03.12.21

EPO and Microsoft Collude to Break the Law — Part I (Start of Series): Enter the “Cloud of Unknowing…”

Posted in Deception, Europe, Microsoft at 5:38 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Previous parts:

Clown of the unknowing
According to Thomas Petri, Bavarian Data Protection Commissioner “nobody is really in charge” when it comes to data protection matters at the EPO

Summary: The first part of an important series; historically, EPO has always sent out aggressive lawyers to issue threats when we exposed EPO-Microsoft collusion

THIS Part I isn’t the same as the introduction to Part I. This is the body of the long story, which will be told responsibly and prudently for the coming fortnight, several times per day. Without further ado, and in spite of suppression attempts, we start this series.


Back in June 2015, it was reported that the Bavarian Data Protection Commissioner, Dr Thomas Petri, and the Federal German Data Protection Commissioner, Andrea Vosshoff, had raised serious concerns about the state of data protection at the EPO.

According to the German press, Dr Petri had previously investigated the data protection framework at the EPO in the spring of 2014 following a complaint and he had come to the conclusion that it was seriously deficient.

Referring to the lack of any genuine independent oversight in data protection matters, Dr Petri stated: “It emerged that nobody was really in charge”.

“An optimist might like to believe that things have surely improved since then. Unfortunately there is no evidence of this.”He called for an external data protection supervisor to be assigned to the EPO because the internal inspectors were not independent enough and “in the absence of any action matters are likely to get out of hand”.

An optimist might like to believe that things have surely improved since then. Unfortunately there is no evidence of this.

In the meantime the EPO seems to have just muddled along relying on its traditional “three monkeys” approach to “rebutting” external criticism of its data protection framework.

3 monkeys
The EPO’s approach to “rebutting” criticism of its data protection framework: See no evil – hear no evil – speak no evil

For example, when the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into effect in May 2018 during the final days of the Benoît Battistelli régime, the EPO’s response was to issue a self-serving communiqué (warning: epo.org link) proclaiming its commitment to “ensuring the highest level of data protection” and announcing that “a recent audit report has confirmed a close alignment with the GDPR legal framework”.

“The reader is expected to take the EPO’s claim at face value despite the fact that it is scarcely credible that an independent external audit could have arrived at such a conclusion.”Of course no substantive information about the “recent audit report” was provided.

The reader is expected to take the EPO’s claim at face value despite the fact that it is scarcely credible that an independent external audit could have arrived at such a conclusion.

If Dr Petri was of the considered opinion that the EPO’s data protection framework was deficient when measured against pre-GDPR data protection standards, then it’s difficult to see how the same framework which hadn’t changed in the meantime could be considered meet the even more stringent data protection standards imposed by GDPR.

As a matter of fact, a report commissioned by the EPO staff union SUEPO from external legal experts in 2016 confirmed that the EPO’s data protection framework was not compliant with EU data protection standards and was in urgent need of a radical overhaul.

But it’s necessary to understand that we are dealing here with the logic of the “système Battistelli”.

“Perish the thought that someone could be so impudent as to call for an independent audit…”If Battistelli insists that the EPO’s data protection framework is GDPR-compliant, well then it has to be. Anybody who dares to question that claim had better watch out! Perish the thought that someone could be so impudent as to call for an independent audit…

And it would be a grave mistake to think that things have improved on this front following Battistelli’s departure.

More recently in September 2020, the EPO published a notice on the topic of “Data privacy policy for the processing of personal data in Microsoft 365″.

Once again the reader is assured:

“The protection of your privacy is of the utmost importance to the European Patent Office (EPO). We are committed to respecting and protecting your personal data and ensuring your rights as a data subject. All data of a personal nature (i.e. data that can identify you directly or indirectly) will be processed fairly, lawfully and with due care.”

For good measure the well-rehearsed schtick about GDPR-compliance is trotted out:

“We strive to keep our data protection framework in line with current best practices. A recent audit report has confirmed that it is in close alignment with the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).”

But where is this mysterious “recent audit report”?

Is it the same one that Battistelli referred to over two years previously back in May 2018?

“But where is this mysterious “recent audit report”?”Of course you’re not supposed to ask and if you have the temerity to do so, then you’d better not hold your breath waiting for an answer.

But when you peel away the PR façade, what the public notice of September 2020 does provide in terms of factual evidence is an irrefutable indication of the increasing reliance of the EPO on cloud computing services hosted by Microsoft.

In the next part we will see how this was confirmed by a recent internal communiqué from EPO Vice-President Steve Rowan (warning: epo.org link), formerly Director of Patents, Trade Marks, Designs and Tribunals at the UKIPO.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2021/03/12/epoleaks-report-march-2021-start/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 17, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, May 17, 2021



  2. 6,700 Signatures in Support of Richard Stallman's Return to the FSF's Board

    6,700 signatures will be secured any day now (maybe later today); we thought the graph is worth replotting again, even if only to remind people how badly the defamatory hate letter has backfired



  3. [Meme] The Real Gates Scandal is About Connections to Sex Trafficking (Epstein), Not Infidelity

    Some media is still trying to shift attention (some of the very same media that misdirected focus to Richard Stallman when a Gates-Epstein scandal unfolded at MIT), but people aren't gullible enough



  4. Links 17/5/2021: New GeckoLinux and Kdenlive 21.04.1

    Links for the day



  5. Richard Stallman Refers to Intel's Management Engine (ME) -- or a Back Door -- as 'Master', and the Processor Intel Lets Us Use as 'Slave'

    “The president and founder of the Free Software Foundation will speak about pressing issues in free software today, and will present the winners of the 2018 Free Software Awards,” says the summary (this was 3 years ago, i.e. before the purge of language, with a prominent role played by Intel)



  6. Links 17/5/2021: NetBSD 9.2 and Early Look at Bodhi Linux 6.0.0

    Links for the day



  7. Calle Josefsson as Living Proof That Attacking the Causes You Once Proclaimed to Stand for is Very Profitable

    Some thoughts on the situation of the Boards of Appeal in Haar; they're led by someone who receives a huge salary (a four- or five-fold increase) in exchange for an epic sellout and abandonment of principles; as a de facto legal slinger or imposter/poser he has already done incredible damage on several levels



  8. The EPO's War on Justice and Assault on the Law -- Part 10: A Faustian Pact?

    Benoît Battistelli‘s rubber-stamping judge from Sweden saw his salary growing four- or five-fold and he has meanwhile lowered his public profile, fearing that people will see what he sold his soul for



  9. EPO Staff Representatives Not Amused to See an Office That Steals From Staff and Even From Pensioners

    The heist continues; the EPO isn't just a milking cow of Germany but also of EPO officials who keep the 'lid' or the 'cover' on this whole financial instrument, which would enrage member states if they truly understood what's going on



  10. [Meme] Virtual Prisons for Virtual Hearings (Haarings)

    Today’s EPO has a truly twisted notion of the “rule of law”



  11. President of the Boards of Appeal, the Star of the Haar Show

    It’s best in the metal version; burn in Hell, Lesley Gore



  12. Right To Repair: When You Don't Own What You Buy (and Cannot Even Repair It Legally)

    The second part of preliminary background regarding the Right To Repair; our associate who extracted the videos from YouTube says that both are relevant to “Freedom 0″ (as per the FSF’s definition of Free software)



  13. Right To Repair: What It's About and How That Relates to Software

    A short (less than one minute) video that offers some background or sheds light on the intersection between Software Freedom and the Right To Repair



  14. Brand as Distraction From the Core Issues Surrounding the Right To Repair

    Excerpt of a video from Odysee, in which an important point is explained regarding a very actual and relevant case, more so given a recent ruling that indirectly impacts software freedom, mostly in (but not limited to) the United States



  15. Virtual 'Courts' Aren't Courts and Aren't Suitable Substitutes, Either

    The cheapening of the concept of justice, even as the pandemic that serves to justify that cheapening is gradually being brought under control, is the real issue that should be debated in Haar (or from private homes, probably somewhere around Haar); whether it's compulsory or not ought to be a side question



  16. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 16, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, May 16, 2021



  17. Links 17/5/2021: Linux 5.13 RC2 and a Lot About Patents

    Links for the day



  18. (All-Time) Archive of Techrights Videos Contains About 1,000 Videos, All Listed in One Place Now

    We're improving access to old material in the site and right now the focus is ways to improve discovery of old video/multimedia files



  19. Haar Song

    The Office in Munich is overseen by “a municipality near Munich,” according to Wikipedia (not inside Munich, so that in itself is a violation of the EPC)



  20. The EPO's War on Justice and Assault on the Law -- Part 9: Squeezing Out the Lifeblood of Democracy?

    The lack of public discourse at the EPO (where tyrants like Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos make up the rules and then have them rubber-stamped by kangaroo courts) helps explain an atrocious policy and moral abyss, which recently led to acceptance of European software patents and mass surveillance disguised as “access to justice”



  21. Luke Smith on Why Free Software Matters and 'Open Source' is Meaningless

    A video just released by a popular YouTube channel



  22. Links 16/5/2021: ExTiX 21.5, Drumstick Multiplatform MIDI File Player Refresh

    Links for the day



  23. EPO.org is a Really Awful Source of Information

    The site that bears a .org suffix is actually more like a private corporation lying about itself in order to save face and attract more money -- or in other words funds that will be squandered and stolen by corrupt administrators



  24. IBM Has Changed a Lot Since 2018, and Not for the Better

    IBM isn't that much of an ally of GNU/Linux as a community-led or community-centric operating system; IBM is in it all just for IBM and we need to treat IBM accordingly



  25. [Meme] Criticising IBM is Racist and Intolerant

    Systemd is becoming untouchable and its critics are framed as "toxic" or "trolls", no matter the facts and irrespective of the technical substance of their complaints



  26. Combatting Revisionist History (Post From 2015, Years Before IBM Bought Red Hat and Increased Vendor Lock-in)

    Today we republish this forum post from more than 6 years ago; in light of what IBM did to CentOS and its vicious attack on the founder of the GNU/Linux operating system we must understand the systemd agenda, which the FSF can more openly speak about now that there are no financial strings



  27. Kyle Wiens, CEO of iFixit: Right to Repair

    Uploaded earlier this month was this talk and accompanying slides; summary below



  28. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 15, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, May 15, 2021



  29. [Meme] When All That Matters is 'Production' and 'Timeliness'

    The EPO has gone down the same route as the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) when it comes to patent quality; as if the goal is to grant 11 million patents (most of them in just a few decades) rather than assess the impact of such patents



  30. The EPO's War on Justice and Assault on the Law -- Part 8: The Radical Student “Brotherhood”

    The latest part in this series explores the roots of Judge Josefsson; that can help explain how Benoît Battistelli constructed his stacked EPO ‘court’, which he and António Campinos basically control to rubber-stamp whatever illegal practices they engage in (in pursuit of money and power, at the expense of the law)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts