EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.02.19

The European Patent Office’s Promotion of Software Patents Overlooks Ongoing ‘Spillage’ of the Patent Crisis to Patent Courts (Rejecting Such Patents)

Posted in Europe, Patents at 10:24 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Presumption of Validity (in the United States): “All issued U.S. patents are presumed to be valid. However, the U.S. PTO is an administrative agency (i.e., a part of the executive branch of government) and its decisions are therefore reviewable by the courts. The presumption of validity means that a patentee does not have to prove in court that the patent is valid. The accused infringer bears the burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence that the PTO erred in awarding the patent.” Source: Affirmed in U.S. Supreme Court‘s Microsoft v i4i 2011 decision.

Summary: The EPO has slipped into the same dangerous territories as the USPTO by overgranting and causing growing uncertainty about the real (as judged by courts) validity of European Patents

THE European patent law is not uniform (not EU). Different countries have different laws (and national patent offices as well as courts) and they’re quite consistent in their rejection of software patents. The latest request for stakeholders’ input at the European Patent Office (EPO) is rather revealing; they speak not about patent quality or presumption of validity; instead they speak of things like “quality of patent services” (an entirely different thing that they measure using yardsticks like speed, not actual quality). This is truly disturbing. They aren’t listening to their stakeholders (there are broadly-signed open letters) and examiners (there are massively-signed petitions), they only pretend to be listening. This is the strategy of the new man/management: pretending to listen. Creating the impression of being responsive to the needs of this system’s users.

“…they only pretend to be listening. This is the strategy of the new man/management: pretending to listen. Creating the impression of being responsive to the needs of this system’s users.”Watermark Intellectual Property’s Christian Schieber wrote a new article titled “European Patent Office to introduce option to defer commencement of examination of applications from 1 July 2018″ and it shows that the EPO, quite frankly as usual, rather than improve patent quality would rather just let applicants control speed of granting; it isn’t about how long examiners will work on the file but “commencement of examination”; applications can be ignored (left on the shelf, so to speak) but quality of examination will remain low due to time constraints, capacity and lack of skills (brain drain). What on Earth is going on? No need to get all alarmist, but it seems as though there’s not even intent to tackle the real, core, inherent problems.

Case of point: After Florian Müller‘s many recent articles about Qualcomm he is being mentioned in some media, showing also the role played by the EPO with questionable European Patents that it granted to Qualcomm. Here’s one such report which emerged just before the weekend:

Apple picked up a win in an ongoing legal spat with Qualcomm, after a German court rejected four out of eight infringement claims.

A district court found no infringement of the patents, related to on-device search, although it noted the judgement is not final. In the case of the four other claims, no final decision was reached, with Qualcomm having the opportunity to comment on a recently-issued missive from the European Patent Office (EPO).

Specialist website FOSS Patents explained the EPO’s findings mean Qualcomm’s remaining claims may also be set to fail.

Qualcomm invested a lot of money and time in patenting and litigation; now the patents come tumbling down. What would that do to the presumption of validity?

“What would that do to the presumption of validity?”FRKelly has just published two articles (the self-promotional kind), one that says “Patent enforcement through the courts in the European Union [...] A structured guide to enforcing patents through the courts in the European Union” and another more detailed one titled “Patents in the European Union”. Here’s the part about software patents:

To what extent can inventions covering software be patented?

Computer programs ‘as such’ are not regarded as inventions. Nevertheless, if an invention is computer implemented, whether through hardware or software, and if it solves a technical problem using technical means, it may be patentable. The standard applied by the EPO is that a computer program claimed by itself is not excluded from patentability if it is capable of bringing about, when running on or loaded onto a computer, a further technical effect going beyond the ‘normal’ physical interactions between the program (software) and the computer (hardware) on which it is run. Individual courts in member states may apply different criteria or tests in spite of a common statutory framework applying.

To what extent can inventions covering business methods be patented?

Business methods are excluded from patentability in all member states. However, an invention relating to a business method may be patentable if it involves further novel and inventive technical means.

To what extent can inventions relating to stem cells be patented?

The use of human embryos for industrial or commercial purposes is strictly excluded from patentability, and any application relating to stem cells will be refused insofar as the methods or products necessarily involve the destruction of human embryos. However, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that parthenogenically derived stem cells are not “human embryos” and that:

As the EPO made clear, it’s willing to grant patents on algorithms in spite of the EPC and in spite of European courts repeatedly rejecting those (and chastising the EPO for misinterpreting the EPC to permit such patent grants).

“No wonder constitutional challenges against the UPC have been very potent and already successful, e.g. in Hungary.”“Join the “knowledge café” at #ExaminationMatters, a 90-minute open discussion forum,” the EPO wrote late on Friday. Well, notice how they neglect to say what this is actually about (it is software patents in Europe). Unless one follows the link to this new page, titled as follows: (warning: epo.org link)

Knowledge café on computer-implemented inventions (CII)

The “knowledge café” is a 90-minute open discussion forum.
You can join one or more of the café tables.
At each table a different topic is discussed.
Topics are introduced, moderated and summarised by EPO experts.
There will be one announced rotation of tables, however you are free to move at any time to explore other topics.
Participants may bring their own questions and examples to be discussed.

So this whole thing is about promotion of software patents, which the EPO continues to refer to as “CII” (to avoid the “S” word).

“This man scares me” is the name of a poster of a new comment who said about António Campinos the following. It’s the last comment of the bunch (no further comments are permitted):

He is sitting every morning at the bar listening to employees queuing to enjoy his beloved one-to-one meeting. Sometimes he listen so carefully that he does not say a single word.

There will be soon direct consequences from what he ‘listened’ and from the dooming survey due to start today.

We all miss and regret the time when he was just doing nothing.

“HE DID NOTHING” was how another person in that same thread put it. As we said back then, it seems abundantly clear that people are running out of patience with him (faster than Battistelli lost the trust of the staff). When the public and when corporations realise that the EPO is consciously allowing patents that courts don’t accept litigation numbers may collapse (like they did in the US, where even the number of patent grants decreased last year). The EPO may be counting on abolishing the appeal boards and the courts (replacing them with UPC), as we shall explain in our next post. No wonder constitutional challenges against the UPC have been very potent and already successful, e.g. in Hungary.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 20/2/2019: digiKam 6.0.0, Cockpit 188, Mesa 19.0 RC5

    Links for the day



  2. How Long Can the EPO Bend the Rules Before the Avalanche of Invalid Software Patents?

    A 35 U.S.C. § 101/SCOTUS moment in Europe will likely squash loads of abstract European Patents granted by the EPO; shouldn’t the EPO foresee this and immediately cease granting such obviously bogus patents, whose main beneficiary is a bunch of patent trolls?



  3. Battistelli Trashed 223 Millions (of Stakeholders' Euros) on a System That Destroyed the European Patent Office and Made Few Private Corporations a Lot Richer

    A quarter of a billion euros later the EPO finally admits in private that this was a massive failure



  4. Links 19/2/2019: Mesa 18.3.4, Cutelyst 2.7.0, Plasma Pass 1.0.0

    Links for the day



  5. What Happened in the United States Now Happens in Europe: Lots of Patents Turn Out to Be Bunk, Fake, Bogus, Invalid and Thus Worthless

    Worthless patents — not opposition to such patents — are the greatest threat to the legitimacy of the patent system, yet bureaucrats fail to heed the warning in the name of short-term profits



  6. Stephen Rowan's and Nellie Simon's Letter to EPO Staff: eDossier Has “Not Reached the Required Quality Levels.”

    We've just commented on it; here is the raw letter in full, explaining that eDossier and related frameworks will be abandoned entirely and indefinitely within less than a fortnight



  7. Search Matters Not at the European Patent Office

    The EPO has found out that "System Battistelli" has been catastrophic for the quality of patents; it stops short of openly admitting it as such and in fact it keeps the message strictly confidential (explained to insiders, who will inevitably notice a system being abandoned)



  8. António Campinos Still Needs to Undo Battistelli's Union-Busting Activities at the EPO

    Solidarity and support for Laurent Prunier are needed because the new French president lacks empathy even for fellow Frenchmen whose sole 'crime' is that they represented EPO staff



  9. Links 18/2/2019: Linux 5.0 RC7, RISC-V Spreading Fast

    Links for the day



  10. António Campinos Still Needs to Hold Team Battistelli Accountable for Illegally Bringing Weapons to the EPO

    It is imperative that, in order to repair the reputation of the European Patent Office (EPO), António Campinos should pursue accountability for the managers who brought Benalla and firearms to the Office (very serious breach of German law, jail sentence included)



  11. Links 17/2/2019: Compiz 0.9.14.0, Geary 0.13.0, GNU FreeDink 109.6, Debian 9.8, Texinfo 6.6

    Links for the day



  12. Amazon's Patent Policy Should be Enough of a Reason to Boycott Amazon and AWS

    There are many things to criticise Amazon and its founder for; but rarely does the mainstream media bring up the company's appalling patent policy



  13. Don't Use Cloudflare Because You Impose This on People Who Least Want It

    Reasons to stop making the World Wide Web so heavily dependent on some dubious companies like Cloudflare, which already has a worrisome track record



  14. How Many/Most EPO Examiners View 'President' António Campinos

    Based on what readers/insiders have told us, there’s a prevalent perception that António Campinos is afraid of (thus controlled/directed by) Bergot, who is still doing Battistelli’s biddings at the European Patent Office (EPO)



  15. Techrights' Priorities Over the Years

    An old priority of ours, eliminating software patents in the United States, is no longer quite so relevant because such patents are perishing in US courts, with or without outside intervention such as activism



  16. Courts in Disagreement: Warning on Wrongly-Granted European Patents and the Looming Collapse of All Software Patents in Europe

    By devaluing patents and reducing their perceived worth (as is happening in China and Europe) patent offices risk decreasing participation in the very system they fundamentally depend on



  17. Computing Will Not Necessarily Make the World a Better Place

    The vision of "happy world" (because each person has a so-called 'smart' 'phone') is a yuppie delusion that overlooks business models and corporate interests



  18. EPO Grants Fake European Patents -- Including Software Patents -- and European Courts Keep Rejecting These

    The demise of the legitimacy or perceived validity of European Patents is measurable and the system isn't the same anymore; the EPO makes no effort to change this for the better, either



  19. Nobody But Patent Trolls and Litigators Will Benefit From the Corruption of the European Patent Office

    IAM, EPO leadership, Iancu and the rest of these raiders are enabling corruption and facilitating or supporting a racket; that money they collect comes at the expense of future victims of their "clients" or "customers" (that's what they call applicants, to whom they grant dubious monopolies as a matter of urgency)



  20. WSL is a Misleading Acronym/Name Because There's No Linux in It, It's Just Windows

    When Microsoft says "Linux" (as in "Microsoft loves Linux") what it actually means is Windows and/or Azure



  21. Links 16/2/2019: Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS, PyCharm 2019.1 EAP 4

    Links for the day



  22. Outline/Index of the Alexandre Benalla/Battistelli Scandal

    Our writings about the scandals implicating Benalla and the European Patent Office (EPO)



  23. Reading Techrights on a Mobile Device Running Android

    A new Android app for reading this site is being tested



  24. Links 14/2/2019: “I Love Free Software Day” and Mesa 19.0 RC4 Released

    Links for the day



  25. “EPO Lawlessness Again”

    Blackberry uses bogus European Patents (on software) for lawsuits; "all of them pure software patents. Patents on programs for computers as such," as Müller puts it



  26. Unitary Patent (UPC) is All About Imposing Patent Maximalists' Ideology of Greed and Self Interest on Courts in the Name of 'Unification' or 'Consistency' or 'Community'

    Pushers of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) are upset that they don’t always get their way when independent judges get to decide; as it turns out, many European Patents are just fake patents, more so under António Campinos



  27. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part V: Mediapart Explains the 'Raid' Attempt, Reporters Without Borders Involved

    Mediapart, an investigative site that unearths a lot of incriminating things about Battistelli's former bodyguard Alexandre Benalla, was the target of a raid attempt some weeks ago



  28. Links 13/2/2019: Tails 3.12.1, MongoDB Being Dumped

    Links for the day



  29. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part IV: Suspected Offenses of Forgery and Possible Falsification

    In a very underworld fashion, Benalla continues to break the law and create yet more scandals



  30. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part III: Mars, France Close Protection (Benalla's Family), and Russian Oligarchy

    An article which examines the business background of Benalla, the outrageous salaries, the severance indemnity pay, and contract with a Russian oligarch close to Vladimir Putin


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts