Bonum Certa Men Certa

Markets Without Fair Competition and Effective Regulation

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Oct 15, 2024

The Phoebus Cartel

ALMOST 30 years ago the computer (and particularly computer software) industry reached a point where not having Windows was "difficult" because everyone was expected to have Windows to run "standard" programs or get so-called "computer skills" (which schools and workplaces expected pupils/professionals to possess or have long trained for, either formally or by experience, i.e. prolonged use akin to 'addiction'). This more or less meant that in the early 2000s Microsoft was already grossly overcharging people. Microsoft did a lot of illegal stuff other than that.

No competition (or no viable alternatives for particular proprietary formats and precompiled binaries) means people will just pay a high price, typically tied very strictly to the price of a new physical computer. Microsoft was selling to OEMs, not people. It was gaming the channel to actively restrict choice.

There are many examples where a lack of true choice encourages cartels (like the OEMs above), higher prices, and price-fixing (ensuring prices artificially remain high; patents do this too).

Some people become very rich this way. But at whose expense and is this moral? Is this desirable? Antitrust laws exist for a reason.

AMD and Intel are a good example of this. Two sides of a similar coin. Intel is suffering because nowadays most computers don't use x86 processors and don't even have a keyboard. In the server room too alternatives computer architectures are explored. This means Intel does not command the price anymore. It lost that.

But outside the areas (domains) of microprocessors and software there are also several examples. Some were discussed today and yesterday in IRC.

Let me use the example of batteries (finger-sized, the "classic" stuff, notably AA and AAA sizes). It's very fresh in my mind. I spent the past 2 days doing lots of work... sort of researching this market, both online and offline. I checked stuff in my drawer (from the 1990s mostly), including the charger that's sturdy, over 30 years old, and still works. I also checked the state of very old rechargeable batteries, effectively chemicals inside a metal vessel/tube. What I generally found was, almost every shop around here stocks no rechargeable batteries (the small local shops anyway) and bigger shops either don't have them or sort of "hide" them, encouraging people to instead buy batteries over and over again, never reusing them. Most stores only stock the two famous brands, nothing else (I won't say the brands out loud). I checked Argos, Sainsbury's, Tesco (both Express and Online), Asda (physical megastore) and another place near us, even if only to make a point or study the situation in order to report it. Eventually I checked eBay, knowing that many physical markets don't stock rechargeable batteries (I already checked in prior months). I'll no longer explore the matter because I made a purchase this morning, but the main lessons are:

How did "the market" become this bad? How was choice narrowed down to the point where people can only choose between expensive and another expensive? (Unless they walk the extra mile)

If we value the planet (the only planet we have) and recognise the harms done by the metals and chemicals inside batteries, why aren't there campaigns to use rechargeable batteries by default or for shops to promote rechargeable batteries by default? Because less batteries would get sold?

Disposable, single-purpose junk seems to have become the norm/al, even for the chargers, which look like plastic toys, not appliances. How safe are these? How long will they last before becoming fire hazards?

There are precedents for it, e.g. the Phoebus cartel. Here are some articles about that:

The Phoebus cartel is now 100 years old. It'll officially turn 100 in about 70 days. To quote IEEE (second above): "On 23 December 1924, a group of leading international businessmen gathered in Geneva for a meeting that would alter the world for decades to come. Present were top representatives from all the major lightbulb manufacturers, including Germany’s Osram, the Netherlands’ Philips, France’s Compagnie des Lampes, and the United States’ General Electric. As revelers hung Christmas lights elsewhere in the city, the group founded the Phoebus cartel, a supervisory body that would carve up the worldwide incandescent lightbulb market, with each national and regional zone assigned its own manufacturers and production quotas. It was the first cartel in history to enjoy a truly global reach."

The world would destroy itself (or rather, mankind would destroy its habitat) if we put profits before people.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Links 01/06/2025: "Vibe Coding" Turns Out to be a Fraud and Amazon Merits Boycott, Argue Bloggers
Links for the day
Gemini Links 01/06/2025: "Stardust" and Ideal PC Setup
Links for the day
Links 01/06/2025: Windows TCO, Openwashing, "It's FOSS" Still Promoting Microsoft
Links for the day
Gemini Links 01/06/2025: Simplification and Networks Everywhere
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 31, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, May 31, 2025
Google Bribes EFF. EFF Promotes LLM Slop as 'Fair Use'. To GAFAM It's a Low-Cost Lobby Hedge.
So the bribes pay off ("slush fund") and the word spreads
Slopwatch: Fake Text and Images, Financial Bubbles, and Scams in "Intelligent" Clothing
Sometimes what they mean by "AI" is just cheap labour somewhere else, as we discussed in IRC a few hours ago
Why Microsoft is Collapsing (Similar to What's Happening at IBM), As Insiders See It
IBM seems like one heck of a mess
Reliable Computing Means Free (Libre) Computing
Sites that want to promote security ought to deal with the biggest issues
Links 31/05/2025: US Court Orders Sides With RFE/RL, War Updates From Ukraine
Links for the day
Gemini Links 31/05/2025: ARM Server and power_supply Subsystem
Links for the day
Links 31/05/2025: Slop Stigmatised as Disinformation, Catalyst/Driver of "Death of Communication"
Links for the day
Common Sense 101: Do Not Write Blog Posts Saying You Want to Murder Colleagues (or Yourself)
Only crazy people would think stabbings are a joke
Microsoft Bankruptcy
"Microsoft unit in Russia to file for bankruptcy, database shows"
Techrights Does Not Compete With LLM Slop, It Exposes the Bastards, Plagiarists and Scammers Who Do That
People like Scam Altman, still facing a lawsuit from his own sister for sexual abuse against her
Links 31/05/2025: Microsoft-Connected Builder.ai is a Fraud and US is Purging Students Based on Race/Nationality
Links for the day
Gemini Links 30/05/2025: Limmat, Doomscrollers, and Arguments Parsing
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 30, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, May 30, 2025
The "AI" (Slop) Bubble Already Popped, But It's Not an Overnight Collapse
where Microsoft put its money
No More Steven Astorino at IBM, Chatter About Weekly/Nonstop Layoffs at IBM
What happened? Good luck guessing.
Looking at Corruption in Europe, Going Beyond the EPO
Expect a new series to kick off very soon
Slopwatch: Security SPAM and LLM Slop for SEO and FUD Purposes, Perpetually Tarnishing the Perception of Linux and (Open)SSH Security
A lot of this Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt (FUD) comes from Microsoft and its LLMs
Links 30/05/2025: Google's LLM Slop Pushers Are Killing Journalism and Shira Perlmutter Fails to Stop Bribed Regime From Legalising Plagiarism (in "AI" Clothing)
Links for the day
Links 30/05/2025: Offline Arts and "Threshold of Patience"
Links for the day
Signing Off Serious Lies With a Statement of Truth is No Joking Matter
It's not hard to see what's happening here
Links 30/05/2025: LLM Slop Already Ingests and Vomits Its Own Garbage, Facebook Exec Admits Copyrights a Concern Too
Links for the day
Mass Layoffs at Microsoft Result in More Whistleblowers From Microsoft
Microsoft's predatory pricing is further
Slopwatch: Planet Ubuntu Became LLM Slop and Some People Fail to See the Immorality of Plagiarism
it lessens the incentive for people to publish real articles
EPO Poll: 68% Dissatisfied With Quality of Slop (Wrongly Framed as "AI") for Patent Classification
Slop does not work, it's just falsely advertised with extra hype (funded by slop pushers that sponsor the major media)
Big Crowds Gather to Learn About Software Freedom From the Man Who Started GNU/Linux in 1983
"It was a great success"
Microsoft Layoffs Again in Bay Area
Microsoft relies on people's false belief that being "in LinkedIn" will get you a job; well, seems like even working inside LinkedIn really sucks and you lose the job
Gemini Links 30/05/2025: Fighting Against the Bad News, and Slop is Dehumanisation Disguised as "Intelligence"
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 29, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, May 29, 2025