EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

04.02.20

OIN in 2020 Resembles Linux Foundation in 2020 (Corporate Front Group Piggybacking the Linux Brand)

Posted in IBM, Microsoft, OIN, Patents at 9:54 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Patent pool or patent swamp?

Clean Sky with upcoming Clouds above Field

Summary: We regret to say that the Open Invention Network seems not to care at all about Software Freedom; to make matters worse, it is a proponent of software patents and a voice for companies like IBM and Microsoft, not the “Community” it fancies misrepresenting

THE OIN announced Huawei joining some time this morning, maybe around 9AM, based on this press release. The exact time does not matter and the words follow the usual ‘template’. This press release was, as usual, soon promoted by Microsoft-friendly sites that systematically promote everything from LOT and OIN while defaming Richard Stallman. Notice who’s celebrating and promoting these things. These people are also connected to the Corporate Linux Foundation.

We recently did a lot of searching and researching in light of new revelations. OIN and LOT turned out to be more closely connected than we had realised.

While working hard to study these cryptic entities I was contacted by GNU developers. We’re often approached by some. They view us as allies of theirs, unlike the Linux Foundation with corporate phonies. Greg K-H has apparently just joined Google. Does it mean he’s also joining the ‘pool’? The so-called ‘patent pool’?

GNU people enjoy playful cleverness. “I hope at least a few people such as you enjoy it,” one of them told me, alluding to a game/word puzzle. Some GNU projects (e.g. Parallels) use political messages in release names. That’s freedom. This is freedom of speech. GNU developers have long valued this kind of freedom — a freedom that even as project founder and leader Linus Torvalds clearly lost.

“Many OIN patents (added to the OIN pools) are likely invalid, which means that the OIN risks becoming obsolete.”OIN is not connected to GNU and it uses the “Linux” brand and logo to promote itself; that in its own right says a lot about the allegiances. It says a lot about the orientation. By all means check the professional background of people who run OIN. It’s not pretty. LOT is probably a lot uglier. For several reasons.

OIN’s CEO is a rather good phony. He’s diplomatic and has a career of bureaucracy (in politics; he’s still connected to politicians). Each time he phoned me, at his own volition, he was very nice but also rather evasive about key issues, such as software patents. There are certain subjects they would not open up on; so one must dig for oneself. It’s a long process. When we started this site in 2006 we were very supportive of OIN, but that relationship changed over time and deteriorated around 2010. It was due to things that happened and were said (or weren’t said at all). OIN is not evil, but it is in many ways useless. It might not be useless to the “Linux agenda” (which includes DRM), but for Software Freedom in general OIN is almost incompatible. It strives for co-existence with software patents even though such patents are close to worthless. Many OIN patents (added to the OIN pools) are likely invalid, which means that the OIN risks becoming obsolete. But as long as it adds more members like Canon and Huawei it can gather more membership fees to sustain itself (the salaries) and add yet more patents for bragging rights.

The Nonprofit Explorer won’t let people see what OIN (or “open invention network”) is or does. The IRS filings might not be public. We can count the members of staff, estimating the turnover, revenue, expenses etc. But quite frankly this is not what matters. What matters to us is their goal and seeing how their staff advances software patents, we simply cannot support it anymore.

We recently became aware that OIN folks are trying to add more members, including GNU projects.

We attempted to find out (as this would help us a great deal) how many people were already contacted about this and what projects they developed (nature and affiliation). We could not put our finger on even a speculative number. It could be 10 developers or 100 developers, maybe even thousands. It’s hard to tell. Today’s press release is about enlisting the leading patent applicant at the European Patent Office (EPO). What do members gain from it? So-called ‘access’ to patents? What patents? Patents on algorithms…

Do we want to foster this convention wherein developers need to beg to write some code? A permission culture for abstract ideas embedded in code? It feels like a takeover.

We think we need to dig deeper and deeper into this. We need to better understand the objective/s of OIN. Don’t let them become evasive as they might find easy prey. They never fold their cards; their CEO did, at one point, reveal to me which Microsoft (software) patents were quietly used against Linux. He named “exFAT”. He hasn’t spoke to me since then (we spoke several times) because I became growingly outspoken. I was being honest, so OIN no longer viewed Techrights as a potential ally. Back then IBM attempted similar games until I caused them trouble. Techrights was initially under the impression that OIN would battle software patents, but the exact opposite is true. OIN is still very close to IBM, probably the most outspoken and active proponent of software patents.

We aren’t going to claim that OIN is afraid of Techrights, which used to be pro-OIN until it found out ‘too much’. Let’s just say that OIN understands that the more it reveals, the more there will be to scrutinise. OIN is in bed with the ‘base’ that Techrights generally antagonises. They misuse their ‘cute’ Tux logo to present themselves as something they’re not. Maybe they should use the LF logo instead.

Suffice to say, OIN’s biggest ‘handlers’ (companies like IBM) have long wanted to get rid of Richard Stallman (RMS). They were happy to see RMS removed and made a statement to that effect. They had several ‘runs’ at it, including an almost successful one back in 2009 (we wrote a lot about this back then). RMS was finally ‘canceled’ because of a media attack, followed by lynch mobs in social control media (which wasn’t as (im)mature in 2009).

“On the surface,” one developer told us, “both OIN and LOT appear to be great Free/Libre supportive organisations that any user should want to join.”

The top members, companies like troll feeder IBM and Google (even Microsoft for about 18 months now), can use these to claim to be “in peace” with a bunch of projects that would otherwise resist and antagonise their bogus software patents — ludicrous patents which US courts would nowadays deem invalid anyway (citing Section 101/Alice). There are other negative aspects to these patent pools, but it took us several years to properly understand what they’re up to and what/who they work towards/for.

“Red Hat,” a developer told us, “wasn’t just happy to see RMS removed. As the poster child for FOSS big business, they were used to front for the Microsoft-IBM machine as they continued, unsuccessfully, to also oust him as head of GNU.”

That developer asserted that “the most vocal signatories of the “Joint Statement” were connected to Red Hat,” urging Stallman to quit GNU.

Taking note of Red Hat’s growing proximities to Microsoft, e.g. [1, 2], the developer asserted that Microsoft too might have had a hand in it.

Microsoft has its fingers in all the big pies now. It certainly has a whole hand in LOT and OIN now.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Slashdot

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 29/9/2020: Fedora 33 Beta, Krita 4.4.0 Beta 2, Stellarium 0.20.3 and Mesa 20.2 Released; 20 Million Downloads From the LVFS

    Links for the day



  2. Another Day of ZDNet Being ZDNet, Calling Windows “Linux” (to Confuse People and Help Microsoft Sell Vista 10)

    Microsoft propaganda site ZDNet is keeping up with the tradition of presenting Windows as "Linux" and promoting Windows even in the "Linux" section of the site



  3. [Meme] It's Crazy Not to Eliminate Lame Words That Might Offend Somebody

    If the word “stupid” offends you, then maybe programming isn’t for you, in the same sense that submitting patches with Git over E-mail shouldn't be hard if/when you can develop decent code with sanity checks



  4. IBM Fought for 'Master Race' and Now It's Banning the Word 'Master'

    A lot of the current push to ban the word "master" came from Red Hat (soon IBM, helped by Intel and Microsoft for the most part); we take a hard look at IBM's history to better understand the incredible double standards and what the real motivations might be



  5. IBM's Founder, Mr. Watson (Yes, That Watson), Had “Very Keen Sense of Public Relations”

    "Watson" is a lot more offensive than those supposedly offensive words IBM is working to purge; think about those hundreds of Red Hat workers who are black and were never told about ethnic purges of blacks facilitated by IBM (their new boss)



  6. Under IBM's Leadership Red Hat Becomes a SPAM Marketing Operation, Sending Mass Mails Without Authorisation and Making It Impossible to Unsubscribe

    Red Hat seems incapable of respecting people's inboxes; it subscribes people to things which they never ever subscribed to and makes it impossible to unsubscribe; what has Red Hat become or succumbed to?



  7. EFF: Sitting on a Massive Pile of Money and Members Are Less Than a Third of the Revenue

    As part of our series which explores non-profits turning against their goals (sometimes in pursuit of money, even if that means sellout) we take a good look at the EFF in this age of unprecedented consolidation of wealth and power



  8. IRC Proceedings: Monday, September 28, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, September 28, 2020



  9. [Meme] Running Public (or Private) Interest Groups for Profit

    The Linux Foundation is picking up some more ‘surveillance capitalism’ money, in the name of… ‘helping’ Linux?



  10. The Concept of Martyrdom in Free Software and the Threat of Demonisation in the Media

    Leaders or figureheads of public interest advocacy are being dismissed as crazy and rude whilst corporations that maim and kill millions of people are spun as "professional" and even "altruistic"; don't fall for it



  11. More Money Does Not Necessarily Mean More Stable Organisations

    The corporate takeover of Free software (privatising the Commons) is a real problem that nobody in the media seems to be talking about, partly because this media is itself corporate and hence part of (participant in) the 'coup'



  12. EPO Management Looks for New and 'Innovative' Ways to Exploit Scientists and Distract From EPO Corruption

    EPO management is desperate for puff pieces, having just produced some greenwashing nonsense (about a dozen press items about this non-event) and now a bunch of self-promotional videos



  13. Before the New York Times Did a Number on Donald Trump It Changed Bill Gates' Tune

    When you speak strictly through a spokesperson it often means you're lying and/or hiding something; the Gates enigma remains unsolved more than a year later



  14. Links 28/9/2020: Linux 5.9 RC7, Review of Linuxfx 10.6, OpenSSH 8.4

    Links for the day



  15. Speaking Through Spokespeople is a Sign of Weakness, Such as Non-Denying and False Denials (or: Bill Gates Never Denied His Connections to MIT Through Jeffrey Epstein)

    Big liars lie shamelessly; the biggest liars lie through proxies and today we examine the evasive tactics of Bill Gates and his associates (who were closely connected to Jeffrey Epstein but refuse to even talk about that, except indirectly)



  16. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, September 27, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, September 27, 2020



  17. Accounting for Debconf 19 Travel... in 2020

    A deeper look or analysis of Debian expenditures, which grew more than twicefold for travel last year



  18. Don't Let Microsoft Make 'Open Source' Synonymous With Proprietary Monopoly GitHub

    Now that the OSI works for Microsoft instead of Open Source (no, GitHub isn’t Open Source; it’s inherently against Open Source) we need to understand the modus operandi and learn from old mistakes



  19. Links 27/9/2020: Puppy Linux 9.5, Nitrux 1.3.3

    Links for the day



  20. Public Relations and Tolerance Stunts Are Very, Very Cheap

    It's 2020 and people are asked to focus on superficial aspects of corporations rather than anything of substance (like the effects on society at large, notably exploitation and long-term harm)



  21. Open to Everything

    It always starts with good intentions...



  22. The OSI's President Apparently Does Not Know That His Own Employer (Salesforce) Works for ICE

    The hypocrisy (or double standard) of the OSI’s President is astounding; taking salaries paid in part by ICE budget (Salesforce works for ICE and similarly evil agencies) while protesting in a proprietary software platform of Microsoft (GitHub) about ICE (all this whilst actively participating in it regardless)



  23. [Meme] Communist Tactics

    To Microsoft, Linux is communism until Microsoft controls it (and then runs over it to crush it, the typical modus operandi)



  24. OSI President: Most or Half of the OSI's Money (Even Individual Donors' Money) Goes to a Microsoft-Led Initiative

    The OSI has turned from advocate of "Open Source" (a disingenuous attempt to set aside Free/libre software) to advocate of Microsoft and GitHub in just 3 years (since taking Microsoft's money/bribes)



  25. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, September 26, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, September 26, 2020



  26. The 24/7 'Tech' Worker (Babysitter of User-hostile Computing) and 'Expensive' Programmer

    The rights of workers are being reduced to nothing (many in their older years made redundant), even in an occupation that is indirectly responsible for automating and thus deprecating jobs in many other occupations



  27. Why Techrights is Totally Unexcited About the New Owner of Linux Journal

    Linux Journal might soon become an anti-Linux site (veiled hostility) if Slashdot's editorial preferences are anything to go by (Slashdot has just seized control of Linux Journal)



  28. The Cheapening of the Programmer is a Threat to Human Rights of All Computer Users

    From the era of computer experts (down to the low level of computing with transistors), mathematicians, physics gurus and respected technicians we've come to orders-following, user-apathetic engineers who are overworked, grossly underpaid, and way too fearful of raising ethical concerns (voicing disagreement can result in prompt dismissal, followed by perpetual unemployment) and this ensures digital oppression without checks and balances



  29. Links 26/9/2020: Wine 5.18, FreeBSD 12.2-BETA3 and Debian 10.6 Released

    Links for the day



  30. 'Appeal to Novelty' as a Lever for Proprietary Software Monopolies, Bloat (Planned Obsolescence) and More Surveillance

    Novelty is generally fine, but in many cases products are developed iteratively (not cumulatively) not to advance society or to objectively improve services, only to increase control over people (because emergent ‘freemium’-like business models nowadays revolve around addiction and subjugation, e.g. ‘brain-farming’ and manipulation of minds)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts