freenode; it's in disarray



  4. GNU/Linux Users, Developers and Advocates Being Painted as Unruly and Rude by Corporate Media Looking to Undermine Software Freedom

    Corporate media, funded by companies that nonchalantly oppress people, would have us believe there's something wrong with people who reject corporate masters in their computing; reality, however, suggests that it is a wholly false narrative induced or cemented by endless repetition, so this framing ought to be rejected outright



  5. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, August 03, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, August 03, 2021



  6. The Free Software Community Needs Solidarity and Stronger Resistance Against Corporate Oligopolies With Their Overlapping Interests

    Linus Torvalds and Richard Stallman (RMS) do not have to be idolised ("cult of personalities") but they definitely need to be defended from a longstanding and ongoing corporate coup, which the corporations seek to justify using nicer-sounding terms like "security" (that's how they justify added complexity such as Rust) or "safe space" (they're collectively insulting the community as if only employees of monopolies can help combat bigotry)



  7. Links 4/8/2021: More IBM Downtimes and Firefox Losing Many Users

    Links for the day



  8. Links 3/8/2021: DeaDBeeF 1.8.8, CrossOver 21, AMD and Valve Hook Up for GNU/Linux Work

    Links for the day



  9. Links 3/8/2021: LibreOffice Autoupdater and Vulkan in X-Plane

    Links for the day



  10. How the News About 'Linux' Gets Manipulated to Spread FUD and Promote the Competition of GNU/Linux

    We quickly examine the sorts of news one gets from Google 'News' when searching for “Linux” and we conclude that real news is occluded or missing



  11. The EPO is Europe's Largest Scale Scam (by Far the Largest)

    In another fine instance of deja vu, the biggest scammers are warning everybody else about lesser “scammers”; one might be tempted to call this “projection tactics” or deflection (staring at the mirror) which helps churn/flood the "news" section with tons of recycled old fluff (they could certainly use a distraction right now)



  12. Links 3/8/2021: Raspberry Pi ‘WeatherClock’ and IPFire 2.27 - Core Update 159

    Links for the day



  13. IBM's Attack on the Community and on GPL/FSF is an Attack on Red Hat's Greatest Asset

    Ever since IBM bought Red Hat it has repeatedly attacked the FSF (in a malicious and personified fashion), looking for its own ‘copyright grab’ whilst outsourcing loads of code to proprietary software monopolisers who attack the GPL; by doing so, IBM is destroying the value of what it paid more than 30 billion dollars for (IBM is governed by pretentious fools, according to IBM insiders; they’ve already lost Red Hat’s longtime CEO and IBM’s new President), so it’s falling back on openwashing of IBM's proprietary software with help from the so-called ‘Linux’ Foundation



  14. Four Weeks of Non-Compliance: EPO Only Accepts Courts That It Rigs and Controls

    Compliance is for suckers, believes the “Mafia” which runs the EPO; it is not even responding (for three weeks!) to letters from the victims who won the cases; this is bad for Europe's image and it sets a dangerous precedent



  15. Seven Eleven: 11 is to 10 What 7 Was to Vista

    Microsoft is, as usual, aggressively manipulating/bribing the media (hyping up a shallow version inflation along with paid-for vapourware advertising) while strong-arming the market; there’s no other way they can compete anymore



  16. IRC Proceedings: Monday, August 02, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, August 02, 2021



  17. Links 3/8/2021: Nitrux 1.5.1 and Gerbera Media Server 1.9.0

    Links for the day



  18. Links 2/8/2021: XEyes 1.2 and Fwupd 1.6.2 Released

    Links for the day



  19. Freenode is IRC... in Collapse

    Freenode is now down to just 13,194 online users, which makes it the 6th biggest IRC network. Months ago it was #1 with almost 6 times as many users as those below it. The graph above shows what the latest blunder has done (another massive drop in less than a week, with a poem and the all-time chart at the very bottom).



  20. Barrier and Synergy Can Work Together, Connecting Lots of Different Machines

    Barrier and Synergy can be configured to work properly in conjunction, though only provided different port numbers (non-default) are specified; in my current setup I have two computers to my right, working over Barrier, and two older ones on the left, working over Synergy; the video explains the setup and the underlying concepts



  21. Links 2/8/2021: Open Science in France and Zoom Pays to Settle Privacy Violations

    Links for the day



  22. It Almost Feels Like Battistelli Still Runs the EPO (by Extension/Proxy)

    The "Mafia" that destroyed the EPO is still being put in charge and is using the EPO for shameless self-promotion; it is never being held accountable, not even when courts demand remediatory action and staff seeks reparations



  23. [Meme] Vichyite Battistelli Committed Crimes and His Buddy António Snubs Courts That Confirm These Are Crimes

    Staff of the EPO is coming to realise (or reaching acceptance of the fact) that the spirit of Battistelli — not just people he left in charge of the EPO — dooms the Office and there’s no way out of this mess



  24. Links 2/8/2021: Linux 5.14 RC4 and 20% Growth in Steam

    Links for the day



  25. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, August 01, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, August 01, 2021



  26. Links 1/8/2021: LibreOffice 7.2 RC2 and Lakka 3.3

    Links for the day



  27. Was Microsoft Ever First in the Market?

    Confronting the false belief that Microsoft ever innovates anything of significance or is "first" in some market/s



  28. Links 1/8/2021: 4MLinux 37.0, IBM Fluff, and USMCA Update

    Links for the day



  29. Microsoft Knows That When Shareholders Realise Azure Has Failed the Whole Boat Will Sink

    The paranoia at Microsoft is well justified; they've been lying to shareholders to inflate share prices and they don't really deliver the goods, just false hopes and unfulfilled promises



  30. [Meme] Nobody and Nothing Harms Europe's Reputation Like the EPO Does

    Europe’s second-largest institution, the EPO, has caused severe harm/damage to Europe’s economy and reputation; its attacks on the courts and on justice itself (even on constitutions in the case of UPC — another attempt to override the law and introduce European software patents) won’t be easily forgotten; SUEPO has meanwhile (on Saturday, link at the bottom in German) reminded people that Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos have driven away the EPO’s most valuable workers or moral compass


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts