EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.10.10

Symantec Lies About GNU/Linux

Posted in GNU/Linux, Security, Windows at 9:56 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Kent Hovind mug shot
Symantec: the Kent Hovind of security?
(mug shot of Kent Hovind courtesy of Escambia
County Sheriff’s Office after his arrest)

Summary: In order to sell some products, Symantec spreads GNU/Linux fear based on misinformation

EVERY once in a while Symantec aims its FUD pistol at some innocent element of computing which Symantec claims has a problem (and Symantec of course offers a solution to this problem). We have already explained this business strategy (using examples that misuse Free software [1, 2]), which characterises many quacks and pseudo-science. That’s why we put Kent Hovind at the top, for those who still wonder.

An issue which we discussed earlier today in IRC is the latest stunt from Symantec, which is probably best deconstructed and explained by Slashdot user “superapecommando” who submits:

The latest MessageLabs Intelligence Report from Symantec Hosted Services is filled with interesting and useful information regarding the current state of malware and e-mail borne threats as well as the trends over time. Of particular interest to me is the assertion in the report that “any given Linux machine is five times more likely to be sending spam than any given Windows machine.”

A pretty clear case of sensationalist metrics from a company which wants to sell their hosted security solutions to Linux box admins. But one interesting thing that comes out of the story is that many of the security researchers believe that misconfigured POSTFIX and SENDMAIL installations are cloaking the actual amount of spam coming from infected Windows hosts.

Desktops that unleash vast amounts of SPAM actually run Windows and one in two Windows PCs is believed/estimated to be a zombie (either active or not). GNU/Linux drives many mail servers, so if it obeys a request from a Windows zombie, then it will deliver SPAM. Should GNU/Linux therefore be blamed? Of course not. It’s just very good at delivering mail.

“GNU/Linux drives many mail servers, so if it obeys a request from a Windows zombie, then it will deliver SPAM.”Quoting Symantec a little further from its ‘report’ (which assumes bogus numbers about the market share of GNU/Linux), “by calculating a ratio of spam from a given operating system compared to the market share, we can get a “spam index” which shows relative to its market share, the likelihood that a particular computer is sending spam, based on its operating system. In the current spam climate, this index shows that relative to its market share, any given Linux machine is five times more likely to be sending spam than any given Windows machine…”

Another translation was sent to us by a reader who says: “Despite a total lack of evidence and being unable to detect the source OS of spam, we conclude that Linux machines are sending more SPAM because there are less of them.”

As our IRC logs will show later today (fragment posted below), there are even better explanations for that.


Techrights logo

IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: May 9th, 2010

Join us now at the IRC channel.

tessier__ http://www.v3.co.uk/v3/news/2262681/botnets-exploit-linux-owners May 10 09:29
tessier__ Someone is smoking crack. May 10 09:29
tessier__ crap May 10 09:31
schestowitz Windows is not used much for E-mail May 10 09:31
tessier__ There is something fishy about that website May 10 09:31
schestowitz Which one? May 10 09:31
schestowitz V3? May 10 09:31
tessier__ Not intentionally, no. But that’s what the botnets are doing with Windows: sending mail May 10 09:31
tessier__ Yeah May 10 09:31
schestowitz VNUNEt? May 10 09:31
tessier__ Have you heard of v3 before? May 10 09:31
tessier__ I never have. May 10 09:31
schestowitz Yes May 10 09:31
schestowitz Linux relays spam May 10 09:32
schestowitz It runs mail servers May 10 09:32
schestowitz It does what it’s supposed to do May 10 09:32
schestowitz Which is to relay requests May 10 09:32
tessier__ I cannot post a comment on that site. The captcha does not work. No matter what you put in there it does not accept it. May 10 09:32
tessier__ Linux by default is not an open relay. May 10 09:32
schestowitz I wonder what sends those requests though May 10 09:32
tessier__ No distro ships their mail servers that way. May 10 09:32
schestowitz It’s spammers May 10 09:32
tessier__ it will deliver the spam to you that someone injected via a Windows box though. May 10 09:33
schestowitz They use open relays May 10 09:33
schestowitz Running Linux because it’s better May 10 09:33
tessier__ Open relays are hard to find these days. May 10 09:33
schestowitz They get blacklisted May 10 09:33
tessier__ And spammers don’t run open relays either. They don’t want other spammers stealing their resources. May 10 09:33
schestowitz What was that list that gather IPs of spam relays? May 10 09:33
schestowitz many services used to look it up and in 2008 it had sustainability issues May 10 09:33
tessier__ Whenever I have investigated IP addresses that were sending me spam it was Windows boxes. May 10 09:33
tessier__ There are lots of DNSBLs May 10 09:34
tessier__ And they operate quite successfully May 10 09:34
tessier__ SORBS is one of the big ones these days May 10 09:34
schestowitz I can’t recall the one I think about. Articles about it were widespread 2 years ago. May 10 09:34
*schestowitz creates http://techrights.org/wiki/index.php/Facebook May 10 09:35
Techrights Title: Facebook – Techrights .::. Size~: 12.91 KB May 10 09:35
tessier__ There have been quite a few May 10 09:35
-BNtwitter/#boycottnovell-[popey] Mark proposes that 10.10 is released on Sunday 10th October 2010. Where 101010 = 42 = Meaning of Life / Universe / Everything! May 10 09:37
-BNtwitter/#boycottnovell-[nsisodiya] need a student volunteer for modifying C++ book #schoolos May 10 09:40
*benJIman has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) May 10 09:42
-BNtwitter/#boycottnovell-[popey] There will be no public ISO of #Ubuntu Light with Unity, but will be tailored specifically for OEMs. May 10 09:49
-BNtwitter/#boycottnovell-[davidgerard] From @cracked – 5 Insane File Sharing Panics from Before the Internet – http://tinyurl.com/2ubthnw May 10 09:53
Techrights Title: 5 Insane File Sharing Panics from Before the Internet | Cracked.com .::. Size~: 81.74 KB May 10 09:53
-BNtwitter/#boycottnovell-[satipera] Liberal Democrat negotiations with Labour look likely if Brown goes quickly. May 10 09:55
*narendra (~79f5e1b0@gateway/web/freenode/x-xaqdkqksysommyyc) has joined #boycottnovell May 10 10:08
narendra where I can upload secrect document anonymousy ? May 10 10:08
narendra wikileaks is not working i think !! May 10 10:08
tessier__ http://موقع.وزارة-الاتصالات.مصر/Default.aspx May 10 10:16
tessier__ Awesome. May 10 10:16
*benJIman (~benji@benjiweber.co.uk) has joined #boycottnovell May 10 10:17
MinceR i’m not so enthusiastic about it. May 10 10:17
*benJIman has quit (Client Quit) May 10 10:17
tessier__ Why not? May 10 10:17
*benJIman (~benji@benjiweber.co.uk) has joined #boycottnovell May 10 10:17
MinceR because it allows even more domains that are difficult to type, read and compare May 10 10:18
MinceR IDN already lets you create identical-looking but distinct domains that can confuse users trying to check whether a certificate really applies to a supposedly secure connection. May 10 10:18
MinceR domain names used to be easy to handle (as such names should be) May 10 10:19
MinceR 7bit US-ASCII should have been enough. May 10 10:19
tessier__ SSL CA was broken from the beginning anyway. This doesn’t make things any worse. May 10 10:21
tessier__ Everyone just clicks ok regardless. May 10 10:21
tessier__ Although I am curious to know how you would work that sort of thing into a bind zone file. May 10 10:21
MinceR no, not everyone. May 10 10:26
Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

A Single Comment

  1. your_friend said,

    May 11, 2010 at 11:03 pm

    Gravatar

    It is worth quoting Paul Wood, a senior analyst for Symantec Hosted Services, in full. This is so dumb, the Windows people will have to take if far from the source to make it stick.

    We found that more than 90 per cent of spam comes from Windows machines, which is not surprising. But if you look at Linux, it has only a one per cent market share but is responsible for more than five per cent of spam. So in a sense you’re more likely to get spam from a Linux than a Windows machine.

    There is not true in any sense. It is difficult to see how Phil Muncaster, the article’s author, could have taken this out of context and there is no forgiving Muncaster’s lack of critical thinking. If more than 90% of all spam comes from Windows, virtually all spam comes from Windows. Alternate interpretations have been debunked above, but the original statement was even dumber than its following missinterpretation by Muncaster.

    There are many good explanations mentioned above for what Symantic saw when they looked at, “the passive fingerprinting signatures of spam email traffic for the first time in this month’s report, in order to learn the type of operating system running on the infected spam-sending machines.” The most obvious are that GNU/Linux is efficient and well placed in networks. Windows’ poor network stack and zombie load mean that any Windows machine will only be able to do about 10% of a comparable GNU/Linux box. The later explanation, that most of the traffic comes because GNU/Linux is acting as a relay is even more damning for Windows – this means that GNU/Linux is just doing its job on networks where the administrators have made the mistake of using Windows on the desktop. The conclusion, backed by reasonable estimates of Windows infection rates and the fact that default GNU/Linux setting that preclude the bogus “open relay” explanation, is that all spam comes from Windows.

What Else is New


  1. Links 17/8/2019: Unigine 2.9 and Git 2.23

    Links for the day



  2. Computer-Generated Patent Applications Show That Patents and Innovations Are Very Different Things

    The 'cheapening' of the concept of 'inventor' (or 'invention') undermines the whole foundation/basis of the patent system and deep inside patent law firms know it



  3. Concerns About IBM's Commitment to OpenSource.com After the Fall of Linux.com and Linux Journal

    The Web site OpenSource.com is over two decades old; in its current form it's about a decade old and it contains plenty of good articles, but will IBM think so too and, if so, will investment in the site carry on?



  4. Electronic Frontier Foundation Makes a Mistake by Giving Award to Microsoft Surveillance Person

    At age 30 (almost) the Electronic Frontier Foundation still campaigns for privacy; so why does it grant awards to enemies of privacy?



  5. Caturdays and Sundays at Techrights Will Get Busier

    Our plan to spend the weekends writing more articles about Software Freedom; it seems like a high-priority issue



  6. Why Techrights Doesn't Do Social Control Media

    Being managed and censored by platform owners (sometimes their shareholders) isn’t an alluring proposition when a site challenges conformist norms and the status quo; Techrights belongs in a platform of its own



  7. Patent Prosecution Highways and Examination Highways Are Dooming the EPO

    Speed is not a measure of quality; but today's EPO is just trying to get as much money as possible, as fast as possible (before the whole thing implodes)



  8. Software Patents Won't Come Back Just Because They're (Re)Framed/Branded as "HEY HI" (AI)

    The pattern we've been observing in recent years is, patent applicants and law firms simply rewrite applications to make these seem patent-eligible on the surface (owing to deliberate deception) and patent offices facilitate these loopholes in order to fake 'growth'



  9. IP Kat Pays the Price for Being a Megaphone of Team UPC

    The typical or the usual suspects speak out about the so-called 'prospects' (with delusions of inevitability) of the Unified Patent Court Agreement, neglecting to account for their own longterm credibility



  10. Links 17/8/2019: Wine 4.14 is Out, Debian Celebrates 26 years

    Links for the day



  11. Nothing Says 'New' Microsoft Like Microsoft Component Firmware Update (More Hardware Lock-in)

    Vicious old Microsoft is still trying to make life very hard for GNU/Linux, especially in the OEM channel/s, but we're somehow supposed to think that "Microsoft loves Linux"



  12. Bill Gates and His Special Relationship With Jeffrey Epstein Still Stirring Speculations

    Love of the "children" has long been a controversial subject for Microsoft; can Bill Gates and his connections to Jeffrey Epstein unearth some unsavoury secrets?



  13. Links 16/8/2019: Kdevops and QEMU 4.1

    Links for the day



  14. The EPO's War on the Convention on the Grant of European Patents 2000 (EPC 2000), Not Just Brexit, Kills the Unitary Patent (UP/UPC) and Dooms Justice

    Team UPC continues to ignore the utter failures that have led to lawlessness at the EPO, attributing the demise of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) to Brexit alone and pretending that it's not even a problem



  15. Links 15/8/2019: GNOME's Birthday, LLVM 9.0 RC2

    Links for the day



  16. 'Foundation' Hype Spreads in China

    Nonprofits seem to have become more of a business loophole than a charitable endeavour; the problem is, this erodes confidence in legitimate Free software and good causes



  17. Links Are Not Endorsements

    If the only alternative is to say nothing and link to nothing, then we have a problem; a lot of people still assume that because someone links to something it therefore implies agreement and consent



  18. The Myth of 'Professionalism'

    Perception of professionalism, a vehicle or a motivation for making Linux more 'corporate-friendly' (i.e. owned by corporations), is a growing threat to Software Freedom inside Linux, as well as freedom of speech and many other things



  19. Links 14/8/2019: Best Chromebooks, EPEL 8.0, LibreOffice 6.2.6

    Links for the day



  20. Being in Favour of Free/Libre Open Source Software Means Rejecting Software Patents

    Those who believe in Software Freedom cannot at the same time believe that software patents are desirable; we've sadly come to a point where many companies that dominate so-called 'Open Source' groups actively lobby for such patents, in effect betraying the community they claim to be a part of



  21. Links 14/8/2019: Apache Evaluated, HardenedBSD Has New Release

    Links for the day



  22. Planet Python is Being Overrun by Microsoft, Just Like PyCon and Python in General

    Microsoft is perturbing the Free/Open Source software (FOSS) world from the inside, promoting Microsoft's most malicious proprietary software from within that world while taking positions of power in powerful FOSS projects



  23. Coming Soon: The Innards of the Eric Lundgren Case That Microsoft is Desperate to Hide or Spin (by Defaming Lundgren)

    Microsoft is rather stressed about Eric Lundgren coming out of prison and telling how Microsoft put him there; right now Microsoft is mostly name-calling while seeking to control public dialogues



  24. Wrong Person in Charge of the Linux Foundation (and in Charge of Linus Torvalds)

    There are several glaring issues when it comes to the leadership of Linux's steward; for one thing, it lacks actual background in... Linux



  25. 2019 Tech Glossary

    This clavis refers to what the de facto definition may be, based on how (and when) media uses the words nowadays



  26. The Silence of the Media Lamb

    There are reasons that are perfectly legitimate to criticise media which is unable and more so unwilling to cover particular scandals for fear that coverage can be detrimental to the media's owners and sponsors



  27. LINUX.COM Managed by Apple’s MacOS Users, Open Source Managed and Covered by People Who Reject Open Source

    The narratives are being hijacked; people who we're supposed to assume speak for Linux and for Open Source support neither of these things; they're only in it for the money



  28. The Linux Foundation's Open Source Summit is a Proprietary Software Marketing Venue

    The distortion of the term Open Source and promotion of proprietary software such as GitHub shows that the foundation called after “Linux” is actually more of a front group of hostile corporations — large brands and rich people to whom Open Source represents a threat that needs to be controlled



  29. Links 13/8/2019: Mir 1.4 Released, Qt PDF Discussed

    Links for the day



  30. Links 13/8/2019: KDevelop 5.4.1 and DragonFly 5.6.2 Released

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts