WHILE groups like the OIN use software patents to fight other software patents (fighting fire with fire, confusing people about the problem being one of "quality") groups like the FFII, ourselves, FSFE, and FSF work hard to convince people that software patents as a whole need to be abolished. James E. Bessen, who is in Boston University (near the FSF), has published this academic paper whose abstract states:
This report examines changes in the patenting behavior of the software industry since the 1990s. It finds that most software firms still do not patent, most software patents are obtained by a few large firms in the software industry or in other industries, and the risk of litigation from software patents continues to increase dramatically. Given these findings, it is hard to conclude that software patents have provided a net social benefit in the software industry.
Bessen: study on #swpats shows benefit for deep pockets & lawyers, not SWindustry or society.
Of course we need no study to observe how #swpats are unhelpful & #evil. But it's reassuring having evidence & numbers backing it
"Boston University's James Bessen has published a landmark study [abstract; full paper available at the link, free of charge] on a generation of software patents. Looking at almost 20 years of software patents, he finds 'that most software firms still do not patent, most software patents are obtained by a few large firms in the software industry or in other industries, and the risk of litigation from software patents continues to increase dramatically. Given these findings, it is hard to conclude that software patents have provided a net social benefit in the software industry.' Not that this surprises anyone actually innovating in software."
The Cupertino Bully Apple has filed a patent lawsuit against Samsung in South Korea.