EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.02.19

The European Patent Office’s Promotion of Software Patents Overlooks Ongoing ‘Spillage’ of the Patent Crisis to Patent Courts (Rejecting Such Patents)

Posted in Europe, Patents at 10:24 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Presumption of Validity (in the United States): “All issued U.S. patents are presumed to be valid. However, the U.S. PTO is an administrative agency (i.e., a part of the executive branch of government) and its decisions are therefore reviewable by the courts. The presumption of validity means that a patentee does not have to prove in court that the patent is valid. The accused infringer bears the burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence that the PTO erred in awarding the patent.” Source: Affirmed in U.S. Supreme Court‘s Microsoft v i4i 2011 decision.

Summary: The EPO has slipped into the same dangerous territories as the USPTO by overgranting and causing growing uncertainty about the real (as judged by courts) validity of European Patents

THE European patent law is not uniform (not EU). Different countries have different laws (and national patent offices as well as courts) and they’re quite consistent in their rejection of software patents. The latest request for stakeholders’ input at the European Patent Office (EPO) is rather revealing; they speak not about patent quality or presumption of validity; instead they speak of things like “quality of patent services” (an entirely different thing that they measure using yardsticks like speed, not actual quality). This is truly disturbing. They aren’t listening to their stakeholders (there are broadly-signed open letters) and examiners (there are massively-signed petitions), they only pretend to be listening. This is the strategy of the new man/management: pretending to listen. Creating the impression of being responsive to the needs of this system’s users.

“…they only pretend to be listening. This is the strategy of the new man/management: pretending to listen. Creating the impression of being responsive to the needs of this system’s users.”Watermark Intellectual Property’s Christian Schieber wrote a new article titled “European Patent Office to introduce option to defer commencement of examination of applications from 1 July 2018″ and it shows that the EPO, quite frankly as usual, rather than improve patent quality would rather just let applicants control speed of granting; it isn’t about how long examiners will work on the file but “commencement of examination”; applications can be ignored (left on the shelf, so to speak) but quality of examination will remain low due to time constraints, capacity and lack of skills (brain drain). What on Earth is going on? No need to get all alarmist, but it seems as though there’s not even intent to tackle the real, core, inherent problems.

Case of point: After Florian Müller‘s many recent articles about Qualcomm he is being mentioned in some media, showing also the role played by the EPO with questionable European Patents that it granted to Qualcomm. Here’s one such report which emerged just before the weekend:

Apple picked up a win in an ongoing legal spat with Qualcomm, after a German court rejected four out of eight infringement claims.

A district court found no infringement of the patents, related to on-device search, although it noted the judgement is not final. In the case of the four other claims, no final decision was reached, with Qualcomm having the opportunity to comment on a recently-issued missive from the European Patent Office (EPO).

Specialist website FOSS Patents explained the EPO’s findings mean Qualcomm’s remaining claims may also be set to fail.

Qualcomm invested a lot of money and time in patenting and litigation; now the patents come tumbling down. What would that do to the presumption of validity?

“What would that do to the presumption of validity?”FRKelly has just published two articles (the self-promotional kind), one that says “Patent enforcement through the courts in the European Union [...] A structured guide to enforcing patents through the courts in the European Union” and another more detailed one titled “Patents in the European Union”. Here’s the part about software patents:

To what extent can inventions covering software be patented?

Computer programs ‘as such’ are not regarded as inventions. Nevertheless, if an invention is computer implemented, whether through hardware or software, and if it solves a technical problem using technical means, it may be patentable. The standard applied by the EPO is that a computer program claimed by itself is not excluded from patentability if it is capable of bringing about, when running on or loaded onto a computer, a further technical effect going beyond the ‘normal’ physical interactions between the program (software) and the computer (hardware) on which it is run. Individual courts in member states may apply different criteria or tests in spite of a common statutory framework applying.

To what extent can inventions covering business methods be patented?

Business methods are excluded from patentability in all member states. However, an invention relating to a business method may be patentable if it involves further novel and inventive technical means.

To what extent can inventions relating to stem cells be patented?

The use of human embryos for industrial or commercial purposes is strictly excluded from patentability, and any application relating to stem cells will be refused insofar as the methods or products necessarily involve the destruction of human embryos. However, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that parthenogenically derived stem cells are not “human embryos” and that:

As the EPO made clear, it’s willing to grant patents on algorithms in spite of the EPC and in spite of European courts repeatedly rejecting those (and chastising the EPO for misinterpreting the EPC to permit such patent grants).

“No wonder constitutional challenges against the UPC have been very potent and already successful, e.g. in Hungary.”“Join the “knowledge café” at #ExaminationMatters, a 90-minute open discussion forum,” the EPO wrote late on Friday. Well, notice how they neglect to say what this is actually about (it is software patents in Europe). Unless one follows the link to this new page, titled as follows: (warning: epo.org link)

Knowledge café on computer-implemented inventions (CII)

The “knowledge café” is a 90-minute open discussion forum.
You can join one or more of the café tables.
At each table a different topic is discussed.
Topics are introduced, moderated and summarised by EPO experts.
There will be one announced rotation of tables, however you are free to move at any time to explore other topics.
Participants may bring their own questions and examples to be discussed.

So this whole thing is about promotion of software patents, which the EPO continues to refer to as “CII” (to avoid the “S” word).

“This man scares me” is the name of a poster of a new comment who said about António Campinos the following. It’s the last comment of the bunch (no further comments are permitted):

He is sitting every morning at the bar listening to employees queuing to enjoy his beloved one-to-one meeting. Sometimes he listen so carefully that he does not say a single word.

There will be soon direct consequences from what he ‘listened’ and from the dooming survey due to start today.

We all miss and regret the time when he was just doing nothing.

“HE DID NOTHING” was how another person in that same thread put it. As we said back then, it seems abundantly clear that people are running out of patience with him (faster than Battistelli lost the trust of the staff). When the public and when corporations realise that the EPO is consciously allowing patents that courts don’t accept litigation numbers may collapse (like they did in the US, where even the number of patent grants decreased last year). The EPO may be counting on abolishing the appeal boards and the courts (replacing them with UPC), as we shall explain in our next post. No wonder constitutional challenges against the UPC have been very potent and already successful, e.g. in Hungary.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 18/10/2019: More KDE Events and OpenBSD 6.6

    Links for the day



  2. We Don't Know Who Will Run the Free Software Foundation, But We Know Who Will Run the GNU Project

    Software Freedom is under a heavy and perhaps unprecedented attack; some people out there are paid by the attackers to celebrate this attack and defame people (cheering for corporate takeover under the blanket of “Open Source”), but the founder of the Free software movement remains alive, well, and very much active



  3. New EPO Meme: Who Wants to Make Billions From a 'Public' Monopoly?

    What was supposed to be a cash-balanced patent office became a money-making monster that fakes ‘crises’ to attack hard-working examiners



  4. EmacsConf Without Richard Stallman

    Now that emacs is being 'rebranded' this kind of meme seems apt



  5. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, October 17, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, October 17, 2019



  6. Guest Article: In the Absence of Richard Stallman OEM Source Software ('Open Source') is Trying to Hijack Even Emacs

    "Now they have to create some fictional history. No need to worry."



  7. Guest Article: Techies Should Not Dictate the Free Software Movement

    "We should start a second phase of the Free software movement that's making good software and putting users at the center."



  8. Links 17/10/2019: Ubuntu Turns 15, New Codename Revealed, Ubuntu 19.10 is Out

    Links for the day



  9. Free as in Free Speech (Restrictions May Apply)

    When limits of speech are not safety-related rules but political correctness or conformism



  10. There Won't be Patent Justice Until Patent Trolling Becomes Completely and Totally Extinct

    SLAPP-like behaviour and extortion/blackmail tactics using patent monopolies are a stain on the patent system; it's time to adopt measures to stop these things once and for all, bearing in mind they're inherently antithetical to the goal/s of the patent system and therefore discourage public support for this whole system



  11. EPO Staff Union and Staff Representatives Ought to Demand EPO Stops Bullying Publishers and Censoring Their Sites

    An often neglected if not forgotten aspect of EPO tyranny is the war on information itself; EPO management continues to show hostility towards journalism and disdain for true information



  12. Bribes, Lies, Fundamental Violations of the Law and Cover-Up: This is Today's European Patent Office

    It has gotten extremely difficult to hold the conspirators accountable for turning Europe’s patent office into a ‘printing machine’ of the litigation industry and amassing vast amounts of money (to be passed to private, for-profit companies)



  13. The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Lost Almost Half (3 Out of 8) Board Members in Only One Month

    As the old saying goes, a picture (or screenshot) is worth a thousand words



  14. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, October 16, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, October 16, 2019



  15. Startpage and System1 Abuse Your Privacy Under the Guise of 'Privacy One Group'

    Startpage has sold out and may have also sold data it retained about its users to a privacy-hostile company whose entire business model is surveillance



  16. Links 16/10/2019: Halo Privacy, Ubuntu Release Imminent

    Links for the day



  17. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 15, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 15, 2019



  18. No, Microsoft is Not an 'Open Source Company' But a Lying Company

    The world’s biggest proprietary software companies want to be seen as “open”; what else is new?



  19. Meme: Setting the Record Straight

    Stallman never defended Epstein. He had called him “Serial Rapist”. It’s Bill Gates who defended Epstein and possibly participated in the same acts.



  20. EPO Staff Resolution Against Neoliberal Policies of António Campinos

    “After Campinos announced 17 financial measures,” a source told us, “staff gathered at multiple sites last week for general assemblies. The meeting halls were crowded. The resolution was passed unanimously and without abstentions.”



  21. Satya Nadella is a Distraction From Microsoft's Real Leadership and Abuses

    "I’m merely wondering if his image and accolades that we’re incessantly bombarded with by the press actually reflect his accomplishments or if they’re being aggrandized."



  22. Raw: EPO Comes Under Fire for Lowering Patent Quality Under the Orwellian Guise of “Collaborative Quality Improvements” (CQI)

    Stephen Rowan, the President’s (António Campinos) chosen VP who promotes the notorious “Collaborative Quality Improvements” (CQI) initiative/pilot, faces heat from the CSC, the Central Staff Committee of the EPO



  23. Making The Most of The Fourth Age of Free Software

    "For better or for worse, we can be certain the Free Software Foundation will never be the same."



  24. FSF is Not for Free Speech Anymore

    The FSF gave orders to silence people



  25. Links 16/10/2019: Plasma 5.17.0, Project Trident Moves to GNU/Linux, NuTyX 11.2

    Links for the day



  26. ...So This GNU/Linux User Goes to a Pub With Swapnil and Jim

    It's hard to promote GNU/Linux when you don't even use it



  27. How to THRIVE, in Uncertain Times for Free Software

    "The guidelines are barely about conduct anyway, they are more about process guidelines for "what to do with your autonomy" in the context of a larger group where participation is completely voluntary and each individual consents to participate."



  28. When They Run Out of Things to Patent They'll Patent Nature Itself...

    The absolutely ridiculous patent bar (ridiculously low) at today’s EPO means that legal certainty associated with European Patents is at an all-time low; patents get granted for the sake of granting more patents each year



  29. EPO Boards of Appeal Need Courage and Structural Disruption to Halt Software Patents in Europe

    Forces or lobbyists for software patents try to come up with tricks and lies by which to cheat the EPC and enshrine illegal software patents; sadly, moreover, EPO judges lack the necessary independence by which to shape caselaw against such practices



  30. Professor Dr. Maximilian Haedicke on Lack of Separation of Powers at the EPO (Which Dooms UPC)

    Team UPC (“empire of lies”) is catching up with reality; no matter how hard media has attempted to not cover EPO scandals (after the EPO paid and threatened many publishers that tried), it remains very much apparent that EPOnia is like a theocracy that cannot be trusted with anything


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts