04.08.07

Gemini version available ♊︎

Patent Pains Begin — Microsoft Disables Novell SUSE Code

Posted in Microsoft, Novell, OpenSUSE, Patents at 7:29 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

So, the ugly consequences of the deal did not take long to emerge. According to a mailing list discussion, Novell’s Linux is losing features which supposedly infringe on Microsoft software patents.

James Ots noticed that Sub-pixel Antialiasing in openSUSE 10.2 seems to be broken, so he recompiled the package from sources, with sub-pixel antialiasing turned on.

Two comments pointed to an openSUSE ML message: [Bug 259718] Sub-pixel antialising does not work when set from KDE Control Center, which quoted comments from the sources to explain the reason and the WONTFIX decision:

Uncomment the line below if you want to activate sub-pixel rendering (a.k.a. LCD rendering, or ClearType) in this build of the library.
Note that this feature is covered by several Microsoft patents and should not be activated in any default build of the library.

Is this the direction taken? Will it expand? Will features be stripped in order to cripple GNU/Linux? In any event, Novell does nobody any favours here, except Microsoft of course, which can now intimidate other distributors. I am aware of the fact that other distributions, such as Ubuntu, take a similar route, but the owner of patents appears to be Apple. We’ll soon find out what exactly is going on here.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

17 Comments

  1. gpl1 said,

    April 8, 2007 at 8:06 am

    Gravatar

    very good catch. At first thought I believed it was just the Apple-Freetype thing that every distro seems to disable, but this goes farther than that.

  2. shane said,

    April 8, 2007 at 8:35 am

    Gravatar

    Um, software patents aren’t valid. So, did Microsoft patent the PC, or is it the monitor they patented? What is the device?

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 8, 2007 at 10:11 am

    Gravatar

    Have a look at this brand-new article from law.com:


    Inside the Microsoft War Room

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | Help wanted: Anyone want a job as a patent litigator at the world’s
    | biggest software company?
    |
    | [...]
    |
    | Microsoft became a patent powerhouse only after the Supreme Court’s
    | 1998 State Street decision legitimized patents on software. The
    | company revamped its patenting regime and went from a portfolio of
    | less than a dozen patents to more than 5,000 today.
    `—-

    http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1175850243704

    Then, I urge you to see this piece of evidence that suggest Redmond ‘troopers’ are nothing but lawyers and marketers.

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | Asked about these problems, Arno Edelmann, Microsoft’s European business
    | security product manager, told ZDNet UK on Thursday that the code itself
    | has pieces missing… “Usually Microsoft doesn’t develop products, we buy
    | products. It’s not a bad product, but bits and pieces are missing,” said
    | Edelmann.
    `—-

    http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39286351,00.htm

  4. shane said,

    April 8, 2007 at 11:14 am

    Gravatar

    Ah yes, State Street – that friggin decision really is the lynchpin of this entire patent problem, isn’t it. That’s why all software patents begin with the words "A method"…

    Here’s the thing though, for patents I thought the basic premise is you have to show how you did it and receive a monopoly on that implementation (balancing public benefit vs inventor profit) – none of these patent apps show the code (because it’s a trade secret), so are they even valid?

    Code gets copyrighted, then you can hide it as a trade secret, but patents don’t apply.

  5. Simon Redding said,

    April 10, 2007 at 9:28 am

    Gravatar

    Well, software patents aren’t valid over here in the UK…
    Tough for you guys over there – I’d get lobbying…

  6. shane said,

    April 10, 2007 at 10:36 am

    Gravatar

    They’re actually invalid here, too. Microsoft’s own lawyer made that argument to the Supreme Court of the United States just recently:

    MR. OLSON [For Microsoft]: The ‘580 patent is a program, as I understand it, that’s married to a computer, has to be married to a computer in order to be patented.
    JUSTICE SCALIA: You can’t patent, you know, on-off, on-off code in the abstract, can you?
    MR. OLSON: That’s correct, Justice Scalia.
    JUSTICE SCALIA: There needs to be a device.
    MR. OLSON: An idea or a principle, two plus two equals four can’t be patented. It has to be put together with a machine and made into a usable device.

  7. shane said,

    April 10, 2007 at 10:40 am

    Gravatar

    Since Microsoft is now a distributor of GPLv2 code, this should no longer be an issue for anyone – right?

    “So, Microsoft is actively participating in distribution of the GPL2 software today, and must have assented to GPL 2 to do that, because any distribution without assent to GPL2 would be infringement. Under GPL 2, they have already given away the rights to use Microsoft patents that are applied in the Novell distribution, for any use in any GPL software, by anyone, forever,” Perens said.

  8. Mike said,

    April 10, 2007 at 10:46 am

    Gravatar

    FWIW, this isn’t something Novell did, this was done by the FreeTyp developer well before the Novell/Microsoft partnership:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/freetype@nongnu.org/msg00972.html

  9. IC said,

    April 10, 2007 at 2:46 pm

    Gravatar

    This was disabled before the Novell/MS deal. And by the DEVELOPER, not Novell… And even with the deal they have to be worried about the patent.

    Other distro’s should be worried too.. All the goof balls mouthing that this distro has it and Opensuse is in bed with MS need to be worried they dont ruin it for their distro.

    ARE ALL YOU GOING TO RETRACT THE STATEMENTS YOU MAKE WHEN YOU ARE PROVEN WRONG?

  10. shane said,

    April 10, 2007 at 3:26 pm

    Gravatar

    Bruce Lowry has updated the Novell PR blog with a similar explanation:

    In this specific case, the ClearType font is supplied as part of the freetype2 package; last summer the upstream maintainer changed the package’s default settings to disable Clear Type and thereby avoid possibly relevant Microsoft patents. So, consistent with Novell’s preexisting practices and current policy, Novell is using the default settings established by the upstream maintainer. Distributions such as Fedora made the same choice. This issue only came up in the summer of 2006 and therefore older distributions are using the previous default (enabled ClearType).

  11. Distant Observer said,

    April 11, 2007 at 4:03 pm

    Gravatar

    Sub-pixel anti-aliasing has prior art written all over it. In fact, when Acorn’s introduced the market to the RiscOS operating system c1989, it had sub-pixel anti-aliasing built in. Implemented by Roger (later Sophie) Wilson.

    Sounds like time the EFF jumped on board and got these patents nullified.

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 11, 2007 at 5:46 pm

    Gravatar

    I may be the exception here, but I think that all software patents and business methods (e.g. Amazon’s infamous one-click purchase) should be nullified. These are illegal in the whole world for a reason. You can’t own mathematical/analytical processes. Now they try to patent things which relate to human tissue. It’s madness. I see no reason why Linux users should receive poor features because the distributor is now located in the States.

  13. Paul Giannaros said,

    April 12, 2007 at 1:49 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy: The sensationalist article here was _proven_ to be completely incorrect. Will you please either post a new article stating as such, or amend the original article with a note?
    Thank you very much.

  14. shane said,

    April 12, 2007 at 2:09 pm

    Gravatar

    Try this posting

  15. loopy said,

    June 28, 2007 at 3:21 am

    Gravatar

    u r cool

  16. wooooooooooooooooo go me!!! said,

    June 28, 2007 at 3:24 am

    Gravatar

    WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO U R GAY HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

  17. loopy said,

    June 28, 2007 at 3:25 am

    Gravatar

    loser u f******* w*****

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Gallery of Patent Law Firms That Still Lie, Still Promote Illegal Agenda, and Casually Game the Media to Mischievously Shape Perceptions

    Another roundup of the past week’s lies (or responses to the lies) from Team UPC; it has become rather absurd and to make matters worse António Campinos is posting similar lies (and advocacy of unlawful agenda) in the EPO‘s official Web site



  2. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 28, 2022

    IRC logs for Saturday, May 28, 2022



  3. Links 29/05/2022: PulseAudio 16.0 and Fresh Complaints About COVID-19 Patents

    Links for the day



  4. The Popularity of the World Wide Web is Partly Faked (Bots and Scams, Especially in Social Control Media)

    ontrary to popular misconceptions surrounding a Web 'monoculture' (therein exists a Web browser monoculture too; many used to equate the Internet with the Web and with the "Blue E"... and now Chrome), there's a lot of fakes, lots of bot activity, and alternatives to the Web are worth exploring



  5. Links 28/05/2022: KDE Eco Sprint and GUADEC 2022 Conference Plans

    Links for the day



  6. When 50% of Slashdot's 'Linux' Section is Microsoft Marketing, EEE, and FUD

    As this minutes-old screenshot shows, Slashdot is not what many of us “geeks” remember it for



  7. Do Not Become (or Remain) Enslaved and Exploited by Microsoft GitHub

    Slavery isn’t a dirty word but a strong word — or a disturbing concept — used to convey or describe an abusive relationship between organisms — typically human beings — or between corporations and humans, e.g. the way Microsoft treats GitHub projects/users



  8. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part XXI — Rumours About How Microsoft Plans to Actually Make Money (Not Losses) From GitHub

    GitHub is not 'free hosting' but a ticking time bomb, a proprietary platform looking to entrap its users (serfs) inside yet more proprietary platforms (for Microsoft to become their oppressive master)



  9. Links 28/05/2022: KDE Weekly Summary, RZBoard V2L

    Links for the day



  10. [Meme] Fluffy Staff

    EPO President António Campinos is failing to ‘contain’ the media after less than 4 years at the Office, just like Benoît Battistelli around 2014



  11. Kluwer Patent Blog Belatedly Gives EPO Staff a Voice

    There are at least 2 bloggers — if not 3 people — at Kluwer Patent Blog who air grievances of EPO staff; in addition, many of the comments there blast EPO management and Team UPC and it helps change the perceptions long shaped by bribes and blackmail from EPO management



  12. [Meme] Fluffy President

    Prepare for more puff pieces and fluff from President Fluffinos, who has commandeered the EPO‘s official Web site for self-serving whitewash and promotion of illegal agenda like European software patents and a kangaroo court to approve those (UPC)



  13. Blaming Patent Examiners Who Respect the Law

    The latest comments here are quite revealing; the EPO not only breaks the law with impunity but it also challenges the very legal system (like courts) with total impunity; Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos are, in that regard, no better than Putin, just more temperamental



  14. Our Priorities and Our Future: More Gemini and More Daily Links (a Lot More Frequently)

    An informal and unscripted video that explains where we are and where we’re going



  15. IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 27, 2022

    IRC logs for Friday, May 27, 2022



  16. Links 28/05/2022: Twitter Fined for Spying in '2FA' Clothing

    Links for the day



  17. Links 27/05/2022: Trisquel 10.0.1 LTS and Perl Appreciation

    Links for the day



  18. Links 27/05/2022: Fwupd 1.8.1 and GCC 9.5

    Links for the day



  19. Visual Proof That Twitter Very Likely Faked Its Magnitude the Moment Musk et al (KSA, Ellison and so on) Wanted to Buy

    There's a very compelling case for the allegation that Twitter is defrauding shareholders and participants in the platform; Twitter is a lot smaller than it used to be (fewer people are actively involved), it is losing money, and it is so desperate to be acquired that it's shamelessly faking traffic



  20. Links 27/05/2022: Wayland 1.21 Alpha, KDE Adds Flatpak and Snap Permissions to Discover

    Links for the day



  21. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 26, 2022

    IRC logs for Thursday, May 26, 2022



  22. Links 27/05/2022: Many More Microsoft Security Failures (and Spin/Lies)

    Links for the day



  23. Links 26/05/2022: KStars 3.5.9 and Chrome 103 Beta

    Links for the day



  24. Links 26/05/2022: AlmaLinux OS 9.0, MooseX::Extended for Perl Introduced

    Links for the day



  25. Links 26/05/2022: Kernel Events and Systemd-Free GNU/Linux Distributions

    Links for the day



  26. Links 26/05/2022: DuckDuckGo Increasingly Exposed as Microsoft Proxy

    Links for the day



  27. EPO Celebrates Software Patents Again, Dubbing Them 'Hey Hi' (AI) and '4IR'

    The ludicrous state of the EPO is demonstrated by yesterday’s puff piece about “four million” (merely requests for monopoly in Europe; most come from outside Europe) and L’Oréal, which claims to have “invented” something that was already done in the 1990s if not the 1980s



  28. [Meme] EPO's Monkey Business: Lowering the Patent Examination Bar

    As we shall show in a moment, EPO President António Campinos has lowered the quality of patents and applications; sooner or later he might outsource the job to ‘livestock’



  29. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 25, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, May 25, 2022



  30. Heads of Patent Offices Are Immune to Coronavirus

    The overconfident chiefs of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and EPO might love speaking about COVID-19 (in relation to patents), but they do not take it seriously themselves


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts