EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

08.08.08

New OOXML Fiasco: Germany and Canada Propose Microsoft as Editor for ODF-OOXML Convergence

Posted in America, Europe, Microsoft, Open XML, OpenDocument at 12:02 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Result of the vote just in…

It should be clear to see that ‘puppet nation’, which only joined very briefly in order to serve Microsoft, did not vote this time around. They have already done their job. A few of those that voted seem keen enough to go on the record and propose that Microsoft takes over.

Here is the recommendation from Canada: John Weigelt, National Technology Officer for Microsoft Canada.

Germany put down Mario Wendt of Microsoft Deutschland. Mario also stuffed attended the horrific BRM in Geneva [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12].

For OOXML abuse stories from Germany and Canada, start at the index. It’s clear that Microsoft still strives to control ODF.

Here is the document containing this new information [PDF]. The accompanying page is laid out below as HTML, but much the formatting is lost.








ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34

Document Description and Processing Languages


Secretariat: Japan (JISC)

























DOC. TYPE
Summary of Voting/Table of Replies
TITLE
Summary of Voting on SC 34 N 1035: Proposal for New Work Item on Open Document Format (ISO/IEC 26300) / Office Open XML (ISO/IEC 29500) Translation
SOURCE
SC 34 Secretariat
PROJECT
 
STATUS
This document will reviewed at the SC 34 plenary meeting to be held in Jeju, Republic of Korea, 2008-10-01.
ACTION ID
FYI
DUE DATE
 
DISTRIBUTION P, O and L Members of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34
; ISO/IEC JTC 1 Secretariat; ISO/IEC ITTF
ACCESS LEVEL
Def
ISSUE NO.
31
FILE
NAME
SIZE (KB)
PAGES




1056c.htm1056.pdf
 42
110



Secretariat ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34
– IPSJ/ITSCJ (Information Processing Society of Japan/Information Technology Standards Commission of Japan)*
Room 308-3, Kikai-Shinko-Kaikan Bldg., 3-5-8, Shiba-Koen, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0011 Japan
*Standard Organization Accredited by JISC



Telephone: +81-3-3431-2808;
Facsimile: +81-3-3431-6493;
E-mail: kimura@itscj.ipsj.or.jp



Raw text version of the PDF is below.


Result of voting
Ballot Information:
Ballot reference:
Ballot type:
Ballot title:
Opening date:
Closing date:
Note:
JTC1/SC34N1035
NWIP
Proposal for New Work Item on
OpenDocument Format (ISO/IEC 26300) /
Office Open XML (ISO/IEC 29500)
Translation
2008-04-29
2008-07-29

Member responses:
Votes cast (28)
Comments submitted (3)
Votes not cast (11)
Brazil (ABNT)
Bulgaria (BDS)
Canada (SCC)
Chile (INN)
China (SAC)
Colombia (ICONTEC)
Czech Republic (CNI)
Denmark (DS)
Finland (SFS)
France (AFNOR)
Germany (DIN)
India (BIS)
Italy (UNI)
Japan (JISC)
Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST)
Kenya (KEBS)
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Malaysia (DSM)
Malta (MSA)
Netherlands (NEN)
New Zealand (SNZ)
Norway (SN)
Poland (PKN)
Romania (ASRO)
Sweden (SIS)
Switzerland (SNV)
United Kingdom (BSI)
USA (ANSI)
Greece (ELOT)
Mexico (DGN)
Spain (AENOR)
Côte-d’Ivoire (CODINORM)

Cyprus (CYS)
Egypt (EOS)
Lebanon (LIBNOR)
Luxembourg (ILNAS)
Pakistan (PSQCA)
South Africa (SABS)
Sri Lanka (SLSI)
Thailand (TISI)
Trinidad and Tobago (TTBS)
Venezuela (FONDONORMA)

Questions:
Q.1 “Do you accept the proposal in the attached NWI Proposal document as a
sufficient definition of the new work item?”
Q.2 “Do you support the addition of the new work item to the programme of work
of the joint technical committee?”
Q.3 “Do you commit yourself to participate in the development of this new work
item?”
Q.4 “Are you able to offer a project editor who will dedicate his/her efforts to the
advancement and maintenance of this project?”
Q.5 “Do you have a major contribution or a reference document ready for
submittal?”
Q.6 “Will you have such a contribution in ninety days?”

Answers to Q.1: “Do you accept the proposal in the attached NWI Proposal
document as a sufficient definition of the new work item?”
18 x Yes Bulgaria (BDS)
Canada (SCC)
China (SAC)
Czech Republic (CNI)
Denmark (DS)
Finland (SFS)
France (AFNOR)
Germany (DIN)
Italy (UNI)
Japan (JISC)
Kenya (KEBS)
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Netherlands (NEN)
Norway (SN)
Poland (PKN)
Romania (ASRO)
Sweden (SIS)
USA (ANSI)
7 x Abstain Chile (INN)
Colombia (ICONTEC)
India (BIS)
Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST)

Malaysia (DSM)
Malta (MSA)
Switzerland (SNV)
3 x No Brazil (ABNT)
New Zealand (SNZ)
United Kingdom (BSI)

Answers to Q.2: “Do you support the addition of the new work item to the
programme of work of the joint technical committee?”
19 x Yes Bulgaria (BDS)
Canada (SCC)
China (SAC)
Czech Republic (CNI)
Denmark (DS)
Finland (SFS)
France (AFNOR)
Germany (DIN)
Italy (UNI)
Japan (JISC)
Kenya (KEBS)
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Netherlands (NEN)
New Zealand (SNZ)
Norway (SN)
Poland (PKN)
Romania (ASRO)
Sweden (SIS)
USA (ANSI)
8 x Abstain Chile (INN)
Colombia (ICONTEC)
India (BIS)
Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST)
Malaysia (DSM)
Malta (MSA)
Switzerland (SNV)
United Kingdom (BSI)
1 x No Brazil (ABNT)

Answers to Q.3: “Do you commit yourself to participate in the development of this
new work item?”
13 x No Brazil (ABNT)
Bulgaria (BDS)
China (SAC)
Denmark (DS)
Italy (UNI)
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Malta (MSA)
Netherlands (NEN)
Norway (SN)
Poland (PKN)

Romania (ASRO)
Sweden (SIS)
Switzerland (SNV)
8 x Yes Canada (SCC)
Czech Republic (CNI)
Finland (SFS)
France (AFNOR)
Germany (DIN)
Japan (JISC)
Kenya (KEBS)
USA (ANSI)
7 x Abstain Chile (INN)
Colombia (ICONTEC)
India (BIS)
Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST)
Malaysia (DSM)
New Zealand (SNZ)
United Kingdom (BSI)

Answers to Q.4: “Are you able to offer a project editor who will dedicate his/her
efforts to the advancement and maintenance of this project?”
19 x No Brazil (ABNT)
Bulgaria (BDS)
Czech Republic (CNI)
Denmark (DS)
Finland (SFS)
France (AFNOR)
Italy (UNI)
Japan (JISC)
Kenya (KEBS)
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Malta (MSA)
Netherlands (NEN)
Norway (SN)
Poland (PKN)
Romania (ASRO)
Sweden (SIS)
Switzerland (SNV)
United Kingdom (BSI)
USA (ANSI)
6 x Abstain Chile (INN)
Colombia (ICONTEC)
India (BIS)
Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST)
Malaysia (DSM)
New Zealand (SNZ)
3 x Yes Canada (SCC)
China (SAC)
Germany (DIN)

Answers to Q.5: “Do you have a major contribution or a reference document ready
for submittal?”
22 x No Brazil (ABNT)
Bulgaria (BDS)
Canada (SCC)
China (SAC)
Czech Republic (CNI)
Denmark (DS)
Finland (SFS)
France (AFNOR)
Italy (UNI)
Japan (JISC)
Kenya (KEBS)
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Malta (MSA)
Netherlands (NEN)
New Zealand (SNZ)
Norway (SN)
Poland (PKN)
Romania (ASRO)
Sweden (SIS)
Switzerland (SNV)
United Kingdom (BSI)
USA (ANSI)
5 x Abstain Chile (INN)
Colombia (ICONTEC)
India (BIS)
Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST)
Malaysia (DSM)
1 x Yes Germany (DIN)

Answers to Q.6: “Will you have such a contribution in ninety days?”
19 x No Brazil (ABNT)
Bulgaria (BDS)
Czech Republic (CNI)
Denmark (DS)
Finland (SFS)
Italy (UNI)
Japan (JISC)
Kenya (KEBS)
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Malta (MSA)
Netherlands (NEN)
New Zealand (SNZ)
Norway (SN)
Poland (PKN)
Romania (ASRO)
Sweden (SIS)
Switzerland (SNV)
United Kingdom (BSI)

USA (ANSI)
7 x Abstain Canada (SCC)
Chile (INN)
Colombia (ICONTEC)
France (AFNOR)
India (BIS)
Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST)
Malaysia (DSM)
2 x Yes China (SAC)
Germany (DIN)

Comments from Voters
Member: Comment: Date:
Brazil (ABNT) Comment 2008-07-29
14:52:46
The local committee considers that, since ISO/IEC 29500 has not been published yet and it is still
on the appeals phase, this is not the adequate time to approve the creation of this working group. If
the official version of ISO/IEC 29500 becomes widely avaiable by ISO, this committee will again
deliberate if it considers this working group worth of creation.
Canada (SCC) Comment 2008-07-14
16:18:57
John Weigelt -johnwei@microsoft.com
China (SAC) Comment 2008-07-16
05:18:20
Fang Chunyan
Germany (DIN) Comment 2008-07-28
07:31:28
Mario Wendt
New Zealand (SNZ) Comment 2008-07-25
06:04:09
ODF will be progressing to v1.2 soon and OOXML will presumably be updated to another version by
the time work on this project starts. There is little point in translating between ODF 1.0 and OOXML
1.0. New Zealand expects that the project team would work on the latest versions available.
Provided as mentioned above, that the work is based on the latest versions of the docs available nd
not restrict the develpment work to Version 1.0 only. New Zealand would like to see plans for
ongoing work and continuing alignment with the developing ODF standard
Switzerland (SNV) Comment File 2008-07-28
14:02:48
CommentFiles/Switzerland(SNV).doc

United Kingdom
(BSI)
Comment 2008-07-16
17:26:13
While in principle we support the general goals of such a project, in the absence of a final text for DIS 29500
it is impossible to determine what the precise scope or programme of work, and especially the timescale,
should be. The draft supplied with the Proposal has many gaps and only serves to highlight the problem of not
having a final text to work with. An accelerated timescale for producing such a Technical Report would seem
unrealistic given the uncertainty as to if and when a final text will be made available.
USA (ANSI) Comment 2008-07-28
21:02:11
TR should be based on both ISO/IEC standards when they become available.

Comments from Commenters
Member: Comment: Date:
Greece (ELOT) Comment 2008-07-29
15:41:05
ELOT answers to Q 1-6
Answer to Q1: Yes
Answer to Q2: Yes
Answer to Q3: No
Answer to Q4: No
Answer to Q5: No
Answer to Q6: No
Mexico (DGN) Comment File 2008-07-24
16:48:29
CommentFiles/Mexico(DGN).doc
Spain (AENOR) Comment 2008-07-29
10:42:35
Spain abstain on the mentioned document.

Template for comments and secretariat observations

Date: 2008-07-28 Document: 34N1035 NWI
1 1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7)
MB Clause No./
Subclause
No./
Annex
(e.g. 3.1)
Paragraph/
Figure/Table/
Note
(e.g. Table 1)
Type
of
comment
2
Comment (justification for change) by the MB Proposed change by the MB Secretariat observations
on each comment submitted

CH 1 3rd
paragraph
“graphical
fidelity”
te It is easily overlooked that the preservation of page
breaks, page numbers and line breaks is often of much
greater importance than other aspects of graphical
fidelity, because page numbers and line numbers are
often used in referencing a particular point in a
document, and the ease and reliability of communication
about such references is greatly reduced if page
breaks, page numbers or line breaks can change during
document translation.
Explain at the end of the paragraph that the
preservation of page breaks, page numbers and
line breaks is often of particular importance, in
order to preserve the accuracy and validity of
refernces to points in the document from outside
the document.
CH 2.3.4 te It should be explained that the lastRenderedPageBreak
element of OOXML is not only useful for assistive
technologies (as often falsely claimed), but that it can
also be used to provide a useful tool for the preservation
of page-break information across document format
conversions. (Does ODF have an equivalent feature?)
Provide the info.

1 MB = Member body (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **
)
2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial
NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory.

page of 1

ISO electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10

VOTE ON NEW WORK ITEM PROPOSAL
Date of circulation
2008-04-06
Reference number of associated New Work Item
Proposal
ISO/TC JTC1 /SC 34 N 1035Closing date for voting
2008-07-29

Circulated to P-members of the committee for vote and to

ISO/TC JTC1 /SC 34

O-members for information, in accordance with 2.3.4 of

Title Document Description and Processing

part 1 of the ISO/IEC Directives.

Languages

P-members of the technical committee or subcommittee
concerned have an obligation to vote.

Secretariat National Body (Mx)
Please send this form, duly completed at all points, to the Secretariat indicated above.

Title of proposal Proposal for New Work Item on OpenDocument Format (ISO/IEC 26300) /
Office Open XML Translation (ISO/IEC 29500).

Evaluation of market relevance of the proposal: (Not applicable to those member bodies who are abstaining.
It is recommended that this evaluation be carried out by a reasonably large number of stakeholders and the average of the
various points given be subsequently reflected on the voting forms.)

low
high

1 2 3 4 5

1.
What is the potential of this project to contribute to international trade and production?
2.
What is the potential of this project to contribute to economic efficiency, health, safety, or the
environment?
3.
How great is the need to harmonize national approaches in this subject area that may serve
as barriers to international trade?
4.
What is the feasibility of achieving consensus on International Standard(s) in this subject
area by the proposed target dates?
5.
What priority should be assigned to the development of International Standard(s) in this
subject area?
(Comments, including proposals for modification of the scope, may be annexed.)
Total points

Do you agree, as the responsible member body, that the requirements in Annex Q of Part 1 of the ISO/IEC Directives on the Justification of
proposals for the establishment of standards have been met by this proposal?

YES

NO

FORM 5 (ISO)

Version 2000.1

1 We agree to the addition of the proposed new work item to the programme of work of the committee:
YES

NO

We abstain/have no interest

2
We are prepared to participate in the development of the project (even if voting against), i.e. to make an effective contribution
at the preparatory stage, at least by commenting on working drafts:

YES*

NO

* Name(s) and address(es) of nominated experts (mandatory)
3 We would agree with direct submission of the draft attached to the new work item proposal as a DIS
YES

NO (Submission as a DIS requires approval by a two-thirds majority of those voting)

4
Standard(s), regulation(s), and other relevant documentation existing in our country, with any remarks concerning their
application if necessary, are attached:

YES

NO
If “yes”, please give references here, or as a separate annex:

An annex is attached to this form

P-member voting Mx
Date July 11th, 2008. Name Mexican committee

FORM 5 (ISO)

Version 2000.1

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

A Single Comment

  1. Needs Sunlight said,

    August 8, 2008 at 1:59 pm

    Gravatar

    “National Technology Officer” ? That what the party was calling their ambassadors. Canada and any other nation-states that wish to retain sovereignty need to wake the f- up right quick.

What Else is New


  1. Links 21/8/2019: Open Source POWER, Alpine 3.10.2, Netrunner 19.08

    Links for the day



  2. Edward as a Nodder to Team UPC Kool-Aid

    Bristows LLP is at it again and it's getting pathetic, not just dishonest as usual



  3. Guest Post: António Campinos' European Patent Office Redefines Modern Slavery in the Heart of Europe in 2019

    The European Patent Office’s (EPO) President António Campinos — like his predecessor Battistelli — emulates Chinese labour practices



  4. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: There is More Than One Iceberg Ahead

    "This strategy is not far from when Microsoft talked about "de-commoditizing protocols" in the late 90s, as part of their plans to control, dominate, and end Open Source and Free software."



  5. EPO Cannot Handle Patent Justice With a Backlog of About 10,000 Cases at the Boards of Appeal

    The EPO's long war on judges and on the law has proven to be costly; it's difficult to pretend that the EPO functions like a first-world legal framework



  6. The European Patent Office Increases Surveillance: Can't Get Food Without Being Spied on

    The infamous "War on Cash" has been 'won' at Europe's second-largest institution, where people's diet can now be monitored and indefinitely retained on the system



  7. To GNU/Linux, the Operating System, GAFAM (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft) is Not the Threat. Microsoft is.

    Don't let Microsoft get away with its bogus narration; GNU/Linux is primarily under attack from Microsoft, whereas Software Freedom in general is under attack from many directions



  8. The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Has the Full Support of Techrights

    Our support for the FSF is strong enough that we want to occasionally suggest improvements; there are growing frictions designed to isolate the FSF and cause self-restraint/censorship



  9. Why We Support Phoronix (Whereas Some Others Do Not)

    Some people try to characterise Michael Larabel as the 'bad boy' of Linux even though Michael is probably the hardest working Linux journalist out there



  10. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: The Simplest Ways that AI will Change Computing

    "AI is already used to help kill people. We should be cautious, and know that the best rules we come up with (like no doing magic outside the school grounds) won't be followed all the time."



  11. Links 20/8/2019: DragonFlyBSD Developing DSynth

    Links for the day



  12. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: Narcissism in The Community

    "Narcissists are drawn to intelligent people. They take great pleasure in attacking, controlling and defeating intelligent people because it makes them feel smarter and more important."



  13. Breaking the Law Has Become the Norm at the European Patent Office

    The European Patent Office’s ongoing practice of destroying critics/whistleblowers and crushing unions, judges, examiners etc. — as well as threats and bribery of the media — ultimately mean a perpetual state of lawlessness that, if it prevails, will let patent trolls raid the European economy and stall innovation



  14. Links 20/8/2019: KMyMoney 5.0.6, Kdenlive 19.08

    Links for the day



  15. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: Free Software in Education

    "If everyone learns to code, then everyone gains some understanding of how to code in other languages."



  16. Links 19/8/2019: Another Linux 5.3 RC, OpenSUSE's Richard Brown Steps Down, Slackware Creates Patreon Page, Qt 6 Initiated

    Links for the day



  17. Speaking Truth to Monopolies (or How to Write Guest Posts in Techrights)

    We need to have more articles tackling the passage of all power — especially when it comes to software — to few large monopolies that disregard human rights or actively participate in their abolishment in the digital realm



  18. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: Free as in Speech

    "While a new breed of so-called anarchists campaign against expression that even the state allows, people are also foolishly overplaying the relevance of the state to free speech issues -- as if it's not a freedom issue when a project is increasingly thought-policed, because the thought-policing isn't on a state level."



  19. Toxic Culture at Microsoft

    Racism, intolerance, sexism and bullying are rampant at Microsoft; but Microsoft would rather deflect/divert/sidetrack to Google and so-called 'GAFA'



  20. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: Introduction

    "The FSF isn't just threatened, it will hit a large iceberg in the future that changes it permanently."



  21. Linux Journal and Linux.com Should Have Been Kept Going

    There's apparently no good explanation for the effective shutdown of Linux Journal and Linux.com; London Trust Media Holdings (LTMH), owner of Linux Journal, saw numbers improving and the Linux Foundation, steward of Linux.com, is loaded with money



  22. 2019 Microsoft Glossary

    How Microsoft internally interprets words that it is saying to the public and to the press



  23. 2019 Surveillance Glossary

    Distortion of technical and nontechnical terms in this day and age of '1984'



  24. Openwashing Report: It's Getting Worse, Fast. Everything is Apparently 'Open' Now Even Though It's Actually Proprietary.

    The latest examples (this past week's) of openwashing in the media, ranging from 5G to surveillance



  25. GitHub is a Dagger Inside Free/Open Source Software (FOSS); This is Why Microsoft Bought It

    A year later it seems pretty evident that Microsoft doesn’t like FOSS but is merely trying to control it, e.g. by buying millions of FOSS projects/repositories at the platform level (the above is what the Linux Foundation‘s Jim Zemlin said to Microsoft at their event while antitrust regulators were still assessing the proposed takeover)



  26. Microsoft Grows Within and Eats You From the Inside

    Microsoft entryism and other subversive tactics continue to threaten and sometimes successfully undermine the competition; Microsoft is nowadays doing that to core projects in the Free/Open Source software world



  27. Links 18/8/2019: New KNOPPIX and Emmabuntus Released

    Links for the day



  28. Links 17/8/2019: Unigine 2.9 and Git 2.23

    Links for the day



  29. Computer-Generated Patent Applications Show That Patents and Innovations Are Very Different Things

    The 'cheapening' of the concept of 'inventor' (or 'invention') undermines the whole foundation/basis of the patent system and deep inside patent law firms know it



  30. Concerns About IBM's Commitment to OpenSource.com After the Fall of Linux.com and Linux Journal

    The Web site OpenSource.com is over two decades old; in its current form it's about a decade old and it contains plenty of good articles, but will IBM think so too and, if so, will investment in the site carry on?


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts