Bonum Certa Men Certa

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is Still Being Smeared by Circles That Benefit From Low-Quality Patents

Big Oil-funded institutions in favour of Oil States? No way!

Antonin Scalia Law School



Summary: Ahead of Oil States v Greene’s Energy Group, et al (upcoming Supreme Court decision) the 'greasy' academics and publishers greased up by patent law firms are trying to tarnish the image of PTAB, even though the technology sector very much supports PTAB

THE PREVIOUS post took note of attacks on Alice Corp. v CLS Bank International (Supreme Court's decision), but there are other, overlapping attacks whose purpose is similar -- to protect software patents that should never have been granted by the USPTO. In effect, PTAB enables just about anyone to challenge bad patents, in a similar way to oppositions and appeals at the EPO. Patent maximalists like neither, as both mechanisms help guard patent quality, which is a threat to patent maximalists' bottom line.



"In effect, PTAB enables just about anyone to challenge bad patents, in a similar way to oppositions and appeals at the EPO."The ideas behind this argument aren't novel. They are not controversial, either. Some people just want more and more patents to exist, as that comes at the expense of various industries and becomes a form of tax that is neither beneficial nor necessary.

A few days ago Managing IP (patent maximalists) wrote about Nidec Motor v Zhongshan. Patent maximalists are waging a war on PTAB, for obvious reasons, and they want every court (Supreme, Federal, District) to stop patent quality assurance. To them, the very concept of quality -- or the notion of quality control -- is obscene. To them, the more patents society gets granted, the more innovation will occur (or so they try to tell us). So anyway, in this particular case there was a "concurring opinion in the Nidec Motor v Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor appeal of a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision at the Federal Circuit [which] has attracted a lot of attention."

"Patent maximalists are waging a war on PTAB, for obvious reasons, and they want every court (Supreme, Federal, District) to stop patent quality assurance."The decision, Nidec Motor v Zhongshan, was covered days later by the same site. It's worth emphasising that PTAB gets the thumbs up from the Federal Circuit about 80% of the time. There's not much of a feud there at all, but patent maximalists try to fuel or inflame one. They keep nitpicking/cherry-picking exceptions to the norm (which reveals their own bias) to give the impression that PTAB is naughty or "impotent" (their word). As Managing IP put it just before the weekend: "126 PTAB petitions were filed in August, while the Federal Circuit expressed concern with the Board’s practice of joinder and expanded panels in Nidec Motor v Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor, said it abused its discretion for failing to consider material evidence in Ultratec v CaptionCall, and ruled that an IPR petitioner doesn’t need to satisfy Article III standing requirements to participate in a patent owner’s appeal in Personal Audio v EFF..."

They make it sound like the Federal Circuit is very upset at PTAB, but that's not hard to do by picking apart just a handful (or less) of cases. That's precisely what Patently-O was doing almost every day in August -- a pattern we vocally complained about at the time. Patently-O is in fact still cherry-picking exceptions to the norm (the norm being PTAB doing a good job, the Federal Circuit then reaffirming it). Now it's this:

In a new decision, the Federal Circuit has ruled that the PTAB erred in its inherency analysis, but ultimately affirmed the claim cancellation after finding the error harmless.

[...]

In its decision, the PTAB (board) used inherency in a particular way – finding first that it would have been obvious to combine the prior art to use the method described; and then finding that the 30% reduction would have inherently resulted from the combination. On appeal, the Federal Circuit rejected that analysis – holding that “the Board cited no evidence that a reduction of 30% in the pulling force would necessarily result from the claimed process, which contains no steps that ensure such reduction.” Rather, as the patentee argued, the 30% reduction serves as a guide for selecting the particular lubricants and arrangements.

[...]

In re Best, 562 F.2d 1252 (C.C.P.A. 1977). In Best, the court noted that inherency would be properly used in this situation for an anticipation decision, but that for obviousness, the PTO can simply find a prima facie obviousness case.

Cancellation affirmed.


So basically, this is more of the same, i.e. the Federal Circuit agreeing with PTAB (except when it comes to more minor details). Be sure a lot of briefs will be sent to the Supreme Court with a false narrative of PTAB as "impotent" or whatever. That's just what the patent microcosm is trying to accomplish these days. Here is another new Patently-O post, also indirectly about PTAB. To quote:

The move is designed to prop the patents up against challenge via a tribal sovereign immunity claim. (Several of the transferred patents are being challenged before the PTAB in AIA Trials). Parallel claims have been quite successful for public universities in fending of both IPR and declaratory judgment lawsuits – even when the patents are exclusively licensed to commercial entities

[...]

Allergan is a frequent player of jurisdictional games. Its corporate “headquarters” is in Dublin for the tax benefits, although it is “actually” sited in New Jersey.


Tax dodger, tax evader, whatever. With Patent Boxes in Europe it's clear that many patent maximalists simply help companies not pay tax. It's a grey if not a black market.

"With Patent Boxes in Europe it's clear that many patent maximalists simply help companies not pay tax."Last but not least we have Adam Mossoff, who not an engineer, just a "law" person that keeps lobbying for the interests of patent trolls and the more radical elements in Texas. We mentioned him many times before. He seems like a de facto lobbyist (connected to Conservative think tanks) and not too shockingly he attacks PTAB now, having chosen a rightwing politcal site to publish his rant. "Anyone can file as many petitions as they want in challenging the validity of any patent," he said, "and they can file it for any reason whatsoever, such as by an activist organization dedicated to eliminating all patents on computer software."

If he is referring to EFF as "activist organization dedicated to eliminating all patents on computer software," then he merely serves to reaffirm where he stands on the subject. He does not develop any software; he's more like a pundit from the Antonin Scalia (Republican) Law School. Here is his conclusion: "Malone’s tale is now typical for all innovators. Accused infringers and commercial competitors now exploit the PTAB as a way to harass inventors, small businesses, and other innovators. The PTAB was supposed to address the problem of low-quality patents; it now threatens all patents, undermining the foundation of the American innovation economy."

"We can expect attacks on PTAB to intensify as the SCOTUS decision is near and patent maximalists want to obliterate PTAB, or in other words destroy patent quality."Got that? To petition PTAB is to "harass", as if challenging a ludicrous patent asserted by some opportunistic troll is the "harassment". As for that last sentence, if "the foundation of the American innovation economy" is a bunch of patents on things like one-click shopping, then the economy boils down to nothing but dirt, maybe shopping (not producing).

We can expect attacks on PTAB to intensify as the SCOTUS decision is near and patent maximalists want to obliterate PTAB, or in other words destroy patent quality.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Computers as a Heat Source
suppose you have over a dozen activated monitors in a room or two
When They Insist That Getting Rid of Paper Receipts and Paper Trail of All Kinds is Better (Manchester City Council and the "Smart" or "App" Mindset)
just classic greenwashing
 
Linux Foundation Increasingly Reliant on Paid Press Releases, Paid-for Stenography, and Even LLM Slop (Fake 'Articles')
This LLM slop is a big problem both for Linux and for Google
Links 10/01/2025: Scam Altman’s Younger Sister Files Lawsuit Claiming He Sexually Abused Her, Apple Faces Embargo
Links for the day
Gemini Links 10/01/2025: Internet Archive Gopher Search Interface and Falling "in Love With the Small Web"
Links for the day
Starting 2025 on a Strong Note
we ought to find more time to produce our own stories
Entire News Sites Have Become Just the Output of Bots (or Chatbots Disguised as "Authors")
the Web is screwed
Colombian Trends Help Explain Why Microsoft Rushes to Start the Year With Mass Layoffs (Before Some Staff is Even Back to Work!)
No wonder there are mass layoffs (first of GAFAM) as early as week 1 of 2025
LLM Slop and Bot-Generated Marketing for the Linux Foundation and Its Openwashing
Of course it's chaff
Social Control Media and 'Linux' Foundation Accelerate the Death of the Web
Social Control Media is basically a dying business
Microsoft Gives Money to Trump, Poor or Even Sluggish Adoption of "Hey Hi" (AI) Reported Amid Mass Layoffs
Microsoft now uses its media moles to downplay layoffs and bribes
More IBM Layoffs (2025)
IBM is being scattered away, yet the media barely covers it. It'll just happen "silently" over time.
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, January 09, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, January 09, 2025
Using Microsoft Chatbot to Generate Microsoft FUD Against SSH/OpenSSH
It's from the "prime suspect"
Free Software Cannot Rely on Politicians, They Don't Even Care About Software, They Only or Mostly Care About Money
There's no simple solution to this situation short of revolutionising the political system
No, There's No "Age Of AI" or "Era Of AI" or "AI Revolution" or "AI Arms Race", It's Just a Dying Tech Industry Looking to Prop Up Its Valuation Using Hype and False Marketing of Mostly Dysfunctional Tools
Please, enough with this nonsense
[Meme] Just a Draft, Nothing Professional Like GNU
the FSF is ~40,000 dollars short of its goal
Draft About Drafts
The static site generator (SSG) is improving
Gemini Links 09/01/2025: Domain Changes, Dirty Links, and OpenWRT
Links for the day
Links 09/01/2025: X-Book (Facebook) Follows the MElon (Musk) Model and X Comes Under EU Investigation for Inciting
Links for the day
[Meme] Microsoft's Scam Altman, Bigger Scammer Than 'Crypto' 'Currency' 'Exchanges'
More pollution, too
Interest in Microsoft Waning, Company Deep in Debt and Mass Layoffs Implemented Every Month Since 2023
As fewer people still use Windows (over time many move to Android or whatever) that site, microsoft.com, will likely languish some more
Microsoft Says Scale of Layoffs in January 2025 is Several Thousands
Microsoft is the first of GAFAM to announce layoffs in 2025
Microsoft Windows Continues to Sink in India
The consistent and almost linear decrease will continue because Microsoft has nothing in store other than vapourware and mass layoffs
statCounter Has Outdated and Unfit-for-Purpose User-Agent Parsers
poor recognition or parsing or classification of User-Agent strings
Microsoft Starts 2025 Like 2024: Mass Layoffs Every Month!
It's a company in tailspin
[Meme] GAFAM Buying Shares in NYSE:EFF
To the ordinary person, today's EFF isn't a go-to protector, it's just meant to look like one
Sometimes the EFF Prefers to Talk About Sex, Not Tech (or Unnecessarily Conflate the Two Things)
The old name (or brand) remains; the goals? Not so much...
Beta'News' Still a Spamfarm Run by Bots
It's a source of Web pollution
Links 09/01/2025: Software Patents Squashed, Meta Becomes "MAGA" Booster
Links for the day
Gemini Links 09/01/2025: Chants of Sennaar and Security Theater
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, January 08, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, January 08, 2025
Gemini Links 08/01/2025: Minimalism and Efficiency With Gemini Protocol and tilde.cafe "May be Shutting Down"
Links for the day
There Used to be an Actual Community in SUSE (OpenSUSE is Dying)
Volunteers with programming skills don't want to become slaves of Microsoft resellers
[Meme] Blindly Trust Rust
First, you need to get it from a proprietary platform
Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) is a Far Bigger Problem Than Some Unintentional Bugs (Not Back Doors) in Software
What's a "memory safe programing [sic] language"? Rust has holes in itself, never mind programs made using Rust.
Amid Mass Layoffs at Microsoft (2025) Executives Flock to Google
The managers and executives typically know ahead of time what's coming
Links 08/01/2025: HMPV Concerns and UK Deaths Soared in 2024
Links for the day
IBMers Question IBM's Decision to Send Money to "Chinese Military Companies" in Spite of US Sanctions
Some people bring this up now
[Meme] Real Money and Fake (Speculative, Fictional) Money
"Looking for the next $400,000,000,000 in 'investment'"
Microsoft LinkedIn Going 'the Way of the Epstein'
LinkedIn is going downhill
Will 2025 Bring Recovery of News Sites or Just More LLM Slop? Probably the Latter.
The Web is deteriorating. Geminispace does not have LLM trash (yet).
Engagement in Microsoft GitHub Falls, Expect More Layoffs and Office Closures
Maybe it'll become an "open secret" if some rebellious whistleblower contacts us
Why Government Data on "Job Openings" is Typically a Lie (Perpetrated in Part by Corporations)
Millions (yes, millions!) of fake "openings" exist in the US alone, based on a survey done last year
[Meme] Microsoft's January 6th
Most Microsoft employees want to leave the company
Links 08/01/2025: Arrest of Yoon Suk Yeol Still Due, Prime Minister of Canada Stepped Down
Links for the day
Gemini Links 08/01/2025: Why Mastodon Sucks and Fake Code Generated by Scanning Real Code
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 07, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, January 07, 2025