EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

08.08.08

New OOXML Fiasco: Germany and Canada Propose Microsoft as Editor for ODF-OOXML Convergence

Posted in America, Europe, Microsoft, Open XML, OpenDocument at 12:02 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Result of the vote just in…

It should be clear to see that ‘puppet nation’, which only joined very briefly in order to serve Microsoft, did not vote this time around. They have already done their job. A few of those that voted seem keen enough to go on the record and propose that Microsoft takes over.

Here is the recommendation from Canada: John Weigelt, National Technology Officer for Microsoft Canada.

Germany put down Mario Wendt of Microsoft Deutschland. Mario also stuffed attended the horrific BRM in Geneva [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12].

For OOXML abuse stories from Germany and Canada, start at the index. It’s clear that Microsoft still strives to control ODF.

Here is the document containing this new information [PDF]. The accompanying page is laid out below as HTML, but much the formatting is lost.








ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34

Document Description and Processing Languages


Secretariat: Japan (JISC)

























DOC. TYPE
Summary of Voting/Table of Replies
TITLE
Summary of Voting on SC 34 N 1035: Proposal for New Work Item on Open Document Format (ISO/IEC 26300) / Office Open XML (ISO/IEC 29500) Translation
SOURCE
SC 34 Secretariat
PROJECT
 
STATUS
This document will reviewed at the SC 34 plenary meeting to be held in Jeju, Republic of Korea, 2008-10-01.
ACTION ID
FYI
DUE DATE
 
DISTRIBUTION P, O and L Members of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34
; ISO/IEC JTC 1 Secretariat; ISO/IEC ITTF
ACCESS LEVEL
Def
ISSUE NO.
31
FILE
NAME
SIZE (KB)
PAGES




1056c.htm1056.pdf
 42
110



Secretariat ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34
– IPSJ/ITSCJ (Information Processing Society of Japan/Information Technology Standards Commission of Japan)*
Room 308-3, Kikai-Shinko-Kaikan Bldg., 3-5-8, Shiba-Koen, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0011 Japan
*Standard Organization Accredited by JISC



Telephone: +81-3-3431-2808;
Facsimile: +81-3-3431-6493;
E-mail: kimura@itscj.ipsj.or.jp



Raw text version of the PDF is below.


Result of voting
Ballot Information:
Ballot reference:
Ballot type:
Ballot title:
Opening date:
Closing date:
Note:
JTC1/SC34N1035
NWIP
Proposal for New Work Item on
OpenDocument Format (ISO/IEC 26300) /
Office Open XML (ISO/IEC 29500)
Translation
2008-04-29
2008-07-29

Member responses:
Votes cast (28)
Comments submitted (3)
Votes not cast (11)
Brazil (ABNT)
Bulgaria (BDS)
Canada (SCC)
Chile (INN)
China (SAC)
Colombia (ICONTEC)
Czech Republic (CNI)
Denmark (DS)
Finland (SFS)
France (AFNOR)
Germany (DIN)
India (BIS)
Italy (UNI)
Japan (JISC)
Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST)
Kenya (KEBS)
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Malaysia (DSM)
Malta (MSA)
Netherlands (NEN)
New Zealand (SNZ)
Norway (SN)
Poland (PKN)
Romania (ASRO)
Sweden (SIS)
Switzerland (SNV)
United Kingdom (BSI)
USA (ANSI)
Greece (ELOT)
Mexico (DGN)
Spain (AENOR)
Côte-d’Ivoire (CODINORM)

Cyprus (CYS)
Egypt (EOS)
Lebanon (LIBNOR)
Luxembourg (ILNAS)
Pakistan (PSQCA)
South Africa (SABS)
Sri Lanka (SLSI)
Thailand (TISI)
Trinidad and Tobago (TTBS)
Venezuela (FONDONORMA)

Questions:
Q.1 “Do you accept the proposal in the attached NWI Proposal document as a
sufficient definition of the new work item?”
Q.2 “Do you support the addition of the new work item to the programme of work
of the joint technical committee?”
Q.3 “Do you commit yourself to participate in the development of this new work
item?”
Q.4 “Are you able to offer a project editor who will dedicate his/her efforts to the
advancement and maintenance of this project?”
Q.5 “Do you have a major contribution or a reference document ready for
submittal?”
Q.6 “Will you have such a contribution in ninety days?”

Answers to Q.1: “Do you accept the proposal in the attached NWI Proposal
document as a sufficient definition of the new work item?”
18 x Yes Bulgaria (BDS)
Canada (SCC)
China (SAC)
Czech Republic (CNI)
Denmark (DS)
Finland (SFS)
France (AFNOR)
Germany (DIN)
Italy (UNI)
Japan (JISC)
Kenya (KEBS)
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Netherlands (NEN)
Norway (SN)
Poland (PKN)
Romania (ASRO)
Sweden (SIS)
USA (ANSI)
7 x Abstain Chile (INN)
Colombia (ICONTEC)
India (BIS)
Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST)

Malaysia (DSM)
Malta (MSA)
Switzerland (SNV)
3 x No Brazil (ABNT)
New Zealand (SNZ)
United Kingdom (BSI)

Answers to Q.2: “Do you support the addition of the new work item to the
programme of work of the joint technical committee?”
19 x Yes Bulgaria (BDS)
Canada (SCC)
China (SAC)
Czech Republic (CNI)
Denmark (DS)
Finland (SFS)
France (AFNOR)
Germany (DIN)
Italy (UNI)
Japan (JISC)
Kenya (KEBS)
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Netherlands (NEN)
New Zealand (SNZ)
Norway (SN)
Poland (PKN)
Romania (ASRO)
Sweden (SIS)
USA (ANSI)
8 x Abstain Chile (INN)
Colombia (ICONTEC)
India (BIS)
Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST)
Malaysia (DSM)
Malta (MSA)
Switzerland (SNV)
United Kingdom (BSI)
1 x No Brazil (ABNT)

Answers to Q.3: “Do you commit yourself to participate in the development of this
new work item?”
13 x No Brazil (ABNT)
Bulgaria (BDS)
China (SAC)
Denmark (DS)
Italy (UNI)
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Malta (MSA)
Netherlands (NEN)
Norway (SN)
Poland (PKN)

Romania (ASRO)
Sweden (SIS)
Switzerland (SNV)
8 x Yes Canada (SCC)
Czech Republic (CNI)
Finland (SFS)
France (AFNOR)
Germany (DIN)
Japan (JISC)
Kenya (KEBS)
USA (ANSI)
7 x Abstain Chile (INN)
Colombia (ICONTEC)
India (BIS)
Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST)
Malaysia (DSM)
New Zealand (SNZ)
United Kingdom (BSI)

Answers to Q.4: “Are you able to offer a project editor who will dedicate his/her
efforts to the advancement and maintenance of this project?”
19 x No Brazil (ABNT)
Bulgaria (BDS)
Czech Republic (CNI)
Denmark (DS)
Finland (SFS)
France (AFNOR)
Italy (UNI)
Japan (JISC)
Kenya (KEBS)
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Malta (MSA)
Netherlands (NEN)
Norway (SN)
Poland (PKN)
Romania (ASRO)
Sweden (SIS)
Switzerland (SNV)
United Kingdom (BSI)
USA (ANSI)
6 x Abstain Chile (INN)
Colombia (ICONTEC)
India (BIS)
Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST)
Malaysia (DSM)
New Zealand (SNZ)
3 x Yes Canada (SCC)
China (SAC)
Germany (DIN)

Answers to Q.5: “Do you have a major contribution or a reference document ready
for submittal?”
22 x No Brazil (ABNT)
Bulgaria (BDS)
Canada (SCC)
China (SAC)
Czech Republic (CNI)
Denmark (DS)
Finland (SFS)
France (AFNOR)
Italy (UNI)
Japan (JISC)
Kenya (KEBS)
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Malta (MSA)
Netherlands (NEN)
New Zealand (SNZ)
Norway (SN)
Poland (PKN)
Romania (ASRO)
Sweden (SIS)
Switzerland (SNV)
United Kingdom (BSI)
USA (ANSI)
5 x Abstain Chile (INN)
Colombia (ICONTEC)
India (BIS)
Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST)
Malaysia (DSM)
1 x Yes Germany (DIN)

Answers to Q.6: “Will you have such a contribution in ninety days?”
19 x No Brazil (ABNT)
Bulgaria (BDS)
Czech Republic (CNI)
Denmark (DS)
Finland (SFS)
Italy (UNI)
Japan (JISC)
Kenya (KEBS)
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Malta (MSA)
Netherlands (NEN)
New Zealand (SNZ)
Norway (SN)
Poland (PKN)
Romania (ASRO)
Sweden (SIS)
Switzerland (SNV)
United Kingdom (BSI)

USA (ANSI)
7 x Abstain Canada (SCC)
Chile (INN)
Colombia (ICONTEC)
France (AFNOR)
India (BIS)
Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST)
Malaysia (DSM)
2 x Yes China (SAC)
Germany (DIN)

Comments from Voters
Member: Comment: Date:
Brazil (ABNT) Comment 2008-07-29
14:52:46
The local committee considers that, since ISO/IEC 29500 has not been published yet and it is still
on the appeals phase, this is not the adequate time to approve the creation of this working group. If
the official version of ISO/IEC 29500 becomes widely avaiable by ISO, this committee will again
deliberate if it considers this working group worth of creation.
Canada (SCC) Comment 2008-07-14
16:18:57
John Weigelt -johnwei@microsoft.com
China (SAC) Comment 2008-07-16
05:18:20
Fang Chunyan
Germany (DIN) Comment 2008-07-28
07:31:28
Mario Wendt
New Zealand (SNZ) Comment 2008-07-25
06:04:09
ODF will be progressing to v1.2 soon and OOXML will presumably be updated to another version by
the time work on this project starts. There is little point in translating between ODF 1.0 and OOXML
1.0. New Zealand expects that the project team would work on the latest versions available.
Provided as mentioned above, that the work is based on the latest versions of the docs available nd
not restrict the develpment work to Version 1.0 only. New Zealand would like to see plans for
ongoing work and continuing alignment with the developing ODF standard
Switzerland (SNV) Comment File 2008-07-28
14:02:48
CommentFiles/Switzerland(SNV).doc

United Kingdom
(BSI)
Comment 2008-07-16
17:26:13
While in principle we support the general goals of such a project, in the absence of a final text for DIS 29500
it is impossible to determine what the precise scope or programme of work, and especially the timescale,
should be. The draft supplied with the Proposal has many gaps and only serves to highlight the problem of not
having a final text to work with. An accelerated timescale for producing such a Technical Report would seem
unrealistic given the uncertainty as to if and when a final text will be made available.
USA (ANSI) Comment 2008-07-28
21:02:11
TR should be based on both ISO/IEC standards when they become available.

Comments from Commenters
Member: Comment: Date:
Greece (ELOT) Comment 2008-07-29
15:41:05
ELOT answers to Q 1-6
Answer to Q1: Yes
Answer to Q2: Yes
Answer to Q3: No
Answer to Q4: No
Answer to Q5: No
Answer to Q6: No
Mexico (DGN) Comment File 2008-07-24
16:48:29
CommentFiles/Mexico(DGN).doc
Spain (AENOR) Comment 2008-07-29
10:42:35
Spain abstain on the mentioned document.

Template for comments and secretariat observations

Date: 2008-07-28 Document: 34N1035 NWI
1 1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7)
MB Clause No./
Subclause
No./
Annex
(e.g. 3.1)
Paragraph/
Figure/Table/
Note
(e.g. Table 1)
Type
of
comment
2
Comment (justification for change) by the MB Proposed change by the MB Secretariat observations
on each comment submitted

CH 1 3rd
paragraph
“graphical
fidelity”
te It is easily overlooked that the preservation of page
breaks, page numbers and line breaks is often of much
greater importance than other aspects of graphical
fidelity, because page numbers and line numbers are
often used in referencing a particular point in a
document, and the ease and reliability of communication
about such references is greatly reduced if page
breaks, page numbers or line breaks can change during
document translation.
Explain at the end of the paragraph that the
preservation of page breaks, page numbers and
line breaks is often of particular importance, in
order to preserve the accuracy and validity of
refernces to points in the document from outside
the document.
CH 2.3.4 te It should be explained that the lastRenderedPageBreak
element of OOXML is not only useful for assistive
technologies (as often falsely claimed), but that it can
also be used to provide a useful tool for the preservation
of page-break information across document format
conversions. (Does ODF have an equivalent feature?)
Provide the info.

1 MB = Member body (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **
)
2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial
NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory.

page of 1

ISO electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10

VOTE ON NEW WORK ITEM PROPOSAL
Date of circulation
2008-04-06
Reference number of associated New Work Item
Proposal
ISO/TC JTC1 /SC 34 N 1035Closing date for voting
2008-07-29

Circulated to P-members of the committee for vote and to

ISO/TC JTC1 /SC 34

O-members for information, in accordance with 2.3.4 of

Title Document Description and Processing

part 1 of the ISO/IEC Directives.

Languages

P-members of the technical committee or subcommittee
concerned have an obligation to vote.

Secretariat National Body (Mx)
Please send this form, duly completed at all points, to the Secretariat indicated above.

Title of proposal Proposal for New Work Item on OpenDocument Format (ISO/IEC 26300) /
Office Open XML Translation (ISO/IEC 29500).

Evaluation of market relevance of the proposal: (Not applicable to those member bodies who are abstaining.
It is recommended that this evaluation be carried out by a reasonably large number of stakeholders and the average of the
various points given be subsequently reflected on the voting forms.)

low
high

1 2 3 4 5

1.
What is the potential of this project to contribute to international trade and production?
2.
What is the potential of this project to contribute to economic efficiency, health, safety, or the
environment?
3.
How great is the need to harmonize national approaches in this subject area that may serve
as barriers to international trade?
4.
What is the feasibility of achieving consensus on International Standard(s) in this subject
area by the proposed target dates?
5.
What priority should be assigned to the development of International Standard(s) in this
subject area?
(Comments, including proposals for modification of the scope, may be annexed.)
Total points

Do you agree, as the responsible member body, that the requirements in Annex Q of Part 1 of the ISO/IEC Directives on the Justification of
proposals for the establishment of standards have been met by this proposal?

YES

NO

FORM 5 (ISO)

Version 2000.1

1 We agree to the addition of the proposed new work item to the programme of work of the committee:
YES

NO

We abstain/have no interest

2
We are prepared to participate in the development of the project (even if voting against), i.e. to make an effective contribution
at the preparatory stage, at least by commenting on working drafts:

YES*

NO

* Name(s) and address(es) of nominated experts (mandatory)
3 We would agree with direct submission of the draft attached to the new work item proposal as a DIS
YES

NO (Submission as a DIS requires approval by a two-thirds majority of those voting)

4
Standard(s), regulation(s), and other relevant documentation existing in our country, with any remarks concerning their
application if necessary, are attached:

YES

NO
If “yes”, please give references here, or as a separate annex:

An annex is attached to this form

P-member voting Mx
Date July 11th, 2008. Name Mexican committee

FORM 5 (ISO)

Version 2000.1

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

A Single Comment

  1. Needs Sunlight said,

    August 8, 2008 at 1:59 pm

    Gravatar

    “National Technology Officer” ? That what the party was calling their ambassadors. Canada and any other nation-states that wish to retain sovereignty need to wake the f- up right quick.

What Else is New


  1. The EPO's Use of Phrases Like “High-Quality Patent Services” Means They Know High-Quality European Patents Are 'Bygones'

    The EPO does a really poor job hiding the fact that its last remaining objective is to grant as many European Patents as possible (and as fast as possible), conveniently conflating quality with pace



  2. A Reader's Suggestion: Directions for Techrights

    Guest post by figosdev



  3. Links 20/4/2019: Weblate 3.6 and Pop!_OS 19.04

    Links for the day



  4. The Likes of Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA), Team Campinos and Team UPC Don't Represent Europe But Hurt Europe

    The abject disinterest in patent quality and patent validity (as judged by courts) threatens Europe but not to the detriment of those who are in the 'business' of suing and printing lots of worthless patents



  5. The Linux Foundation Needs to Change Course Before GNU/Linux (as a Free Operating System) is Dead

    The issues associated with the Linux Foundation are not entirely new; but Linux now incorporates so many restrictions and contains so many binary blobs that one begins to wonder what "Linux" even means



  6. Largest Patent Offices Try to Leave Courts in a State of Disarray to Enable the Granting of Fake Patents in the US and Europe

    Like a monarchy that effectively runs all branches of government the management of the EPO is trying to work around the judiciary; the same is increasingly happening (or at least attempted) in the United States



  7. Links 19/4/2019: PyPy 7.1.1, LabPlot 2.6, Kipi Plugins 5.9.1 Released

    Links for the day



  8. Links 18/4/2019: Ubuntu and Derivatives Have Releases, digiKam 6.1.0, OpenSSH 8.0 and LibreOffice 6.2.3

    Links for the day



  9. Freedom is Not a Business and Those Who Make 'Business' by Giving it Away Deserve Naming

    Free software is being parceled and sold to private monopolisers; those who facilitate the process enrich themselves and pose a growing threat to freedom in general — a subject we intend to tackle in the near future



  10. Concluding the Linux Foundation (LF) “Putting the CON in Conference!” (Part 3)

    Conferences constructed or put together based on payments rather than merit pose a risk to the freedom of free software; we conclude our series about events set up by the largest of culprits, which profits from this erosion of freedom



  11. “Mention the War” (of Microsoft Against GNU/Linux)

    The GNU/Linux desktop (or laptops) seems to be languishing or deteriorating, making way for proprietary takeover in the form of Vista 10 and Chrome OS and “web apps” (surveillance); nobody seems too bothered — certainly not the Linux Foundation — by the fact that GNU/Linux itself is being relegated or demoted to a mere “app” on these surveillance platforms (WSL, Croûton and so on)



  12. The European Patent Office Does Not Care About the Law, Today's Management Constantly Attempts to Bypass the Law

    Many EPs (European Patents) are actually "IPs" (invalid patents); the EPO doesn't seem to care and it is again paying for corrupt scholars to toe the party line



  13. The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) Once Again Pours Cold Water on Patent Maximalists

    Any hopes of a rebound or turnaround have just been shattered because a bizarre attack on the appeal process (misusing tribal immunity) fell on deaf ears and software patents definitely don't interest the highest court, which already deemed them invalid half a decade ago



  14. Links 17/4/2019: Qt 5.12.3 Released, Ola Bini Arrested (Political Stunts)

    Links for the day



  15. Links 16/4/2019: CentOS Turns 15, Qt Creator 4.9.0 Released

    Links for the day



  16. GNU/Linux is Being Eaten Alive by Large Corporations With Their Agenda

    A sort of corporate takeover, or moneyed interests at the expense of our freedom, can be seen as a 'soft coup' whose eventual outcome would involve all or most servers in 'the cloud' (surveillance with patent tax as part of the rental fees) and almost no laptops/desktops which aren't remotely controlled (and limit what's run on them, using something like UEFI 'secure boot')



  17. Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF

    Restrictions on speech are said to have been spread and reached some of the most liberal circles, according to a credible veteran who opposes illiberal censorship



  18. Corporate Media Will Never Cover the EPO's Violations of the Law With Respect to Patent Scope

    The greed-driven gold rush for patents has resulted in a large pool of European Patents that have no legitimacy and are nowadays associated with low legal certainty; the media isn't interested in covering such a monumental disaster that poses a threat to the whole of Europe



  19. A Linux Foundation Run by People Who Reject Linux is Like a Children's Charity Whose Management Dislikes Children

    We remain concerned about the lack of commitment that the Linux Foundation has for Linux; much of the Linux Foundation's Board, for example, comes from hostile companies



  20. Links 15/4/2019: Linux 5.1 RC5 and SolydXK Reviewed

    Links for the day



  21. Links 14/4/2019: Blender 2.80 Release Plan and Ducktype 1.0

    Links for the day



  22. 'Poor' (Multi-Millionaire) Novell CEO, Who Colluded With Steve Ballmer Against GNU/Linux, is Trying to Censor Techrights

    Novell’s last CEO, a former IBMer who just like IBM decided to leverage software patents against the competition (threatening loads of companies using "platoons of patent lawyers"), has decided that siccing lawyers at us would be a good idea



  23. Guest Post: The Linux Foundation (LF) is “Putting the CON in Conference!” (Part 2)

    Calls for papers (CfP) and who gets to assess what's presented or what's not presented is a lesser-explored aspect, especially in this age when large corporate sponsors get to indirectly run entire 'community' events



  24. Patent Maximalists Are Enabling Injustices and Frauds

    It's time to come to grips with the simple fact that extreme patent lenience causes society to suffer and is mostly beneficial to bad actors; for the patent profession to maintain a level of credibility and legitimacy it must reject the deplorable, condemnable zealots



  25. Further Decreasing Focus on Software Patents in the United States as They Barely Exist in Valid Form Anymore

    No headway made after almost 4 months of Iancu-led stunts; software patents remain largely dead and buried, so we’re moving on to other topics



  26. Links 13/4/2019: Wine 4.6 and Emacs 26.2 Released

    Links for the day



  27. Links 12/4/2019: Mesa 19.0.2, Rust 1.34.0 and Flatpak 1.3.2 Released

    Links for the day



  28. Caricature: EPO Standing Tall

    A reader's response to the EPO's tall claims and fluff from yesterday



  29. The EPO is Slipping Out of Control Again and It's Another Battistelli-Like Mess With Disregard for the Rule of Law and Patent Scope

    The banker in chief is just 'printing' or 'minting' lots and lots of patents, even clearly bogus ones that lack substance to back their perceived value



  30. Global Finance Magazine Spreads Lies About the Unitary Patent and German Constitutional Court

    Alluding to the concept of a "unified European patent," some site connected to Class Editori S.p.A. and based in Manhattan/New York City tells obvious lies about the Unified Patent Court (UPC), possibly in an effort to sway outcomes and twist people's expectations


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts