Gemini version available ♊︎

OSChoice Addresses Microsoft Bundling Against Choice

Posted in Site News at 11:38 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz


Summary: Call for action against unfair competition at the OEM channel

ONE impediment to GNU/Linux is the practice of Microsoft bundling inside OEMs’ territories. Users never get to even choose their software, only their hardware. This is not fair competition — an issue close to our hearts here at Techrights.

Iophk points out that “It is bundling, but there was a work-around that MS had to replace the illegal per-processor licensing.” We covered this some years ago when we showed court evidence about it. [...]”

“Anyway,” he adds, “the OSChoice idea would have to overcome that barrier, among others.”

Here is a new article about OSChouice.eu. To quote:

It is worth to note that a judge in Florence Court, Italy, ruled in favour of a user that had long been demanding the refund of the unused Windows licence from HP. Similar sentences have been pronounced in France against Asus and Acer[3], as well as elsewhere around the world. I am unsure whether those verdicts would still hold today, since Microsoft has since updated its End User License Agreement (EULA). Indeed, the EULA for Microsoft Windows 7 states that, if in disagreement with the licensing terms, one should “contact the manufacturer or installer to determine its return policy [and] comply with that policy, which might limit your rights or require you to return the entire system on which the software is installed”[1]. It should also be underlined that the real price the consumer pays for an OEM Windows license is unknown, as the bills of PC purchases do not show the cost of the different components. Such licensing terms are a disrespectful violation of consumers’ rights, and result in the de facto impossibility of buying many computer models without purchasing a Windows licence.

The retailers’ offer of laptops without Windows pre-installed is extremely limited and often restricted to the very low (old and cheap) or very high (and expensive) segments of the market. Of the 571 laptops available on the web site of the Italian store eprice.it, as of August 1st 2011, only 13 machines are shipped with non Windows operating systems – namely GNU/Linux, Free Dos or none. In other words, only 2.3% of laptops available on the retail website come without Windows pre-installed.

Some may argue that the 2.3% offer of mainstream stores is more or less in line with the 2.8% market share of operating systems other than Windows and Mac OS[*]. I reject this critique because the low level of adoption may very well be a consequence — not the cause — of not offering a choice for operating systems.

Furthermore, Microsoft recently announced that the upcoming Windows 8 will require manufacturers to support secure boot in order to participate in its certification programme[2]. This could potentially make things really hard for Linux enthusiasts that purchase a computer with Microsoft Windows and then install their favourite distribution on top of it, as the computer might be locked by the vendor to only run the operating system it was sold with.

We wrote about this subject very extensively in the past. The regulators need to take action to make it possible to trivially buy PCs without Windows. At present, there is no fair competition because people who do not want Windows are often forced to pay for it. We will revisit this subject later because the wheels are moving [1, 2].

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.


  1. Michael said,

    December 20, 2011 at 2:53 pm


    People want complete tools – not half. It would be idiotic to force OEMs to sell half a tool and make people get the other half elsewhere.

    Right now OEMs can and do sell computers with Windows, DOS, Ubuntu, other flavors of desktop Linux, and – with Apple – OS X. Nothing is stopping OEMs from selling any of those (assuming they are licensed to do so… and Apple does not allow others to be licensed). With desktop Linux, though, the license is easy… so anyone can easily do so.

    This whining that OEMs do not cater to the desires of a tiny minority is just silly. If I want a purple computer with orange polka dots it is not Dell’s responsibility to make one for me – it would be an uncommon desire and I would need to do some work to get mine to look that way. If lots of people wanted one like that, though, you better believe Dell and HP and the like would jump in to serve the need. But it is not their job to try to get people to like these uncommon desires… it would be my job to convince people such a computer was “cool” or offered some advantage.

    Right now desktop Linux simply does not compete well with the competition. Office software is inferior, graphics editing software is inferior, screencasting software is inferior, and this is all on a system with inferior integration and a lower focus on usability, productivity, efficiency, and error reduction. It makes *less* sense to push such a machine as it does the purple and orange one I describe above – but people who want such oddly colored machines do not run around whining about how Dell and HP must be doing them wrong. They buy paint.

  2. mcinsand said,

    December 21, 2011 at 10:02 am


    Bundling?!?! I don’t think so! At the start of this, at the heart of this, you have to ask yourself one key question; are the OS and hardware available as separate UPC’s? This gets to why the industry will argue for preinstalls as well as why this is tying, *NOT* bundling. When a supplier bundles, the customer is offered a selection of available products to be packaged for a total price at a discount. If Windows and, say, the average Dell laptop were actually bundled, then you would see one price for the hardware, one for the software, and then a percentage discount on buying them together. What if the only way to buy, for example, a Ford was to pay a surcharge on top of the price of the car, with this added cost being a prepay for Ford consumables? In the current situation, the products are tied and, if tying a browser to OS is illegal, then tying OS to hardware is certainly illegal. DG versus Digidyne went a long way to reinforce that hardware and software are separate markets. We need to re-establish those lines.

    What makes matters worse is the current idiocy of putting the OS backup on a separate hard drive partition. In my experience, the hard drive is the most likely to fail and, when a user has not taken the time to make a recovery CD (happens more often than not), then it’s time to war with the supplier. This then gives suppliers the chance ot try to strong-arm customers into maintenance contracts. A Dell tech once insisted that he could not sell me a recovery CD until I agreed to pay $250 for a year’s maintenance contract.

    Preinstall tying and the patent thuggery are still MS’ only remaining tools to maintain market share (have you laughed at the ‘IP’ that they threatened B&N with, yet?). In fact, if we sold only clean PC’s, either MS would have to learn how to clean up their installs or their market share would collapse much faster. I do installs, upgrades, and general look-sees for a number of friends. A Windows install or upgrade generally is a 4-8 hour job, and getting the drivers straightened out is usually most of it. Gimme an hour and an Ubuntu, Fedora, PCBSD, or Slackware CD, and I can usually have the user up, Youtubing, Facebooking, e-mailing, and my way home.


    Michael Reply:

    The OS and the hardware are sold together because one needs the other. Still, you can get Windows, DOS, or any number of Linux distros… or, from Apple, OS X.

    I am for choice. I am completely against your anti-choice movement which would force anyone to sell products based on *your* desires and not what they think is best for their customers and for themselves.

    It would be like my trying to push a law where every OEM has to sell a purple computer with orange polka dots… just because I want one and I am not willing to do the work to get it done myself. It would be absurd to use force to make this happen. But that is what people who want to *force* OEMs to offer products they do not wish to offer are doing. Exact same thing. Well, maybe one difference: the purple and orange computer, as ugly as it might be, would still be just as fit for service – a computer with desktop Linux is, in general, *not* as fit for service. So what you want is even more absurd than my example.

    Here is the better tact to take: work to make desktop Linux desirable. Even once you get there, of course, markets do not generally change on a dime and it will take time for the value to spread – but *nothing* could hold that back.

    Can you think of any example of a free and easily accessible product *not* doing well in the market (not gaining lots of users). It does not happen. If and when the OSS desktop becomes a good competitor, nothing will be able to hold it back: not Microsoft nor Apple – for they charge for their products. If all else was equal, they would lose customers to OSS desktops at a fast pace.

    The OSS community needs to stop whining about how others are beating them in the market, stop trying to push laws to favor their own preferences, stop trying to force people to move to what does not serve them as well… and make a truly competitive environment.

    J.H. Reply:


    What kind of a troll are you?

    I don’t think most FOSS advocates really care if OEM’s offer Linux, but how about OEM’s offering hardware sans OS so they don’t have to pay for something they don’t want?

    And desktop Linux not fit for service? My Linux desktops work perfectly fine, thank you.

    Want to talk about something not fit for service? Take a look at any version of Windows Server.

    Michael Reply:


    You start your post with name calling – which reduces the value of your comment.

    As far as selling hardware without an OS, can you show that this would reduce the price? Include the additional SKUs for the company selling it along with the junk-ware that OEMs are paid to add to the machines (not including Apple).

    As far as desktop Linux not being fit for service, I am talking in a general sense, not your specific case. It is really not worth debating the idea that desktop Linux is behind in many, many areas, including: word processing, screen casting, email, image editing, online screen reading, presentation software, and on and on and on. And this does not include system-wide things such as a media browser, proxy icons, PDF services, automator, finding a path from almost any window, system services, consistent hot keys and menu placements and terms for things such as preferences, etc.

    To be clear: I am not saying word processing or emailing or image editing or the other things I list cannot be done on desktop Linux – of course they can. But I do not think anyone who knows desktop Linux and the competition well can say, with a straight face, that desktop Linux does these things *as well*. And this is a huge problem for those of us who are fans of desktop Linux (based on the licensing model and philosophy). To deny it, however, does not make it go away. All too often people in the open source world deny these things – as if lying about them or burying your head in the sand is going to make things better.

    If there was a demand for OS-less hardware, by the way, it would exist. There is just too much competition in the market for that not to happen.

DecorWhat Else is New

  1. Links 27/05/2022: Many More Microsoft Security Failures (and Spin/Lies)

    Links for the day

  2. Links 26/05/2022: KStars 3.5.9 and Chrome 103 Beta

    Links for the day

  3. Links 26/05/2022: AlmaLinux OS 9.0, MooseX::Extended for Perl Introduced

    Links for the day

  4. Links 26/05/2022: Kernel Events and Systemd-Free GNU/Linux Distributions

    Links for the day

  5. Links 26/05/2022: DuckDuckGo Increasingly Exposed as Microsoft Proxy

    Links for the day

  6. EPO Celebrates Software Patents Again, Dubbing Them 'Hey Hi' (AI) and '4IR'

    The ludicrous state of the EPO is demonstrated by yesterday’s puff piece about “four million” (merely requests for monopoly in Europe; most come from outside Europe) and L’Oréal, which claims to have “invented” something that was already done in the 1990s if not the 1980s

  7. [Meme] EPO's Monkey Business: Lowering the Patent Examination Bar

    As we shall show in a moment, EPO President António Campinos has lowered the quality of patents and applications; sooner or later he might outsource the job to ‘livestock’

  8. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 25, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, May 25, 2022

  9. Heads of Patent Offices Are Immune to Coronavirus

    The overconfident chiefs of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and EPO might love speaking about COVID-19 (in relation to patents), but they do not take it seriously themselves

  10. Links 26/05/2022: Plex Finally on GNU/Linux

    Links for the day

  11. The General Consultative Committee of the EPO Exposes a Disaster and a Lack of Genuine Dialogue

    The General Consultative Committee (GCC) at the EPO deals with unlawful proposals from António Campinos (he’s happy to violate laws, constitutions, protocols, conventions, just like Benoît Battistelli did) and once again the abuses by managers is covered up; it’s as if the Office is run by unaccountable gangsters who arrogantly curse at everyone whilst insisting they’re the nicest people ever

  12. The Latest Letter to Josef Kratochvìl and the Heads of Delegation of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation

    A week-old letter from the Central Staff Committee (CSC) to the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation highlights the nature of a crisis; there's no genuine dialogue and staff of the EPO (i.e. the scientists who do all the actual work) is constantly under attack

  13. [Meme] The Recordings Must Have Accidentally Been Lost While Breaking the Rules

    The EPO‘s “nicest” chief, Monopoly Tony, won’t even mention the recordings…

  14. Links 25/05/2022: ‘V Rising’ on GNU/Linux and Pearl Linux OS 11

    Links for the day

  15. Links 25/05/2022: Librem Tries Another Approach

    Links for the day

  16. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 24, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, May 24, 2022

  17. Links 24/05/2022: nginx-1.22.0 and WordPress 6.0

    Links for the day

  18. [Meme] Divine Protection

    You won’t find Monopoly Tony (António Campinos) wearing a mask at the EPO because the rules of the Office do not apply to him

  19. António Campinos and the Alicante Clique (EPO Management, Appointed Based on Nepotism Despite Lack of Qualifications) Nowadays Exploiting Kids for PR Charades

    The sick old habit of exploiting kids for Public Relations (PR) and marketing purposes is all too common at the EPO (they’re constantly exploiting “the children” to associate criticism of the EPO with demeaning the young and innocent), but the management — which enjoys nepotism and immunity rather than relevant skills — carries on today and it’s being called “inaugural”

  20. [Meme] Snake on a Plane

    The EPO‘s President ‘Monopoly Tony’ (António Campinos), whom you never see wearing a mask (none of the photo ops; he does not even socially distance himself from peers, he wears sneakers instead of masks) during the height of a pandemic, is the "f***ing president"; don’t tell him to wear one…

  21. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part XX — Entering Phase II

    We're about to resume the long-running series about the sick clique which ran GitHub until the assault on women became too much of a liability (among other wrongdoings and PR blunders)

  22. Links 24/05/2022: Fedora 37 Test Days and Tor Browser 11.0.13

    Links for the day

  23. Microsoft Vidal, as USPTO Director, Already Plays 'Political Cards' to Disguise and Deflect Away From the Corporate Agenda

    Microsoft Vidal, another corporate pawn in charge of the world’s most dangerous patent system, is using soft-spoken defle

  24. Links 24/05/2022: WAL-G 2.0

    Links for the day

  25. IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 23, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, May 23, 2022

  26. Unethical Advertising, Published as So-called 'Articles', in CNX Software

    As we noted earlier this year, the CNX team is looking for money in the wrong places

  27. Links 23/05/2022: Broadcom to Buy VMware?

    Links for the day

  28. LibreOffice Conference 2022, As Before, Puts the Keynotes on Sale (the Rich Buy Influence, the Price Doubles)

    Discrimination against the community; talks and mentions are based on money, not merit ($2000 has become $4000 in just one year)

  29. Links 23/05/2022: Kdenlive 22.04.1 and New Alpine Linux Released

    Links for the day

  30. António Campinos Promotes Software Patents Using Buzzwords and Sketchy Loopholes With Dubious Legal Basis

    ‘Monopoly Tony’ (António Campinos) is shamelessly manipulating EPO processes at both ends (sender and receiver) to facilitate the illegal granting of invalid European software patents; we’re meant to think this former EU official and imposter (banker) is some guru in the sciences because he reads a lousy speech crafted for him with lots of meaningless buzzwords peppered all over it (he’s not good at reading it, either)

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts