Microsoft Should Have Been Fined and Sanctioned Over UEFI 'Lockout' (Locking GNU/Linux Out of New PCs)
Why did that not happen? Does the law apply to people who aren't Microsoft employees and those people only?
On UEFI 'secure' boot less than a day ago: "I've often wondered about this. I think that the FTC should be pursuing the issue."
Why does the FSF not speak about this anymore? A lack of funding? A fear of the cancel mob?
Would the issue be tackled at all if more people donated to the FSF?
Recent: Speaking of Enshittification and Freedom, We've Still Not Begun Tackling the UEFI 'Secure' Boot Mess (Preventing GNU/Linux From Even Booting!) | GNU Project Updates on Proprietary Surveillance, Malware in Cars, DRM in Trains, UEFI Insecure Boot and More | The FSF Ought to Protest Against UEFI 'Secure Boot' (Like It Used To)