Bonum Certa Men Certa

The Notorious 1-Click Buying Patent Expired Rather Than Invalidated

Receipt



Summary: As proof of the fact that many bogus patents (typically on software) are worthless but not invalidated, we now have Amazon's patents reaching their end of life

THE terrible quality of patents is often being demonstrated using awful, controversial, and infamous patents like the patent on the progress bar or the 1-click buying patent of Amazon. We wrote many articles about that in the distant past.



Red Hat's Jan Wildeboer‏ took note of the latter, telling me yesterday that: "On 12th of September the infamous #Amazon one-click-to-buy #patent expires. Party time!"

Benjamin Henrion joked: "on my birthday the 11th I file an Alice invalidity lawsuit?"

"PTAB, which is under attack from the patent microcosm, could probably invalidate hundreds of thousands of patents if it actually had time to look at all of them."How could this patent remain valid for this long? Media scrutiny has been immense, but the media isn't a trial (or trial by media). Probably because Amazon never asserted it in a court of law. But still, why was such a joke of a patent ever granted in the first place? And what does that tell us about the quality bar? The EFF has a series called "Stupid Patent of the Month", but certainly they could run a series called "Stupid Patent of the Hour" or "Stupid Patent of the Day". The above discussion has become a discussion about Red Hat's patent policy, but the point remains that many patents reach their expiry date without ever being challenged. Does that mean that they were not bogus? Not at all. Many expired patents were bogus all along. Nobody (like a court or PTAB) tested these, so they rested in peace.

Earlier today we noticed that this patent's expiry is mentioned in the media, under the headline ="Amazon.com, Inc. Is About To Lose The Worst Patent Ever" (actually, there are many equally laughable patents).

The USPTO should be embarrassed about granting this. As the article explains:

Amazon.com, Inc.(NASDAQ:AMZN) has shown time and time again that serious reform is needed in how the states regulate commerce. From its avoidance of sales taxes-something it finally gave up fully earlier this year-to its wily navigation of anti-trust law, the firm’s exploits are as insightful as they are attention grabbing. One of the worst ways the firm ever took advantage of the system, though, is soon going to be taken away.

Quartz’s Keith Collins reported on Saturday morning that the Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) patent on 1 Click buying is going to expire on September 11th. The firm applied for the patent in 1997 and it was granted in 1999. It doesn’t protect specific lines of code, or even a specific step by step approach to buying online. Instead it protects the general concept of buying something with just one click using pre-loaded payment and delivery details.


PTAB, which is under attack from the patent microcosm, could probably invalidate hundreds of thousands of patents if it actually had time to look at all of them. The bottom line is, patent certainty is very low these days. This is why litigation numbers nosedived.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Giving back to the community
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
SoylentNews Grows Up, Registers as a Business, Site Traffic Reportedly Grows
More people realise that social control media may in fact be a passing fad
Links 28/03/2024: Sega, Nintendo, and Bell Layoffs
Links for the day
Open letter to the ACM regarding Codes of Conduct impersonating the Code of Ethics
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
With 9 Mentions of Azure In Its Latest Blog Post, Canonical is Again Promoting Microsoft and Intel Vendor Lock-in, Surveillance, Back Doors, Considerable Power Waste, and Defects That Cannot be Fixed
Microsoft did not even have to buy Canonical (for Canonical to act like it happened)
Links 28/03/2024: GAFAM Replacing Full-Time Workers With Interns Now
Links for the day
Consent & Debian's illegitimate constitution
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
The Time Our Server Host Died in a Car Accident
If Debian has internal problems, then they need to be illuminated and then tackled, at the very least in order to ensure we do not end up with "Deadian"
China's New 'IT' Rules Are a Massive Headache for Microsoft
On the issue of China we're neutral except when it comes to human rights issues
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, March 27, 2024
IRC logs for Wednesday, March 27, 2024
WeMakeFedora.org: harassment decision, victory for volunteers and Fedora Foundations
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 27/03/2024: Terrorism Grows in Africa, Unemployment in Finland Rose Sharply in a Year, Chinese Aggression Escalates
Links for the day
Links 27/03/2024: Ericsson and Tencent Layoffs
Links for the day
Amid Online Reports of XBox Sales Collapsing, Mass Layoffs in More Teams, and Windows Making Things Worse (Admission of Losses, Rumours About XBox Canceled as a Hardware Unit)...
Windows has loads of issues, also as a gaming platform
Links 27/03/2024: BBC Resorts to CG Cruft, Akamai Blocking Blunders in Piracy Shield
Links for the day
Android Approaches 90% of the Operating Systems Market in Chad (Windows Down From 99.5% 15 Years Ago to Just 2.5% Right Now)
Windows is down to about 2% on the Web-connected client side as measured by statCounter
Sainsbury's: Let Them Eat Yoghurts (and Microsoft Downtimes When They Need Proper Food)
a social control media 'scandal' this week
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, March 26, 2024
IRC logs for Tuesday, March 26, 2024
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
Windows/Client at Microsoft Falling Sharply (Well Over 10% Decline Every Quarter), So For His Next Trick the Ponzi in Chief Merges Units, Spices Everything Up With "AI"
Hiding the steep decline of Windows/Client at Microsoft?
Free technology in housing and construction
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
We Need Open Standards With Free Software Implementations, Not "Interoperability" Alone
Sadly we're confronting misguided managers and a bunch of clowns trying to herd us all - sometimes without consent - into "clown computing"
Microsoft's Collapse in the Web Server Space Continued This Month
Microsoft is the "2%", just like Windows in some countries