EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.13.17

Latest Attempts to Blow Air Into the Sails of the Sinking Unitary Patent (UPC)

Posted in Europe, Patents at 2:39 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Making up news about the UPC out of stuff that says nothing about it!

Self-fulfilling prophecy
Reference: Self-fulfilling prophecy

Summary: A survey of the latest media mentions and interpretations of the UPC, which don’t quite stack up when compared to reality

Techrights will, perhaps some time later this week, publish more material about the UPC complaint in Germany. It’s our understanding that the FFII wishes to submit input of its own to courts, adding its voice to that of the EPO and the patent microcosm (including Team UPC).

“After IP Kat‘s admission that the European Commission isn’t pursing the UPC anymore (its position paper conspicuously does not even mention it ) Managing UP, IAM, and IP Watch jump at the opportunity to mention the UPC anyway.”If the German courts foolishly decide to listen only to law firms (regarding the UPC), that will say a lot about their own biases if not mischief. It’ll say or show that they’re not open to input from technology companies and scientists (i.e. those impacted most by the outcome). In other words, more of the same in the UPC saga; it was the same all along…

Looking at the EPO’s Twitter account, yesterday it was promoting the UPC again, in an act of misleading propaganda or a sort of veiled lobbying: “Have you already downloaded a copy of the “Unitary Patent Guide”?”

“The UPC is NOT happening,” I told them, so “stop promoting things that don’t exist, EPO.”

“CJEU does not have jurisdiction to decide on the legality of the UPCA at this point,” a new comment said yesterday, citing that old Gordon & Pascoe opinion. To quote:

The EU was a party to the planned EPLA but is not a party to the UPCA- hence the difference in whether an opinion was sought in advance.

As set out in the Gordon & Pascoe opinion in relation to question 5 (Point 127) https://www.bristowsupc.com/assets/files/counsel_s%20opinion%20on%20effect%20of%20brexit%20on%20upc,%2012%20sept%202016.pdf

and seemingly by the EU Commission, the CJEU does not have jurisdiction to decide on the legality of the UPCA at this point.

The CJEU also noted limits on their jurisdiction in relation the the UPCA in C-146/13 point 101

The UPC, “like the EPO [would be] exempt from EU labour and data protection law,” somebody wrote in the next comment.

Immunity? Again? No oversight? Here we go again; some people carry on pretending that Brexit is not a problem:

Point 90 of C-146/13 seems to be quite clear:
“First, the Unified Patent Court does not form part of the institutional and judicial system of the European Union.”

So it is settled that the UPC is not an EU Institution.

This would also seem to imply that it is – like the EPO – exempt from EU labour and data protection law. Or have I missed something?

Meanwhile, Bristows tries hard to give an illusion of progress, speaking of “allowing for the final preparations for the start of the UPC system, such as recruitment of judges…”

This was halted in the UK and in Germany also. So why bother looking elsewhere, at economies a faction of that size? After IP Kat‘s admission that the European Commission isn’t pursing the UPC anymore (its position paper conspicuously does not even mention it) Managing IP, IAM, and IP Watch jump at the opportunity to mention the UPC anyway. How predictable!

“The EPO, as usual, says what it wants to believe rather than what is true.”Managing IP (or should that be Managing UP, as in Managing Unitary Patent Events?) wrote this yesterday afternoon, IAM said that UPC “is not yet up and running” (and likely NEVER will be), and IP Watch oddly enough chose to quote lies from the the EPO’s management regarding the matter (mentioning the EPO regarding UPC in relation to a report that says nothing about the UPC). They also quote the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA), one of the biggest pushers of the UPC.

Here is what IAM’s chief editor (strongly pro-UPC) said:

The Unified Patent Court agreement is not yet up and running (and thanks to Brexit and a recent court challenge in Germany may not be for quite a while) and, in any case, is not structured as an EU body, while current patent rights are either national or issued by the European Patent Office, which is not an EU institution.

And from IP Watch:

The situation seems to be slightly different for the unitary patent system. According to the European Patent Office, “The long-term participation of the UK in the Unitary Patent system is legally possible. However, this is a political decision to be taken by the EU, its remaining Member States and the UK.”

It’s barely possible. The EPO, as usual, says what it wants to believe rather than what is true. Giving the coup of Team Battistelli (UPC heavyweights), is it even worth quoting the above?

Wow, so much talk about the UPC. In reports about a report/paper that mentions the UPC not even once! We expected this when we wrote about the paper last week. If Merkel and/or May say “oops” this week, perhaps Team UPC will interpret that as them saying “ups”, thus expressing commitment to the UPC no matter what.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. How the Opposition to CRISPR Patents at the EPO Sent Shockwaves Through the Industry

    Additional reports/coverage on the EPO (European Patent Office) revoking Broad Institute's CRISPR patent show that the issue at hand isn't just one sole patent but the whole class/family of patents



  2. Unified Patents Says That RPX, Which Might Soon be Owned by Patent Trolls, Paid Patent Trolls Hundreds of Millions of Dollars

    Unified Patents, which helps crush software patents, takes note of RPX’s financial statements, which reveal the great extent to which RPX actually helped trolls rather than stop them



  3. IAM Together With Its Partner, IIPCC, is Lobbying the USPTO to Crush PTAB and Restore Patent Chaos

    Having handled over 8,000 petitions (according to Professor Lemley's Lex Machina), PTAB champions patent quality at the USPTO, so front groups of the litigation 'industry' creep in and attempt to lobby the likely next Director of the USPTO (inciting him against PTAB, as usual)



  4. Software Patents Are Still Dropping Like Flies in 2018, Thanks to Alice v CLS Bank (SCOTUS, 2014) and Section 101 (USPTO)

    Section 101 (§ 101) is thriving in the sense that it belatedly throws thousands of patents -- and frivolous lawsuits that depend on them -- down the chute; the patent trolls and their allies in the patent microcosm are very furious and they blame PTAB for actually doing its job (enforcing Section 101 when petitioned to do so)



  5. Patent Troll Finjan Looks Like It's About to Collapse, But Patent Maximalists Exploit It for Software Patents Promotion

    Patent trolls are struggling in their use of software patents; few (if any) of their patents are upheld as valid and those that miraculously remain in tact become the subject of fascination if not obsession among trolls' advocates



  6. The Attacks on PTAB Are Slowing Down and Attempts to Shield Oneself From Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) Are Failing

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) reapplies patent eligibility tests/guidelines in order to squash likely invalid patents; The litigation 'industry' is not happy about it, but its opposition to PTAB is also losing steam



  7. Links 21/1/2018: Wine 3.0 Coverage, KaOS 2018.01, Red Hat Among 'Admired Companies'

    Links for the day



  8. Blockchain Patents Are a Catastrophe in the Making as Trolls and Aggressors Accumulate Them

    As patents pertaining to blockchains continue to be granted -- even in defiance of Alice/Section 101 -- it seems likely that patent wars will sooner or later erupt, involving some large banks, IBM, and patent trolls associated with the notorious Erich Spangenberg



  9. Qualcomm/Broadcom/NXP Combination Would Become a Disastrous Patent Thicket Which Benefits Nobody

    Worried by the prospect of mega-mergers and takeovers which would put far too much market power (and monopoly through patents) in one place, governments and corporations speak out



  10. Patent Litigation in East Asia: Huawei, Samsung, HTC, Nintendo and COLOPL

    A quick look at some high-profile cases in which large Asian firms are embroiled; it seems clear that litigation activities have shifted eastwards (where actual production is done)



  11. Patent Litigation in the US is Down Sharply and Patent Trolls' Demise Has Much to Do With It

    Docket Navigator and Lex Machina both show a significant decline in litigation -- a trend which is likely to carry on now that TC Heartland is in tact (not for just half a year but a whole year) and PTAB completes another record year



  12. Cheating the US Patent System is a Lot Harder After TC Heartland

    Some new examples of tricks (and sometimes cheats) attempted by patent claimants and their representatives; it does not go as well as they hoped



  13. RPX Might Soon be Owned by Patent Troll Erich Spangenberg

    RPX, whose top executives are leaving and business is gradually dying, might end up as another 'asset' of patent trolls



  14. Patent Quality (Not Numbers) as an Asset: Oppositions, Appeals and Rejections at the EPO

    Benoît Battistelli wants a rubber-stamping operation (like INPI) rather than a functional patent office, but oppositions at the Office prove to be fruitful and many erroneously-granted patents are -- by extrapolation -- already being revoked (affecting, in retrospect, Battistelli's so-called 'results')



  15. Links 19/1/2018: Linux Journalism Fund, Grsecurity is SLAPPing Again

    Links for the day



  16. The EPO Ignores This Week's Decision Which Demonstrates Patent Scope Gone Awry; Software Patents Brought Up Again

    The worrisome growth of European Patents (EPs) — a 40% jump in one year in spite of decline in the number of patent applications — is a symptom of the poor judgment, induced largely by bad policies that impede examiners’ activities for the sake of so-called ‘production’; this week's decision regarding CRISPR is another wake-up call and software patents too need to be abolished (as a whole), in lieu with the European Patent Convention (EPC)



  17. WesternGeco v ION Geophysical (at the US Supreme Court) Won't Affect Patent Scope

    As WesternGeco v ION Geophysical is the main if not sole ‘major’ patent case that the US Supreme Court will deal with, it seems safe to say that nothing substantial will change for patent scope in the United States this year



  18. Links 18/1/2018: MenuLibre 2.1.4, Git 2.16 Released

    Links for the day



  19. Microsoft, Masking/Hiding Itself Behind Patent Trolls, is Still Engaging in Patent Extortion

    A review of Microsoft's ugly tactics, which involve coercion and extortion (for businesses to move to Azure and/or for OEMs to preload Microsoft software) while Microsoft-connected patent trolls help hide the "enforcement" element in this whole racket



  20. Patent Prosecution Highway: Low-Quality Patents for High-Frequency Patent Aggressors

    The EPO's race to the bottom of patent quality, combined with a "need for speed", is a recipe for disaster (except for litigation firms, patent bullies, and patent trolls)



  21. Press Coverage About the EPO Board Revoking Broad's CRISPR Patent

    Even though there's some decent coverage about yesterday's decision (e.g. from The Scientist), the patent microcosm googlebombs the news with stuff that serves to distract from or distort the outcome



  22. Links 17/1/2018: HHVM 3.24, WordPress 4.9.2

    Links for the day



  23. No Patents on Life (CRISPR), Said EPO Boards of Appeal Just a Few Hours Ago

    Broad spectacularly loses its key case, which may soon mean that any other patents on CRISPR too will be considered invalid



  24. Only Two Weeks on the Job, Judge Patrick Corcoran is Already Being Threatened by EPO Management

    The attack on a technical judge who is accused of relaying information many people had already relayed anyway (it was gossip at the whole Organisation for years) carries on as he is again being pushed around, just as many people predicted



  25. EPO Board of Appeal Has an Opportunity to Stop Controversial Patents on Life

    Patent maximalism at the EPO can be pushed aback slightly if the European appeal board decides to curtail CRISPR patents in a matter of days



  26. Links 16/1/2018: More on Barcelona, OSI at 20

    Links for the day



  27. 2018 Will be an Even Worse Year for Software Patents Because the US Supreme Court Shields Alice

    The latest picks (reviewed cases) of the Supreme Court of the United States signal another year with little or no hope for the software patents lobby; PTAB too is expected to endure after a record-breaking year, in which it invalidated a lot of software patents that had been erroneously granted



  28. Patent Trolls (Euphemised as “Public IP Companies”) Are Dying in the United States, But the Trouble Isn't Over

    The demise of various types of patent trolls, including publicly-traded trolls, is good news; but we take stock of the latest developments in order to better assess the remaining threat



  29. EPO Management and Team UPC Carry on Lying About Unified Patent Court, Sinking to New Lows in the Process

    At a loss for words over the loss of the Unitary Patent, Team UPC and Team Battistelli now blatantly lie and even get together with professional liars such as Watchtroll



  30. China Tightens Its Knot of Restrictive Rules and Patents

    Overzealous patent aggressors and patent trolls in China, in addition to an explosion in low-quality patents, may simply discourage companies from doing production/manufacturing there


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts