Bonum Certa Men Certa

Actions Against EPO Corruption and Unitary Patent (UPC) Injustice/Lobbying

Patent terrorism



Summary: The EPO is apparently going on strike again and an action against the UPC is scheduled for later this week (protest in Brussels)

WE are generally pleased to see/read news about patents in the US because 35 U.S.C. ۤ 101 endures many challenges (another one reported on yesterday; it's in Daily Links). USPTO-granted software patents won't withstand scrutiny. Moreover, the USPTO can be sued (as habitually happens). But as long as software patents are being granted in Europe and Team Battistelli/Campinos tries to swap European courts with something that the European Patent Office (EPO) better controls there remains a real threat. Campinos recently pressured judges at the EPO to allow software patents. It's really that crude and blatant. Is the President of the EPO also the chief judge? Or a whole panel of judges? That would of course be a serious violation of the EPC at every level*.



"Is the President of the EPO also the chief judge? Or a whole panel of judges? That would of course be a serious violation of the EPC at every level."We are grateful to each and every patent examiner who participated in the recent strike ballot. We imagine that virtually all of them voted for a strike. To quote the couple of comments from RIP Kat (Märpel's anonymous blog), "Anonymous" said: "Not really correct: 54% participation and 83,2% of the participants in favour of a strike. About 3000 epo staff voted in favor of a strike. In view of the enormous efforts by Campinos to convince staff of the non- existence of the alleged gap, this shows that he clearly did not convince a big part of epo staff and shows a clear failure of his so-called transparent communication strategy."

"Anonymous Concerned examiner" said (with our emphasis added): "Märpel could also have written that only 417 voted against the strike and for Campinos project. That is little more than the top floors of the Isar building.

"As an examiner, however, I like that the figure is presented as "83". It reminds me of Article 83 EPC, the one we use when an application document is so unclear that we can't do anything with it. Maybe it is a symbol of Campinos financial studies?"

Well put, well framed. So we know that technical people at the EPO aren't happy. They want things to change. From those we've spoken to we always learn that examiners also oppose software patents. But they're under pressure to grant some, even if they know it's in violation of the EPC (like the EPO's guidelines themselves).

"The EPO continues to lie about its impact on SMEs, denying the fact that in reality they’re discriminated against and barely get/pursue patents.""What are the latest trends in self-driving vehicle innovation? This EPO study reveals the most-active companies too," the EPO tweeted yesterday.

"Way to frame software patents as "Cars" -- one of several tricks ("Hey Hi", "Blockchain", "IoT") for painting illegal patents as ground-breaking," I responded. They also tweeted their usual nonsense about "SMEs". The EPO continues to lie about its impact on SMEs, denying the fact that in reality they’re discriminated against and barely get/pursue patents.

Our FFII friends at Brussels are meanwhile preparing action on the ground. As Benjamin "NO Software Patents" Henrion put it yesterday, quoting Richard Stallman: "The volunteer activists drifted away, thinking the battle won, but the corporate lobbyists for software patents were paid to stay on the job. Now they have contrived another sneaky method: the "unitary patent" system proposed for the EU..."

"Demonstration against Unitary Software Patents" is planned, Henrion told me yesterday, setting the time and place as follows: "thu 12dec@12h00, Brussels regional parliament (PRB)" (the same time Brits are voting).

"We are calling for a demonstration against the UPC this thursday at noon," he said, "in front of the Brussels Parliament. UPC is on the agenda the day after."

This didn't happen overnight, as he first told me about it last week and yesterday he tweeted: "We are preparing a demonstration against the Unitary Patent Court (UPC) and its patent trolls, stay tuned!"

Henrion is still preparing this protest (same day as British election) and needs to interact with those who attend. There's lots at stake and having just earned television coverage in Belgium (an event he organised), one can hope the UPC protest can accomplish something similar. _____ * Incidentally, Rose Hughes (AstraZeneca UK litigation team) has just published this 'Katty' post about T 2037/18. The 'Kats' used to write a great deal about the fact that judges had come under attack and lost their independence. But not anymore. From the EPO's Boards of Appeal that totally lack independence:

T 2037/18 is an EPO Boards of Appeal case that considers how much an opponent needs to prove in the Notice of Opposition itself. The case related to a dispute between Bombardierand Siemens regarding Bombardier’s EP patent (EP2619063) for a train carriage. Siemens cited a train (the TDR Series 460) as prior art against the patent, alleging prior use by Bombardier’s customer Transregio Deutsche Regionalbahn (TDR). The case centred around whether the transfer of the train from Bombardier to TDR could be considered to have taken place under conditions of confidentiality. Crucial questions in the case were a) on which party the burden of proof should be laid and b) whether this burden was on the opponent in the Notice of Opposition. Another key question was whether the burden of proof placed on Siemens in opposition had been the equivalent of asking them to prove a negative (or more philosophically speaking, had it been like asking the opponent to prove the existence of the philosophical "celestial teapot").

The Opposition Division (OD) did not consider the information provided by Siemens on the TDR 460 train to be enough to substantiate the opposition. The OD particularly considered that the process of transfer between Bombardier and TDR should be considered as having taken place under conditions of implied confidentiality. The OD thus found that the burden of proof had been on Siemens to demonstrate the lack of such conditions of confidentiality between Bombardier and TDR in the Notice of Opposition. In the absence of any such proof the opposition was considered inadmissible.

The appeal case explored the issue of whether the burden of proof really should be viewed as resting with the opponent in such a case.


There's more in there on what was decided on "existence of confidentiality agreements"; as usual, Hughes conveniently ignores the fact that the decision may lack legitimacy due to judges lack of autonomy -- an issue they themselves have repeatedly complained about.

Recent Techrights' Posts

How the EPO Pressures Staff Into Minting More Monopolies (Patents), Even Illegal Ones That Harm Europe and Ultimately Dismantle the Rule of Law
insights into the pressure examiners are under
LLM Slop Machines Are Not a Win for "Open Source" and If They Get Cheaper, It's Even Worse
If some program that claims to be "Open Source" pollutes the Web with fake articles (Microsoft SPAM and fake "Linux" articles), whose win is it?
Richard Stallman Speech in Bengaluru, "Silicon Valley of India"
62 years have passed since his "young nerd" days and he's still at it
More Illegal Patents at the EPO, Legality of Granted European Patents No Longer Matters to the Office
breaking the law for profit
Sharing is Caring (But Advocating Copyleft Makes You a "Target")
GPLv3 does not close all the loopholes which the "Affero" helps close
"Latest Technology News" in BetaNews Still LLM Slop and SPAM Composed by LLMs (It's Basically a Spamfarm Disguised as a News Site)
Only a fool would visit BetaNews in search of actual news
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
The EPO's Corruption, If It Remains Untackled, Helps the Far Right and Enemies of European Unity/Solidarity
Do not negotiate with evil
The Web, Including Wikipedia, Gets Filled With Lies About Bill Gates, Added by Bill Gates and His PR Team
Of course Wikipedia is funded by Gates
 
Certificate Authority Let's Encrypt Falls to Only 0.4% of the Total in Geminispace
Geminispace does not need to outsource trust
The Munich-Based EPO is Still Using a Platform That Promotes the Far Right and Rehabilitates Nazism
Active Twitter account
Links 29/01/2025: Dismantling Public Health in the US, Air Busan Plane Up in Flames (South Korea's Air Disasters Streak)
Links for the day
Announcements and Administrivia
This week we're going out for two days in a row to celebrate an achievement that's very respectable
Gemini Links 29/01/2025: Japan, GTD, and More
Links for the day
Sir, Yes, Sir. The Life of EPO Patent Examiners.
If working for the EPO makes it harder to sleep at night, take action
Links 29/01/2025: Data Privacy Day and Growing Tensions in Europe
Links for the day
Nazi Twitter (aka "X") Became a Troll Site That Lets People Buy a Blue Tick While Its Boss Actively Promotes Neonazi Politicians
the intellectual level of people who infest the Web through "Twitter" or "X"
This is Why They're So Afraid of Richard Stallman (He Tells People the Correct History)
Then they post about it to Microsoft's LinkedIn
Claim: Facebook Deletes Posts of IBM Red Hat Critics
As always, follow the money (advertisers)
Links 29/01/2025: Climate Crisis and "It’s time for the Xbox to fade away" (Microsoft Lose)
Links for the day
Links 29/01/2025: Buying Groceries During a Trade War, Political 'Retro'
Links for the day
Network Improvements Tomorrow
"Network maintenance" down in London
Articles About Free Speech at Facebook
'Facebook vs Linux' story is now receiving a lot more media coverage
We Were Right About stallmansupport.org Making an Error by Joining Social Control Media. mastodon.social Suspends stallmansupport.org.
From what we can guess, accounts can be banned by some oversensitive admin or a mob of users ("bury brigades")
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 28, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, January 28, 2025
Facebook Banning Linux Sites (or People Who Link to Linux Sites) is Another Symptom of the Web's Demise
The state of media on the Web is really bad; Social Control Media amplifies the badness, as Facebook serves to show
Gemini Links 29/01/2025: Neovim Telescope and Writing Less
Links for the day
Links 28/01/2025: Chaffbot as Commodity Fad, New Import Restrictions in Thailand
Links for the day
Links 28/01/2025: "Against Social [Control] Media", "Smart" Buses' Ticketing System Cracked
Links for the day
[Video] Richard Matthew Stallman (RMS) in India, Talking About Proprietary Software's Dangers Only Yesterday
WebM file
Gemini Links 28/01/2025: Thinking About Not Much, Computing Fatigue, the Curse of JavaScript
Links for the day
"SuccessFactors" (SAP) Stunts at the EPO Used to Break Laws and Constitutions, Staff Tricked Into Harming Themselves
Ongoing corruption and lawlessness became the norm; Europe's second-largest institution (EPO) along with the largest institution (EU) has its very own Minsk
The GNU Manifesto Turns 40 in a Few Weeks
The FSF turns 40 later this year, too
Continued Support and Momentum at the Free Software Foundation (FSF)
"This helps protect our community."
Another Talk by Richard Stallman Tomorrow, This Time in Bengaluru
This means that in January 2025 he is giving at least 5 public talks
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 27, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, January 27, 2025
Links 27/01/2025: Lukashenko's Sham Elections, TikTok for Insurrection Loyalist (Larry Ellison)?
Links for the day
Gemini Links 27/01/2025: IndieWeb Musings and Devlog
Links for the day
IBM Layoffs in "Co-location Mandate" Clothing
It's possible that later this week, around the time of the so-called 'results', many layoffs would be announced
Microsoft-Funded IDG Seems to be 'Googlebombing' the Term Free Software to Promote Proprietary Spyware Too
Microsoft advocated along with other proprietary things
Videos and Photos of Richard Stallman's (RMS) Keynote Address in India Earlier Today
He probably told the target audience (India) a thing or two about the role of proprietary software in colonialism
Rhino Linux Can (and Perhaps Should) Promote Alternatives to Microsoft Instead of Preloading Microsoft
Deeper down inside Rhino Linux there's a problem
GAFAM Hates - Except in a Worryingly Parasitic Way - GNU/Linux and Its Freedoms (or Its Users)
Let the story from DistroWatch serve as a reminder that the era of Social Control Media is over
Links 27/01/2025: Social Control Media Explores Propaganda for Racism as a Business Model, China’s Tibet Dam Criticised
Links for the day
Slashdot is Once Again Publishing Lies and Revisionism for Bill Gates, Citing Microsoft's MSN to Rewrite History and Distract From the Jeffrey Epstein Crimes
Of course this also distracts
Too Big, Will Fail (How Linux Grew Way Too Fat)
Linux has very extensive hardware support, but that comes at a cost
Richard Stallman Gives Keynote Address in a Few Hours
Richard Stallman's personal site was updated to give more details
Microsoft Relegated by Manchester United
No Microsoft
IBM Layoffs in 2025: Rumours Say Even Managers Will Get the Axe, Some Via Loopholes Like PIP and/or RTO (Preparations Already Underway)
Where does IBM's money go?
FOSDEM Talks Are Vanishing
They no longer seem to be taking money from Microsoft and/or its tentacles
Gemini Links 27/01/2025: Mental Locomotion, Gemini Protocol Bots From China, and Domain-Specific Languages
Links for the day
Microsoft Still Hires Journalists to Reward Them (Belated Payment) for Microsoft Propaganda
The PR/lying pipeline
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 26, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, January 26, 2025