Bonum Certa Men Certa

Technology: rights or responsibilities? - Part XI

posted by Rianne Schestowitz on Dec 22, 2024,
updated Dec 22, 2024

By Dr. Andy Farnell

Back to Part I

Back to Part II

Back to Part III

Back to Part IV

Back to Part V

Back to Part VI

Back to Part VII

Back to Part VIII

Back to Part IX

Back to Part X

The veil of ignorance

I want to move on to talk about the relation between knowledge and respect. Responsibility requires respect. But where does that come from?

knowledge and respect

I think that technology in the 20th century felt good because our optimism was based on an understanding of it and its potential - both good and evil. We hoped to harness that potential and exercise more control over life. Somewhere we stopped understanding it and began to accept its apparent effects as outside our control - not just as everyday folk, but as scientists and engineers too.

A. N. Whitehead thought that civilisation advances by abstraction, giving us the ability to deal in larger ideas without the baggage of small details. It turns out that those small details are really important. Here I want to invoke one of our duties to technology, the duty to understand it. I do not take A.C. Clarke's note that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" as a positive observation. I think he gave us a warning. Magic is that which fools children into a dissociated sense of amusement and suspension of rational disbelief. Distraction and deception are assaults on our minds.

magic

The "veil of ignorance" or "original position from nowhere" is a thought experiment that asks us to imagine we are totally oblivious to the world and its ways, and of ourselves. We are supposed to imagine choices made on purely moral values not knowing whether we would be advantaged or disadvantaged by any information, social status, money, power, or position. We place our bets, and then as in a television game show, the veil is lifted revealing the hand life has actually dealt us based only on our moral choices.

Digital technology has now created such a veil. Rather than revealing the truth to us it's slowly made invisible all sorts of things like our real class status, our actual wealth, and has hidden away enabling knowledge about the world that our great-grandparents took for granted.

We've been led to believe a complete falsehood - that "technology is neutral". It's a slogan still repeated today by prominent leaders and intellectuals who ought to know better. It is a comforting idea that enables us to believe we are making "neutral moral judgements" as "disinterested amoral business people" and "passive consumers in a digital society". The veil has become an excuse not to look too hard.

Of course that was never the intention of philosophers like Locke, Hobbes, or Rawls, for whom the experiment was a tool for the actually intelligent and informed thinker to "check their privilege".

When the veil is lifted what will we see? When the intoxication of TikTok, Facebook and "convenience" wears off I think many will be shocked to realise where digital technology has placed them in the actual hierarchy and objective fortunes of life. Waking from the dream is going to hurt.

veil

A few decades ago any sixteen year-old left school with a good general knowledge of science. Physics, biology, chemistry, mechanics, were all on the syllabus because these were the skills we thought young people needed for modern life. At my "co-ed comprehensive" the girls studied metalwork and car mechanics while the boys took home economics (cookery and sewing), because "every citizen needs to have modern survival skills".

survival skills

Take household products as an example. Once you had to know what chemicals were in your kitchen, at least for basic safety. Knowing which ones not to mix and which ones you could mix - such as making a perfect window cleaner from a weak solution of methanol and vinegar. There were such things as chemist shops. For medicinal, domestic, hobbies and craft uses, you could buy unbranded household chemicals over the counter, disinfectants like iodine or potassium permanganate, solvents like acetone, useful acids and alkalies like sodium hydroxide, nitrates as plant food and so on.

These stores were systematically destroyed. One popular explanation is that civil access to the chemical basics of life created danger, so health and safety and counter-terrorism concerns were to blame. That's only slightly true. In reality, business was the dominant force.

As control consolidated into the few domestic product and big-pharma monopolists like Unilever, Kraft, Procter and Gamble etc, a "produstisation" took place. Now, unless you go to a specialist "organic" store you cannot buy "soap", knowing that it is simply hydrolysed fat. You can buy "a luxury experience" or a "nourishing skincare bar".

Simultaneously we stopped teaching basic home skills at schools. Science was dumbed down. Classroom experiments with even the slightest risk were replaced with computer simulations and watching dull videos. Gone is the sheer visceral excitement and lifelong learning impression as the whole class stood nervously 10 meters back while the chemistry teacher threw a lump of potassium into a bucket of water - demonstrating that the Earth and the whole Universe is alive!! And moreover, demonstrating that the reality we live in deserves respect. For disconnected young people now "a reaction" is something you get from posting on social media.

Universe is alive

Consider the parallels to digital technology. Labelling laws changed, regressing us back to the Victorian era of hucksters selling coloured water. Whereas "chemicals" (raw reagents) were subject to very strict labelling laws, supermarket products escape the same clear information requirements. Information spoils the aesthetic of beauty packaging and "scares people". Likewise, proprietary software is opaque and magical. Corporations get to "protect" their "secret formulas". Now you just buy mystery chemicals. However, opaque modern products are just as dangerous or more dangerous than raw "chemicals". Only now we don't know what they are and we do not respect them. We've outsourced that 'respect' to absentee "experts". Once you could have used a "search engine" (something people before 2020 used to look up "facts"). But companies stopped publishing things like service manuals, data sheets, full bills of materials - so despite COSHH and other safety regulations discovery can require hours of active research. Or you can use an "AI" which will tell you "Sodium Hydroxide goes great on pizza!"

Whereas we once wrote our own programs and studied "IT" to understand technology, today we teach kids only how to use it. To quote Emma Goldman, "The greatest violence in society today is ignorance". Yet most of technology today positively encourages ignorance. Its market share depends on ignorance. It sets out to make you ignorant so that you will need and depend on it.

ignorance

We no longer know the difference between what is hidden from us to make things easier and what is deceptively hidden from us to benefit vendors or other invisible agents. As technical designer Mark Hurst put it, "UX now stands for user exploitation". This is a massive epistemological crisis equal and adjacent to the problems of "AI" and disinformation, but nobody dares to talk about it.

As large language models (LLM) replace search and authorship this problem will grow significantly. "Authority" shares the same etymological root as "Author". The replacement of human writing by generative systems erodes authority. A post "AI" world is therefore a world without authority. It is where scepticism and critical thinking is meaningless because one cannot examine the provenance of information. Everything becomes speculation and "mere opinion", and is thus easy to counter with "alternative information" but spoken in a louder voice by an "expert" with more power. This is the root of the populist crisis undermining science. For commercial and political gain we've destroyed the epistemological framework by which real expertise and facts can be respected.

Without attribution we live a world of hearsay. It is postmodern relativism raised to a large power. Any society foolish enough to "embrace AI" will have to contend with the demise of truth in favour of "truth brands". Is that Apple truth? Microsoft truth? Or Google truth? And you can bet your fancy pants those will be "incompatible truths".

truth brands

We've created a society that values ignorance as a way to keep us "safe" from the burden of thinking. But ignorance is also a foundation of disrespect. Racists, sexists and animal abusers grow-up without positive life experiences of other cultures, the opposite sex or other creatures. The veil of ignorance has an effect I do not think Rawls anticipated, that it paradoxically breeds immorality. Those who have no moral impetus, and are starved of any moral education, feel only fear and contempt toward the unknown. Ignorance is not "liberating" or "bliss", it's terrifying! What we are taught, or what society fails to teach us can be a kind of trauma or bad socialisation.

So it is with technology. We do not respect it. We do not respect its consequences beyond what is temporarily "convenient" for us. "Magic" is an unreliable lover. I'm starting to see that so many people who claim to "love tech" are faking it.

Being "left behind" is a threat. Creepy is the new cool. Cringing. Awkward. When you hear those simpering, adoring comments about "technology I couldn't do without" listen for the note of resentment. Like a beaten spouse plastering on the grimmace of Stockholm syndrome. And, to a frightening degree, one or two generations have already been so traumatised by tech they have a now incurable ambivalent relation to it and the world it mediates for them. What surprises me is how many young kids welcome the smartphone ban. As if they're breathing a sigh of relief! Only the damaged adults robbed of their childhood are vicariously angry.

From birth we are given an endless stream of cheap plastic toys that blink, beep, chatter and then die and are thrown out. As kids we do not respect the genius behind their designs, the labour (often by other children) that went to make them, their cost to the planet in materials, energy and water, and the grave legacy of micro-plastics and heavy metal pollution they leave. Then, as adults we realise that technology bites. It fails and lets us down, betrays our privacy, and to the extent it has a "mind of its own" it is an interloper in our lives. This compounds the already established sense of ambivalence and latent hostility we have towards technology. Add to that "AI", where it produces disinformation, marketing spam, slop and lies.

What we do not see is that technology itself is none of these things. It is the directing minds behind our technology who are the source of its faults and shape our negative attitudes toward it. If we do not control our devices then our devices are simply a representation of someone else's values. If the Internet is no longer a peer-to-peer nexus of people it is just another broadcast system for those in power. If those people are malign, treacherous, greedy, cheap, negligent toward the planet, and contemptuous of other "dumb fucks", then that's what our technology becomes.

We wanted convenience uber alles, so we settled for ignorance. Into the vacuum rushed a hoard of more agile, cheaper unprincipled opportunists, snake-oil sellers, solutionists, fakes and impostors hell-bent on a descent into directionless excess. Technology now means nothing to it's creators except as a way to make money. This is no country for old men like Steve Jobs riding "bicycles for the mind". You think Apple love computers? Think again. Apple loves customers. Customers identify with their computers because Apple's shtick is to play with your emotions and attachment patterns.

bicycles for the mind

Government regulation of tech monopoly is too little and came too late. Besides, it mostly makes things worse, It either replaces moral action and consideration with compliance checklists and shallow performance, or it is a net too coarse and loose for slippery corporate lawyers. It creates rules to be gamed by those with the resources, putting challengers at a disadvantage. It reduces the Law and ethics to mere fines which are factored into the cost of doing business by obscenely wealthy corporations.

By allowing the brats to run amok too long, letting tech go undisciplined, we've made regulation an ugly battle for control. It provokes sound and fury from those small and bitter little men of the US "tech leadership" whose mask slips revealing the fume of their full-on technofascist ambition.

The answer of course is to pierce the veil. People can not respect technology that is so evidently being used against them. One must show people the real emperor's clothes of tech. People deserve to appreciate that a venture like Facebook is really no more than an undergraduate database project with some fancy style-sheets. It exists only by dint of protectionist laws, a broken trademark, copyright and patent system that stops it being torn apart by worthy competitors in a heartbeat.

Or let's explain to people that "AI" is a triumph of pure brute force whose massive costs are hidden. Or that using biometrics for access control is the single dumbest idea in the history of computer security. These are not the places sane nations should be investing money. Instead let governments take an official stance against such foolishness instead of kowtowing as they did at the Bletchley Summit.

By trying to regulate errant industries, governments simply lend them credibility. What we're finally seeing at last is institutions like NIST, FTC, FBI, CISA, NSA, NCSC, European Parliament, and civil representatives like FSF, taking the fight to an intellectual battleground and very publicly calling out BigTech's bluster and bullshit. The US government flat-out called Microsoft a security risk. Which it is.

With its magic broken and it's spell lifted, the power of tech "elites" will evaporate in short order. Projects like social algorithms and the oh so terrifying Wizard-of-Oz contraptions of "AI", face recognition and cybernetic social control will revert to children's toys. They have literally no benefit to people qua citizens. In the cold light of day, when the circus has left town, the grown-ups will finally be able to focus on rebuilding reality; health services, transport, energy, reliable water and power - not these games of billionaire egotists which tarnish technology.

But while we remain on the technofascist/futurist agenda it means clocking-up a terrible loss, a swell of very negative social capital is accumulating all around - but it is barely visible. Personally, the reasons that made me a passionate teacher of computer science have evaporated after a lifetime of service. I find it morally impossible to contribute in any way to what we are building except in the field of civic cybersecurity which is teaching people how to defend against the present mischief of intrusive tech.

Can we rekindle a renaissance in digital literacy? Especially amongst politicians? Can deep knowledge breed a new wave of respect for actually useful technology and enable a fresh generation to retake control of, and responsibility for it? I think it will be a very different kind of knowledge than my generation absorbed, but that new flavour of intellectual-self-defence will be an equally valuable life-skill as when we learned car mechanics and cookery at school.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Microsoft Uses LLM Slop to Defraud (or Rob) Shareholders
Microsoft is basically defrauding its shareholders by LLM slop
The "Davos Effect": Tarnishing the Reputation of Places Not by Overtourism But by Oligarch Infestation
The last Venice needs is an affiliation with Venetian oligarchs
 
Links 01/07/2025: "Independence Day in Taiwan", Bounties on Software Patents
Links for the day
What Happens When Your Law Firm is Preoccupied With Harassing and Trying to Extort a Humble Couple in Manchester, Even on Behalf of Violent Microsoft Staff From Another Continent
It's good to see that law firms which operate in bad faith are perishing
Lawyer X, Law Firm X and Elon Musk's X: scandals linked by Old Xaverian
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Gemini Links 01/07/2025: Distraction-Free Writing and Hytale Mismanagement
Links for the day
Links 01/07/2025: "Beauty of Blogging" and "Etiquette of Collapse"
Links for the day
The Web is a Dead End
We need to adopt alternatives
When Words Lose Their Intended Meaning
examples of words that, at least in the technical spheres, don't mean what they sound like
People Who Disagree With You on Technical Matters May or May Not Agree With You on Political Things (But Usually They Do)
What bothers me a great deal is seeing left-leaning people accusing other left-leaning people of being "nazis"
"Too Much Choice" and "Too Many Programming Languages"
What IBM and its apologists aim for was attempted in the 1930s and it failed
Microsoft Lost 400,000,000 Windows Users, According to Microsoft
more people adopt smaller computers and many people replace Windows with GNU/Linux, as they don't really need a new computer
Half a Year Gone, What's to Come Next
In the second half of 2025 we expect to be done with the Microsoft SLAPPs
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, June 30, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, June 30, 2025
People at the Very Top of Microsoft Know How Bad Things Really Are
There's no product that can replace the former profitability of Windows licensing and stuff that went on top of Windows
Gemini Links 01/07/2025: Mid Year and a Tour of Old Languages
Links for the day
EPO Presentation Bemoans Misuse of Slop in Decision-Making on Patents and in Classification (Which is Likely Illegal Too)
We habitually mention failed use cases of LLMs on the Web
Mass Layoffs at Microsoft Confirmed, "XBox Hardware Is Dead"
It's possible that over 20% of the staff will be laid off
Links 30/06/2025: Kyrgyzstan vs Media Freedom, Dalai Lama Succession
Links for the day
Gemini Links 30/06/2025: Backend Programs in Gemini and Dynamic Content Without The Scripting
Links for the day
Links 30/06/2025: Zuckerberg’s Tax-Evading Scheme Harms Kids, US Copyright Office Lacks Leadership
Links for the day
Microsoft Isn't Laying Off Tens of Thousands to 'Invest' in Slop ('Hey Hi'), It's Laying Off Tens of Thousands Because It's Running Out of Money (and Willing Lenders)
the layoffs are a sign of the business failing, not "hey hi" (whatever that is) replacing staff
Intel Lays Off 20% of Its Workforce, Microsoft is Doing the Same This Year
Like a yoyo, whatever goes up will come back down
Microsoft XBox Layoffs: Almost 2,000 Layoffs Became "Over 2,000"? (Over 20% of the Staff)
over 20% of staff will be let go, not counting staff that leaves voluntarily
GNU/Linux Rises to New Highs in Angola, Africa in General is Abandoning Windows
Western media barely covers Microsoft layoffs in Africa, but in recent years Microsoft culled the workforce and even shut down entire operations
Summer Plans in Techrights and Elsewhere
massive layoffs at Microsoft
Destination Geminispace (in the Age of LLM Slop and Slop Images That Infest the Web and Social Control Media)
Geminispace isn't vast, but at least it is - on average - a lot "cleaner"
GNU/Linux Growing in Sierra Leone This Year
Based on what statCounter is seeing, this year there are more and more people there who adopt GNU/Linux
Serial Sloppers Gonna Slop
More sites out there ought to call out the cheaters
Quartz (qz.com) is Spam and a Slopfarm
It used to be OK. Then they fired the staff.
Links 30/06/2025: US Economic Woes, Extreme Heat
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, June 29, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, June 29, 2025
Gemini Links 30/06/2025: "The AI Hype" and New AuraGem Ask
Links for the day
Our Desktops Are Not Your Experiments, X is Not an Experiment
Breaking what already worked
Microsoft's Big Lies Regarding This Week's Mass Layoffs Have Already Begun (and They're Already Being Spread by Slopfarms)
Microsoft is the "market leader" in slop
Explaining the Full Story of SLAPPs From Microsoft Staff
For every action there is a reaction, for every attack there will be proportionate consequences
The Openwashing Shills Initiative (OSI) - Part III: IRS and Status of OSI
"They lied to the US IRS and there’s a paper trail"
IBM Red Hat's Dogmatic Fanaticism Under a Thin Veil of "Modernism"
IBM now has the audacity to paint people who don't agree as "nazis"
Microsoft's Share in Guatemala Fell From 97% to 14%
Eventually Microsoft will get stuck in a loop of layoffs, layoffs, and more layoffs
They Made Technology Scary and Taught Us That It's Innocent, Friendly, Even "Social"
Rejection of all this "apps" and "gadgets" and "Smart" (whatever that means!) status quo isn't a rejection of society
The Media is Under Attacks Partly Because There's Little Other (Remaining) Press to Speak in Its Defence
The biggest danger here is that when there's very little press or no "opposition media" left it becomes even easier to crush critics because there aren't many people left to speak about the matter
If Your Web Site is Run by Bots, Eventually Nobody Will 'Read' It Except Bots (People Don't Want to Read Slop)
Eventually people learn from mistakes
Links 29/06/2025: Microsoft Releases False/Fake Benchmarks, "Google Wants You to Watch Ads or Take Surveys to Read Articles"
Links for the day
Links 29/06/2025: Data Breaches and Online Censorship
Links for the day
Gemini Links 29/06/2025: "The Price Of Eggs" and Gemini 3D Tic Tac Toe
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, June 28, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, June 28, 2025