EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.12.08

World’s Computing Thugs Fight Governments and Continents

Posted in Antitrust, Asia, Fraud, Hardware, IBM, Law, Microsoft, Oracle, Servers, Windows at 12:17 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Because the biggest criminals wear suits, not jumpers

Being a large company is no crime. However, behaviour is a separate factor and it’s unfortunate that regulation has been so utterly poor, which means that those who are corrupt also meet the most ‘success’.

We see the effects of this in the global crisis right now because those who are rich are doing fine, whereas those who are poor are marginalised further and forced to pay big corporations in order to ‘save’ them (from their own fraud).

Has everyone read about the $50 billion Madoff corruption yet? Everyone should. It’s in today’s news.

The Software Felon

Companies like Microsoft grow to become political creatures that laugh at the government [1, 2]. This is something that we covered — using plenty of extensive evidence — so many times before. Here is the news story about Microsoft’s latest fight against European law, which it refuses to obey. It’s not inability. It’s unwillingness, it's vanity and it’s hubris.

Trade groups the Association of Competitive Technology (ACT) and the Computing Technology Industry Association (CompTIA) will side with Microsoft, while IBM, Oracle and Red Hat will help the Commission defend itself in the court appeal.

Got that? Microsoft and its fronts are so adamant and vicious that the European Commission needs to be defended by large American companies like Oracle and IBM. Yes, a high legal authority needs to defend itself like a coward, having witnessed the smear campaigns Microsoft et al launched at Neelie Kroes for ‘daring’ to call for (and yet to restore) justice.

The text quoted above would also be useful to few naive people who still stubbornly deny that CompTIA [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] and ACT [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] are Microsoft mouthpieces. These are people who virtually work for Microsoft, but can pretend not to because they do their trade under titles which sounds more neutral, e.g. BSA [1, 2, 3, 4], being an equivalent of the RIAA or MPAA.

The article continues:

The Free Software Foundation Europe, the Samba Team of open-source software programmers, the Software and Information Industry Association (SIIA), the European Committee for Interoperable Systems (ECIS) will also turn up in support of the Commission, the court said in a statement released earlier this week.

[...]

Microsoft failed to honor this order for three years after the 2004 ruling, employing delaying tactics despite being threatened with further fines. The Commission imposed an additional €600 million in fines because of the delays.

Yes, that’s the same old Microsoft, whose ways never changed.

The two sides here are not equal per se. Freedom is no “religion” and those who battle against freedom and human rights have all sorts of names, none of which seems appropriate to include here. Sometimes there are no gentle words when approaching a hard issue, but need truth really be a taboo?

Apple vs. Microsoft (or Mac OS versus Windows) is a battle of egos and a battle between vendors, but both are harmful to the users, who are manipulated into not realising this and not even valuing what they have and what they gradually lose.

The Hardware Felon

Intel continues to treat governments like they are some nuisance or a bunch of obnoxious kids. Intel is so full of itself that it believes only ‘responsible adults’ who run the corporations should decide what qualifies as a bribe and what does not. This series of patronisations now extends beyond Europe as Intel takes its ‘beef’ over to Korea where it wishes not to pay heavy fines for crimes it committed (with conviction).

Intel takes legal swing at Korean antitrust decision

[...]

The watchdog ordered Intel to cough up $18.6m for violating fair trade rules. The Commission ruled that Intel paid rebates to South Korean computer firms to undercut arch rival AMD.

Intel was charged by the regulator in June last year for violating antitrust laws following a two year investigation into the company’s business dealings in South Korea.

It is disappointing to see what comes out of Intel’s crimes, a recent example of which is the case of collusion (a joint conspiracy with Microsoft). We covered this in:

Speaking of Will Poole and NComputing, the company has just added an executive from Intel, which is the very same company that fought against a charity, OLPC. Yes, one might add the role of OLPC (NComputing, like Intel, fought against it) and the recent example of corruption in the OOXML fiasco. Intel supported Microsoft’s OOXML, of course.

Unless governments are able to regain a grip on corporations, there will be a reversal of roles (or a continuation, if not exacerbation, of this reversal). This means that we, the ‘little people’, are left at the mercy of people in companies who want to “cut off air supplies”, “tilt into death spirals” and “whack” those who are disobedient. And that’s just a sample of Microsoft vocabulary and attitude towards legitimate competitors. It gets worse.

Intel puppy

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

33 Comments

  1. orbital said,

    December 12, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    Gravatar

    The PCWorld article mentions the ECJ website:

    “More information about the participation in the new appeal can be found in this section of the Court of Justice of the European Communities’ Web site.”

    I cannot find anything related to Microsoft there:

    http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/form.pl?lang=en?wform=newform&Submit=Submit&alljur=alljur&jurcdj=jurcdj&jurtpi=jurtpi&jurtfp=jurtfp&alldocrec=alldocrec&docj=docj&docor=docor&docop=docop&docav=docav&docsom=docsom&docinf=docinf&alldocnorec=alldocnorec&docnoj=docnoj&docnoor=docnoor&typeord=ALL&docnodecision=docnodecision&allcommjo=allcommjo&affint=affint&affclose=affclose?maff=T-167/08&ddatefs=&mdatefs=&ydatefs=&ddatefe=&mdatefe=&ydatefe=&nomusuel=&domaine=&mots=&resmax=100

  2. Josh Bell said,

    December 12, 2008 at 1:13 pm

    Gravatar

    What a horrible picture at the end of this article. There is no truth to what you say in that picture. You really need to get some help Roy. Now your starting to sound like PETA. Disturbed and disgusted.

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 12, 2008 at 1:29 pm

    Gravatar

    Your humour gauge is broken. Your regular heckling, Josh Bell, is not effective.

  4. jo Shields said,

    December 12, 2008 at 1:32 pm

    Gravatar

    Whose kit should we buy, Roy?

  5. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 12, 2008 at 1:34 pm

    Gravatar

    I don’t instruct (you’re trying to trip me up here, I’m sure). It probably depends on one’s needs as well.

  6. Josh Bell said,

    December 12, 2008 at 1:46 pm

    Gravatar

    Humor and heckling? You think showing a dog with a gun to its head is funny. I didn’t realize that kind of trash was funny. I don’t heckle you Roy, I try to point out inconsistencies and untruths. The shame of the matter is that you make some good points and good arguments but you don’t accept any other viewpoint. At the point you realize you’ve been cornered is when you start to doublespeak and try to back your way out.

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 12, 2008 at 1:49 pm

    Gravatar

    It’s a famous picture. It’s part of a famous joke.

  8. SubSonica said,

    December 12, 2008 at 2:20 pm

    Gravatar

    Go out there and read “No lobbyists as such” by Florian Mueller who fought against software patents being sneaked into the european legislation mainly by the Microsoft lobbyists….

  9. jo Shields said,

    December 12, 2008 at 2:22 pm

    Gravatar

    The question stands alone, Roy. The only “gotcha” is the very nature of your constant negativity, which you reinforced more than dissuaded in your reply.

    If Intel, with its full-time staff working on Free drivers, is irredeemably bad, then who would you recommend instead? You constantly say “AVOID X, IT IS EVIL INCARNATE” – perhaps it would be easier for people if you gave some positive words (e.g. telling them which alternatives you’d recommend) alongside the negative? Perhaps even throw in some realism in your suggestions (e.g. don’t suggest Python as an alternative for C# developers).

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 12, 2008 at 2:46 pm

    Gravatar

    The question stands alone, Roy. The only “gotcha” is the very nature of your constant negativity, which you reinforced more than dissuaded in your reply.

    Read this news article which tells you Wall Street (NASDAQ at least) was/is run by criminals.

    Read SubSonica’s comments about Microsoft’s “legalised bribery” (that’s what I cynically call lobbying).

    Can you not see what is wrong?

    If you want positive advice, see my posts in USENET. About 80% of my posts are positive. This site is not a ‘marketing’ site though, so you won’t find much positivity here. We already have ‘too many’ pro-Linux sites but too few that explore the ugly sides which turn against GNU/Linux and Free software.

  11. SubSonica said,

    December 12, 2008 at 2:50 pm

    Gravatar

    “If Intel, with its full-time staff working on Free drivers, is irredeemably bad, then who would you recommend instead? You constantly say “AVOID X, IT IS EVIL INCARNATE”

    Stop speaking strawmans, We don’t critizice Intel in the things it does right (like opening the specs for their integrated graphic chipsets -which, aside the fact they are the most Gnu/Linux compatible, are crappy when compared with nvidia or ATi-), but that can never compensate or justify its wrongdoings and its competition-stiffling strategies. Didn’t you hear about the WinTel duopoly?, about the Ready for Vista fiasco?

    Look at what is happening with netbooks and nano cpus:
    http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/11/29/intel-slams-netbooks.html

    Monopolists and oligopolists abuse their market dominance and evolve their business in ways that are damaging for its customers and consumers at large in order to maximize benefits (they can afford to do it because their customers have no way or find very difficult to escape)

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 12, 2008 at 3:01 pm

    Gravatar

    Intel’s crimes are mostly well documented. It still amuses me when Alex Hudson sings about Microsoft’s submission of a few dandy patches whilst the company bribes and bullies (he chooses to ignore that).

    Intel’s driver giveaway reminds me of robber barons that throw a nickel at grateful bums at the street’s corner. God, those thieving hounds are sooooo generous. Oh yeah… and BillG claims to be a philanthropist, too.

  13. jo Shields said,

    December 12, 2008 at 3:02 pm

    Gravatar

    “If Intel, with its full-time staff working on Free drivers, is irredeemably bad, then who would you recommend instead? You constantly say “AVOID X, IT IS EVIL INCARNATE”

    Stop speaking strawmans, We don’t critizice Intel in the things it does right (like opening the specs for their integrated graphic chipsets -which, aside the fact they are the most Gnu/Linux compatible, are crappy when compared with nvidia or ATi-), but that can never compensate or justify its wrongdoings and its competition-stiffling strategies. Didn’t you hear about the WinTel duopoly?, about the Ready for Vista fiasco?

    “When you buy Intel a puppy dies”? That encourages people to support positive action, does it?

    This may come as a shock, but I’ve been around for long enough to know MORE than enough about Wintel, about Ready for Vista, and so on. These are not news.

    It’s the overriding problem with the all-encompassing “single label” approach taken by sites such as this. Coming up with a final “good!” “bad!” label summing up every action taken by a large corp is impossible to do properly. How many lines of source & documentation is a misleading Vista Capable sticker worth? How many Linux-capable home consoles per rootkit? Large companies are impossible to view as a single entity.

    Look at what is happening with netbooks and nano cpus:
    http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/11/29/intel-slams-netbooks.html

    Pretty ironic given they’re the ones who made the damn things, but they’re obviously unhappy about selling lots of cheap chips instead of expensive chips. Duh. You understand the whole idea of “business”, yes?

  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 12, 2008 at 3:12 pm

    Gravatar

    It’s not business, it’s price fixing.

  15. SubSonica said,

    December 12, 2008 at 3:19 pm

    Gravatar

    “Pretty ironic given they’re the ones who made the damn things,”
    Yes, well, they followed VIA’s C7 in order not to risk loosing a whole market.
    “You understand the whole idea of “business”, yes? ”
    Yeah, very much the same as the ideas of free market, fair competition and consumer choice (which Intel and Microsoft don’t seem very interested in)

  16. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 12, 2008 at 3:30 pm

    Gravatar

    Yes, well, they followed VIA’s C7 in order not to risk loosing a whole market.

    No, wait. It was an anti-OLPC move.

    To be specific, about 8 months ago, PJ put the following text in News Picks, linking to a this article I had sent her.

    “The Eee PC’s success wasn’t possible without Intel’s support. The chip maker was initially hesitant to embrace Asustek’s push into low-cost laptops for fear it would drive down margins for its mobile processors if users opted to buy low-cost laptops instead of more powerful — and more expensive — models. But Intel eventually decided that the opportunity to expand the size of the overall laptop market outweighed the risks of lower profit margins, and gave its backing to the little laptops.”

    [PJ: I hate to say I told you so, but I told you so. All you folks who flamed me for saying Intel was involved with Asus can now send me emails of apology. Chocolate would be nice too. It would show sincerity, don't you think?]

  17. SubSonica said,

    December 12, 2008 at 3:41 pm

    Gravatar

    Thanks. Anyway Intel is anything but happy of VIA making any progress in the CPU market. As long as VIA stays in the niche of the pico-micro-ITX machines it won’t be too troublesome, but there has already been some threats on the part of Intel suggesting they could sue VIA…

  18. jo Shields said,

    December 12, 2008 at 3:49 pm

    Gravatar

    They sued once. Over licenses to make motherboard chipsets I think.

    And the unfortunate problem with C7 is it’s completely shit.

  19. SubSonica said,

    December 12, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    Gravatar

    “the unfortunate problem with C7 ”
    I tried an Asus EEE 701 and I think it actually works surprisingly well (with Gnu/Linux) for its low power requirements.

    “is it’s completely shit”
    Do you mean like this?:
    http://en.tiraecol.net/modules/comic/comic.php?content_id=6

  20. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 12, 2008 at 4:08 pm

    Gravatar

    How many continents is Intel under fire in? 3? 4?

    “In 2005, a unit of Shenzhen Donjin countersued Intel, alleging the Santa Clara, California chipmaker had engaged in monopolistic practices.”

    http://www.newsgd.com/business/enterprise/200705150025.htm

  21. jo Shields said,

    December 12, 2008 at 4:16 pm

    Gravatar

    I tried an Asus EEE 701 and I think it actually works surprisingly well (with Gnu/Linux) for its low power requirements.

    You know Celeron is not C7, right?

    “is it’s completely shit”
    Do you mean like this?:
    http://en.tiraecol.net/modules/comic/comic.php?content_id=6

    I mean a chip sold in 2008 shouldn’t struggle with DVD playback

  22. SubSonica said,

    December 12, 2008 at 4:38 pm

    Gravatar

    You know Celeron is not C7, right?

    OMFG! My FAIL!
    http://failblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/fail-owned-tough-toys-wheel-fail.jpg
    Moreover I confused via nano for C7.

    Anyway what is true is that the performance surprised me (also for being a Celeron, which is good).

  23. jo Shields said,

    December 12, 2008 at 5:07 pm

    Gravatar

    Celeron blows C7 out of the water, even at lower clock speeds

  24. SubSonica said,

    December 12, 2008 at 5:29 pm

    Gravatar

    I would really like that Intel (or AMD, whoever) released a good fanless CPU. There is not so much point as before on ever-increasing clock speeds. It would be much better if they improved efficiency.
    Also software should stop being bloated and be much less resource-hungry.

  25. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 12, 2008 at 5:31 pm

    Gravatar

    ARM-based sub-notebooks are coming. I think Maplin has already had some (running just GNU/Linux of course).

  26. SubSonica said,

    December 12, 2008 at 5:41 pm

    Gravatar

    I remember back in the 8-bit times. Computers were not upgradeable so software programmers had to work wonders out of very limited resources. I remember people programmed in assembler and even machine code for the Ziliog Z80 of the Sinclairs (3,5 Mhz, 48 Kb RAM), and they had 3-D games that ran on that!!!!

  27. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 12, 2008 at 5:45 pm

    Gravatar

    Compare that to Vista which gobbles up 700MB of RAM+GPU to tilt a Windows or two (notepad.exe).

  28. jo Shields said,

    December 12, 2008 at 5:51 pm

    Gravatar

    I would really like that Intel (or AMD, whoever) released a good fanless CPU. There is not so much point as before on ever-increasing clock speeds. It would be much better if they improved efficiency.

    There’s a balance to make, though. You can get a full-on Core 2 Duo if you like, at less than 10W – it’s only 1 GHz. And, of course, there’s Atom. However, plenty of people really want the clocks.

    ARM-based sub-notebooks are coming. I think Maplin has already had some (running just GNU/Linux of course).

    Yeah, £140 for a 400mhz ARM. An extra 40 quid gets you a “real” laptop, like an Acer Aspire One from Tesco. 400MHz is fine for a PDA, but I’m not convinced it gives an actual laptop, not in this day & age (and try convincing people that they don’t want video or Flash abilities)

  29. SubSonica said,

    December 12, 2008 at 6:12 pm

    Gravatar

    “There’s a balance to make”

    I fully agree with you on that.
    Also code optimization of software is needed. Too many resources are wasted with the current model of development and the ever growing cycle of forced obsoleteness. There is high time that the companies go from offering “more power, more (often unneded) features, more clock cycles” to optimization: “less power consumption” “less memory footprint” “less cpu overhead” “faster operation times on the same hardware” “cooler running hardware”, etc…

    I think dual core Atoms will be nice, if only they could get to make them passive cooled…

  30. jo Shields said,

    December 12, 2008 at 6:22 pm

    Gravatar

    Outside a tight laptop enclosure, you could run one without a heatsink, TBH

    The issue, as always, is airflow

  31. SubSonica said,

    December 12, 2008 at 6:30 pm

    Gravatar

    What has happened with peltier-effect heatsinks? It would be nice if there were some developments on these…

  32. jo Shields said,

    December 12, 2008 at 6:51 pm

    Gravatar

    2 problems with a pelt:

    * They eat power
    * A peltier only MOVES heat. If you can’t remove all the heat from the heated end, then the supposedly cold end turns into a cooker

  33. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 14, 2008 at 3:23 pm

    Gravatar

    For future reference, I am adding this report from Associated Press:

    IBM, Oracle, Red Hat Allowed to Back EU in Microsoft Appeal
    http://www.mercurynews.com/nationworld/ci_11172721?nclick_check=1

What Else is New


  1. Two Things IBM and Microsoft Have in Common: Layoffs and Fake Hype Like 'Clown Computing' and 'Hey Hi' (AI) as Perceived 'Opportunity' for 'Growth'

    The infamous pair of monopolists, Microsoft and IBM, are both suffering during the COVID-19 lock-downs (no matter how hard they try to spin it and/or distract from it)



  2. IBM (Red Hat) Lectured FSF That It Needed More Diversity, But Was It Looking at the Mirror? IBM and Red Hat Are Even Less Diverse.

    Techrights examines Red Hat’s (IBM’s) hypocritical claims about the Free Software Foundation, founded by Richard Stallman back when IBM was the “big scary monopolist”; IBM employees were prominent among those pushing to oust Stallman from the GNU Project, which he founded, as well



  3. IRC Proceedings: Friday, June 05, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, June 05, 2020



  4. Guix Petition Demographic Data, by Figosdev

    That old anti-RMS letter, which called for his removal (or resignation) from GNU (RMS is the founder of the GNU Project), as characterised by metadata of signatories



  5. When You Realise People Who Don't Support RMS Do Not Really Support GNU, Either

    The (in)famous letter against Richard Stallman (RMS), which was signed by many Red Hat employees with Microsoft (GitHub) accounts, doesn’t look particularly good in light of recent revelations/findings; it increasingly looks like IBM simply wants Microsoft-hosted and “permissively” licensed stuff, just like another project it announced yesterday and another that it promoted yesterday



  6. The Gates Press (GatesGate) -- Part III: What Happens When You Tell the Truth About Bill Gates and the Gates Foundation

    One might not expect this from a so-called 'charity'; the Gates Foundation's critics are often met with unprecedented aggression, threats and retribution, which make one wonder if it's really a charity or a greedy cult of personalities (Bill and Melinda)



  7. Links 6/6/2020: Bifrost Meets GNOME, Wine 5.10 is Out

    Links for the day



  8. Links 5/6/2020: LibreELEC (Leia) 9.2.3, Rust 1.44.0, and Hamburg's Pivot to Free/Libre Software

    Links for the day



  9. This Article About GitHub Takeover Never Appeared (Likely Spiked by Microsoft and Its Friends Inside the Media)

    And later they wonder why people distrust so much of the media (where paying advertisers set the agenda/tone)



  10. Raw: How Microsoft and/or the EPO Killed an Important EPO Story About Their SLAPP Against Techrights and Others

    Spiking a story about spiked stories about corruption



  11. The Linux Foundation 'Bootcamp' -- Badly Timed and Badly Named in June 2020 -- Only Uses Linus Torvalds Like a 'Prop' (for Legitimacy) While Promoting Militarised Monopolies

    Sometimes a picture says a lot more than words, especially in light of political events in the US and a certain Chinese anniversary we cannot name (Microsoft censors mentions of it)



  12. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, June 04, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, June 04, 2020



  13. The Gates Press (GatesGate) -- Part II: When Media That You Bribe Calls All Your Critics 'Conspiracy Theorists' (to Keep Them Silenced, Marginalised)

    The assault on the media by Bill Gates is a subject not often explored by the media (maybe because a lot of it is already bribed by him); but we're beginning to gather new and important evidence that explains how critics are muzzled (even fired) and critical pieces spiked, never to see the light of day anywhere



  14. GitHub is Not Sharing But 'Theft' by Microsoft

    Microsoft buying GitHub does not demonstrate that Microsoft loves Open Source (GitHub is not Open Source and may never be) but that it loves monopoly and coercion (what GitHub is all about and why it must be rejected)



  15. The Huge Damage (Except for Patent Lawyers' Bottom Line) Caused by Fake European Patents

    The European Patent Office (EPO) keeps granting fake patents that cause a lot of real harm (examiners are pressured to play along and participate in this unlawful agenda); nobody is happy except those who profit from needless, frivolous lawsuits



  16. Red Hat/IBM Got 'Tired' of RMS. Is It Getting 'Tired' of GPL/Copyleft Too?

    After contributing to the cancellation of Richard Stallman (RMS) based on some falsehoods perpetuated in the media we're seeing the sort of thing one might expect from IBM (more so now that it totally controls Fedora and RHEL)



  17. Links 4/6/2020: Proton 5.0-8 Release Candidate, GNU Linux-libre 5.7

    Links for the day



  18. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, June 03, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, June 03, 2020



  19. Social Engineering of Free Software, Based on Corporate Criteria

    What "professional" nowadays means in the context of coding and honest assessment of technical work



  20. Weakening GNU/Linux by Disempowering Its Leaders and Founders, Replacing Them With Microsoft Employees and GNU/Linux-Hostile Moles

    The coup to remove (or remove power from) Stallman and Torvalds, the GNU and Linux founders respectively, is followed by outsourcing of their work to Microsoft’s newly-acquired monopoly (GitHub) and appointment of Microsoft workers or Microsoft-friendly people, shoehorning them into top roles under the disingenuous guise of "professionalism"



  21. Sword Group Violates Its Own Commitment by Working for the EPO

    The European Patent Office (EPO) keeps outsourcing its work to outside contractors (for-profit private entities) to the tune of hundreds of millions if not billions — all this without any oversight



  22. In 2020 Canonical No Longer Fights for Freedom

    Freedom requires a GNU/Linux distro other than Ubuntu, which seems unwilling or unable/incapable of speaking about and promoting the ideals of GNU/Linux



  23. We Need to Use the F Word (Freedom) to Promote Adoption of GNU/Linux

    "People get the government their behavior deserves. People deserve better than that." -Richard Stallman



  24. People Who Want to Explore GNU/Linux With Ubuntu See This Today

    "Wait, am I in a GNU/Linux blog or another Windows blog," a visitor might think... or, is Microsoft 'taking over' messaging at Canonical? (Same with code)



  25. Links 4/6/2020: Septor 2020.3, Nextcloud and Blender 2.83

    Links for the day



  26. Hey, Where's Red Hat (IBM)?

    Red Hat is conspicuously silent at these critical times (in its home country); Must be too busy hailing and cashing in on Trump's military (state) while dishing out shallow and self-contradictory diversity PR/fluff…



  27. Microsoft's Latest Vapourware About Supercomputers

    Microsoft has spent almost two decades dropping supercomputers vapourware on the media, but those misinformation dumps always turn out to be 100% hot air, no substance



  28. 2020: A Time for Resolutions or Revolutions?

    There are nonviolent means by which the current system can be corrected; we need to convince peers and relatives to change the way they behave and not cooperate with unjust elements of the system



  29. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, June 02, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, June 02, 2020



  30. The Gates Press (GatesGate) -- Part I: Lost the Job After Writing an Article Critical of Bill Gates for Attacking Some Actual, Legitimate Charities (Because They Had Spread GNU/Linux)

    The sociopaths from the fake 'charity' of Bill Gates would go to great lengths to squash criticism and also to eliminate critics; this series tells the story of some of those personally affected


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts