EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

06.11.10

Constructive Critics Defend Spectators’ Freedom, So Why Do Passive Observers Criticise Them?

Posted in Free/Libre Software, FSF at 5:32 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Richard Stallman

Summary: An exploration of FSF disdain, including the special case of Richard Stallman who is the public face of this organisation

ON NUMEROUS occasions — and last year in particular [1, 2] — we wrote many posts that explain why people who report negative news are often portrayed as “bad guys”. As those who speak out against injustice, they put themselves out there, sometimes to be attacked by the same large entities which they stand against.

Our readers too sometimes ask, why is it that critics are portrayed as “bad guys” rather than those who fight for the rights of the very same people who sometimes criticise them? Well, that’s just a fact of life and it applies not only to IT. Incitement against critics is more organised than most people realise (there are whistleblowers).

People from the United States have probably witnesses the right wing (Fox News et al.) daemonising Michael Moore and making him look extreme (which he is not) for daring to stand up for his neighbours’ health, not the cartels which profit from mortality. We have just found a recent video where Wendell Potter and Bill Moyers explain this. The Ogg Theora version is just partial for technical reasons.


As everyone can see, the multi-trillion dollar ‘Medical Industrial Complex’ is trying to radicalise the image of Michael Moore, who is simply the messenger. If they can squash the messenger, then they can extrapolate this to squash anyone who bears the same message. The same type of tactics are being used against the FSF and Richard Stallman in particular. Too few people pay attention to what he says and instead they pay attention to those with a financial agenda against him. In their minds they have a radicalised vision of the messenger, who is an atheist and pacifist; it’s intentional and it is part of the propaganda. The following posts about Richard Stallman hopefully help clarify common misconceptions:

There are many other people — myself included — who are being daemonised based on falsehoods and one common tactic is to make the messenger look radical or dangerous. The goal is to prevent people from communicating with the target, referencing it, or even just mentioning it.

Anyway, earlier today we found this rant about the FSF and here is one response to it.

Campaigns like DefectiveByDesign or Windows7Sins are *very*small* things compared to the rest.

That you should choose your position over them rather than the whole, and totally demonstrate you missed the point of software freedom, is really revealing that you don’t give a damn about your community’s software freedom.

You just want, like a spoiled child, to run all the software you want at your will, regardless of whether you’re infringing the law.

Openuniverse responds to the part of this rant which says: “I am a very positive person, even if I might might look ranty or grumpy from time to time,”

“…and whether you believe it or not,” Openuniverse writes, “stallman is exactly the same. but if a friend tells you you’ve got crap on your face, you have choices- you can thank them and wipe it off (free software,) you can leave it on and not care (non-free software,) or you can find friends who won’t even tell you- the latter is called the “open source” movement, and these people like having stallman’s ideas pre-chewed for them. it’s always an option, don’t let anyone tell you different.”

In a separate message, Openuniverse writes that “there’s a surely unintended, very subtle question i found amidst this article- does “open source” give microsoft something to “support” while using it against free software? (much like foreign exploitation of the confederacy in the civil war)”

“[D]oes “open source” give microsoft something to “support” while using it against free software?”
      –Openuniverse
This is an issue that we covered last night with regards to Apple. This issue was mentioned many times before; companies like Apple and Microsoft love the term “Open Source” when they are using it to remove the “F” from FOSS. Apple increasingly uses this trick, the other one being the trick of “UNIXwashing” (associating oneself with the reputation of code one exploits, BSD in this case). Separately, writes Openuniverse: “it’s amazing that people will take “windows7sins” literally, when stallman is a strong atheist and doesn’t believe in sin- i mean, it’s a serious joke, but it’s still a joke”

The same thing happens with “virgin” jokes and parodies about organised religion. Some people who want to daemonise Stallman pretend not to understand the humour (or maybe their humour meter is just broken).

On the other hand, Stallman and the FSF do have some real critics and it is worth recognising that they exist. Jos Poortvliet from KDE, for example, sent me the following messages earlier today: “he is right. FSF often kills opportunities for FOSS with companies by dumb behaviour like that, unreasonable and extreme.”

He then added: “besides FSF dislikes constructive (or any) criticism alot. Maybe FSF hurts FOSS more than it helps these days.”

“Anyway it doesn’t hurt me,” Poortvliet concluded, “so I usually stay away from the FSF flames, let them screw up I don’t care. FSFE does lot better btw”

This is a matter of personal opinion and Poortvliet deserves to be heard about it. My personal belief is that the FSF promotes more than just software freedom and that’s what makes it controversial in some circles. It makes the FSF an easier (more vulnerable) target, offering more ‘dirt’ to those who constantly mine for it.

“Microsoft does not like negative or even objective press coverage and they have a tendency to be a bully about it. If something appears that they don’t like, they have the ability to punish the publication.”

Knight-Ridder New Media President Bob Ingle

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

A Single Comment

  1. your_friend said,

    June 11, 2010 at 6:51 pm

    Gravatar

    Jos Poortvliet’s quoted statements are not constructive criticism, they are the same old slander that’s always been thrown at the FSF and Richard Stallman. Constructive criticism would point out exactly what behavior had been foolish and recommend positive action that achieves the desired goals without compromising principles.

What Else is New


  1. Patent Extremism is Not Normal and Not an Innocent Mindset

    Reflection upon the sad state of the European patent system and how media turns a blind eye to it; worldwide, in general, the discussion about patents is being warped by the litigation giants, whose sole goal is to maximise the number of lawsuits/shakedowns (personal gain)



  2. Links 22/9/2019: LLVM 9.0.0 and FreeBSD 12.1 Beta

    Links for the day



  3. Links 21/9/2019: Plasma 5.17 Beta in Kubuntu, Cockpit 203

    Links for the day



  4. IBM Cannot Become a True Friend of Free Software Because of Its Current Patent Policy

    IBM needs to quit bullying people/companies with software patents; that would help towards appeasement of IBM critics and sceptics



  5. When Patent 'Professionals' Sound Like Children Who Learned to Parrot Some Intentionally-Misleading Buzzwords, Myths and Lies

    With buzzwords like "AI" and misleading terms like "IP" the litigation zealots are trying to convince themselves (and the public) that software is a physical thing and a "property" which needs "protecting" from "theft"; it doesn't seem to bother these people that copyright law already covers software<



  6. The European Parliament Needs to Become More Outspoken About EPO Abuses

    There are few encouraging signs in Europe right now because the EPO's disregard for patent law (striving to just grant as many patents as possible) earned it much-needed backlash from the European Parliament



  7. Links 19/9/2019: German Federal Ministry of the Interior Wants FOSS, Top Snaps Named

    Links for the day



  8. Buying the Voices of 'Linux' People to Repeat Microsoft's Talking Points While Removing Our Icons and Leaders (Calling Them Sexist)

    The dirty games leveraged by several companies including Microsoft target charismatic people who are essential for morale and leadership; these tactics aren't particularly novel



  9. When the EPO Sees Itself as Above European Law, Grants Patents in Defiance of the EPC (Its Founding Document) and Violates Staff's Labour Rights/Protections (International Law)

    The absurd state of affairs at the EPO has reached the point where laws at every level are being violated and even judges are being threatened or vainly ignored; the EU is belatedly trying to tackle these issues, which have actually cost its credibility a great deal and threaten the perception of Rule of Law at multiple levels



  10. Links 19/9/2019: Samba 4.11.0 and Kubernetes 1.16

    Links for the day



  11. Update on Koch v EPO: Internal Appeals Committee (IAC) Composition Still Likely Illegal

    An important EPO case, concerning a dismissed staff representative, shows what ILO-AT and the EPO's Internal Appeals Committee boil down to



  12. Links 18/9/2019: Fedora Linux 31 Beta, PCLinuxOS 2019.09 Update

    Links for the day



  13. Links 17/9/2019: CentOS 7.7 and Funtoo Linux 1.4 Released

    Links for the day



  14. EPO is Not European

    Internationalists and patent trolls are those who stand to benefit from the 'globalisation' of low-quality and law-breaking patents such as patents on algorithms, nature and life itself; the EPO isn't equipped to serve its original goals anymore



  15. The EPO's Central Staff Committee and SUEPO (Staff Union) Respond to “Fascist Bills” Supported by EPO President António Campinos

    Raw material pertaining to the latest Campinos "scandal"; what Campinos said, what the Central Staff Committee (CSC) said, and what SUEPO said



  16. Storm Brewing in the European Patent Office After a Hot Summer

    Things aren't rosy in EPOnia (to say the least); in fact, things have been getting a lot worse lately, but the public wouldn't know judging by what media tells the public (almost nothing)



  17. Why I Once Called for Richard Stallman to Step Down

    Guest post from the developer who recently authored "Getting Stallman Wrong Means Getting The 21st Century Wrong"



  18. As Richard Stallman Resigns Let's Consider Why GNU/Linux Without Stallman and Torvalds Would be a Victory to Microsoft

    Stallman has been ejected after a lot of intentionally misleading press coverage; this is a dark day for Software Freedom



  19. Links 16/9/2019: GNU Linux-libre 5.3, GNU World Order 13×38, Vista 10 Breaks Itself Again

    Links for the day



  20. Links 16/9/2019: Qt Quick on Vulkan, Metal, and Direct3D; BlackWeb 1.2 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  21. Richard Stallman's Controversial Views Are Nothing New and They Distract From Bill Gates' Vastly Worse Role

    It's easier to attack Richard Stallman (RMS) using politics (than using his views on software) and media focus on Stallman's personal views on sexuality bears some resemblance to the push against Linus Torvalds, which leans largely on the false perception that he is sexist, rude and intolerant



  22. Links 16/9/2019: Linux 5.3, EasyOS Releases, Media Backlash Against RMS

    Links for the day



  23. Openwashing Report on Open Networking Foundation (ONF): When Open Source Means Collaboration Among Giant Spying Companies

    Massive telecommunications oligopolies (telecoms) are being described as ethical and responsible by means of openwashing; they even have their own front groups for that obscene mischaracterisation and ONF is one of those



  24. 'Open Source' You Cannot Run Without Renting or 'Licensing' Windows From Microsoft

    When so-called ‘open source’ programs strictly require Vista 10 (or similar) to run, how open are they really and does that not redefine the nature of Open Source while betraying everything Free/libre software stands for?



  25. All About Control: Microsoft is Not Open Source But an Open Source Censor/Spy and GitHub/LinkedIn/Skype Are Its Proprietary Censorship/Surveillance Tools

    All the big companies which Microsoft bought in recent years are proprietary software and all of the company’s big products remain proprietary software; all that “Open Source” is to Microsoft is “something to control and censor“



  26. The Sad State of GNU/Linux News Sites

    The ‘media coup’ of corporate giants (that claim to be 'friends') means that history of GNU/Linux is being distorted and lied about; it also explains prevalent lies such as "Microsoft loves Linux" and denial of GNU/Free software



  27. EPO President Along With Bristows, Managing IP and Other Team UPC Boosters Are Lobbying for Software Patents in Clear and Direct Violation of the EPC

    A calm interpretation of the latest wave of lobbying from litigation professionals, i.e. people who profit when there are lots of patent disputes and even expensive lawsuits which may be totally frivolous (for example, based upon fake patents that aren't EPC-compliant)



  28. Links 15/9/2019: Radeon ROCm 2.7.2, KDE Frameworks 5.62.0, PineTime and Bison 3.4.2

    Links for the day



  29. Illegal/Invalid Patents (IPs) Have Become the 'Norm' in Europe

    Normalisation of invalid patents (granted by the EPO in defiance of the EPC) is a serious problem, but patent law firms continue to exploit that while this whole 'patent bubble' lasts (apparently the number of applications will continue to decrease because the perceived value of European Patents diminishes)



  30. Patent Maximalists, Orbiting the European Patent Office, Work to 'Globalise' a System of Monopolies on Everything

    Monopolies on just about everything are being granted in defiance of the EPC and there are those looking to make this violation ‘unitary’, even worldwide if not just EU-wide


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts