EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.10.10

Symantec Lies About GNU/Linux

Posted in GNU/Linux, Security, Windows at 9:56 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Kent Hovind mug shot
Symantec: the Kent Hovind of security?
(mug shot of Kent Hovind courtesy of Escambia
County Sheriff’s Office after his arrest)

Summary: In order to sell some products, Symantec spreads GNU/Linux fear based on misinformation

EVERY once in a while Symantec aims its FUD pistol at some innocent element of computing which Symantec claims has a problem (and Symantec of course offers a solution to this problem). We have already explained this business strategy (using examples that misuse Free software [1, 2]), which characterises many quacks and pseudo-science. That’s why we put Kent Hovind at the top, for those who still wonder.

An issue which we discussed earlier today in IRC is the latest stunt from Symantec, which is probably best deconstructed and explained by Slashdot user “superapecommando” who submits:

The latest MessageLabs Intelligence Report from Symantec Hosted Services is filled with interesting and useful information regarding the current state of malware and e-mail borne threats as well as the trends over time. Of particular interest to me is the assertion in the report that “any given Linux machine is five times more likely to be sending spam than any given Windows machine.”

A pretty clear case of sensationalist metrics from a company which wants to sell their hosted security solutions to Linux box admins. But one interesting thing that comes out of the story is that many of the security researchers believe that misconfigured POSTFIX and SENDMAIL installations are cloaking the actual amount of spam coming from infected Windows hosts.

Desktops that unleash vast amounts of SPAM actually run Windows and one in two Windows PCs is believed/estimated to be a zombie (either active or not). GNU/Linux drives many mail servers, so if it obeys a request from a Windows zombie, then it will deliver SPAM. Should GNU/Linux therefore be blamed? Of course not. It’s just very good at delivering mail.

“GNU/Linux drives many mail servers, so if it obeys a request from a Windows zombie, then it will deliver SPAM.”Quoting Symantec a little further from its ‘report’ (which assumes bogus numbers about the market share of GNU/Linux), “by calculating a ratio of spam from a given operating system compared to the market share, we can get a “spam index” which shows relative to its market share, the likelihood that a particular computer is sending spam, based on its operating system. In the current spam climate, this index shows that relative to its market share, any given Linux machine is five times more likely to be sending spam than any given Windows machine…”

Another translation was sent to us by a reader who says: “Despite a total lack of evidence and being unable to detect the source OS of spam, we conclude that Linux machines are sending more SPAM because there are less of them.”

As our IRC logs will show later today (fragment posted below), there are even better explanations for that.


Techrights logo

IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: May 9th, 2010

Join us now at the IRC channel.

tessier__ http://www.v3.co.uk/v3/news/2262681/botnets-exploit-linux-owners May 10 09:29
tessier__ Someone is smoking crack. May 10 09:29
tessier__ crap May 10 09:31
schestowitz Windows is not used much for E-mail May 10 09:31
tessier__ There is something fishy about that website May 10 09:31
schestowitz Which one? May 10 09:31
schestowitz V3? May 10 09:31
tessier__ Not intentionally, no. But that’s what the botnets are doing with Windows: sending mail May 10 09:31
tessier__ Yeah May 10 09:31
schestowitz VNUNEt? May 10 09:31
tessier__ Have you heard of v3 before? May 10 09:31
tessier__ I never have. May 10 09:31
schestowitz Yes May 10 09:31
schestowitz Linux relays spam May 10 09:32
schestowitz It runs mail servers May 10 09:32
schestowitz It does what it’s supposed to do May 10 09:32
schestowitz Which is to relay requests May 10 09:32
tessier__ I cannot post a comment on that site. The captcha does not work. No matter what you put in there it does not accept it. May 10 09:32
tessier__ Linux by default is not an open relay. May 10 09:32
schestowitz I wonder what sends those requests though May 10 09:32
tessier__ No distro ships their mail servers that way. May 10 09:32
schestowitz It’s spammers May 10 09:32
tessier__ it will deliver the spam to you that someone injected via a Windows box though. May 10 09:33
schestowitz They use open relays May 10 09:33
schestowitz Running Linux because it’s better May 10 09:33
tessier__ Open relays are hard to find these days. May 10 09:33
schestowitz They get blacklisted May 10 09:33
tessier__ And spammers don’t run open relays either. They don’t want other spammers stealing their resources. May 10 09:33
schestowitz What was that list that gather IPs of spam relays? May 10 09:33
schestowitz many services used to look it up and in 2008 it had sustainability issues May 10 09:33
tessier__ Whenever I have investigated IP addresses that were sending me spam it was Windows boxes. May 10 09:33
tessier__ There are lots of DNSBLs May 10 09:34
tessier__ And they operate quite successfully May 10 09:34
tessier__ SORBS is one of the big ones these days May 10 09:34
schestowitz I can’t recall the one I think about. Articles about it were widespread 2 years ago. May 10 09:34
*schestowitz creates http://techrights.org/wiki/index.php/Facebook May 10 09:35
Techrights Title: Facebook – Techrights .::. Size~: 12.91 KB May 10 09:35
tessier__ There have been quite a few May 10 09:35
-BNtwitter/#boycottnovell-[popey] Mark proposes that 10.10 is released on Sunday 10th October 2010. Where 101010 = 42 = Meaning of Life / Universe / Everything! May 10 09:37
-BNtwitter/#boycottnovell-[nsisodiya] need a student volunteer for modifying C++ book #schoolos May 10 09:40
*benJIman has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) May 10 09:42
-BNtwitter/#boycottnovell-[popey] There will be no public ISO of #Ubuntu Light with Unity, but will be tailored specifically for OEMs. May 10 09:49
-BNtwitter/#boycottnovell-[davidgerard] From @cracked – 5 Insane File Sharing Panics from Before the Internet – http://tinyurl.com/2ubthnw May 10 09:53
Techrights Title: 5 Insane File Sharing Panics from Before the Internet | Cracked.com .::. Size~: 81.74 KB May 10 09:53
-BNtwitter/#boycottnovell-[satipera] Liberal Democrat negotiations with Labour look likely if Brown goes quickly. May 10 09:55
*narendra (~79f5e1b0@gateway/web/freenode/x-xaqdkqksysommyyc) has joined #boycottnovell May 10 10:08
narendra where I can upload secrect document anonymousy ? May 10 10:08
narendra wikileaks is not working i think !! May 10 10:08
tessier__ http://موقع.وزارة-الاتصالات.مصر/Default.aspx May 10 10:16
tessier__ Awesome. May 10 10:16
*benJIman (~benji@benjiweber.co.uk) has joined #boycottnovell May 10 10:17
MinceR i’m not so enthusiastic about it. May 10 10:17
*benJIman has quit (Client Quit) May 10 10:17
tessier__ Why not? May 10 10:17
*benJIman (~benji@benjiweber.co.uk) has joined #boycottnovell May 10 10:17
MinceR because it allows even more domains that are difficult to type, read and compare May 10 10:18
MinceR IDN already lets you create identical-looking but distinct domains that can confuse users trying to check whether a certificate really applies to a supposedly secure connection. May 10 10:18
MinceR domain names used to be easy to handle (as such names should be) May 10 10:19
MinceR 7bit US-ASCII should have been enough. May 10 10:19
tessier__ SSL CA was broken from the beginning anyway. This doesn’t make things any worse. May 10 10:21
tessier__ Everyone just clicks ok regardless. May 10 10:21
tessier__ Although I am curious to know how you would work that sort of thing into a bind zone file. May 10 10:21
MinceR no, not everyone. May 10 10:26
Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

A Single Comment

  1. your_friend said,

    May 11, 2010 at 11:03 pm

    Gravatar

    It is worth quoting Paul Wood, a senior analyst for Symantec Hosted Services, in full. This is so dumb, the Windows people will have to take if far from the source to make it stick.

    We found that more than 90 per cent of spam comes from Windows machines, which is not surprising. But if you look at Linux, it has only a one per cent market share but is responsible for more than five per cent of spam. So in a sense you’re more likely to get spam from a Linux than a Windows machine.

    There is not true in any sense. It is difficult to see how Phil Muncaster, the article’s author, could have taken this out of context and there is no forgiving Muncaster’s lack of critical thinking. If more than 90% of all spam comes from Windows, virtually all spam comes from Windows. Alternate interpretations have been debunked above, but the original statement was even dumber than its following missinterpretation by Muncaster.

    There are many good explanations mentioned above for what Symantic saw when they looked at, “the passive fingerprinting signatures of spam email traffic for the first time in this month’s report, in order to learn the type of operating system running on the infected spam-sending machines.” The most obvious are that GNU/Linux is efficient and well placed in networks. Windows’ poor network stack and zombie load mean that any Windows machine will only be able to do about 10% of a comparable GNU/Linux box. The later explanation, that most of the traffic comes because GNU/Linux is acting as a relay is even more damning for Windows – this means that GNU/Linux is just doing its job on networks where the administrators have made the mistake of using Windows on the desktop. The conclusion, backed by reasonable estimates of Windows infection rates and the fact that default GNU/Linux setting that preclude the bogus “open relay” explanation, is that all spam comes from Windows.

What Else is New


  1. The EPO is Lying to Its Own Staff About ILO and Endless (Over 2 Years) EPO Mistrials

    The creative writing skills of some spinners who work for Battistelli would have staff believe that all is fine and dandy at the EPO and ILO is dealing effectively with staff complaints about the EPO (even if several years too late)



  2. EPO’s Georg Weber Continues Horrifying Trend of EPO Promoting Software Patents in Defiance of Directive, EPC, and Common Sense

    The EPO's promotion of software patents, even out in the open, is an insult to the notion that the EPO is adhering to or is bound by the rules upon which it maintains its conditional monopoly



  3. Protectionism v Sharing: How the US Supreme Court Decides Patent Cases

    As the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) starts delivering some decisions we take stock of what's to come regarding patents



  4. Links 22/3/2017: GNOME 3.24, Wine-Staging 2.4 Released

    Links for the day



  5. The Battistelli Regime, With Its Endless Scandals, Threatens to Crash the Unitary Patent (UPC), Stakeholders Concerned

    The disdain and the growing impatience have become a huge liability not just to Battistelli but to the European Patent Office (EPO) as a whole



  6. The Photos the EPO Absolutely Doesn't Want the Public to See: Battistelli is Building a Palace Using Stakeholders' Money

    The Office is scrambling to hide evidence of its out-of-control spendings, which will leave the EPO out of money when the backlog is eliminated by many erroneous grants (or rejections)



  7. In the US Patent System, Evolved Tricks for Bypassing Invalidations of Software Patents and Getting Them Granted by the USPTO

    A roundup of news about patents in the US and how the patent microcosm attempts to patent software in spite of Alice (high-impact SCOTUS decision from 2014)



  8. “Then They Came For Me—And There Was No One Left To Speak For Me.”

    The decreasing number of people who cover EPO scandals (partly due to fear, or Battistelli's notorious "reign of terror") and a cause for hope, as well as a call for help



  9. As Expected, the Patent Microcosm is Already Interfering, Lobbying and Influencing Supreme Court Justices

    The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) is preparing to deliver some important decisions on cases with broad ramifications, e.g. for patent scope, and those who make money from patent feuds are attempting to alter the outcome (which would likely restrict patent scope even further, based on these Justices' track record)



  10. Intellectual Ventures -- Like Microsoft (Which It Came From) -- Spreads Patents to Manifest a Lot of Lawsuits

    That worrisome strategy which is passage of patents to active (legally-aggressive) trolls seems to be a commonality, seen across both Microsoft and its biggest ally among trolls, which Microsoft and Bill Gates helped create and still fund



  11. What the Patent Microcosm is Saying About the EPO and the UPC

    Response to 3 law firms and today's output from them, which serves to inform or misinform the European public at times of Big Lies and fog of (patent) war, revealing the true nature of 21st century asymmetric patent warfare and lobbying



  12. Tough Day for the EPO's Media/Press/PR Team, Trying 'Damage Control' After Important Techrights Publications

    In an effort to save face and regain a sense of legitimacy the EPO publishes various things belatedly, and only after Techrights made these things publicly known and widely discussed



  13. Links 21/3/2017: PyPy Releases, Radeon RX Vega, Eileen Evans at Linux Foundation

    Links for the day



  14. In IAM, Asian Courts That Deliver Justice Are “Unfriendly” and Asian Patent Trolls Are Desirable

    Rebuttal or response to the latest pieces from IAM, which keeps promoting a culture of litigation rather than sharing, collaboration, negotiation, and open innovation



  15. At EPO “I Have the Feeling That Lowering Quality is Part of a Concerted Plan.”

    Growing concern about patent quality at the EPO -- a subject which causes managers to get rather nervous -- is now an issue at the forefront



  16. EPO Reduces the World to Just Seven Nations to Bolster an Illusion of Growing 'Demand' for European Patents

    The unscientific -- if not antiscientific -- attitude of the European Patent Office (EPO) continues to show with the arrival of yet more misleading 'infographics' (disinfographics would be a more suitable term)



  17. Letter to Angela Merkel Expresses Concerns About Impact of EPO Scandals on Germany and Its Image

    Dr. Angela Merkel, arguably the most powerful woman in the world, is being warned about the consequences of Germany ignoring (and hence facilitating) the abuses of Benoît Battistelli



  18. EPO Caricature: Low Patent Quality Not an Achievement

    A new cartoon about the legacy of Battistelli, which ruins both inventors and staff (examination) while handing money to abusers



  19. Are Lithuania and Latvia the Latest Additions to the List of Benoît Battistelli's Vassal States?

    Benoît Battistelli's 'back room' deals came at an interesting, strategic time and the Office uncharacteristically kept quiet about these



  20. Links 20/3/2017: Linux 4.11 RC3, OpenSSH 7.5 Released

    Links for the day



  21. Supposedly 'Pampered' Prisoners Are Still Prisoners of the EPO

    Response to those gross and familiar attempts to portray patent examiners, not politicians who trample all over them, as the cause of all the problems at the EPO



  22. Insulting Reversal of Narratives at the EPO: Team Battistelli as the Victim

    At times of great oppression against staff, in clear defiance of the law in fact, journalists are being asked (or expected) to view the oppressor as the victim, even when this oppressor drives people to suicide



  23. Battistelli's EPO Copies China -- Not the US -- When it Comes to Patenting Software and Expanding Patent Scope

    A detailed explanation of some of the latest reports from China and the US, serving to show that one opens up to software patents whereas the other shuts the door on them (and guess whose lead the EPO is taking)



  24. What IAM Says About AST, RPX, Ericsson, and IBM

    IAM, the trolls' mouthpiece (also the EPO's mouthpiece, but that's another story), provides updates on trolls and troll-like entities, but further commentary is needed to clarify and counterbalance the promotional language



  25. Apple and Microsoft, Two Patent Aggressors That Habitually Attack GNU/Linux Distributors, Get Sued by a Patent Troll, Soverain IP

    Putting in perspective the latest high-profile (in the press at least) lawsuits filed by a notorious troll, which this time around chose as its targets two patent aggressors that deserve no sympathy because of their own actions



  26. What's OIN Doing While Microsoft is Siccing Patent Trolls on Azure Competitors' Customers?

    Microsoft's patent litigation strategy has become clearer, and patents-centric efforts such as OIN offer no defence against such a strategy, which attempts to pressure everyone to flock to Microsoft for 'protection' (from Microsoft itself)



  27. “EPO Continues to Grant Software Patents”

    The longstanding concern about the granting of software patents at the EPO (typically disguised as a "device") as reinforced by T 0625/11



  28. Links 19/3/2017: Linux Sightings, What's Wrong With Microsoft, and Death of Docker

    Links for the day



  29. Governance Crisis at EPO Deepens After Latest Meeting of the Administrative Council, Necessitating Urgent Outside Intervention

    he EPO's Administrative Council continues to be subservient to -- and without any authority over -- Team Battistelli with its endless mischief and endless power grab, including unbridled money grab



  30. EPO Management Deeply Concerned That the Public Has Found Out Quality of European Patents (EPs) Nosedived Under Battistelli's Regime

    Growing pressure on the EPO's management to acknowledge that quality control has gone totally out of control as stakeholders already grasp the obvious and act accordingly, turning to other patent offices, such as their national ones (NPOs)


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts