04.08.07

Patent Pains Begin — Microsoft Disables Novell SUSE Code

Posted in Microsoft, Novell, OpenSUSE, Patents at 7:29 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

So, the ugly consequences of the deal did not take long to emerge. According to a mailing list discussion, Novell’s Linux is losing features which supposedly infringe on Microsoft software patents.

James Ots noticed that Sub-pixel Antialiasing in openSUSE 10.2 seems to be broken, so he recompiled the package from sources, with sub-pixel antialiasing turned on.

Two comments pointed to an openSUSE ML message: [Bug 259718] Sub-pixel antialising does not work when set from KDE Control Center, which quoted comments from the sources to explain the reason and the WONTFIX decision:

Uncomment the line below if you want to activate sub-pixel rendering (a.k.a. LCD rendering, or ClearType) in this build of the library.
Note that this feature is covered by several Microsoft patents and should not be activated in any default build of the library.

Is this the direction taken? Will it expand? Will features be stripped in order to cripple GNU/Linux? In any event, Novell does nobody any favours here, except Microsoft of course, which can now intimidate other distributors. I am aware of the fact that other distributions, such as Ubuntu, take a similar route, but the owner of patents appears to be Apple. We’ll soon find out what exactly is going on here.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

17 Comments

  1. gpl1 said,

    April 8, 2007 at 8:06 am

    Gravatar

    very good catch. At first thought I believed it was just the Apple-Freetype thing that every distro seems to disable, but this goes farther than that.

  2. shane said,

    April 8, 2007 at 8:35 am

    Gravatar

    Um, software patents aren’t valid. So, did Microsoft patent the PC, or is it the monitor they patented? What is the device?

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 8, 2007 at 10:11 am

    Gravatar

    Have a look at this brand-new article from law.com:


    Inside the Microsoft War Room

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | Help wanted: Anyone want a job as a patent litigator at the world’s
    | biggest software company?
    |
    | [...]
    |
    | Microsoft became a patent powerhouse only after the Supreme Court’s
    | 1998 State Street decision legitimized patents on software. The
    | company revamped its patenting regime and went from a portfolio of
    | less than a dozen patents to more than 5,000 today.
    `—-

    http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1175850243704

    Then, I urge you to see this piece of evidence that suggest Redmond ‘troopers’ are nothing but lawyers and marketers.

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | Asked about these problems, Arno Edelmann, Microsoft’s European business
    | security product manager, told ZDNet UK on Thursday that the code itself
    | has pieces missing… “Usually Microsoft doesn’t develop products, we buy
    | products. It’s not a bad product, but bits and pieces are missing,” said
    | Edelmann.
    `—-

    http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39286351,00.htm

  4. shane said,

    April 8, 2007 at 11:14 am

    Gravatar

    Ah yes, State Street – that friggin decision really is the lynchpin of this entire patent problem, isn’t it. That’s why all software patents begin with the words "A method"…

    Here’s the thing though, for patents I thought the basic premise is you have to show how you did it and receive a monopoly on that implementation (balancing public benefit vs inventor profit) – none of these patent apps show the code (because it’s a trade secret), so are they even valid?

    Code gets copyrighted, then you can hide it as a trade secret, but patents don’t apply.

  5. Simon Redding said,

    April 10, 2007 at 9:28 am

    Gravatar

    Well, software patents aren’t valid over here in the UK…
    Tough for you guys over there – I’d get lobbying…

  6. shane said,

    April 10, 2007 at 10:36 am

    Gravatar

    They’re actually invalid here, too. Microsoft’s own lawyer made that argument to the Supreme Court of the United States just recently:

    MR. OLSON [For Microsoft]: The ‘580 patent is a program, as I understand it, that’s married to a computer, has to be married to a computer in order to be patented.
    JUSTICE SCALIA: You can’t patent, you know, on-off, on-off code in the abstract, can you?
    MR. OLSON: That’s correct, Justice Scalia.
    JUSTICE SCALIA: There needs to be a device.
    MR. OLSON: An idea or a principle, two plus two equals four can’t be patented. It has to be put together with a machine and made into a usable device.

  7. shane said,

    April 10, 2007 at 10:40 am

    Gravatar

    Since Microsoft is now a distributor of GPLv2 code, this should no longer be an issue for anyone – right?

    “So, Microsoft is actively participating in distribution of the GPL2 software today, and must have assented to GPL 2 to do that, because any distribution without assent to GPL2 would be infringement. Under GPL 2, they have already given away the rights to use Microsoft patents that are applied in the Novell distribution, for any use in any GPL software, by anyone, forever,” Perens said.

  8. Mike said,

    April 10, 2007 at 10:46 am

    Gravatar

    FWIW, this isn’t something Novell did, this was done by the FreeTyp developer well before the Novell/Microsoft partnership:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/freetype@nongnu.org/msg00972.html

  9. IC said,

    April 10, 2007 at 2:46 pm

    Gravatar

    This was disabled before the Novell/MS deal. And by the DEVELOPER, not Novell… And even with the deal they have to be worried about the patent.

    Other distro’s should be worried too.. All the goof balls mouthing that this distro has it and Opensuse is in bed with MS need to be worried they dont ruin it for their distro.

    ARE ALL YOU GOING TO RETRACT THE STATEMENTS YOU MAKE WHEN YOU ARE PROVEN WRONG?

  10. shane said,

    April 10, 2007 at 3:26 pm

    Gravatar

    Bruce Lowry has updated the Novell PR blog with a similar explanation:

    In this specific case, the ClearType font is supplied as part of the freetype2 package; last summer the upstream maintainer changed the package’s default settings to disable Clear Type and thereby avoid possibly relevant Microsoft patents. So, consistent with Novell’s preexisting practices and current policy, Novell is using the default settings established by the upstream maintainer. Distributions such as Fedora made the same choice. This issue only came up in the summer of 2006 and therefore older distributions are using the previous default (enabled ClearType).

  11. Distant Observer said,

    April 11, 2007 at 4:03 pm

    Gravatar

    Sub-pixel anti-aliasing has prior art written all over it. In fact, when Acorn’s introduced the market to the RiscOS operating system c1989, it had sub-pixel anti-aliasing built in. Implemented by Roger (later Sophie) Wilson.

    Sounds like time the EFF jumped on board and got these patents nullified.

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 11, 2007 at 5:46 pm

    Gravatar

    I may be the exception here, but I think that all software patents and business methods (e.g. Amazon’s infamous one-click purchase) should be nullified. These are illegal in the whole world for a reason. You can’t own mathematical/analytical processes. Now they try to patent things which relate to human tissue. It’s madness. I see no reason why Linux users should receive poor features because the distributor is now located in the States.

  13. Paul Giannaros said,

    April 12, 2007 at 1:49 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy: The sensationalist article here was _proven_ to be completely incorrect. Will you please either post a new article stating as such, or amend the original article with a note?
    Thank you very much.

  14. shane said,

    April 12, 2007 at 2:09 pm

    Gravatar

    Try this posting

  15. loopy said,

    June 28, 2007 at 3:21 am

    Gravatar

    u r cool

  16. wooooooooooooooooo go me!!! said,

    June 28, 2007 at 3:24 am

    Gravatar

    WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO U R GAY HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

  17. loopy said,

    June 28, 2007 at 3:25 am

    Gravatar

    loser u f******* w*****

What Else is New


  1. IRC Proceedings: Friday, December 04, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, December 04, 2020



  2. Links 4/12/2020: New Raspberry Pi OS, Tizen OS Dominating TVs, Wine 6.0 RC, Debian 10.7 Ready Later Today, Fedora 33 Elections Concluded, Pacman 6.0 Enters Alpha

    Links for the day



  3. What's GNEW? GNEW's Nice Efforts Welcomed! (The GNEW Manifesto)

    "Dyne.org could be useful," figosdev says. "Denis Roio would be useful. Devuan would not. Dyne.org, it should be noted, was one of the very few organisations that publicly and explicitly defended Stallman when others (like FSFE) attacked."



  4. Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) is Not About Freedom

    As evidence serves to show, the SFC quit caring about Free-as-in-Freedom-respecting Software a long time ago; it’s about raising money (even from Microsoft) and ‘canceling’ people who actually care about Software Freedom



  5. [Meme] Being Occupied by Microsoft Azure and Windows

    The persistent lying (led by slogans like "Microsoft loves Linux") only ever comes from media moles of Microsoft, who spent decades attacking GNU/Linux, so we know the real sentiments



  6. [Meme] The Master Negotiator

    EPO President António Campinos is the opposite of what his father claimed to be, as EPO staff quickly found out



  7. What Really Happened Last Year When Workers of the European Patent Office, Europe's Second-Largest Institution, Were About to Go on Strike

    The full story of what happened behind the scenes around the time of the call for strike (less than a year after a "new" (recycled) and "better" president had been appointed, perpetuating the same abuses)



  8. Censored EPO Publication: Conflict Resolution Unit (CRU) Unspeakable Because Office Management Buries the Facts

    Another censored (by EPO management) publication, this time about the cover-up of misconduct



  9. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, December 03, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, December 03, 2020



  10. Linux Foundation Trolls Its Critics by Forging Metadata in Its Annual Report (Updated)

    The annual report of the so-called 'Linux' Foundation was produced using mythical software (or not)



  11. Links 4/12/2020: Mesa 20.3.0, Manjaro 20.2 Nibia and Budgie 10.5.2

    Links for the day



  12. Censored EPO Publication: Staff Cannot Comment on the Administrative Council's Meetings?

    The suppression of speech in Europe’s second-largest institution should be a cautionary tale or loud alarm to the rest of Europe. Corruption and cover-up have reached the point where mentioning the corruption is its own right a ‘crime’.



  13. Nobody Needs to Write a Text Editor (or Use Geany)

    "If free software really benefits from education, then telling people not to learn more about creating software by working on a simple text editor project makes no sense at all."



  14. [Mail] Reader's Comment on 'Fraudlinger'

    ‘Fraudlinger’ (as our reader calls Margot Fröhlinger) is knowingly lying to Europe, just like the EPO routinely does, both to workers and to the general public/journalists



  15. [Meme] European Patent Office Violates European Laws

    By violating international and European laws the EPO basically tells us what it’s all about (and it has nothing to do with protecting patent law or any law for that matter, not even the EPC)



  16. EPO Management Consciously Breaking European Union Laws: Staff and Stakeholders Subjected to Illegal Tactics and Practices, Now Exam Takers As Well

    The EPO routinely breaks privacy laws, knowing that there’s not even an attempt to enforce the law against the EPO’s dictators; we’ve lost count of the instances/number of privacy scandals at the EPO, but we keep adding more to our list



  17. 'Social Dialogue' at the EPO Broke Down, Team Campinos is Totally Delusional

    Team Campinos is speaking to itself, reaffirming its own decisions, but it's trying to give the impression of consultation with staff; unfortunately for them, staff isn't gullible enough and there's good understanding of the false pretenses



  18. The EPO's 2020 Impaired Vision/ViCo: Imposing Illegal Practices on EPO Stakeholders, Not Only on EPO Staff

    Corruption is contagious; we now see a growing number of EPO stakeholders speaking out against the outrageous attempts by Office management to impose illegal practices on them; they don't wish to participate in any of this



  19. Censored EPO Publication: Evidence That the Censorship of EPO Staff Representation (Central Staff Committee) Started Months After António Campinos Started His Term

    Central Staff Committee representatives explained in very clear terms how Team Campinos (soon 2.5 years in the role) was — and still is — censoring representatives in an attempt to keep staff ignorant, misinformed, and afraid



  20. Guest Post: Helping Roy Delete Debian at Work and Home

    "What we probably don't want to do is continue to support Debian or systemd, if we can help it."



  21. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, December 02, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, December 02, 2020



  22. Links 2/12/2020: Multi-Touch Gestures in elementaryOS, DXVK 1.7.3

    Links for the day



  23. Links 2/12/2020: ZaReason RIP, Rancher Now SUSE-Owned, OSI Board Director Works for/on Azure

    Links for the day



  24. [Meme] Espionage With Spyware: Slack's Data Sold to Company That Helps ICE Kidnap Children and Forcibly Sterilise Women

    There's now an additional good reason to boycott Slack's malware, which is basically surveillance of workers disguised as 'collaboration'



  25. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, December 01, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, December 01, 2020



  26. The World is Ill

    Not only Europe's second-largest institution (the EPO) is morbidly if not critically ill; the OSI is now a zombie controlled by Microsoft and friends, much like the so-called 'Linux' Foundation



  27. Censored EPO Publication: Staff Representatives Cannot Comment on the Survey Conducted by the Office's Management

    EPO management tried to muzzle EPO staff after the Office-wide staff survey turned out to be “nothing short of a disaster.”



  28. Censorship at the EPO is Counterproductive, Rendering the Censored Publications More Seductive and Censored People More Disgruntled

    The efforts to gag Techrights or to intimidate us have all been unfruitful; in a sense, they encouraged us to focus on EPO scandals even more and arguably invoked the 'Streisand Effect' at the EPO (most workers read this site, no matter what their bosses say)



  29. EPO Management Has No Plans Other Than Granting Loads of Invalid Patents (e.g. Software Patents) to Pocket Fees and Then Grift/Gamble With the Money

    The EPO does not know what the hell it’s doing; it’s more of that magical festival-like thinking, as if running a patent office is Eurovision



  30. Links 1/12/2020: KDE Plasma 5.20.4, GNU Octave 6.1, OpenZFS 2.0, and PinePhone KDE Community Edition

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts