03.15.21

EPO and Microsoft Collude to Break the Law — Part VIII Addendum

Posted in Deception, Europe, Microsoft, Patents at 8:31 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Video download link

Summary: The letter or the press release issued half a year ago explains the severity of the scandal we’ve been dealing with in recent days and will likely deal with well into April

APPENDICES or addenda typically come at the end of a series, but this time we’d like to interject for a bit, especially when covering pertinent documents alluded to previously albeit not discussed in an in-depth fashion.

“The above text says nothing about security incidents, which may compromise data and render it accessible to virtually everybody in the world.”This one merits further emphasis and an explanation of context/s.

The video above is an informal discussion about this press release [PDF] which is only half a year old. It was mentioned in Part VIII and its text is as follows (we also have an HTML version here):

711.424.1

Press Release

17 July 2020

After “Schrems II”: Europe needs digital independence

After the adequacy of the “EU-US Privacy Shield” was invalidated by a recent decision issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection and the Freedom of Information, Maja Smoltczyk, is now calling on data processors in Berlin to move any personal data stored in the USA to Europe.

In its decision of 16 July 2020 (“Schrems II”, C-311/18), the CJEU stated that the US authorities’ access to data belonging to European citizens is too extensive. As a result, personal data may generally no longer be transferred to the USA until the legal situation changes. There are some exceptions, especially in special cases stipulated by law, such as when booking a hotel room in the USA.

One of the findings noted in the CJEU decision concerns the government surveillance measures in the USA, which involve the mass collection of personal data with no clear limitations. This contradicts the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Paragraph 180 et seq. of the Decision). The CJEU also indicates that European citizens are unable to request a judicial review of the surveillance measures carried out by the US authorities. This violates the European fundamental right to effective legal protection.

Personal data may only be transferred to third countries that ensure a level of data protection that is equivalent to the essence of the European fundamental rights. As the findings of the highest European court suggest that is not the case in the USA, the decision issued by the CJEU has invalidated the adequacy of the “EU-US Privacy Shield”, which was previously the basis for many personal data transfers to the USA. By contrast, the CJEU has ruled that “standard contractual clauses” are admissible under certain conditions; standard contractual clauses can be established between European companies and providers in third countries to ensure the European level of data protection abroad. Before the first data transfer, however, the CJEU emphasises that both European data exporters and third-country data importers are obliged to check whether the data could potentially be accessed by government authorities in the third country in a manner that goes beyond the access rights granted under European law (Paragraphs 134 et seq. & 142 of the Decision). If such rights of access are enjoyed by the government authorities, data may not even be exported on the basis of standard contractual clauses. Any data that has already been transferred to any such third countries must be retrieved. Contrary to the prevalent practice to date, data cannot be exported merely on the basis of standard contractual clauses (Paragraph 126 et seq. of the Decision).

Press Officer: Dalia Kues

Office: Cristina Vecchi

Email: presse@datenschutz-berlin.de

Friedrichstr. 219
D-10969 Berlin

Tel.: +49 301 388 9900
Fax: +49 302 155 050


The CJEU emphasises that the data protection supervisory authorities must prohibit unlawful data exports according to these new standards (Paragraphs 135 & 146 of the Decision), and that data subjects may claim damages for the unlawful exportation of personal data (Paragraph 143 of the Decision). This may especially include non-material damage (solatia); the amount of compensation must act as a deterrent in accordance with European law.

The Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection and the Freedom of Information calls on all controllers under her supervision to observe the CJEU’s decision. Controllers who transfer personal data to the USA, especially when using cloud-based services, are now required to switch immediately to service providers based in the European Union or a country that can ensure an adequate level of data protection.

Maja Smoltczyk:
“The CJEU has made it refreshingly clear that data exports are not just financial decisions, as people’s fundamental rights must also be considered as a matter of priority. This ruling will put an end to the transfer of personal data to the USA for the sake of convenience or to cut costs. Now is the time for Europe to become digitally independent.

The CJEU has explicitly obliged the supervisory authorities to prohibit all unlawful data transfers, and we gladly accept the challenge. Of course, that not only applies to data transfers to the USA, which have already been outlawed by the CJEU; we must also check whether similar or perhaps even greater problems are involved in data transfers to other countries, such as China, Russia or India”.

The above text says nothing about security incidents, which may compromise data and render it accessible to virtually everybody in the world. It happened many times in the past. The very practice of outsourcing data — no matter if within one’s national jurisdiction or outside it — is a bad idea. They just need to hire competent security professionals, employed in-house and regulated by rules and regulations of the employer, not only national laws.

In light of new revelations we expect this scandal and its coverage to last well into springtime. This is a very big deal, not just to the EPO and to Microsoft. More people are becoming involved now.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2021/03/15/epoleaks-report-march-2021-part-8-addendum/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. The Next Generation of Free Software (or Software Freedom) Activism, Tackling Newer Problems

    New challenges as labour rights and human rights are further eroded, thanks to 'high' 'tech' with its very 'innovative' 'features'



  2. Mass Litigation Over the Salary Adjustment Procedure (SAP), Basically an Attack on All EPO Staff, Even EPO Pensioners

    “Importance of a binding and unambiguous erga omnes declaration” stressed by staff representatives of the EPO in a new letter to Benoît Battistelli‘s successor of choice, António Campinos, who has done nothing so far except attacking (or robbing) EPO staff, even EPO pensioners



  3. EPO 'Dialogue' With Staff Representatives is as Dead as 'Dialogue' With the Union

    “Yet another failure of social [sic] dialogue [sic] for Mr Campinos,” according to staff representatives, who rightly bemoan the Office president not giving a damn about staff; things quickly deteriorate in Europe’s second-largest institution, which does even worse things than granting loads of illegal European software patents (harming software producers and users alike)



  4. The FSF Needs to Reject OSI (and Open Source) Along With Much-Needed Rejection of the GNOME Foundation (Not the Same as the GNOME Project)

    Response to a good little speech (unscripted apparently) by Geoffrey Knauth, who explained his position on Open Source about a year ago



  5. Links 11/5/2021: Bodhi Linux 6.0, Coreboot 4.14, and DragonFly BSD 6.0

    Links for the day



  6. IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 10, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, May 10, 2021



  7. Keynote by FSF President Geoff Knauth and Executive Director John Sullivan

    To quote the source: “FSF president Geoff Knauth became the president of the FSF in 2020, but has served on the FSF board of directors for over twenty years. FSF executive director John Sullivan started work with the FSF in 2003, and has never stopped since, with past roles including the FSF’s first Campaigns Manager and later the Manager of Operations.”



  8. Richard Stallman on Companies That Are “Only Pretending to be American Companies”

    Dr. Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation's founder, speaks about US politics being captured and dominated by large and multinational corporations in pursuit of just money and power



  9. Last Night's Talk by Richard Stallman About Software Freedom

    An inspiring new talk reminds many of us why loads of people continue to support the founder of the Free Software Movement



  10. Links 10/5/2021: Huawei's GNU/Linux Laptops and Kotlin 1.5.0

    Links for the day



  11. Richard Stallman on Writing rm, ls, and cp (Also Working on Bison)

    Dr. Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation's founder, explains what programs he developed in the eighties



  12. Raise the Roof

    Out comes the taxpayers’ subsidy, assured; with military the sky is the limit (and bailout guaranteed)



  13. Richard Stallman Replatformed 10 Hours From Now

    Link to the talk (when it goes live)



  14. [Meme] Bill Says, Bill Saves

    Bill Gates seems more likely to be indicted than to win a presidential election/term



  15. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 09, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, May 09, 2021



  16. According to the Wall Street Journal, Bill Gates’s Relationship with Jeffrey Epstein Caused the Bill-Melinda Divorce (While the Media Deflected to Dr. Stallman, Using a Phony 'Scandal')

    It’s becoming rather obvious that there’s real substance to accusations that Mr. Gates was in some sense enabling Jeffrey Epstein; while Gates-funded media told us that he was saving us from climate change and a pandemic (PR stunts for empathy and sympathy) Melinda worked really hard to distance herself from him, the father of her kids



  17. [Meme] Bill, What's Your Opinion?

    While it's ludicrous to insinuate that Mr. Gates somehow "started" COVID-19 he certainly "rode the wave" for reputation laundering purposes, profit, and distraction from scandals that precede the epidemic in China (and caused his marriage to break down)



  18. Links 10/5/2021: SystemRescueCD 8.03, KeePass 2.48 Released

    Links for the day



  19. How We Process and Upload Videos Hosted in Techrights

    With ffmpeg as the Swiss army knife (and various other utilities/programs ‘in between’) it’s possible to automate much of the pipeline associated with video production and self-hosting



  20. Richard Stallman's Free Software Speech in 2020 (FSF Turning 35)

    We've re-encoded (as WebM) the likely sole/only speech Richard Stallman gave about his movement last year; today seems like a suitable time to republish it because tomorrow a British university/group will replatform him (to use their term)



  21. The Chaos Theory

    Making GNU/Linux less stable and less predictable isn't good for GNU/Linux users; but it certainly helps sell Red Hat support contracts and vexation inside the community weakens Red Hat's competitors



  22. Gemini and Techrights: Still Growing in Gemini Space and Always Supporting/Loving the Protocol

    As we continue to expand in Gemini space (where our very large site became a very large and likely the largest capsule) it's worth explaining some of the overlooked merits of the protocol; unlike the World Wide Web (WWW) it does not impose things on the user/visitor, who is more or less in charge



  23. Links 9/5/2021: KDE Frameworks 5.82.0 Release and Patents Related to COVID Subjected to Waivers

    Links for the day



  24. Act More 'Professional' to Appease Mobs

    We should all think alike, dress alike, and like everybody (especially the business overlords)



  25. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 08, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, May 08, 2021



  26. Some Background on the Free Speech Society at the University of Buckingham, Where Richard Stallman is Being 'Replatformed'

    A private British university, the University of Buckingham, will 'host' (virtually) the most-defamed person in the Free software world; the Free Speech Society is only two years old and rationality for its existence is explained by its co-founder James Oliver



  27. Web Sites or News Sites Perish When Their Arguments Are Weak and/or Invalid

    "Just be honest!" is a simple motto for any site; but some sites sell out in pursuit of money or grandiosity, unlike us (we turned 14.5 years old on Friday)



  28. GNU/Linux Turns 38 (in 4 Months From Now)

    Contrary to what the Linux Foundation wants you to think, the operating system turns 38 later this year



  29. Richard Stallman: Steve Jobs Did Some Very Bad Things

    Dr. Richard Stallman told me about Steve Jobs that he had helped digitally imprison computer users



  30. GNU/Linux Founder Richard Stallman to Give a Talk at the University of Buckingham Tomorrow (Live Stream)

    Tomorrow it will be possible to watch this new talk live using Free software


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts