Bonum Certa Men Certa

Almost a Thousand EPO Staff Protesting to EPO Member States That the Office Illegally Grants Software Patents and Other Invalid European Patents

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Oct 10, 2024

Call for clear and transparent rules respecting the EPC

THIS week a meeting of EPO staff was held in Germany, bearing an agenda and a vote on "DRAFT RESOLUTION to be adopted on EPO procedures". That meeting is now over and there's a letter informing staff of the outcome, in the process condemning António Campinos when moreover informing Heads of Delegation in the Administrative Council (who are supposed to oversee Campinos; in practice they help him cover up his abuses). It is particularly worth noting that they're naming European software patents - i.e. patents which are both illegal and undesirable - as it's a major and very much intentional illegality coordinated from above and within. The Central Staff Committee said to the staff or "colleagues" (as it refers to them): "Staff of the European Patent Office gathered on Wednesday 9 October 2024 in a General Assembly attended by 820 participants. Thank you for your participation! A resolution on the EPO procedures was put to a vote and supported by an overwhelming majority: 773 voted in favour, 66 against and 52 abstained. The outcome confirms that the concerns about the EPO’s ability to grant legally sound patents remain. In this open letter, we urge the Administrative Council to exert its supervisory role and instruct EPO management to enter into genuine dialogue with the staff representation and to put in place the measures supported by staff in the resolution."

The letter is similar but its target (recipient) would be considered (in a functioning democracy) the regulator that should actually do something on the matter:

European Patent Office
80298 Munich
Germany

Central Staff Committee
Comité central du personnel
Zentraler Personalausschuss

centralSTCOM@epo.org

Reference: sc24060cl

Date: 09/10/2024

European Patent Office | 80298 MUNICH | GERMANY

To:
Heads of Delegation in the Administrative Council

Mr António Campinos
President of the EPO

By email:
council@epo.org
president@epo.org

OPEN LETTER

Call for clear and transparent rules respecting the EPC

Dear Members of the Administrative Council,

Staff of the European Patent Office gathered today in a General Assembly attended by 820 participants.

A resolution on the EPO procedures1 was put to a vote and supported by an overwhelming majority: 773 voted in favour, 66 against and 52 abstained. The outcome confirms that the concerns about the EPO’s ability to grant legally sound patents remain. The Quality Action Plan 2024 obviously failed to deliver the improvements hoped for. The press and the users of the patent system continue to be critical of the quality of EPO granted patents2. The Staff Engagement Survey 2024 by Willis Towers Watson showed a significant decline of –12 percentage points since 20223 with respect to the perception of the EPO’s reputation for the quality of products and services. Back in 2022, the results were already –13 percentage points below the European norm4. The Active Search Division project was

_____________

1 “Resolution adopted on EPO procedures” [Annex 1]

2 “Serious interferences in the EPO patent granting process”, CSC letter of 19-09-2024 (sc24057cl)

3 Engagement Survey 2024, Willis Towers Watson, p. 12/35

4 Engagement Survey 2022, Willis Towers Watson, p. 11/34


hastily put in place to formally integrate a check of all searches by each member of a potential future Examining Division and their line manager without any basis in the EPC into the Patent Work Bench. One year later, positive results are missing and the project still lacks definition and legal basis.

Over the summer, DG1 Operations has arbitrarily and unilaterally reallocated patent applications from IPQC members to so-called “Repair Teams” working in another Directorate of a different technical field. Oral proceedings were cancelled and intentions to grant sent directly instead. The project can neither be seen as a “peer review” nor as “harmonisation” as the competent “peer” Examining Division was neither consulted nor provided any feedback. It was run outside the Quality Management System (QMS) and cannot comply with ISO 9001 and ISO quality management principles. Indeed, the latter require proper documentation and sharing of knowledge and experience in a feedback loop which is still missing.

We can only urge the Administrative Council to exert its supervisory role and instruct EPO management to enter into genuine dialogue with the staff representation and to put in place the measures supported by staff in the resolution.

Sincerely yours

Derek Kelly
Chairman of the Central Staff Committee

List of annexes:
Annex 1 Resolution adopted by staff on EPO procedures


RESOLUTION adopted on EPO procedures

Staff of the EPO, gathered in a General Assembly,

Noting that:

• DG1 Operations arbitrarily initiated the cancellation of oral proceedings and reallocated patent applications i.a. from IPQC members to so-called “Repair Teams” working in another Directorate of a different technical field without consulting nor providing any feedback to the competent Examining Division;

• DG1 Operations mandated, outside of any legal framework of the EPC or quality management system, “special units” to check summons for oral proceedings and communications on patent applications, i.a., from IPQC members;

• new “Golden Rules” are circulating in some Directorates with the explicit mention that they shall remain confidential;

• DG1 Operations frequently interfered with the work of the Examining Division especially in the field of Software Patents (e.g., CII, digital simulations)

Fears:

• an abolition of the obligation for neutrality of the EPO in the treatment of patent applications;

• the failure of the Organisation’s mission to grant legally sound patents, and

• a negative effect on European society and industry;

Urges the President and the Administrative Council to:

• respect the EPC’s regulations on patent examination, which is further oriented on the interpretation and case law of the Boards of Appeal, and guided by publicly available Guidelines for Examination;

• put an end to interferences with Examining Divisions and arbitrary reallocation of files on the advice of “special units” and hidden instructions;

• clearly and transparently define regulations for the allocation and for the exceptional reallocation of files to competent Examining Divisions;

Munich/The Hague/Berlin, 9 October 2024

As the above hopefully shows, the crisis of Benoît Battistelli's making did not stop, it's just being brushed under the carpet by successive regimes. An associate told us that "the bigger picture is that the corruption in the EPO is spreading to the rest of Europe, specifically the EU, through its continued existence."

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

IBM: Less Than a Month's Severance for Each Decade of Service
Yes, decade!
The EPO, Europe's Largest Patent Office, Admits Outsourcing to Microsoft Slop
Their sole goal is to make more money
The Better the Understanding or the More Nations Understand the Threat Posed by Microsoft, the Faster It'll be Eradicated
We believe that the thing to advocate is self-hosting and Free software... A lack of simplicity or absence of alternatives is a form of vendor lock-in
 
July 2 2025 Would Not be First Big Wave of Microsoft Layoffs Before Major National Holiday
July 2 or 3 mark the start of a very long weekend in the US
IDG's NetworkWorld Seems to Have Just Become LLM Slop
If IDG (now controlled by China) does that in at least one site, why not the rest? Only a matter of time?
Gemini Links 16/06/2025: Free Lunches and Bookmarklet for Mastodon
Links for the day
Gemini Protocol Turns 6 on Friday
Active (online) Gemini capsules are estimated by Lupa at over 3,000
Taking a Lesson From Denmark and Greenland? Iceland Shows New Lows for Windows, All-Time Highs for GNU/Linux
If Microsoft sabotages systems of judges at the Hague (in order to appease the insane man who wanted to invade Greenland), why won't its neighbour Iceland take note?
BetaNews Has Just Deleted Its Latest 'Article' or Got Cracked Again and Restored From Outdated Backup Again
BetaNews seems to be in some serious trouble right now
Microsoft's "FUD-as-a-Service" (Against Linux) Not Functioning Well
This is the kind of contribution companies like Microsoft and Google have to offer to society
Software Freedom is "Activism" Because the Corporate Agenda Revolves Around Bribery, Deceit, and Betrayal
At the end Software Freedom will win because it's on the same side as truth and lawfulness
Links 16/06/2025: EchoLeak and NASA Teaming up With India
Links for the day
A Week of Sunlight
They say transparency is like sunlight to a vampire
"Linux" Sites That Went Astray
there are even worse things than shutdowns
Links 16/06/2025: Climate, Wildfires, Breaches, and Monopolies
Links for the day
Links 16/06/2025: Summer in Finland and Misunderstandings
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, June 15, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, June 15, 2025
Gemini Links 15/06/2025: Rainy Season and OpenDocument Format (ODF)
Links for the day
Links 15/06/2025: Military Games, Parade, and Actions
Links for the day
Links 15/06/2025: Windows TCO, Openwashing, and Wars
Links for the day
Gemini Links 15/06/2025: "AI Fatigue and Crappiness"
Links for the day
When Abusive Law Firms (Working for Microsofters Against Us) Assert That Someone Writing in Social Media About Himself is Confidential Information
There was no reason to throw "GDPR" into 2 SLAPPs; they know it, but the goal was to increase the cost of a Defence and lessen the incentive to challenge the SLAPPs
Microsoft Attack Dogs Against Watchdogs and Guard Dogs in Software
Last year Microsofters hired attack dogs or "guns for hire"
Slop Cannot Replace Domain Expertise
All this "AI" hype (it's not even intelligence, it's all a misnomer, as many of us have insisted all along) will fizzle and be written off as a failed experiment
IBM's Fresh 'PIPs' (Action Before Layoffs)
At times like these, even once-reputable employers resort to PIPs and other procedures/tricks for denial of workers' rights
Microsoft is a Problem Not Just for Denmark
Every country should consider what Denmark is doing, why Denmark is doing it, and then do the same
The Slopfarms' Self Detonation
If more sites like BetaNews go under, then maybe we can still salvage some of the Web
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, June 14, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, June 14, 2025
Links 14/06/2025: FDA Changes Priorities, Cassette Data Storage From The 1970s
Links for the day
Gemini Links 14/06/2025: Steam Next Fest and Thoughts on Gemini
Links for the day
Site/Datacentre Maintenance Next Week
speed things up
Bulgaria: GNU/Linux Near 10%
The Bulgarian market seems to be changing
I Never Spoke to BetaNews. But BetaNews Wants to Ensure I Never Will, Either.
Sometimes just the reluctance to talk about it can say a great deal
Throwing Money at Lawyers Can't Stop Us (It Never Did)
Even just trying to censor things can result in the opposite of the desired outcome
Online Search or Large Search Engines Aren't Working Anymore
business models that directly compete with interests of Web users
Holidays and Breaks
I've hardly taken any long breaks since I got married
Danish OpenDocument Freedom
"year of Linux"
Links 14/06/2025: Wars and L.A. Distortion Effect
Links for the day
BetaNews Has More or Less Died After Experiments With LLM Slop, Is Linuxsecurity Next?
It doesn't seem like BetaNews knows what it's doing, let alone what it talks about
Gemini Links 14/06/2025: Historic Ada Design and GeminiSpace.Club to Expire
Links for the day
Links 14/06/2025: India Plane Crash and Middle-Eastern War
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, June 13, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, June 13, 2025