Bonum Certa Men Certa

Leaked: Proof That Benoît Battistelli Disregarded Orders From the Administrative Council (Again)

EPO flirting with radical authoritarian nationalism where Battistelli does anything he wants

Minutes of October 2016 Administrative Council



Summary: Battistelli's inability to respect the hierarchy at the European Patent Office and Organisation stresses the importance of throwing him out, putting to sleep the tail which wags the dog

PORTIONS of the meeting minutes of the October 2016 Administrative Council meeting (primarily in German) made their way to us after the meeting had ended and we finally have the full document [PDF]. We are hoping to have an English translation soon.



What does the document serve to show? Well, it shows that Battistelli was supposed to suspend his union-busting activities, which certainly he did not. There might soon be another protest in The Hague over it. Battistelli is totally out of control!

If one looks at IP Kat comments today, there are about a dozen new ones. "Battistelli's presidency has revealed the fatal flaws in the EPC," said one person, but actually, Battistelli 'hacked' the EPC (even violating it several times) and this is very dangerous as it can doom the whole Organisation. The Administrative Council ought to know this by now. Here is the full comment:

Is article 4a enforceable in any way? Against whom and by whom? Who is responsible for calling such a conference? It does seem the only way that a semblance of democratic oversight might be possible by this means. Do the member states want to move from a system favoring small and medium enterprises, which benefits the economy and stimulates employment, to a registration system which favors big enterprises with deep pockets, as Battistelli clearly intends. This should be a political decision, taken by elected representatives, not by one man.

And to enter the discussion about whether patent attorneys an or should complain, they are the servants of their masters, who fall into two groups: those who benefit for a high examination standard, and those who do not. It is futile to expect that as a group they can come to the rescue.

Battistelli's presidency has revealed the fatal flaws in the EPC, which provides no practical mechanism for democratic oversight of the workings of the EPO.


"Liechtenstein hasn't attended the AC for years," said this person. "They have perfect teeth." (this relates to an old observation about free dental treatment). Is the Administrative Council so deep in Battistelli's pocket? Are the delegates mere chinchillas?

Here is another comment on the subject:



Morale will only improve when law, justice and the framework for mutual respect and fairplay are restored at the EPO. There is no excuse for those with the highest of authority not to remove this toxic Enarque and his clique. The country responsible for this toxic entryism at the EPO should now financially and morally support all those victims, including Laurent, who have suffered at the hands of the Enarquien tyrant. A disgrace to the ENA, a disgrace to Europe....


"Battistelli can just ignore its results just as he ignored what the Council requested (twice)," said the following comment:

I don't see how a Conference of ministers of the Contracting States could be useful. Battistelli can just ignore its results just as he ignored what the Council requested (twice).

Sorry to ask the same question again: but what can the Council really do, in practice, if Battistelli simply ignores what they ask? He can simply do as he wants and ignore anything the Council pushes at him, can't he? I mean: he already did.

Sure, the Council can open disciplinary proceedings (in theory, I don't think the form these proceedings are supposed to take has been planed in the texts). Sure, the Council can refuse to vote the budget. But the Council cannot stop Battistelli dismantling the European Patent Office if that is his plan. He can continue as long as he gets votes from 10 countries. Even for a second or third term, as far as I can tell.

All he needs are the votes from 10 countries.

Now the question is: why would these 10 countries do that, considering the scandal? The answer is that there are probably 10 countries among the 38 which have little or no patents and few industries to protect, so they don't care. These countries may even see it as an advantage to annoy the big users of the patent system. Maybe they believe that if, e.g., the German small and medium industry cannot use the patent system as effectively as they do, they could develop small and medium industries of their own? Who knows?

Did I understood correctly or are there any Articles I did not consider in the EPC or in other treaties?


The Administrative Council probably needs to coordinate (in secret of course, for their own safety) the dismissal of Battistelli. The harder Battistelli pushes them around and the more utter lies he spreads around, the more 'leaky' the EPO becomes. People want the truth to be told. We are getting virtually every document, we just lack the time to study and publish it all. Certainly, the more often Battistelli breaks the law and the more arrogantly he does so, the more likely we are to hear from people in his vicinity. He can't survive in his job like this. The EPO does not have a few disgruntled employees but thousands of such employees (maybe a silent majority). They've had it with Battistelli and they recognise that he is their enemy, not their boss, as he puts the entire Office in jeopardy. If they wish to work collectively for job security, then they will need to topple/oust Team Battistelli. It's almost like their moral duty.

This new union-shaming comment makes us wonder if Battistelli's lies now make their way into blogs in the form of anonymous comments. This has already been rebutted politely by others, who correctly explain the role of management in all this. Blaming the unions for all the problems is like blaming whistleblowers rather than the crimes exposed by these whistleblowers (and the perpetrators of these crimes).

Here is what one commenter said in response:



What a pity that under the current rules of the EPO, the public at large - but also SUEPO members and all the staff - conveniently cannot hear the version of Prunier and the other dismissed representatives and make up their mind, while the President and you, dear anonymous, are free to provide their own.


Another said this:



Surely the issue of whether or not Mr Prunier should be fired are pretty much irrelevant. The two big issues are:

i) There is a clear lack of due process when the President of the EPO and others can publicly provide comment on the case (including unsubstantiated allegations that cast the EPO in a bad light and are detrimental to its reputation) but the person fired cannot provide any public comment lest he be further punished by losing his pension.

ii) The AC explicitly told the President not to take any further disciplinary action against SUEPO leaders before ensuring that the disciplinary proceedings are fair and seen to be fair. This has not been done so the action to fire Mr Prunier are in direct violation of the AC's instructions to the President. This casts further bad light on the EPO and is detrimental to its reputation.

To my mind the President of the EPO is undertaking actions that are clearly detrimental to the reputation of the EPO. This is something he has been very strict on in relation to his employees and, in the order to be fair, he should be subject to comparable disciplinary proceedings.


It is well documented, not to mention publicly stated, that Battistelli was not allowed to dismiss Mr Prunier.

Do the Administrative Council's delegates realise just to what extent Battistelli mocks/humiliates/insults them? They need to organise and remove this menace from the Office, escorting him out of Eponia along with his spurious bodyguards that are a total waste of money. There are some (in)famous mental health hospitals not so far away (over in Haar for example). Maybe he can admitted before it's too late and maybe there is even a cure for his megalomania. This spoiled brat behaves more like a child than an adult capable of handling an office with such a high budget and so much at stake. As some employees put it, "Not My President".

Recent Techrights' Posts

People's Understanding of the History of GNU/Linux is Changing
RMS is not a radical, he's just clever enough to see and foresee what's going on
Microsofters Were Scheming to Take Over This Entire Web Site (in Their Own Words!)
Money gets spent censoring/deplatforming people who speak about real issues; no money gets spent actually tackling those underlying issues
Bicycles for the Minds and the Story Harrison Bergeron
"The goal of having people in charge of the tools they use and that the tools should amplify ability" has long been abandoned
[Video] Cory Doctorow Explains DMCA: DRM in the Browser (or Webapp) Will "Make It a Felony to Protect Your Privacy While You Use It."
Pycon US Keynote Speaker Cory Doctorow
 
Microsoft Layoffs Again in Bay Area
Microsoft relies on people's false belief that being "in LinkedIn" will get you a job; well, seems like even working inside LinkedIn really sucks and you lose the job
Gemini Links 30/05/2025: Fighting Against the Bad News, and Slop is Dehumanisation Disguised as "Intelligence"
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 29, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, May 29, 2025
Links 29/05/2025: Chinese Cracking Against EU Institutions (Prague), More Assaults on Media and Its Funding Sources
Links for the day
EPO Workers Caution That the Officials Are Still Illegally Trying to Replace Staff With Slop (to Lower Quality and Validity of European Patents)
Nobody in Europe voted for any of this
Links 29/05/2025: US Health Deficit and Malware Disguised as Slop Generator
Links for the day
Links 29/05/2025: Turtle Roadkill, Modern 'Tech' as a Sting
Links for the day
Thanks for All the Fish, Linux Format
people who once wrote for it (or for other magazines) comment on the importance of this news
Links 29/05/2025: YouTube Problem and Giant Privacy Hole in Microsoft OneDrive
Links for the day
United States Courts With Sworn Testimonies Are on Our Side, We'll Present the Same Here
Chronicling what happened is a moral imperative
Serial Sloppers Ruin and Lessen the Incentive to Cover "Linux"
The Serial Sloppers (SSs) ought to be named and shamed, but almost nobody does this
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 28, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, May 28, 2025
Links 28/05/2025: 'Emulation Layers' (Measurements and Linguistics), Libraries, and Discomfort
Links for the day
Links 28/05/2025: More Arrests for Bitcoin-Connected Torture and Prosecutions for Dieselgate-Linked Executives
Links for the day
Even Microsoft (MSN) Covers Richard Stallman's Public Talk in Milan 2 Days Ago
He spoke in Spanish earlier this month (Alicante)
Gemini Links 28/05/2025: Techo-authoritarianism With Slop Plagiarism and "No Online June" (Going Offline)
Links for the day
Links 28/05/2025: GitHub MCP Exploited and MathWorks Discovers Huge Windows TCO
Links for the day
Very High Attendance Level at Richard Stallman's Talk Shows People Can Relate to His Message
Smear campaigns have their limits
Gemini Links 28/05/2025: Celsius-Fahrenheit, Endless Scrolling/Infinite Scrolling, and Trapping LLM Slop Bots
Links for the day
Prison gate backdrop to baptism by Fr Sean O'Connell, St Paul's, Coburg
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
More Photos From This Week's Milan Talk by Richard Stallman
The posts are in Italian, not English
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 27, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, May 27, 2025